MILLER Banding Procedure for Treatment of Dialysis Access-Related Steal Syndrome, Pulmonary Hypertension, and Heart Failure.

A Minimally Invasive Limited Ligation Endoluminal-assisted Revision (MILLER) banding procedure has been used for treating patients with dialysis access-related steal syndrome (DASS) and high-flow vascular access-related pulmonary hypertension (PHT) and heart failure (HF).We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing the MILLER procedure performed for DASS, HF, and PHT from our Vascular Access Database from September 2017 to October 2019. Outcomes included primary patency of banding, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency, using time-to-event analyses with Kaplan-Meier curves and life tables to estimate 6- and 12-month rates.A total of 13 patients (6 men and 7 women, mean age 60 ± 14 years) underwent the MILLER procedure, 6 patients for DASS and 7 patients for pulmonary hypertension and heart failure (PHT/HF). Technical success was achieved in all patients. The longest duration of follow-up was 28 months (median 12 months [IQR 7, 19]). One patient died at 1 month after the intervention due to stroke. One patient developed access thrombosis of the graft 3 days after the procedure. Repeat banding was required in 1 patient 8 months after the first procedure. The 6-month primary patency rate of banding following this procedure was 83% while the 12-month rate was 66%. The 6- and 12-month secondary patency rates were 87% and 75%, respectively.The MILLER procedure can be performed for DASS and PHT/HF with improvement of symptoms and good long-term patency rates. Additional interventions to maintain patency and efficacy are required on long-term follow-up.

Early Assessment of National Kidney Allocation Policy Change.

BACKGROUND: The new kidney allocation changes with elimination of donor service areas (DSAs) and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network regions were initiated to improve equity in organ allocation. The aim of this evaluation was to determine the operational, financial, and recipient-related effect of the new allocation system on a large rural transplantation program. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of organ offers, allograft outcomes, and attributed costs in a comparative time cohort, before (December 16, 2020 to March 14, 2021) and after (March 15, 2021 to June 13, 2021) the allocation change was performed. Outcomes were limited to adult, solitary, deceased donor kidney transplantations. RESULTS: We received 198,881 organ offers from 3,886 organ donors at our transplantation center from December 16, 2020 to June 31, 2021: 87,643 (1,792 organ donors) before the change and 111,238 (2094 organ donors) after the change, for a difference of +23,595 more offers (+302 organ donors). This resulted in 6.5 more organs transplanted vs a predicted loss of 4.9 per month. Local organ offers dropped from 70% to 23%. There was a statistically significantly increase in donor terminal serum creatinine (1.2 ± 0.86 mg/dL vs 2.2 ± 2.3 mg/dL, p < 0.001), kidney donor profile index (KDPI) (39 ± 20 vs 48 ± 22, p = 0.017), cold ischemia time (16 ± 7 hours vs 21 ± 6 hours, p < 0.001), and delayed graft function rates (23% vs 40%, p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: The new kidney allocation policy has led to an increase in KDPI of donors with longer cold ischemia time, leading to higher delayed graft function rates. This has resulted in increasing logistical and financial burdens on the system. Implementing large-scale changes in allocation based predominantly on predictive modeling needs to be intensely reassessed during a longer follow up.

The impact of race on metabolic, graft, and patient outcomes after pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities following pancreas transplantation (PTX) are poorly defined. METHODS: This was a large-scale, single-center, longitudinal cohort study including adult PTX recipients. Patients were grouped by race to allow for comparisons. RESULTS: 287 PTX recipients were included; 125 (43.5%) were African American (AA). At baseline, AAs had a significantly higher proportion of T2DM (19.4% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.001), were younger, and more likely to be female. AAs experienced significantly higher rates of pancreatic leaks and post-operative bleeding. PTX rejection was comparable, however, kidney rejection tended to be higher among AA SPKs. Long-term mean HgbA1C levels were significantly higher among AAs (6.9% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.039). Patient and graft survival was comparable between groups, but early patient survival tended to be lower in AAs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated significant perioperative health disparities among AA PTX recipients, including poorer glycemic control and more early deaths, despite similar long-term patient and graft survival.

Maintaining Equity and Access: Successful Implementation of a Virtual Kidney Transplantation Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Maintaining access to kidney transplantation during a pandemic is a challenge, particularly for centers that serve a large rural and minority patient population with an additional burden of travel. The aim of this article was to describe our experience with the rollout and use of a virtual pretransplantation evaluation platform to facilitate ongoing transplant waitlisting during the early peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of the process improvement project implemented to continue the evaluation of potential kidney transplantation candidates and ensure waitlist placement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Operational metrics include transplantation volume per month, referral volume per month, pretransplantation patients halted before completing an evaluation per month, evaluations completed per month, and patients waitlisted per month. RESULTS: Between April and September 2020, a total of 1,258 patients completed an evaluation. Two hundred and forty-seven patients were halted during this time period before completing a full evaluation. One hundred and fifty-two patients were presented at selection and 113 were placed on the waitlist. In addition, the number of patients in the active referral phase was able to be reduced by 46%. More evaluations were completed within the virtual platform (n = 930 vs n = 880), yielding similar additions to the waitlist in 2020 (n = 282) vs 2019 (n = 308) despite the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The virtual platform allowed continued maintenance of a large kidney transplantation program despite the inability to have in-person visits. The value of this platform will likely transform our approach to the pretransplantation process and provides an additional valuable method to improve patient equity and access to transplantation.

Small Bowel Perforation as the Initial Manifestation of Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in a Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Recipient: A Case Report.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) comprises a broad spectrum of diseases and is a rare but serious complication of solid organ transplantation. We report the case of a 45-year-old simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant recipient with diffuse, early-onset PTLD, manifesting as jejunal perforation at 6 months after transplantation. The patient underwent urgent small bowel resection of the affected portion of jejunum. The surgical pathology report was significant for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Subsequently, the patient underwent a full workup, including upper and lower endoscopy and whole-body positron emission tomography that revealed involvement of the axial skeleton and multiple abdominal organs with sparing of the grafts. He was treated with rituximab and intrathecal methotrexate for central nervous system prophylaxis. The patient experienced complete resolution of disease by positron emission tomography 8 months after initial presentation. We found no previous report in the literature of intestinal perforation as the initial presentation of PTLD in SPK transplant recipients.

Inflammatory biomarkers, glycemic variability, hypoglycemia, and renal transplant outcomes: results of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that compared to standard glycemic control [blood glucose (BG): 70-180 mg/dL], patients randomized to intensive glycemic control (BG: 70-110 mg/dL) were at increased risk of graft rejection in renal transplantation. However, the underlying mechanisms that associate the effect of intensive glycemic control with renal transplant outcomes have not been identified. METHODS: A secondary data analysis of 93 participants (n=44 intensive, n=49 control) was conducted using data from a previous randomized controlled clinical trial. We examined inflammatory biomarkers, glycemic variability, hypoglycemia, and hyperglycemia as potential contributing etiologies by assessing the effect of intensive glycemic control on these characteristics, and evaluate the association of these variables with graft rejection. RESULTS: Intensive glycemic control had no appreciable effect on highly sensitive C-reactive protein, interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor alpha, IL-1ß, or IL-10 levels at all time points after transplantation. Moreover, neither inflammatory biomarkers nor increased glycemic variability were associated with graft rejection. However, intensive treatment increased the risk of hypoglycemia (BG <70 mg/dL, 84% vs. 25%, P<0.001). In sub-analysis, compared to non-rejecters, rejecters demonstrated higher rates of blood glucose below 70 mg/dL (90% vs. 49%, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Inflammatory biomarkers and increased glycemic variability lack correlation with clinical outcomes in renal transplant, but importantly, increased perioperative hypoglycemic episodes (BG <70mg/dL) may be a salient etiology that contributed to the increased risk for acute allograft rejection related to intensive glycemic control. Further research is needed to confirm a causal association.

The concept of a composite perioperative quality index in kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Public reporting of patient and graft outcomes in a national registry and close Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services oversight has resulted in transplantation being a highly regulated surgical discipline. Despite this, transplantation surgery lacks comprehensive tracking and reporting of perioperative quality measures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the association between a kidney transplantation centers' perioperative quality benchmarking and graft and patient outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was an analysis of 2011 aggregate data compiled from 2 national datasets that track outcomes from member hospitals and transplantation centers. The transplantation centers included in this study were composed of accredited US kidney transplantation centers that report data through the national registry and are associate members of the University HealthSystem Consortium. RESULTS: A total of 16,811 kidney transplantations were performed at 236 centers in the United States in 2011, of which 10,241 (61%) from 93 centers were included in the analysis. Of the 6 perioperative quality indicators, 3 benchmarked metrics were significantly associated with a kidney transplantation center's underperformance: mean ICU length of stay (C-statistic 0.731; p = 0.002), 30-day readmissions (C-statistic 0.697; p = 0.012) and in-hospital complications (C-statistic 0.785; p = 0.001). The composite quality index strongly correlated with inadequate center performance (C-statistic 0.854; p < 0.001, R(2) = 0.349). The centers in the lowest quartile of the quality index performed 2,400 kidney transplantations in 2011, which led to 2,640 more hospital days, 4,560 more ICU days, 120 more postoperative complications, and 144 more patients with 30-day readmissions, when compared with centers in the 3 higher-quality quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: An objective index of a transplantation center's quality of perioperative care is significantly associated with patient and graft survival.

Safe use of highly steatotic livers by utilizing a donor/recipient clinical algorithm.

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety and clinical outcomes associated with the utilization of highly steatotic donor livers utilizing a specific donor/recipient matching algorithm. This was a prospective, observational, single-center, 10-yr follow-up study. Highly steatotic livers were utilized according to a donor/recipient algorithm that guided the surgeon to use highly steatotic donor organs judiciously in low-risk recipients. This study initially compared fat assessment based on frozen-section Ehrlich's hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to reperfusion biopsy fat assessment and demonstrated that H&E is an insensitive analysis to determine degree of steatosis. Patients were divided into three groups based on donor steatosis (group 1: <30% steatosis, group 2: 30-60% steatosis, group 3: >60% steatosis), and clinical outcomes were assessed. One hundred and sixteen patients were included in the analysis. Patients that received severely steatotic livers (>60% fat) showed increased reperfusion liver injury and delayed return of liver function in the early postoperative period, demonstrated by biochemical markers. However, there were no differences in primary non-function, postoperative complications, length of stay, and patient and graft survival. Using rigorous donor/recipient matching through a detailed algorithm, these data demonstrate that normal liver allograft outcomes are not superior to those in highly steatotic grafts.

Improving the perioperative value of care for vulnerable kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The increased use of marginal donors, an aging recipient population, and Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) cost restraints place significant pressures on kidney transplant centers to maintain financial viability while sustaining high quality outcomes. We engaged in a quality initiative in delayed graft function (DGF) kidney transplant recipients aimed at improving safe and efficient discharge. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of national databases comparing the perioperative outcomes and costs for our transplant center and national benchmark values for kidney recipients undergoing transplantation between October 2008 and March 2012. During this time, we developed and implemented quality initiatives aimed at improving health care value for kidney transplant recipients, and focused efforts particularly in patients who developed DGF. Pediatric patients and multiorgan transplant recipients were excluded. RESULTS: There were 583 kidney transplants performed at our institution; these were compared with 37,712 transplants available from national data. Rates of DGF increased at our institution from 6% to 25% but were steady at 27% nationally. The quality initiatives improved hospital length of stay (LOS) in DGF patients from an average of 8 days initially to 4 days at study end, which reduced overall LOS from 3.6 ± 1.5 days to 3.3 ± 0.8 days (p = 0.021); national LOS was consistent at a mean of 10 days; hospital costs decreased by 42% at our institution, while national rates rose by 12%. Our institutional 30-day readmission rates in all patients and those with DGF were significantly lower than national rates across the entire study period (9% vs 15% and 12% vs 18%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that health care value can be significantly improved in kidney transplant recipients, particularly in DGF patients, by implementing a multidisciplinary initiative aimed at safely and efficiently discharging patients.

A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of glycemic control on renal transplantation outcomes.

CONTEXT: Outcomes from intensive glycemic control postrenal transplant have not been studied. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to observe the optimal management of hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance receiving renal transplantation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial with patients undergoing renal transplantation randomized to either i.v. insulin therapy (intensive) or standard s.c. insulin therapy while the patients were admitted to the hospital. INTERVENTIONS: The study consisted of a 3-day postrenal transplant group treated with intensive i.v. insulin [blood glucose (BG) = 70-110 mg/dl] or a control group treated with s.c. insulin (BG = 70-180 mg/dl). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary endpoint was delayed graft function (DGF). Secondary endpoints were glycemic control, graft survival, and acute rejection episodes. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were screened and randomized to either the intensive or control condition; however, the intention-to-treat analysis set consisted of only the 93 participants (n = 44 intensive, n = 49 control) that underwent a renal transplant. DGF was present in 18% (eight of 44) of the intensive group and 24% (12 of 49) of the control group (P = 0.46). The occurrence of severe hypoglycemia (BG < 40 mg/dl) and severe hyperglycemia (BG > 350 mg/dl) were the primary safety outcome measures. There were nine participants with hypoglycemia identified, seven of which (78%) were in the intensive treatment group (P = 0.08). There were 30 instances of hyperglycemia with five participants (11%) in the intensive group and 12 participants (24%) in the control group having at least one hyperglycemic event (P = 0.10). For the 11 rejection episodes, nine were in the intensive treatment group (P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The primary outcome measure of DGF was not statistically different for the two treatment groups. Regarding longer-term rejection and graft survival, the intensively treated participants were at higher risk for a rejection episode.

Comparison of efficacy of induction therapy in low immunologic risk African-American kidney transplant recipients.

African-Americans (AA) have higher acute rejection rates and poorer long-term graft survival rates when compared with non-AA. It is yet to be demonstrated that the type of induction therapy modifies outcomes in this 'high-risk' population. This retrospective analysis compares the efficacy of induction therapy [antilymphocyte antibodies (ALA) versus interleukin-2 receptor antagonists (IL-2RA)] in the AA population. Some 189 AAs were included. There was no difference in acute rejection at one year between the groups (ALA (12%) or IL-2RA (12%), P = 0.89). Type of induction therapy had no significant effect on death-censored (P = 0.61) or uncensored graft survival (P = 0.32). There was no difference between CMV or BK virus infections between the groups (P = 0.14 and 0.94 respectively). Type of induction therapy does not appear to affect acute rejection rates or long-term graft survival in low-risk AA kidney transplant recipients.

Efficacy of induction therapy on acute rejection and graft outcomes in African American kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: African Americans (AA) have higher rejection rates and poorer graft outcomes compared to non-AAs. Induction therapy is yet unproven in this high risk population. METHODS: This retrospective study compared the efficacy of induction therapy [IL-2 receptor antibodies (IL2RA) or thymoglobulin] vs. no induction. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-five AA patients were included in this analysis. Patients were well matched for demographic and immunologic characteristics in the non-induction and IL2RA induction groups; the Thymoglobulin induction group had significantly higher risk patients. Significantly fewer episodes of acute rejection occurred at one yr in patients treated with thymoglobulin and IL2RA vs. no induction (18% vs. 47%, p = 0.003, 26% vs. 47%, p = 0.02). Three yr graft survival was significantly improved in the IL2RA group compared to the non-induction group (85% vs. 68%, p = 0.032). Despite the thymoglobulin group being at high risk, they had similar graft survival rates compared to both the IL2RA group (76% vs. 85%, p = 0.18) and the non-induction group (76% vs. 68%, p = 0.48). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that induction therapy (combining IL2RA and thymoglobulin) independently reduced the risk of both acute rejection and graft loss. CONCLUSION: The use and type of induction therapy in AA patients significantly reduces acute rejection rates and may improve long-term graft outcomes in AA patients.

No difference between smokers, former smokers, or nonsmokers in the operative outcomes of laparoscopic donor nephrectomies.

The laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has revolutionized the living donation process for kidney transplantation. Because this surgery is elective and altruistic and smoking has been associated with greater technical difficulty and increased risk for postoperative complications for other types of surgeries, the potential risk of smoking must be addressed with regard to surgical complications. We reviewed 221 laparoscopic kidney donors with known smoking status. Forty-two (19%) were smokers, 39 (18%) were former smokers, and 140 (63%) were nonsmokers. Important donor demographics were similar between groups. There was no difference between the 3 groups for mean operative time (4.5 h vs. 4.6 h vs. 4.4 h), median or mean length of stay (2 days for all groups), estimated blood loss (173+/-137 mL vs. 209+/-184 mL vs. 188+/-198 mL), narcotic use (0.57+/-0.48 mg/kg vs. 0.49+/-0.26 mg/kg vs. 0.53+/-0.36 mg/kg of total 4 morphine equivalents), or postoperative complications. Smoking status does not seem to impact perisurgical patient outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomies.

Use of bivalirudin to prevent thrombosis following orthotopic liver transplantation in a patient with Budd-Chiari syndrome and a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated syndrome that may arise in a time-dependent manner following heparin therapy, placing patients at significant risk for thromboembolic events. Therapy includes anticoagulation with a direct thrombin inhibitor and avoidance of heparin. We report a patient with Budd-Chiari syndrome and a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who presented for orthotopic liver transplant and required postoperative anticoagulation with bivalirudin. During the post-transplant graft function improvement, we observed a significant dose-effect alteration manifested by an increased bivalirudin dose requirement as factor V activity increased. This observation is an important consideration in the attempt to maintain an optimal balance between effective anticoagulation and a reduced risk of postoperative bleeding.

Prevention and management of hyperglycemia after pancreas transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pancreas transplantation is considered the optimal therapy for patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. Successful pancreas transplantation achieves euglycemia and allows freedom from insulin therapy. Long-term allograft success may be limited by the development of impaired glucose metabolism. The objectives of the present review are to summarize the possible reasons for endocrine pancreatic dysfunction and to focus on its prevention and management and emphasize the role of immunosuppression. RECENT FINDINGS: The diabetogenic effects of current immunosuppressive agents have been well established. Regimens without corticosteroids and calcineurin-inhibitor minimization or avoidance have been promoted. Recent studies have revisited the pathogenesis of type I and type II diabetes and demonstrated common pathways, including apoptosis induction, for the exhaustion and destruction of the pancreatic islets. SUMMARY: The immunosuppressive regimens in pancreatic transplantation should be designed and appropriately modified according to the graft immunological and metabolic conditions. New molecules that are able to preserve islet function and maintain optimal insulin secretion should be considered for pancreas transplant recipients.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the liver.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor is a rare benign entity formerly known as inflammatory pseudotumor. Involvement of the liver is extremely rare. There are controversies about the optimal treatment of this benign entity. Newer reports suggest an association with autoimmune sclerosing pancreatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. We present a case of an 18-year-old patient with biliary obstruction from a perihilar mass of the liver requiring hepatic resection. Division of the hepatic bile duct resulted in drainage of yellow, thick, gelatinous material in the presence of benign margins and absence of cholangitis. Histological examination showed a mass with fibroblastic and myofibroblastic cells set in a loose myxoid matrix containing scattered lymphocytes, consistent with an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. One-year recovery was uneventful. This report discusses the presentation, diagnosis, and controversies in management of this disease.

Does bioequivalence between modified cyclosporine formulations translate into equal outcomes?

Neoral was replaced with a generic cyclosporine formulation on our hospital formulary. We compared outcomes for de novo kidney transplant recipients who either received Gengraf (n=88) or Neoral (n=100) in a single-center, retrospective review. As compared to patients who received Neoral, patients who received Gengraf were significantly more likely to have an acute rejection episode (39% vs. 25%, P=0.04), more likely to have a second rejection episode (13% vs. 4%; P=0.03), or to have received an antibody preparation to treat acute rejection (19% vs. 8%; P=0.02). Patients treated with Gengraf had a higher degree of intrapatient variability for cyclosporine trough concentrations as determined by %CV (P<0.05). The incidence of acute rejection at 6 months posttransplant was significantly higher in patients who received Gengraf compared to Neoral. A larger, prospective analysis is warranted to compare these formulations of cyclosporine in de novo kidney transplant recipients.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a renal transplant recipient.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II is an immunologically mediated reduction in platelets that increases the risk of arterial or venous thrombosis. It has been reported in up to 5% of patients receiving unfractionated heparin. Unlike other thrombocytopenic coagulopathies, HIT is associated with a high risk of thromboembolic events if not treated with an appropriate anticoagulant alternative. Diagnosis is dependent on assessment of platelet reduction, identification of previous heparin exposure, detection of thrombotic complications and evaluation of laboratory assays. HIT has been well described in surgical patient populations; however, the abdominal organ transplant population is an exception. HIT should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with thrombocytopenia after transplantation in order to prevent or treat thrombotic complications that can pose a risk to patient or graft survival.

Attenuation of ischemia-reperfusion injury in a canine model of autologous renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the potential therapeutic effects of a combination therapy consisting of 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-D-ribonucleoside (AICAR) and N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) to attenuate ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in a canine model of autologous renal transplantation. METHODS: Male mongrel dogs (15-20 kg) underwent left nephrectomy followed by flushing and static preservation of the kidney in University of Wisconsin (UW) solution for 48 hr. The treatment group received AICAR (50 mg/kg) plus NAC (100 mg/kg) intravenously before the left nephrectomy. The compounds were added to the UW solution as well. All dogs underwent right nephrectomy 48 hr later followed by autotransplantation of the preserved left kidney. Treated dogs received a second dose of AICAR and NAC before implantation of the renal autograft. RESULTS: The treated dogs had excellent urine output posttransplant, with peak serum creatinine of 7.26 mg/dL on postoperative day (POD) 3 that normalized after 14 days. The control group were anuric and developed clinical symptoms of uremia on POD 1. Morphologic evaluation supported the protective effects of combination therapy. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed decrease of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interferon-gamma, and inducible nitric oxide synthase; and TUNEL assay showed decreased apoptosis in the treated group. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with AICAR and NAC attenuates renal I/R injury and improves the outcome of the transplanted kidney after prolonged cold preservation.