RESUMEN
Background and Aim: Vonoprazan as a new acid blocker has more potency and longer lasting acid suppression than proton pump inhibitors. Whether the efficacy of vonoprazan-based triple therapy is comparable with or even better than that of currently recommended first-line therapies is still unknown. Our study aims to compare the eradication rate and major adverse effects between 7-day vonoprazan-based triple therapy with high-dose amoxicillin and 14-day extended sequential therapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis from the database of 13C-urea breath test at Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital. All patients with a definite diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection by rapid urease test, urea breath test, stool antigen test, or pathology report were recruited. Patients receiving first-line regimens with vonoprazan-based triple therapy or extended sequential therapy were included. The respective eradication rate determined by 13C-urea breath test and major adverse effects were demonstrated. Results: Totally, 106 patients were recruited in the vonoprazan-based triple therapy group and 357 in the extended sequential therapy group. There was no significant difference in eradication rate between vonoprazan-based triple therapy with high-dose amoxicillin and extended sequential therapy (83.0 vs 88.8%, P = 0.12). Major adverse effects occurred in 13 of the extended sequential therapy group but none in the other group (0% vs 3.6%, P = 0.046). Conclusions: Seven-day vonoprazan-based triple therapy with high-dose amoxicillin is a potential first-line anti-Helicobacter pylori regimen alternative to current standard treatment, with the advantages of simplicity, short treatment duration, low pill burden, and fewer major adverse effects.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Selective deep biliary cannulation is the first and the most important step before further biliary therapy. Transpancreatic sphincterotomy (TPS), and needle knife fistulotomy (NKF) were commonly used in patients with difficult cannulation, but few studies compare the outcome between TPS and NKF. METHODS: A total of 78 patients who met the criteria of difficult cannulation in the National Taiwan University hospital from October 2015 to October 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Their baseline demographics, success rate of biliary cannulation, and the rate of adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: 31 patients and 47 patients underwent TPS and NKF for difficult biliary access, respectively. The characteristics of the 2 groups were similar, but patients in TPS group had more frequent pancreatic duct cannulation. Bile duct cannulation was successful in 23 patients (74.2%) in the TPS group and 39 (83.0%) in the NKF group (P = 0.34). There was no difference between the TPS and NKF in the rate of adverse events, including post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) (16.1% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.17), and hemorrhage (3.2% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.35). No perforation occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Both TPS and NKF have good biliary access rate in patient with difficult cannulation. TPS has acceptable successful rate and similar complication rate, compared with NKF.