Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Phys Med ; 123: 103394, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38852364

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To present the results of the first multi-centre real-world validation of autoplanning for whole breast irradiation after breast-sparing surgery, encompassing high complexity cases (e.g. with a boost or regional lymph nodes) and a wide range of clinical practices. METHODS: The 24 participating centers each included 10 IMRT/VMAT/Tomotherapy patients, previously treated with a manually generated plan ('manplan'). There were no restrictions regarding case complexity, planning aims, plan evaluation parameters and criteria, fractionation, treatment planning system or treatment machine/technique. In addition to dosimetric comparisons of autoplans with manplans, blinded plan scoring/ranking was conducted by a clinician from the treating center. Autoplanning was performed using a single configuration for all patients in all centres. Deliverability was verified through measurements at delivery units. RESULTS: Target dosimetry showed comparability, while reductions in OAR dose parameters were 21.4 % for heart Dmean, 16.7 % for ipsilateral lung Dmean, and 101.9 %, 45.5 %, and 35.7 % for contralateral breast D0.03cc, D5% and Dmean, respectively (all p < 0.001). Among the 240 patients included, the clinicians preferred the autoplan for 119 patients, with manplans preferred for 96 cases (p = 0.01). Per centre there were on average 5.0 ± 2.9 (1SD) patients with a preferred autoplan (range [0-10]), compared to 4.0 ± 2.7 with a preferred manplan ([0,9]). No differences were observed regarding deliverability. CONCLUSION: The automation significantly reduced the hands-on planning workload compared to manual planning, while also achieving an overall superiority. However, fine-tuning of the autoplanning configuration prior to clinical implementation may be necessary in some centres to enhance clinicians' satisfaction with the generated autoplans.


Asunto(s)
Automatización , Neoplasias de la Mama , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Femenino , Radiometría
2.
Phys Med Biol ; 59(24): 7643-52, 2014 Dec 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25415044

RESUMEN

When a carbon beam interacts with human tissues, many secondary fragments are produced into the tumor region and the surrounding healthy tissues. Therefore, in hadrontherapy precise dose calculations require Monte Carlo tools equipped with complex nuclear reaction models. To get realistic predictions, however, simulation codes must be validated against experimental results; the wider the dataset is, the more the models are finely tuned.Since no fragmentation data for tissue-equivalent materials at Fermi energies are available in literature, we measured secondary fragments produced by the interaction of a 55.6 MeV u(-1) (12)C beam with thick muscle and cortical bone targets. Three reaction models used by the Geant4 Monte Carlo code, the Binary Light Ions Cascade, the Quantum Molecular Dynamic and the Liege Intranuclear Cascade, have been benchmarked against the collected data. In this work we present the experimental results and we discuss the predictive power of the above mentioned models.


Asunto(s)
Carbono/química , Simulación por Computador , Radioterapia de Iones Pesados/métodos , Modelos Teóricos , Método de Montecarlo , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Algoritmos , Humanos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA