RESUMEN
Background: Most studies examining cervical cancer screening outcomes have focused on either an age-specific diagnosis and outcomes of abnormal smears or frequency of abnormal outcomes among a sample of insured women. Thus, it is unclear what the distribution outcomes would be when other sociodemographic characteristics are considered. This study examines the variation in cervical cancer screening outcomes and sociodemographic characteristics (patients' age, marital status, race/ethnicity, rurality, and Papanicolaou [Pap] test screening history) within a sample of low-income and uninsured women. Materials and Methods: Our grant-funded program provided 751 Pap tests, 577 human papillomavirus (HPV) tests, and 262 colposcopies to 841 women between 2013 and 2019. Observed outcomes for each procedure type were cross-tabulated by patients' sociodemographic characteristics. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to test the independence of screening outcomes and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: The overall positivity rate was 7.2% for Pap tests (n = 54/751), 3.6% for HPV tests (n = 21/577), and 44.7% for colposcopies (n = 117/262). Significance tests suggested that the Pap test and colposcopy outcomes we observed were independent of sociodemographic characteristics in all but one instance-Pap test outcomes were not independent of patient age (p = 0.009). Moreover, the Pap test positivity rate increased with patient age. Conclusions: Our findings support recommendations to discontinue screening for women older than 65 years at low risk for cervical cancer. Our ability to identify an association between cervical screening outcomes and other sociodemographic characteristics may have been limited by our small sample size. This highlights an important barrier to studying health outcomes within low-income and uninsured populations, which are often missing in larger research data sets (e.g., claims).
RESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to examine screening mammography prevalence and its associated beliefs among a multi-ethnic sample of low-income, uninsured women. Data pertaining to the sample's demographic characteristics, mammography screening history and beliefs, and knowledge on recommended screening age were analyzed (n=533). Overall, 22.1% of the participants had never been screened. Black women were more likely than others to have never been screened, White women were more likely to be overdue, and Hispanic women were more likely to report recent screening. Fear of not knowing what will be done during mammography consistently predicted screening among the racial/ethnic groups. Concerns about "people doing mammograms being rude to women" had the highest negative correlation with mammography among Hispanic women. A majority of the sample believed that screening should begin at age 40. Interventions to increase screening mammography must incorporate information about the screening procedure and be sensitive to cultural differences in screening barriers.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamografía , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Pacientes no AseguradosRESUMEN
Studies have found a positive association between adherence to mammography screening guidelines and early detection of breast cancer lesions, yet the proportion of women who get screened for breast cancer remains below national targets. Previous studies have found that mammography screening rates vary by sociodemographic factors including race/ethnicity, income, education, and rurality. It is less known whether sociodemographic factors are also related to mammography screening outcomes in underserved populations. Thus, with a particular interest in rurality, we examined the association between the sociodemographic characteristics and mammography screening outcomes within our sample of 1,419 low-income, uninsured Texas women who received grant-funded mammograms between 2013 and 2019 (n = 1,419). Screening outcomes were recorded as either negative (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification 1-3) or positive (BI-RADS classification 4-6). When we conducted independency tests between sociodemographic characteristics (age, race/ethnicity, rurality, county-level risk, family history, and screening compliance) and screening outcomes, we found that none of the factors were significantly associated with mammogram screening outcomes. Similarly, when we regressed screening outcomes on age, race/ethnicity, and rurality via logistic regression, we found that none were significant predictors of a positive screening outcome. Though we did not find evidence of a relationship between rurality and mammography screening outcomes, research suggests that among women who do screen positive for breast cancer, rural women are more likely to present with later stage breast cancer than urban women. Thus, it remains important to continue to increase breast cancer education and access to routine cancer screening for rural women.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study determined the impact of an interprofessional education (IPE) simulation on family nurse practitioner (FNP) students' and family medicine residents' (FMRs) self-reported confidence in counseling women reluctant to engage in cancer screening or evaluation and assessed knowledge of breast and cervical cancer risk factors. METHOD: A multi-item knowledge survey on breast and cervical cancer risk factors was administered to 76 FNP students and FMRs followed by an IPE simulation with a pre-/postsurvey of self-reported confidence in counseling a woman reluctant to have breast and cervical cancer screening and evaluation. DISCUSSION: Data demonstrated knowledge deficits in breast and cervical cancer risk factors in both disciplines with the average risk factor knowledge score of 8.5/12 for breast cancer and 7.8/12 for cervical cancer. Following IPE simulation, confidence in counseling women reluctant to have breast or cervical cancer screening improved across both disciplines (p < .05) and debrief feedback findings suggest improved attitudes toward collegiality, communication, and understanding of other interprofessional roles among both disciplines. CONCLUSION: Knowledge gaps exist among both FNP students and FMRs in breast and cervical cancer risk factors. This study suggests IPE simulation is effective in building individual provider confidence and team collegiality.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Competencia Clínica/normas , Educación Continua/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Curriculum/normas , Curriculum/tendencias , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/normas , Educación Continua/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Texas , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapiaRESUMEN
A steady decline in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in the United States has been attributed to increased uptake of cervical cancer screening tests such as Papanicolau (Pap) tests. However, disparities in Pap test compliance exist, and may be due in part to perceived barriers or lack of knowledge about risk factors for cervical cancer. This study aimed to assess correlates of cervical cancer risk factor knowledge and examine socio-demographic predictors of self-reported barriers to screening among a group of low-income uninsured women. Survey and procedure data from 433 women, who received grant-funded cervical cancer screenings over a span of 33 months, were examined for this project. Data included demographics, knowledge of risk factors, and agreement on potential barriers to screening. Descriptive analysis showed significant correlation between educational attainment and knowledge of risk factors (r = 0.1381, P < 0.01). Multivariate analyses revealed that compared to Whites, Hispanics had increased odds of identifying fear of finding cancer (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.00-2.43), language barriers (OR 4.72, 95% CI 2.62-8.50), and male physicians (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.32-3.55) as barriers. Hispanics (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.16-3.44) and Blacks (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.15-3.68) had a two-fold increase in odds of agreeing that lack of knowledge was a barrier. Identified barriers varied with age, marital status and previous screening. Programs aimed at conducting free or subsidized screenings for medically underserved women should include culturally relevant education and patient care in order to reduce barriers and improve screening compliance for safety-net populations.