Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 19(1): 14, 2024 Jan 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38167107

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised regarding the impact of preoperative intravenous dexamethasone on postoperative glycemic control in diabetic patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This study aimed to determine relationships between preoperative different dexamethasone regimens and postoperative fasting blood glucose (FBG), as well as to identify risk factors for postoperative FBG ≥ 200 mg/dl in diabetic patients undergoing TJA. METHODS: This retrospective study included 1216 diabetic patients undergoing TJA and categorized into group A (dexamethasone = 0 mg), group B (dexamethasone = 5 mg), and group C (dexamethasone = 10 mg). All dexamethasone was administered before skin incision. FBG levels were monitored until postoperative day (POD) 3. Analyses were conducted for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and wound complications during 90 days postoperatively. And the risk factors for postoperative FBG ≥ 200 mg/dl were identified. RESULTS: Preoperative dexamethasone administration resulted in a transiently higher FBG on POD 0 and POD 1 (all P < 0.001). However, no differences were observed on POD 2 (P = 0.583) and POD 3 (P = 0.131) among three groups. While preoperative dexamethasone led to an increase in postoperative mean FBG and postoperative maximum FBG (all P < 0.001), no differences were found in wound complications (P = 0.548) and PJI (P = 1.000). Increased HbA1c and preoperative high FBG, but not preoperative dexamethasone, were identified as risk factors for postoperative FBG ≥ 200 mg/dl. Preoperative HbA1c level of ≥ 7.15% was associated with an elevated risk of postoperative FBG ≥ 200 mg/dl. CONCLUSIONS: Although preoperative intravenous administration of 5 mg or 10 mg dexamethasone in diabetic patients showed transient effects on postoperative FBG after TJA, no differences were found in the rates of PJI and wound complications during 90 days postoperatively. Notably, patients with a preoperative HbA1c level of ≥ 7.15% and elevated preoperative FBG may encountered postoperative FBG ≥ 200 mg/dl.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemoglobina Glucada , Control Glucémico , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artritis Infecciosa/etiología , Dexametasona
2.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1246733, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37731717

RESUMEN

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of bone wax in reducing blood loss in various orthopedic surgeries. However, the effect of bone wax on total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of bone wax in THA. Methods: We enrolled 104 patients in this randomized controlled trial. These patients were randomized (1:1) to either the bone wax or control group. The primary outcome was total blood loss after THA. The secondary outcomes included serum hemoglobin (Hb) level, change in Hb level, lower limb diameters on the first and third postoperative day (POD), range of motion at discharge, length of postoperative hospital stay, and adverse events. Results: Patients in the bone wax group had significantly lower total blood loss on PODs 1 and 3 (p < 0.05). Moreover, patients in the bone wax group performed better in terms of postoperative serum Hb level, change in Hb level on PODs 1 and 3, and length of postoperative hospital stay (all p < 0.05). Patients in the bone wax group did not experience any bone wax-related adverse events. Conclusion: Bone wax administration in THA significantly reduced perioperative blood loss. Therefore, bone wax is promising for optimizing blood-conserving management protocols in THA. Clinical trial registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [ChiCTR2100043868].

3.
Orthop Surg ; 14(2): 246-253, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34898021

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the clinical outcomes between unstemmed and stemmed constrained condylar knees (CCK) in complex primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of implant survivorship, change in outcome evaluations, and complications. METHODS: We reviewed 156 consecutive patients who received primary TKA using PFC®SIGMA®TC3 (TC3) of constrained condylar design between January 2009 and January 2017 at our institution. After removing patients who met exclusion criteria, 25 patients were identified as unstemmed TC3 cases and 81 as stemmed TC3 cases. Propensity score matching was used to select 25 stemmed cases as a control group for the unstemmed group with comparable preoperative conditions including preoperative demographics, preoperative diagnosis, preoperative range of motion, main reason to use TC3, ASA score (American Society of Anesthesiologists), and follow-up duration. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations including Knee Society Score (KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), and the range of motion (ROM) were obtained and compared. The instability, periprosthetic fracture, radiolucent lines, polyethylene wear, and heterotrophic ossification were assessed according to the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the knee. The complications and implant survivorship between the two groups were also recorded and compared. RESULTS: 3After the index surgery, both groups showed substantial improvement in KSS (knee and function), HSS score, SF-12, and ROM compared with baseline. There was no significant difference in the mean KSS scores (knee and function), HSS score, SF-12, and ROM between the unstemmed and stemmed group postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was found in the overall complication rate between the two groups. The overall Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 98.0% (95% confidence interval 94.1%-100.0%) at 7 years. No significant difference was found in the survival rate between the unstemmed group (100.0%) and the stemmed group (96.0%) at 7 years (log rank, P = 0.317). The mean duration of follow-up was 7.0 years for unstemmed group and 7.7 years for stemmed group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with adequate bone stock receiving complex primary TKA, unstemmed CCK could achieve similar clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up as stemmed CCK.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Puntaje de Propensión , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 16(1): 519, 2021 Aug 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34419108

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (NONFH) is a devastating disease, and the risk factors associated with progression into collapse after core decompression (CD) remain poorly defined. Therefore, we aim to define risk factors associated with collapse-free survival (CFS) after CD of precollapse NONFH and to propose a nomogram for individual risk prediction. METHODS: According to the baseline characteristics, clinical information, radiographic evaluations, and laboratory examination, a nomogram was developed using a single institutional cohort of patients who received multiple drilling for precollapse NONFH between January 2007 and December 2019 to predict CFS after CD of precollapse NONFH. Furthermore, we used C statistics, calibration plot, and Kaplan-Meier curve to test the discriminative ability and calibration of the nomogram to predict CFS. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-three patients who underwent CD for precollapse NONFH were retrospectively screened and included in the present study. Using a multiple Cox regression to identify relevant risk factors, the following risk factors were incorporated in the prediction of CFS: acute onset of symptom (HR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.03-7.48; P = 0.043), necrotic location of Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) C1 and C2 (HR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.20-11.27; P = 0.023), necrotic angle in the range of 250-299°(HR, 5.08; 95% CI, 1.73-14.93; P = 0.003) and > 299° (HR, 9.96; 95% CI, 3.23-30.70; P < 0.001), and bone marrow edema (BME) before CD (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.02-4.02; P = 0.042). The C statistics was 0.82 for CFS which revealed good discriminative ability and calibration of the nomogram. CONCLUSIONS: Independent predictors of progression into collapse after CD for precollapse NONFH were identified to develop a nomogram predicting CFS. In addition, the nomogram could divide precollapse NONFH patients into prognosis groups and performed well in internal validation.


Asunto(s)
Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral , Cabeza Femoral/fisiología , Descompresión , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/cirugía , Humanos , Nomogramas , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Surgeon ; 15(6): 336-348, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28756064

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To determine whether computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more suitable for the patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) systems for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 2016 for prospective comparative trials that compared CT- versus MRI-based PSI systems for TKA. Our predefined primary outcome was the outliers incidence of coronal overall limb alignment. RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 336 knees meeting the eligibility criteria, and four trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with MRI-based PSI systems, CT-based PSI systems were associated with a higher outliers incidence of coronal overall limb alignment (risk ratio: 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-2.72; P = 0.04), more angular errors of coronal overall limb alignment (mean difference (MD): 1.01°; 95% CI: 0.47-1.56; P = 0.0003), and longer operation time (MD: 5.02 min; 95% CI: 1.26-8.79; P = 0.009). While no significant differences in the coronal/sagittal alignment of the femoral/tibial component outliers, the angular errors of coronal overall limb alignment, the angular errors of the femoral/tibial component in coronal plane, or incidence of change of implant size of the femoral/tibial component were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The current limited evidence suggests that MRI-based PSI systems exhibit higher accuracy for TKA regarding the coronal limb axis than CT-based PSI systems. However, well-designed studies comparing CT-versus MRI-based PSI systems for TKA are warrant to confirm these results before widespread use of this technique can be recommended.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/instrumentación , Humanos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA