Potent covalent irreversible inhibitor of KRAS G12C IBI351 in patients with advanced solid tumors: First-in-human phase I study.

BACKGROUND: IBI351 is an irreversible and covalent inhibitor of KRAS G12C. Despite FDA approval of two KRAS G12C inhibitors, there are still significant unmet clinical needs in Chinese patients and ongoing concerns about the optimal dosage. Herein, we presented the phase Ia/Ib study of IBI351 monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors harboring KRAS G12C mutation. METHODS: In phase Ia dose escalation, IBI351 at 250/450/700/900 mg once daily and 450/600/750 mg twice daily (BID) were evaluated. Potentially efficacious doses and optimal recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) were further evaluated in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase Ia dose expansion and phase Ib. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and investigator-assessed tumor response were evaluated. RESULTS: As of June 13, 2023, 176 patients were enrolled. IBI351 was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicity reported across all evaluated doses. The RP2D was determined as 600 mg BID by considering safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics. A total of 168 patients (95.5 %) had at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), and 64 patients (36.4 %) had grade 3 or higher TRAEs, most commonly gamma-glutamyl transferase increased (10.2 %) and anemia (6.8 %). For patients with NSCLC, the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 45.5 % across all doses. At 600 mg BID, the confirmed ORR was 46.8 % and median progression-free survival was 9.6 months with a median follow-up of 6.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: IBI351 was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors and showed promising antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C mutation.

UBE2C promotes LUAD progression by ubiquitin-dependent degradation of p53 to inactivate the p53/p21 signaling pathway.

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the greatest causes of cancer death worldwide. As a novel potential tumor biomarker, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C (UBE2C) is a critical factor during the onset and development of human cancers. However, the mechanisms of UBE2C in LUAD are not well understood. In this study, increased expression level of UBE2C was observed in LUAD tumor tissues. High LUAD level portended a worse prognosis of LUAD patients. Down-regulation of UBE2C attenuated the cell proliferation and cycle, migration, and invasion. Consistently, the tumorigenic capacity of LUAD cells in nude mice was significantly suppressed by the knockdown of UBE2C. Knockdown of UBE2C inhibited the degradation of p53 protein via an ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, thereby increasing p53 and p21 protein expression. Moreover, the inhibition of LUAD cell malignant phenotypes caused by UBE2C knockdown was attenuated on account of the inactivation of p53/p21 signaling pathway. In conclusion, UBE2C facilitates cell malignant behaviour in LUAD by ubiquitin-dependent degradation of p53 to suppress the p53/p21 signaling pathway. UBE2C is potentially developed as a therapeutic target for patients with LUAD.

Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar SCT510 Compared with Bevacizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study.

INTRODUCTION: SCT510 is a biosimilar to bevacizumab (Avastin) reference product (RP) that is approved for various metastatic cancers. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the equivalence of SCT510 and bevacizumab in terms of efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with non-squamous NSCLC were randomized equally to the SCT510 group (comprising SCT510, paclitaxel, and carboplatin) and the bevacizumab group (comprising bevacizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin) for 4-6 cycles, followed by maintenance monotherapy with SCT510. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) at week 12. Secondary endpoints included 18-week ORR, disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and 1-year survival rate, as well as assessments of safety, immunogenicity, and multi-dose PK analysis. RESULTS: Between March 29, 2019, and April 27, 2021, 989 patients were screened and 567 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the SCT510 group (285 patients) and the bevacizumab group (282 patients). The ORR at week 12 was 52.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46.66-58.55%] in the SCT510 group and 52.5% (95% CI 46.47-58.47%) in the bevacizumab group. The ORR at week 18 was 55.4% (95% CI 49.46-61.30%) for SCT510 and 55.7% (95% CI 49.68-61.62%) for bevacizumab. The ORR risk ratio (RR) at weeks 12 and 18 was 0.99 (90% CI 0.873-1.133) and 0.99 (90% CI 0.872-1.114), respectively, both within the pre-specified equivalence margin of 0.75-1.33. There were no differences between the two groups in relation to other secondary endpoints, specifically DCR, DOR, PFS, OS, and 1-year survival rate. The overall safety findings were similar between the two treatment groups, and both SCT510 and bevacizumab RP exhibited low immunogenicity. CONCLUSIONS: SCT510 is similar to bevacizumab in clinical efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and PK in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. The totality of the evidence supports the clinical equivalence of SCT510 and bevacizumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03792074.

Circulating tumor DNA-based stratification strategy for chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Stratification strategies for chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are critically demanded. We performed high-throughput panel-based deep next-generation sequencing and low-pass whole genome sequencing on prospectively collected circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) specimens from 460 patients in the phase 3 CHOICE-01 study at different time points. We identified predictive markers for chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitor, including ctDNA status and genomic features such as blood-based tumor mutational burden, intratumor heterogeneity, and chromosomal instability. Furthermore, we established an integrated ctDNA-based stratification strategy, blood-based genomic immune subtypes (bGIS) scheme, to distinguish patients who benefit from the addition of PD-1 inhibitor to first-line chemotherapy. Moreover, we demonstrated potential applications for the dynamic monitoring of ctDNA. Overall, we proposed a potential therapeutic algorithm based on the ctDNA-based stratification strategy, shedding light on the individualized management of immune-chemotherapies for patients with advanced NSCLC.

A pooled analysis of clinical outcome in driver-gene negative non-small cell lung cancer patients with MET overexpression treated with gumarontinib.

Background: MET overexpression represents the most MET aberration in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, except MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutation was recognized as a clinical biomarker, the role of MET overexpression as a predictive factor to MET inhibitor is not clear. Objectives: The purpose of the pooled analysis is to explore the safety and efficiency of gumarontinib, a highly selective oral MET inhibitor, in drive-gene negative NSCLC patients with MET overexpression. Design and methods: NSCLC patients with MET overexpression [immunohistochemistry (IHC) ⩾3+ as determined by central laboratory] not carrying epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, METex14 skipping mutation or other known drive gene alternations who received Gumarontinib 300 mg QD from two single arm studies were selected and pooled for the analysis. The efficacy [objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] and safety [treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE), treatment related AE (TRAE) and serious AE (SAE) were assessed. Results: A total of 32 patients with MET overexpression were included in the analysis, including 12 treatment naïve patients who refused or were unsuitable for chemotherapy, and 20 pre-treated patients who received ⩾1 lines of prior systemic anti-tumour therapies. Overall, the ORR was 37.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 21.1-56.3%], the DCR was 81.3% (95% CI: 63.6-92.8%), median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) were 6.9 month (95% CI: 3.6-9.7) and 17.0 month (95% CI: 10.3-not evaluable), respectively. The most common AEs were oedema (59.4%), hypoalbuminaemia (40.6%), alanine aminotransferase increased (31.3%). Conclusion: Gumarontinib showed promising antitumour activity in driver-gene negative locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with MET overexpression, which warranted a further clinical trial. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03457532; NCT04270591.

Vebreltinib for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring c-Met Exon 14 Skipping Mutation: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II KUNPENG Study.

PURPOSE: The KUNPENG study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vebreltinib (also known as bozitinib, APL-101, PLB-1001, and CBT-101), a potent and highly selective inhibitor of c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring c-Met alterations. METHODS: This multicenter, multicohort, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial enrolled patients with c-Met dysregulated, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC from January 2020 to August 2022 across 17 centers. Cohort 1 included patients with MET exon 14 skipping (METex14)-mutant NSCLC who had not previously received MET inhibitors. Participants were administered vebreltinib at a dosage of 200 mg twice a day in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR), and the key secondary end point was the duration of response (DoR), both evaluated by a blinded independent review committee according to the RECIST version 1.1. RESULTS: As of August 9, 2022, 52 patients had been enrolled in cohort 1, of whom 35 (67.3%) were treatment-naïve. The ORR reached 75% (95% CI, 61.1 to 86). Among treatment-naïve patients, the ORR was 77.1% (95% CI, 59.9 to 89.6), and in previously treated patients, it was 70.6% (95% CI, 44.0 to 89.7). The disease control rate was 96.2%, with a median DoR of 15.9 months, a median progression-free survival of 14.1 months, and a median overall survival of 20.7 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events were peripheral edema (82.7%), QT prolongation (30.8%), and elevated serum creatinine (28.8%). CONCLUSION: Vebreltinib has shown promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with METex14-mutant NSCLC.

Benmelstobart, anlotinib and chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.

Immunochemotherapy is the first-line standard for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Combining the regimen with anti-angiogenesis may improve efficacy. ETER701 was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial that investigated the efficacy and safety of benmelstobart (a novel programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor) with anlotinib (a multi-target anti-angiogenic small molecule) and standard chemotherapy in treatment-naive ES-SCLC. The ETER701 trial assessed two primary endpoints: Independent Review Committee-assessed progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS). Here the prespecified final progression-free survival and interim OS analysis is reported. Patients randomly received benmelstobart and anlotinib plus etoposide/carboplatin (EC; n = 246), placebo and anlotinib plus EC (n = 245) or double placebo plus EC ('EC alone'; n = 247), followed by matching maintenance therapy. Compared with EC alone, median OS was prolonged with benmelstobart and anlotinib plus EC (19.3 versus 11.9 months; hazard ratio 0.61; P = 0.0002), while improvement of OS was not statistically significant with anlotinib plus EC (13.3 versus 11.9 months; hazard ratio 0.86; P = 0.1723). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 93.1%, 94.3% and 87.0% in the benmelstobart and anlotinib plus EC, anlotinib plus EC, and EC alone groups, respectively. This study of immunochemotherapy plus multi-target anti-angiogenesis as first-line treatment achieved a median OS greater than recorded in prior randomized studies in patients with ES-SCLC. The safety profile was assessed as tolerable and manageable. Our findings suggest that the addition of anti-angiogenesis therapy to immunochemotherapy may represent an efficacious and safe approach to the management of ES-SCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04234607 .

Camrelizumab combined with anlotinib as second-line therapy for metastatic or recurrent small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of camrelizumab combined with anlotinib versus chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) undergoing second-line treatment. Methods: Data were sourced from medical records at a Chinese medical facility, involving 34 patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC after failing first-line treatment. Patients were divided into two groups: one received camrelizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) with anlotinib (12 mg daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest), while the other group received physician-chosen chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Results: The combination therapy group showed a significant improvement in PFS compared to the chemotherapy group (median PFS: 7 months vs. 3 months; hazard ratio (HR): 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15-0.77; p<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between the groups (16.3 months vs. 17.3 months; p=0.82). The ORR was 52.9% in the combination therapy group versus 23.5% in the chemotherapy group (p=0.08), and the DCR was 82.4% compared to 58.8% (p=0.26). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 17.6% of the combination therapy group and 29.4% of the chemotherapy group. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the combination of camrelizumab and anlotinib offers a superior anti-tumor response with a manageable safety profile in a second-line setting for ES-SCLC patients. This combination regimen may be a viable option for second-line ES-SCLC treatment.

Association of PD-L1 expression and clinical outcomes in ROS1 - rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with crizotinib.

Background: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is more readily expressed in ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to NSCLC cases lacking driver gene mutations. Prior research has established a link between PD-L1 expression and reduced effectiveness of EGFR or ALK inhibitors in EGFR or ALK-positive NSCLC. Nonetheless, the relationship between initial PD-L1 levels and the clinical impact of first-line crizotinib therapy in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC is still uncertain. Methods: From January 2016 to December 2021, a total of 246 patients with ROS1 positive tumors were collected. Out of these, 82 patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC, who were treated with crizotinib as their initial therapy, were selected for the study. The study aimed primarily to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), and secondarily to assess disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 82 advanced ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patients, 38 exhibited PD-L1 positivity, subdivided into 11 with high and 27 with low expression levels, while the remaining 44 showed no PD-L1 expression. The ORR for all included patients was 80.5%. No statistically significant variance in ORR was observed among ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patients across differing PD-L1 expression statuses. However, there was a statistically significant difference in DCR between PD-L1 negative group (100%) and high expression group (90.9%) (p=0.04). The median PFS spanned 26.4 months for the PD-L1 negative group, 16.6 for the low expression group, and 13.7 for the high expression group (p=0.001). Additionally, a notable statistical disparity was also observed in median PFS between the PD-L1 negative and positive groups (p=0.02). For the entire study population, the median OS was 53.0 months (95% CI 43.8 - 62.2). In the PD-L1-negative group, the median OS reached 57.2 months, compared to 53.0 months in the PD-L1-positive group, a difference lacking statistical significance (p=0.43). Conclusions: Our results suggest that for ROS1-positive NSCLC patients receiving crizotinib as first-line therapy, PD-L1 expression may serve as a negative prognostic marker for PFS rather than OS.

Corrigendum: The efficacy of furmonertinib in untreated advanced NSCLC patients with sensitive EGFR mutations in a real-world setting: a single institutional experience.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1331128.].

Case report: The effect of second-line vebreltinib treatment on a patient with advanced NSCLC harboring the MET exon 14 skipping mutation after tepotinib treatment.

Background: Highly selective type Ib mesenchymal-epithelial transition gene (MET) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard-of-care (SOC) therapy for previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations. However, there are rare reports describing effective regimens for patients who fail SOC without identifying resistant mutations or tissue transformation. Case report: We report the first case of a 74-year-old woman with lung adenocarcinoma (cT1cNxM0) harboring METex14 splice region mutation, which was identified by a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assay. The patient was administered two treatments, including first-line tepotinib and second-line vebreltinib. The patient achieved progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.6 months, and then disease progression of tepotinib was observed. A re-biopsy was performed for NGS, which revealed the same mutations as before, with no new gene mutations detected. The woman received subsequent vebreltinib therapy and experienced durable clinical benefits. In the first 6.8 months, chest computed tomography demonstrated stable disease. Then, she achieved partial response (PR). The durable PR lasted for more than 13 months, and the PFS is currently over 20 months, exceeding the prior treatment. Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of considering re-biopsy and reanalysis of genetic profiles in NSCLC patients harboring METex14 skipping mutations after progressive disease in MET TKI treatment. This raises the possibility that vebreltinib may have long-term survival benefits for patients without mutations conferring resistance (funded by Beijing Pearl Biotechnology Co., Ltd; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04258033).

Perfect confinement of crown ethers in MOF membrane for complete dehydration and fast transport of monovalent ions.

Fast transport of monovalent ions is imperative in selective monovalent ion separation based on membranes. Here, we report the in situ growth of crown ether@UiO-66 membranes at a mild condition, where dibenzo-18-crown-6 (DB18C6) or dibenzo-15-crown-5 is perfectly confined in the UiO-66 cavity. Crown ether@UiO-66 membranes exhibit enhanced monovalent ion transport rates and mono-/divalent ion selectivity, due to the combination of size sieving and interaction screening effects toward the complete monovalent ion dehydration. Specifically, the DB18C6@UiO-66 membrane shows a permeation rate (e.g., K+) of 1.2 mol per square meter per hour and a mono-/divalent ion selectivity (e.g., K+/Mg2+) of 57. Theoretical calculations and simulations illustrate that, presumably, ions are completely dehydrated while transporting through the DB18C6@UiO-66 cavity with a lower energy barrier than that of the UiO-66 cavity. This work provides a strategy to develop efficient ion separation membranes via integrating size sieving and interaction screening and to illuminate the effect of ion dehydration on fast ion transport.

A Novel Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Signature Predicts Patient Chemotherapy Resistance and Prognosis in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Chemoresistance is a key obstacle in the long-term survival of patients with locally and advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This study used bioinformatic analysis to reveal the chemoresistance of gene-neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) associated with LUAD. RNA sequencing data and LUAD expression patterns were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases, respectively. The GeneCards database was used to identify NETosis-related genes (NRGs). To identify hub genes with significant and consistent expression, differential analysis was performed using the TCGA-LUAD and GEO datasets. LUAD subtypes were determined based on these hub genes, followed by prognostic analysis. Immunological scoring and infiltration analysis were conducted using NETosis scores (N-scores) derived from the TCGA-LUAD dataset. A clinical prognostic model was established and analyzed, and its clinical applications explored. Twenty-two hub genes were identified, and consensus clustering was used to identify two subgroups based on their expression levels. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves demonstrated statistically significant differences in prognosis between the two LUAD subtypes. Based on the median score, patients were further divided into high and low N-score groups, and KM curves showed that the N-scores were more precise at predicting the prognosis of patients with LUAD for overall survival (OS). Immunological infiltration analysis revealed significant differences in the abundances of 10 immune cell infiltrates between the high and low N-score groups. Risk scores indicated significant differences in prognosis between the two extreme score groups. The risk scores for the prognostic model also indicated significant differences between the two groups. The results provide new insights into NETosis-related differentially expressed genes (NRDEGs) associated with chemotherapy resistance in patients with LUAD. The established prognostic model is promising and could help with clinical applications to evaluate patient survival and therapeutic efficiency.

Tislelizumab Plus Platinum and Etoposide Versus Placebo Plus Platinum and Etoposide as First-Line Treatment for Extensive-Stage SCLC (RATIONALE-312): A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) prognosis remains poor. The phase 3 RATIONALE-312 study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC. METHODS: RATIONALE-312 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, conducted in the People's Republic of China. Eligible patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive four cycles of tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo, with etoposide plus carboplatin or cisplatin intravenously every 3 weeks, followed by tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo as maintenance. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival and safety. RESULTS: Between July 22, 2019 and April 21, 2021, 457 patients were randomized to tislelizumab (n = 227) or placebo (n = 230), plus chemotherapy. Baseline demographics were generally balanced between arms. At the data cutoff (April 19, 2023), the median study follow-up was 14.2 months (interquartile range: 8.6-25.3). Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited a statistically significant OS benefit versus placebo plus chemotherapy (stratified hazard ratio = 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.93]; one-sided p = 0.0040; median: 15.5 [95% CI: 13.5-17.1] versus 13.5 mo [95% CI: 12.1-14.9], respectively). Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the tislelizumab versus placebo arm (stratified hazard ratio = 0.64 [95% CI: 0.52-0.78]; p < 0.0001; median: 4.7 [95% CI: 4.3-5.5] versus 4.3 mo [95% CI: 4.2-4.4], respectively). Grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 86% of patients in each treatment arm and were mostly hematologic. CONCLUSIONS: Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited statistically significant clinical benefit and manageable safety compared with placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced ES-SCLC.

The efficacy of furmonertinib in untreated advanced NSCLC patients with sensitive EGFR mutations in a real-world setting: a single institutional experience.

Background: Furmonertinib is the standard treatment option in the first-line setting for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in China. However, there are limited real-world data available. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study at a single center, analyzing a cohort of 73 NSCLC patients who tested positive for EGFR mutations and were treated with furmonertinib as their initial therapy between August 2022 and December 2023. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety profile. Results: The median observation period was 9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-20.0). The median PFS was 19.5 months (95% CI, 14.6-24.4). OS data were not yet mature. Univariate analysis showed no significant correlation between PFS and factors such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, presence of brain or liver metastases, sex, age, EGFR mutation status, or number of metastatic sites. However, multivariate analysis indicated a potential trend toward extended PFS in patients younger than 65 years (p = 0.053, 95% CI, 0.10-1.02), although the p-value was only marginally significant. The most common adverse events were diarrhea (24%), anemia (36%), and liver injury (32%); however, only four cases experienced severe adverse events. Conclusion: In a real-world setting, furmonertinib appears to be a favorable treatment option for EGFR-mutated patients. The manageable nature of adverse events further supports its use in clinical practice.

KN046, a bispecific antibody against PD-L1 and CTLA-4, plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC: A multicenter phase 2 trial.

KN046, a bispecific antibody targeting PD-L1 and CTLA-4, presents a promising therapeutic option for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this multicenter phase 2 trial, patients with nonsquamous (non-sq) NSCLC receive pemetrexed, whereas those with sq-NSCLC receive paclitaxel, plus KN046 and carboplatin. Following four cycles, maintenance therapy includes KN046 with pemetrexed for non-sq-NSCLC and KN046 for sq-NSCLC. The objective response rate is 46.0%, and the median duration of response is 8.1 months. The median progression-free and overall survival are 5.8 and 26.6 months, respectively. The common adverse events include anemia (87.4%), loss of appetite (72.4%), and neutropenia (70.1%). The most prevalent immune-related adverse event is pruritus (28.7%). These findings indicate that first-line treatment with KN046 and chemotherapy is effective and tolerable in metastatic NSCLC patients, warranting further investigation in a larger phase 3 trial. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04054531).

Efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy in metastatic BRAF-mutated lung cancer: a single-center retrospective data.

Background: The effectiveness of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy in treating non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with BRAF mutations has not been sufficiently explored. Methods: We compiled data from 306 NSCLC patients with identified BRAF mutations. We looked at efficacy by assessing the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), as well as survival through measuring progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Out of the patient pool, 44 were treated with a regimen of immune-chemotherapy. Patients undergoing ICI in combination with chemotherapy had a median PFS of 4 months, and the median OS was recorded at 29 months. There was a notable increase in OS in patients receiving first-line treatment versus subsequent lines (29 vs 9.75 months, p=0.01); however, this was not the case with PFS (9 vs 4 months, p=0.46). The ORR for patients on ICIs was 36.3%. PFS and OS rates did not significantly differ between patients with the BRAF-V600E mutation and those with non-V600E mutations (p=0.75 and p=0.97, respectively). Additionally, we found a significant variation in PD-L1 expression between those who responded to treatment and those who didn't (p=0.04). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that chemo-immunotherapy as an initial treatment may lead to improved OS in patients with BRAF-mutated NSCLC when compared to its use in subsequent lines of therapy. Further studies are needed to validate these results and to delve deeper into how specific types of BRAF mutations and PD-L1 expression levels might predict a patient's response to treatments in NSCLC.

Response to immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy in metastatic RET-mutated lung cancer from real-world retrospective data.

BACKGROUND: The impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) based treatments on non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with RET fusions remains poorly understood. METHODS: We screened patients with RET fusions at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and included those who were treated with ICIs based regimens for further analysis. We evaluated clinical indicators including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 232 patients with RET fusions were included in the study. Of these, 129 patients had their programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL1) expression levels tested, with 22 patients (17.8%) having a PDL1 level greater than or equal to 50%. Additionally, tumor mutational burden (TMB) status was evaluated in 35 patients, with the majority (30/35, 85.8%) having a TMB of less than 10 mutations per megabase. Out of the 38 patients treated with ICI based regimens, the median PFS was 5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-7.6 months) and the median OS was 19 months (95% CI: 9.7-28.3 months) at the time of data analysis. Stratification based on treatment lines did not show any significant differences in OS (18 vs. 19 months, p = 0.63) and PFS (6 vs. 5 months, p = 0.86). The ORR for patients treated with ICIs was 26.3%. Furthermore, no significant differences were found for PFS (p = 0.27) and OS (p = 0.75) between patients with positive and negative PDL1 expression. Additionally, there was no significant difference in PD-L1 levels (p = 0.10) between patients who achieved objective response and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RET fusion positive NSCLCs may not benefit from ICI based regimens and therefore should not be treated with ICIs in clinical practice.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: A single­institution experience.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and highly invasive lung cancer subtype with an overall poor prognosis. Due to its low incidence rate and unusual pathological features, the clinical management of LCNEC remains controversial. The present study aimed to assess the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on treatment response and survival outcomes in patients with advanced LCNEC. The clinical data from 148 patients with LCNEC treated with ICIs at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou, China) between January 2019 and September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between clinicopathological variables and patient outcomes. Patients treated with ICIs demonstrated extended median overall survival (mOS) times [23.5 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 18.524-28.476] compared with patients who did not receive ICIs (11.2 months; 95% CI, 4.530-18.930) (P<0.001). Univariate analysis revealed that histological subtype (P=0.043), lymph node metastases (P=0.032) and number of metastatic organs (P=0.009) were associated with a poor prognosis. The heterogeneity of pathological components was associated with prognosis, and the mOS time was shorter for mixed LCNEC than that for pure LCNEC (P=0.043). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) (9.78 vs. 9.37 months; P=0.82) and mOS (20.70 vs. 25.79 months; P=0.181) times showed no significant association with regard to different regimens of immuno-based combination therapy (chemotherapy combined with ICIs vs. anti-angiogenic agents combined with ICIs). Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score (P=0.04), multiple organ metastases (P=0.02) and high cancer antigen 125 levels (P=0.01) were independent risk factors of a poor prognosis. The present findings offer valuable insights into potential prognostic markers and highlight the favorable impact of ICIs on OS in advanced LCNEC. Prospective clinical studies are required to validate the therapeutic value of ICIs in LCNEC.

Advancing Ion Selective Membranes with Micropore Ion Channels in the Interaction Confinement Regime.

Ion exchange membranes allowing the passage of charge-carrying ions have established their critical role in water, environmental, and energy-relevant applications. The design strategies for high-performance ion exchange membranes have evolved beyond creating microphase-separated membrane morphologies, which include advanced ion exchange membranes to ion-selective membranes. The properties and functions of ion-selective membranes have been repeatedly updated by the emergence of materials with subnanometer-sized pores and the understanding of ion movement under confined micropore ion channels. These research progresses have motivated researchers to consider even greater aims in the field, i.e., replicating the functions of ion channels in living cells with exotic materials or at least targeting fast and ion-specific transmembrane conduction. To help realize such goals, we briefly outline and comment on the fundamentals of rationally designing membrane pore channels for ultrafast and specific ion conduction, pore architecture/chemistry, and membrane materials. Challenges are discussed, and perspectives and outlooks are given.