Association of circulating cytokine levels and tissue-infiltrating myeloid cells with achalasia: results from Mendelian randomization and validation through clinical characteristics and single-cell RNA sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a rare motility disorder of the esophagus often accompanied by immune dysregulation, yet specific underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. METHODS: We utilized Mendelian randomization (MR) to explore the causal effects of cytokine levels on achalasia, with cis-expression/protein quantitative trait loci (cis-eQTLs/pQTLs) for 47 cytokines selected from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis and GWAS data for achalasia obtained from FinnGen. For cytokines significantly linked to achalasia, we analyzed their plasma concentrations and expression differences in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) profiling, respectively. We further employed bioinformatics approaches to investigate underlying mechanisms. RESULTS: We revealed positive associations of circulating Eotaxin, macrophage inflammatory protein-1b (MIP1b), soluble E-selectin (SeSelectin) and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) with achalasia. When combining MR findings with scRNA-seq data, we observed upregulation of TRAIL (OR = 2.70, 95% CI, 1.20-6.07), encoded by TNFSF10, in monocytes and downregulation of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.84), encoded by IL1RN, in FOS_macrophages in achalasia. TNFSF10high monocytes in achalasia displayed activated type I interferon signaling, and IL1RNlow FOS_macrophages exhibited increased intercellular communications with various lymphocytes, together shaping the proinflammatory microenvironment of achalasia. CONCLUSIONS: We identified circulating Eotaxin, MIP1b, SeSelectin and TRAIL as potential drug targets for achalasia. TNFSF10high monocytes and IL1RNlow macrophages may play a role in the pathogenesis of achalasia.

Feasibility of a novel unassisted single-channel transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy for the treatment of appendiceal lesions (with video).

BACKGROUND: Transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy (TEA) is rapidly evolving and has been reported as a minimally invasive alternative to appendectomy. We aimed to characterize the feasibility and safety of a novel unassisted single-channel TEA. METHOD: We retrospectively investigated 23 patients with appendicitis or appendiceal lesions who underwent TEA from February 2016 to December 2022. We collected clinicopathological characteristics, procedure­related parameters, and follow­up data and analyzed the impact of previous abdominal surgery and traction technique. RESULTS: The mean age was 56.0 years. Of the 23 patients with appendiceal lesions, fourteen patients underwent TEA and nine underwent traction-assisted TEA (T-TEA). Eight patients (34.8%) had previous abdominal surgery. The En bloc resection rate was 95.7%. The mean procedure duration was 91.1 ± 45.5 min, and the mean wound closure time was 29.4 ± 18.6 min. The wounds after endoscopic appendectomy were closed with clips (21.7%) or a combination of clip closure and endoloop reinforcement (78.3%), and the median number of clips was 7 (range, 3-15). Three patients (13.0%) experienced major adverse events, including two delayed perforations (laparoscopic surgery) and one infection (salvage endoscopic suture). During a median follow-up of 23 months, no residual or recurrent lesions were observed, and no recurrence of abdominal pain occurred. There were no significant differences between TEA and T-TEA groups and between patients with and without abdominal surgery groups in each factor. CONCLUSION: Unassisted single-channel TEA for patients with appendiceal lesions has favorable short- and long-term outcomes. TEA can safely and effectively treat appendiceal disease in appropriately selected cases.

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for the jejunoileal lesions.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection (ER) for jejunoileal lesions (JILs) has been technically challenging. We aimed to characterize the clinicopathologic characteristics, feasibility, and safety of ER for JILs. METHOD: We retrospectively investigated 52 patients with JILs who underwent ER from January 2012 to February 2022. We collected and analyzed clinicopathological characteristics, procedure-related parameters, outcomes, and follow-up data. RESULTS: The mean age was 49.4 years. Of the 52 JILs, 33 ileal tumors within 20 cm from the ileocecal valve were resected with colonoscopy, while 19 tumors in the jejunum or the ileum over 20 cm from the ileocecal valve received enteroscopy resection. The mean procedure duration was 49.0 min. The en bloc resection and en bloc with R0 resection rates were 86.5% and 84.6%, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) included one (1.9%) major AE (delayed bleeding) and five (9.6%) minor AEs. During a median follow-up of 36.5 months, two patients had local recurrence (3.8%), while none had metastases. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were 92.9% and 94.1%, respectively. Compared with the enteroscopy group, overall AEs were significantly lower in the colonoscopy group (P < 0.05), but no statistical differences were observed in RFS (P = 0.412) and DSS (P = 0.579). There were no significant differences in AEs, RFS, and DSS between the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and the endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) group. CONCLUSIONS: ER of JILs has favorable short-term and long-term outcomes. Both ESD and EMR can safely and effectively resect JILs in appropriately selected cases.

Endoscopic management of duodenal perforation caused by foreign bodies in adults: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Duodenal perforation caused by foreign bodies (FBs) is very rare but is an urgent emergency that traditionally requires surgical intervention. Several case reports have reported the successful endoscopic removal of duodenal perforating FBs. Here we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic management of duodenal perforating FBs in adults. METHODS: Between October 2004 and October 2022, 12,851 patients with endoscopically diagnosed gastrointestinal FBs from four tertiary hospitals in China were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were enrolled if they were endoscopically and/or radiographically diagnosed with duodenal perforating FBs. RESULTS: The incidence of duodenal total FBs and perforating FBs was 1.9% and 0.3%, respectively. Thirty-four patients were enrolled. Endoscopic removal was achieved in 25 patients (73.5%), and nine patients (26.5%) received surgery. For the endoscopic group, most perforating FBs were located in the duodenal bulb (36.0%) and descending part (28.0%). The adverse events included 3 mucosal injuries and 1 localized peritonitis. All patients were cured after conventional treatment. In the surgical group, most FBs were lodged in the descending part (55.6%). One patient developed localized peritonitis and one patient died of multiple organ failure. The significant features of FBs requiring surgery included FB over 10 cm, both sides perforation, multiple perforating FBs and massive pus overflow. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic removal of duodenal perforating FBs is safe and effective, and can be the first choice of treatment for experienced endoscopists. Surgical intervention may be required for patients with FBs over 10 cm, both sides perforation, multiple perforating FBs, or severe infections.

Management of delayed bleeding of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal tunneling procedures: a retrospective single-center analysis and brief meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Delayed bleeding is a rare but important major adverse event (mAE) after endoscopic submucosal tunneling procedures (ESTP), which is scarcely reported. We aimed to characterize the clinical characteristics of delayed bleeding and provide better management of this mAE. METHOD: From August 2010 to October 2022, we reviewed 3852 patients with achalasia receiving peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and 1937 patients with upper gastrointestinal tumors receiving submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER). Among these, records of 22 patients (15 POEM, 7 STER) with delayed bleeding were collected. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of delayed bleeding were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age was 43.6 years. Ten patients (45.5%) were intratunnel bleeding, seven (31.8%) were intratunnel bleeding accompanied by mucosal bleeding, and five (22.7%) were mucosal bleeding. The most common accompanied symptoms were hematemesis, fever, and melena. The most common accompanied mAEs were fistula, pulmonary inflammation, and pleural effusion with atelectasis. The mean duration from ESTP to endoscopic intervention was 5.3 ± 4.9 days. Active bleeding was identified in 21 patients (95.5%). The bleeding was successfully controlled by electrocoagulation (19 cases), endoscopic clipping (six cases), and Sengstaken-Blakemore tube insertion (three cases), and no patient required surgical intervention. The mean hemostatic procedure duration was 61.8 ± 45.8 min. The mean post-bleeding hospital stay was 10.0 ± 6.2 days. A brief meta-analysis of previous studies showed the pooled estimate delayed bleeding rate after POEM, STER, and G-POEM was 0.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed bleeding is uncommon and could be effectively managed by timely emergency endoscopic procedures without requiring subsequent surgical interventions.

A single-cell transcriptional landscape of immune cells shows disease-specific changes of T cell and macrophage populations in human achalasia.

Achalasia is a rare motility disorder of the esophagus caused by the gradual degeneration of myenteric neurons. Immune-mediated ganglionitis has been proposed to underlie the loss of myenteric neurons. Here, we measure the immune cell transcriptional profile of paired lower esophageal sphincter (LES) tissue and blood samples in achalasia and controls using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). In achalasia, we identify a pattern of expanded immune cells and a specific transcriptional phenotype, especially in LES tissue. We show C1QC+ macrophages and tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM), especially ZNF683+ CD8+ TRM and XCL1+ CD4+ TRM, are significantly expanded and localized surrounding the myenteric plexus in the LES tissue of achalasia. C1QC+ macrophages are transcriptionally similar to microglia of the central nervous system and have a neurodegenerative dysfunctional phenotype in achalasia. TRM also expresses transcripts of dysregulated immune responses in achalasia. Moreover, inflammation increases with disease progression since immune cells are more activated in type I compared with type II achalasia. Thus, we profile the immune cell transcriptional landscape and identify C1QC+ macrophages and TRM as disease-associated immune cell subsets in achalasia.

The role of type II esophageal microbiota in achalasia: Activation of macrophages and degeneration of myenteric neurons.

OBJECTIVE: The gut microbiota plays a critical role in the appropriate development and maintenance of the enteric nervous system (ENS). Esophageal achalasia (EA) is a rare motility disorder characterized by the selective degeneration of inhibitory neurons in the esophageal myenteric plexus. This study aimed to evaluate the composition of the esophageal microbiota in achalasia and explore the potential microbial mechanisms involved in its pathogenesis. DESIGN: The lower esophageal mucosal microbiota was analyzed in patients with achalasia and control participants using 16 S rRNA sequencing. The association between the esophageal microbiota and achalasia was validated by inducing esophageal dysbiosis in C57BL/10 J and C57BL/10ScNJ (TLR4KO) mice via chronic exposure to ampicillin sodium in their drinking water. RESULTS: The esophageal microbiota in EA patients had lower diversity and a predominance of Gram-negative bacteria (Type II microbiota) compared to that in the healthy controls. Additionally, the relative abundance of Rhodobacter decreased significantly in patients with achalasia, which correlated with an enrichment of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis based on the COG database. Antibiotic-treated mice showed an esophageal microbiota characterized by increased abundance of Gram-negative bacteria (Type II microbiome), decreased abundance of Rhodobacter, and enriched LPS biosynthesis. Compared to the control and TLR4KO mice, the antibiotic-treated wild-type mice had higher LES resting pressure, increased LES contraction rate after carbachol stimulation, and decreased relaxation response to L-arginine. Moreover, the number of myenteric neurons decreased, while the number of lamina propria macrophages (LpMs) increased after antibiotic exposure. Furthermore, the TLR4-MYD88-NF-κB pathway was up-regulated, and the production of TNF-α, IL-1ß, and IL-6 increased in the antibiotic-treated mice. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with achalasia exhibit esophageal dysbiosis, which may induce aberrant esophageal motility.

Landscape of Psychological Profiles in Patients With Esophageal Achalasia.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal achalasia (EA) is a chronic esophageal dysmotility disease, of which psychological distress was poorly understood. This study aims to assess the status of psychosocial characteristics in EA and to determine the relationship between psychological distress and EA. METHODS: Seventy pairs of age and gender-matched patients with EA and healthy control individuals were prospectively enrolled from December 2019 to April 2020 at our hospital. Demographic, psychosocial, and clinical data were obtained. Psychosocial assessments contained psychological distress (Symptom Checklist-90 Revised), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale-14), and stressful life events (Life Events Scale). Comparison for psychological parameters was made between patients with EA and controls as well as for EA before/after per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to testify the association between psychological distress and achalasia symptoms. RESULTS: The mean course and Eckardt score of patients with EA were 4.26 ± 5.11 years and 6.63 ± 2.21, respectively. There was a significant difference between patients with EA and healthy individuals in Global Severity Index ( P = 0.039) and Positive Symptoms Total ( P = 0.041) for Symptom Checklist-90 Revised as well as positive intensity ( P = 0.011) for the Life Events Scale. Somatization ( P < 0.001), anxiety ( P = 0.021), anger-hostility ( P = 0.009), and others (appetite and sleep, P = 0.010) accounted for the most difference. Somatization was positively associated with chest pain ( P = 0.045). Two patients with EA developed recurrence and showed no relationship with psychological status. Psychological status was significantly improved after POEM. DISCUSSION: Psychological distress, especially somatization, was more prevalent in patients with EA than healthy controls. POEM seemed able to improve psychological distress.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions involving the anastomosis after upper gastrointestinal surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for anastomotic lesions is technically challenging due to severe fibrosis, deformity, staples, and limited space for procedure. We aimed to characterize the clinicopathological characteristics, feasibility, and effectiveness of ESD for anastomotic lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 43 patients with lesions involving the anastomoses of the upper GI tract who underwent ESD from April 2007 to February 2021. We collected clinicopathological characteristics, procedure­related parameters and outcomes, and follow­up data and analyzed the impact of anastomotic involvement. RESULTS: The median duration from previous upper GI surgery was 60 months and the median procedure duration was 30 min. The rate of en bloc resection and en bloc with R0 resection was 90.7% and 81.4%, respectively. Two patients (4.7%) experienced major adverse events, including delayed bleeding and febrile episode. During a median follow-up of 80 months, 3 patients had local recurrence and 4 patients had metastases. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 89.6% and 95.1%, respectively. Compared with the unilaterally involving group, the straddling anastomosis group had significantly longer procedure duration, larger specimen, lower rates of en bloc resection and en bloc with R0 resection, and shorter DFS and OS (all P < 0.05). However, rates of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The short­ and long-term outcomes of ESD for upper GI anastomotic lesions were favorable. Although with technically challenging, ESD could be performed safely and effectively for anastomotic lesions.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for anastomotic lesions after colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for anastomotic lesions is technically challenging. We aimed to characterize the clinicopathologic characteristics, feasibility, and effectiveness of ESD for anastomotic lesions of the lower gastrointestinal tract. METHOD: We retrospectively investigated 55 patients with anastomotic lesions of the lower gastrointestinal tract who underwent ESD from February 2008 to January 2021. The lesions involving one or both sides of anastomoses were classified into the unilaterally involving anastomosis (UIA) or straddling anastomosis (SA) group, respectively. We collected clinicopathological characteristics, procedure-related parameters and outcomes, and follow-up data and analyzed the impact of anastomotic involvement. RESULTS: The mean age was 62.5 years, and the median procedure duration was 30 min. The rates of en bloc resection and R0 resection were 90.9% and 85.5%, respectively. Four patients (7.3%) experienced major adverse events (AEs). During a median follow-up of 66 months (range 14-169), seven patients had local recurrence, and six patients had metastases. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 82.4% and 90.7%, respectively. The 5-year disease -specific survival (DSS) rate was 93.3%. Compared with the UIA group, the SA group had significantly longer procedure duration, larger specimen, lower rates of en bloc resection and R0 resection, and shorter disease-free survival (all P < 0.05). However, rates of AEs did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term and long-term outcomes of ESD for colorectal anastomotic lesions were favorable. Although with technically challenging, ESD could be performed safely and effectively for lesions at the anastomoses.

A cross-sectional study reveals a chronic low-grade inflammation in achalasia.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Immune-mediated neuroinflammation has been proposed to underlie the loss of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) myenteric neurons in achalasia. However, the immune status and key pathogenic immune subpopulations remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the inflammatory status of patients with achalasia and their correlation with clinical characteristics, and further explore the key pathogenic subpopulations. METHODS: We investigated the complete blood cell count and inflammatory markers in a large population of patients with achalasia (n = 341) and healthy controls (n = 80). The subpopulations of lymphocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry. Immunofluorescence was used to determine immune cell infiltration in the LES. Transcriptome changes of the key subpopulation were determined by RNA sequencing analysis. RESULTS: NLR, MLR, CRP, globulin, IL-6 and IL-10 were significantly elevated in patients with achalasia. MLR and globulin were positively correlated with disease duration. The absolute count and percentage of CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood and its infiltration around ganglion in the LES were significantly increased in achalasia. Transcriptome analysis indicated that CD8+ T cells were activated and proliferative. In addition to multiple inflammatory pathways, regulation of neuroinflammatory response pathway was also significantly up-regulated in achalasia. GSEA analysis revealed a close association with autoimmune diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with achalasia suffered from chronic low-grade inflammation with dysregulated immune cells and mediators associated with disease duration. CD8+ T cells might be the key pathogenic subpopulation of achalasia. Our results provide an important immune cell signature of the pathogenesis of achalasia.

Endoscopic resection of upper GI extraluminal tumors (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic resection is a feasible treatment for GI extraluminal tumors but remains a challenging procedure with limited data. In this study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection for extraluminal tumors in the upper GI tract. METHODS: From May 2016 to December 2021, 109 patients undergoing endoscopic resection for extraluminal tumors in the upper GI tract were retrospectively included. Clinicopathologic characteristics, procedure-related parameters, adverse events (AEs), and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The en-bloc tumor resection rate was 94.5% and en-bloc retrieval rate 86.2%. Statistical analysis revealed tumor size ≥3.0 cm and irregular shape as significant risk factors for piecemeal extraction. Resection time and suture time were 46.8 ± 33.6 minutes and 20.6 ± 20.1 minutes, respectively. Large tumor size was significantly associated with a longer procedure duration. Five patients (4.6%) experienced major AEs, including recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hydrothorax, major bleeding, local peritonitis, duodenal leakage, and repeat endoscopic surgery for tumor extraction. Minor AEs occurred in 13 patients (11.9%). Irregular tumor shape and tumor location (duodenum) were significantly associated with AE occurrence. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.7 ± 3.3 days. No recurrence or metastasis was observed during the mean follow-up period of 31.8 ± 15.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic resection is a safe and feasible therapeutic approach for upper GI extraluminal tumors. Tumor size, shape, and location impact the difficulty and safety of the procedure. Endoscopic resection of duodenal tumors is also feasible but associated with an increased risk of AEs compared with tumors in other locations.