Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 52(6): 102605, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37210010

RESUMEN

Five to 20% of women regret having a tubal ligation. These women are generally otherwise fertile and have a better chance of pregnancy than other patients experiencing infertility, whether by in vitro fertilization or after tubal surgery. Historically, tubal anastomosis surgery has long been performed by microsurgery through laparotomy, which provided very high precision but was associated with some degree of morbidity. The parallel development of in vitro fertilization and laparoscopy have contributed to reducing the indications for tubal surgery. The laparoscopic approach is challenging because of the number and precision of the sutures needed. The robot-assisted laparoscopic approach may reduce the surgical difficulty and improve the accessibility of this technique. We have described the technique of tubo-tubal reanastomosis after sterilization with robot-assisted laparoscopy in 10 steps. Robot-assisted laparoscopy provides favourable conditions for performing tubo-tubal reanastomosis after sterilization due to the camera stability, precision of movement, and amplitude of articulations.


Asunto(s)
Robótica , Esterilización Tubaria , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Reversión de la Esterilización/métodos , Esterilización Tubaria/métodos , Trompas Uterinas/cirugía , Esterilización
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA