Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Shock ; 54(6): 731-737, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32496415

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The routine use of empiric combination therapy with aminoglycosides during critical illness is associated with uncertain benefit and increased risk of acute kidney injury. This study aimed to assess the benefits of aminoglycosides in immunocompromised patients with suspected bacterial pneumonia and sepsis. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study. Adult immunocompromised patients with suspected bacterial pneumonia and sepsis or septic shock were included. Primary outcome was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were needed for renal replacement therapy (RRT). Mortality was also assessed in neutropenic patients and in those with confirmed bacterial pneumonia. Results were further analyzed in a cohort matched on risk of receiving aminoglycosides combination. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-five patients were included in this analysis, of whom 187 (35%) received aminoglycosides in addition to another antibiotic effective against gram-negative bacteria. Overall hospital mortality was 59.6% (58.3% vs. 60.3% in patients receiving and not receiving combination therapy; P = 0.71). Lack of association between mortality and aminoglycosides was confirmed after adjustment for confounders and center effect (adjusted OR 1.14 [0.69-1.89]) and in a propensity matched cohort (adjusted OR = 0.89 [0.49-1.61]). No association was found between aminoglycosides and need for RRT (adjusted OR = 0.83 [0.49-1.39], P = 0.477), nor between aminoglycoside use and outcome in neutropenic patients or in patients with confirmed bacterial pneumonia (adjusted OR 0.66 [0.23-1.85] and 1.25 [0.61-2.57], respectively). CONCLUSION: Aminoglycoside combination therapy was not associated with hospital mortality or need for renal replacement therapy in immunocompromised patients with pulmonary sepsis.


Asunto(s)
Aminoglicósidos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Neumonía Bacteriana , Choque Séptico , Anciano , Enfermedad Crítica , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Bacteriana/complicaciones , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Choque Séptico/complicaciones , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 19(4): 363-9, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22439889

RESUMEN

Implementation of care bundles for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and its impact on patient outcomes requires validation with long-term follow-up. A collaborative multi-centre cohort study was conducted in five Spanish adult intensive-care units. A care bundle approach based on five measures was implemented after a 3-month baseline period, and compliance, VAP rates, intensive-care unit length of stay (ICU LOS) and duration of mechanical ventilation were prospectively recorded for 16 months. There were 149 patients in the baseline period and 885 after the intervention. Compliance with all measures after intervention was <30% (264/885). In spite of this, VAP incidence decreased from 15.5% (23/149) to 11.7% (104/885), after the intervention (p <0.05). This reduction was significantly associated with hand hygiene (OR = 0.35), intra-cuff pressure control (OR = 0.21), oral hygiene (OR = 0.23) and sedation control (OR = 0.51). Use of the care bundle was associated with an incidence risk ratio of VAP of 0.78 (95% CI 0.15-0.99). We documented a reduction of median ICU LOS (from 10 to 6 days) and duration of mechanical ventilation (from 8 to 4 days) for patients with full bundle compliance (intervention period). Efforts on VAP prevention and outcome improvement should focus on achieving higher compliance in hand and oral hygiene, sedation protocols and intracuff pressure control.


Asunto(s)
Control de Infecciones/métodos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , España
3.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 18(10): 1040-8, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22264290

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to determine if severity assessment tools (general severity of illness and community-acquired pneumonia specific scores) can be used to guide decisions for patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) due to pandemic influenza A pneumonia. A prospective, observational, multicentre study included 265 patients with a mean age of 42 (±16.1) years and an ICU mortality of 31.7%. On admission to the ICU, the mean pneumonia severity index (PSI) score was 103.2 ± 43.2 points, the CURB-65 score was 1.7 ± 1.1 points and the PIRO-CAP score was 3.2 ± 1.5 points. None of the scores had a good predictive ability: area under the ROC for PSI, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65-0.78); CURB-65, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.59-0.74); and PIRO-CAP, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.56-0.71). The PSI score (OR, 1.022 (1.009-1.034), p 0.001) was independently associated with ICU mortality; however, none of the three scores, when used at ICU admission, were able to reliably detect a low-risk group of patients. Low risk for mortality was identified in 27.5% of patients using PIRO-CAP, but above 40% when using PSI (I-III) or CURB65 (<2). Observed mortality was 13.7%, 13.5% and 19.4%, respectively. Pneumonia-specific scores undervalued severity and should not be used as instruments to guide decisions in the ICU.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Argentina/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/virología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Viral/virología , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
4.
Eur Respir J ; 37(6): 1332-9, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20847075

RESUMEN

The objectives of this study were to assess the determinants of empirical antibiotic choice, prescription patterns and outcomes in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)/ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in Europe. We performed a prospective, observational cohort study in 27 intensive care units (ICUs) from nine European countries. 100 consecutive patients on mechanical ventilation for HAP, on mechanical ventilation>48 h or with VAP were enrolled per ICU. Admission category, sickness severity and Acinetobacter spp. prevalence>10% in pneumonia episodes determined antibiotic empirical choice. Trauma patients were more often prescribed non-anti-Pseudomonas cephalosporins (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.50-4.78). Surgical patients received less aminoglycosides (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.49). A significant correlation (p<0.01) was found between Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score and carbapenem prescription. Basal Acinetobacter spp. prevalence>10% dramatically increased the prescription of carbapenems (OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.0-6.1) and colistin (OR 115.7, 95% CI 6.9-1,930.9). Appropriate empirical antibiotics decreased ICU length of stay by 6 days (26.3±19.8 days versus 32.8±29.4 days; p=0.04). The antibiotics that were prescribed most were carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam and quinolones. Median (interquartile range) duration of antibiotic therapy was 9 (6-12) days. Anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents were prescribed in 38.4% of VAP episodes. Admission category, sickness severity and basal Acinetobacter prevalence>10% in pneumonia episodes were the major determinants of antibiotic choice at the bedside. Across Europe, carbapenems were the antibiotic most prescribed for HAP/VAP.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Aminoglicósidos/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Quinolonas/uso terapéutico , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Intensive Care Med ; 37(2): 272-83, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21107529

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Early use of corticosteroids in patients affected by pandemic (H1N1)v influenza A infection, although relatively common, remains controversial. METHODS: Prospective, observational, multicenter study from 23 June 2009 through 11 February 2010, reported in the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) H1N1 registry. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with completed outcome data were analyzed. Invasive mechanical ventilation was used in 155 (70.5%). Sixty-seven (30.5%) of the patients died in ICU and 75 (34.1%) whilst in hospital. One hundred twenty-six (57.3%) patients received corticosteroid therapy on admission to ICU. Patients who received corticosteroids were significantly older and were more likely to have coexisting asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic steroid use. These patients receiving corticosteroids had increased likelihood of developing hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) [26.2% versus 13.8%, p < 0.05; odds ratio (OR) 2.2, confidence interval (CI) 1.1-4.5]. Patients who received corticosteroids had significantly higher ICU mortality than patients who did not (46.0% versus 18.1%, p < 0.01; OR 3.8, CI 2.1-7.2). Cox regression analysis adjusted for severity and potential confounding factors identified that early use of corticosteroids was not significantly associated with mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.3, 95% CI 0.7-2.4, p = 0.4] but was still associated with an increased rate of HAP (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.8, p < 0.05). When only patients developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were analyzed, similar results were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Early use of corticosteroids in patients affected by pandemic (H1N1)v influenza A infection did not result in better outcomes and was associated with increased risk of superinfections.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/efectos de los fármacos , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Pandemias , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Adulto , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Supervivencia
6.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 43(12): 1153-1159, Dec. 2010. ilus, tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: lil-569008

RESUMEN

Clinically relevant animal models capable of simulating traumatic hemorrhagic shock are needed. We developed a hemorrhagic shock model with male New Zealand rabbits (2200-2800 g, 60-70 days old) that simulates the pre-hospital and acute care of a penetrating trauma victim in an urban scenario using current resuscitation strategies. A laparotomy was performed to reproduce tissue trauma and an aortic injury was created using a standardized single puncture to the left side of the infrarenal aorta to induce hemorrhagic shock similar to a penetrating mechanism. A 15-min interval was used to simulate the arrival of pre-hospital care. Fluid resuscitation was then applied using two regimens: normotensive resuscitation to achieve baseline mean arterial blood pressure (MAP, 10 animals) and hypotensive resuscitation at 60 percent of baseline MAP (10 animals). Another 10 animals were sham operated. The total time of the experiment was 85 min, reproducing scene, transport and emergency room times. Intra-abdominal blood loss was significantly greater in animals that underwent normotensive resuscitation compared to hypotensive resuscitation (17.1 ± 2.0 vs 8.0 ± 1.5 mL/kg). Antithrombin levels decreased significantly in normotensive resuscitated animals compared to baseline (102 ± 2.0 vs 59 ± 4.1 percent), sham (95 ± 2.8 vs 59 ± 4.1 percent), and hypotensive resuscitated animals (98 ± 7.8 vs 59 ± 4.1 percent). Evidence of re-bleeding was also noted in the normotensive resuscitation group. A hypotensive resuscitation regimen resulted in decreased blood loss in a clinically relevant small animal model capable of reproducing hemorrhagic shock caused by a penetrating mechanism.


Asunto(s)
Animales , Masculino , Conejos , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Resucitación/métodos , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Choque Traumático/terapia , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Hematócrito , Choque Hemorrágico/sangre , Choque Hemorrágico/etiología , Choque Traumático/sangre , Choque Traumático/complicaciones
7.
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 43(12): 1153-9, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21085888

RESUMEN

Clinically relevant animal models capable of simulating traumatic hemorrhagic shock are needed. We developed a hemorrhagic shock model with male New Zealand rabbits (2200-2800 g, 60-70 days old) that simulates the pre-hospital and acute care of a penetrating trauma victim in an urban scenario using current resuscitation strategies. A laparotomy was performed to reproduce tissue trauma and an aortic injury was created using a standardized single puncture to the left side of the infrarenal aorta to induce hemorrhagic shock similar to a penetrating mechanism. A 15-min interval was used to simulate the arrival of pre-hospital care. Fluid resuscitation was then applied using two regimens: normotensive resuscitation to achieve baseline mean arterial blood pressure (MAP, 10 animals) and hypotensive resuscitation at 60% of baseline MAP (10 animals). Another 10 animals were sham operated. The total time of the experiment was 85 min, reproducing scene, transport and emergency room times. Intra-abdominal blood loss was significantly greater in animals that underwent normotensive resuscitation compared to hypotensive resuscitation (17.1 ± 2.0 vs 8.0 ± 1.5 mL/kg). Antithrombin levels decreased significantly in normotensive resuscitated animals compared to baseline (102 ± 2.0 vs 59 ± 4.1%), sham (95 ± 2.8 vs 59 ± 4.1%), and hypotensive resuscitated animals (98 ± 7.8 vs 59 ± 4.1%). Evidence of re-bleeding was also noted in the normotensive resuscitation group. A hypotensive resuscitation regimen resulted in decreased blood loss in a clinically relevant small animal model capable of reproducing hemorrhagic shock caused by a penetrating mechanism.


Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/métodos , Resucitación/métodos , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Choque Traumático/terapia , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Hematócrito , Masculino , Conejos , Choque Hemorrágico/sangre , Choque Hemorrágico/etiología , Choque Traumático/sangre , Choque Traumático/complicaciones
8.
J Trauma ; 69(4): 849-54, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20938271

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Differences in trauma patients developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are described regarding etiology and risk factors associated. We aim to describe the differences in outcomes in trauma and nontrauma patients with VAP. METHODS: A prospective, observational study conducted in 27 intensive care units from nine European countries. We included patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for >48 hours who developed VAP. Logistic regression model was used to assess the factors independently associated with mortality in trauma patients with VAP. RESULTS: A total of 2,436 patients were evaluated; 465 developed VAP and of these 128 (27.5%) were trauma patients. Trauma patients were younger than nontrauma (45.3 ± 19.4 vs. 61.1 ± 16.7, p < 0.0001). Nontrauma had higher simplified acute physiology score II compared with trauma patients (45.5 ± 16.3 vs. 41.1 ± 15.2, p = 0.009). Most prevalent pathogens in trauma patients with early VAP were Enterobacteriaceae spp. (46.9% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.06) followed by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (30.6% vs. 13%, p = 0.03) and then Haemophilus influenzae (14.3% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.02), and the most prevalent pathogen in late VAP was Acinetobacter baumannii (12.2% vs. 44.4%, p < 0.0001). Mortality was higher in nontrauma patients than in trauma patients (42.6% vs. 17.2%, p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] = 3.55, 95%CI = 2.14-5.88). A logistic regression model adjusted for sex, age, severity of illness at intensive care unit admission, and sepsis-related organ failure assessment score at the day of VAP diagnosis confirmed that trauma was associated with a lower mortality compared with nontrauma patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.37, 95%CI = 0.21-0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patients developing VAP had different demographic characteristics and episodes of etiology. After adjustment for potential confounders, VAP episodes in trauma patients are associated with lower mortality when compared with nontrauma patients.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/mortalidad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/mortalidad , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , APACHE , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/mortalidad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/mortalidad
9.
Eur Respir J ; 36(5): 1073-9, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20150202

RESUMEN

The influence of infecting serotype group on outcome in bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia remains unclear. We performed a prospective, 10-yr observational study in an 800-bed teaching hospital. 299 adults diagnosed with pneumonia whose blood cultures showed growth of Streptococcus pneumoniae were included in the study. High invasive disease potential (H) serotypes included serotypes 1, 5 and 7F, which served as a reference category, were compared with low invasive disease potential (L) serotypes (3, 6A, 6B, 8, 19F, and 23F) and other (O) serotypes (non-H, non-L). The influence on outcome was determined for each group of serotypes after adjusting for underlying conditions and severity of illness at admission. Overall, 30-day mortality was 11%. H serotypes (n = 93) infected primarily younger people and presented a higher risk of complicated parapneumonic effusion or empyema (17.2 versus 5.1%; p = 0.01), with lower mortality (3.2%). The isolation of L serotypes (n = 78) was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality (OR 7.02, 95% CI 1.72-28.61), as were Charlson score (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08-1.58), alcohol abuse (OR 3.99, 95% CI 1.39-11.39) and severity of illness measured by American Thoracic Society (ATS)/Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria (OR 4.80, 95% CI 1.89-12.13). A vaccination strategy including serotypes 3, 6A, 6B, 8, 19F and 23F may improve survival in adults.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía Neumocócica/microbiología , Neumonía Neumocócica/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Streptococcus pneumoniae/clasificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas Neumococicas/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Neumocócica/prevención & control , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Serotipificación , Vacunas Conjugadas/uso terapéutico
10.
Med Intensiva ; 34(2): 87-94, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20061066

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1)v infection is the first pandemic in which intensive care units (ICU) play a fundamental role. It has spread very rapidly since the first cases were diagnosed in Mexico with the subsequent spread of the virus throughout the Southern Cone and Europe during the summer season. OBJECTIVE: This study has aimed to compare the clinical presentation and outcome among the critical patients admitted to the ICU until July 31, 2009 in Spain with some series from Latin America. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Six series of critically ill patients admitted to the ICU were considered. Clinical characteristics, complications and outcome were compared between series. RESULTS: Young patients (35-45 years) with viral pneumonia as a predominant ICU admission cause with severe respiratory failure and a high need of mechanical ventilation (60-100%) were affected. Obesity, pregnancy and chronic lung disease were risk factors associated with a worse outcome, however there was a high number of patients without comorbidities (40-50%). Mortality rate was between 25-50% and higher in the Latin America series, demonstrating the specific potential pathogenesis of the new virus. The use of antiviral treatment was delayed (between 3 and 6 days) and not generalized, with greater delay in Latin America in regards to Spain. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a more aggressive treatment strategy, with earlier and easier access to the antiviral treatment might reduce the number of ICU admissions and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Gripe Humana/complicaciones , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Gripe Humana/virología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , América Latina/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oseltamivir/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Sistema de Registros , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Choque/etiología , España/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
11.
Intensive Care Med ; 36(4): 612-20, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19953222

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect on survival of macrolides or fluoroquinolones in intubated patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with severe community-acquired pneumonia (severe CAP). METHODS: Prospective, observational cohort, multicenter study conducted in 27 ICUs of 9 European countries. Two hundred eighteen consecutive patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for an admission diagnosis of CAP were recruited. RESULTS: Severe sepsis and septic shock were present in 165 (75.7%) patients. Microbiological documentation was obtained in 102 (46.8%) patients. ICU mortality was 37.6% (n = 82). Non-survivors were older (58.6 +/- 16.1 vs. 63.4 +/- 16.7 years, P < 0.05) and presented a higher score on the simplified Acute Physiology Score II at admission (45.6 +/- 15.4 vs. 50.8 +/- 17.5, P < 0.05). Monotherapy was given in 43 (19.7%) and combination therapy in 175 (80.3%) patients. Empirical antibiotic therapy was in accordance with the 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines in 100 (45.9%) patients (macrolides in 46 patients and fluoroquinolones in 54). In this cohort, a Cox regression analysis adjusted by severity identified that macrolide use was associated with lower ICU mortality (hazard ratio, HR 0.48, confidence intervals, 95% CI 0.23-0.97, P = 0.04) when compared to the use of fluoroquinolones. When more severe patients presenting severe sepsis and septic shock were analyzed (n = 92), similar results were obtained (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.95, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia had a low adherence with the 2007 IDSA/ATS guidelines. Combination therapy with macrolides should be preferred in intubated patients with severe CAP.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Intubación Intratraqueal , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , APACHE , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Choque Séptico/epidemiología , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Tasa de Supervivencia
12.
Med Intensiva ; 32(5): 248-52, 2008.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18570835

RESUMEN

Infection prevention is an intervention opportunity to promote patient safety. The strategies to obtain the full implementation of available prevention measures is the main challenge in clinical practice. Using care bundles, continuing education and feedback on adherence to the measures proposed are key points to improve the safety of patients in the Intensive Care Unit.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/complicaciones , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Humanos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/etiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Seguridad
13.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 126(9): 993-6, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16864500

RESUMEN

Mucormycosis is a rare acute fatal fungal infection. It is typically observed in diabetic or immunocompromised patients but not in systemically healthy individuals. Here, we describe an unusual mucormycosis case in an immunocompetent patient who had clinical signs of a maxillary sinusitis and associated osteomyelitis at the first examination. He was treated by surgery and removal of the necrotic bone and amphotericin B medication. At 1-year follow-up he shows complete recovery.


Asunto(s)
Inmunocompetencia , Sinusitis Maxilar/microbiología , Mucormicosis/diagnóstico , Osteomielitis/microbiología , Anciano , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Desbridamiento , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Sinusitis Maxilar/terapia , Mucormicosis/terapia , Osteomielitis/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA