Description of a pharmacist-driven safety algorithm in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: Compliance, interventions, and good saves.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-driven Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) safety bundle supported by leadership and to compare compliance before and after implementation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with descriptive and before-and-after analyses. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: All patients with documented SAB, regardless of the source of infection, were included. Patients transitioned to palliative care were excluded from before-and-after analysis. METHODS: A pharmacist-driven safety bundle including documented clearance of bacteremia, echocardiography, removal of central venous catheters, and targeted intravenous therapy of at least 2 weeks duration was implemented in November 2015 and was supported by leadership with stepwise escalation for nonresponse. A descriptive analysis of all patients with SAB during the study period included pharmacy interventions, acceptance rates, and escalation rates. A pre-post implementation analysis of 100 sequential patients compared bundle compliance and descriptive parameters. RESULTS: Overall, 391 interventions were made in the 20-month period following implementation, including 20 "good saves" avoiding potentially major adverse events. No statistically significant differences in complete bundle compliance were detected between the periods (74% vs 84%; P = .08). However, we detected a significant increase in echocardiography after the bundle was implemented (83% vs 94%; P = .02) and fewer patients received suboptimal definitive therapy after the bundle was implemented (10% vs 3%; P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: This pharmacist-driven SAB safety bundle with leadership support showed improvement in process measures, which may have prevented major adverse events, even with available infectious diseases (ID) consultation. It provides a critical safety net for institutions without mandatory ID consultation or with limited antimicrobial stewardship resources.

Minimum inhibitory concentration changes in relapsed left ventricular assist device driveline infections.

Driveline infection is the most common infectious complication in patients with left ventricular assist devices. Minimum inhibitory concentration changes are not well described in relapsed driveline infections. This retrospective descriptive epidemiology study of patients with left ventricular assist device implantation between January 1, 2013, and August 1, 2017, who developed driveline infection with positive cultures aimed to describe minimum inhibitory concentration changes. Of the 330 patients underwent left ventricular assist device implantation, 30 (9%) met criteria for driveline infection. Median duration of follow-up was 26 months (interquartile range 16, 39) and time to first driveline infection was 171 days (interquartile range 83, 403). There were 74 driveline infections: 40 new and 34 relapsed. Staphylococcus aureus was most common in new and relapsed driveline infection. Thirteen patients comprised the 34 relapsed infections, 9 of which experienced a minimum inhibitory concentration change. Median time to first minimum inhibitory concentration change was 56 days (interquartile range 36-88), and type of minimum inhibitory concentration change was an increase in five cases, decrease in two cases, and both increase and decrease in two cases. Minimum inhibitory concentration changes did not result in resistance in S. aureus but did in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Mycobacterium fortuitum relapsed driveline infection. Time to first relapse from initial infection was longer in those who received suppressive therapy, 60 days versus 83 days, p = 0.047. Relapsed driveline infections were most common with S. aureus. Minimum inhibitory concentration changes were quite variable and may not be the major contributor to relapsed infection in gram-positive driveline infection.

Driving antimicrobial use improvement: attitudes of providers of adult hospital care on optimal attribution and feedback.

Understanding provider perceptions of antimicrobial use (AU) feedback is important for optimal implementation. A survey addressing AU attribution scenarios, feedback methods, and implementation barriers was distributed to inpatient providers. As AU scenarios became more complex, disagreement regarding AU attribution arose. All providers were highly concerned about barriers to AU reporting.