New reconstruction for bone integration of non-vascularized autogenous bone graft with better bony union and revascularisation.

INTRODUCTION: Phalangeal defects are often seen after tumor resection, infections, and in complex open hand fractures. In many cases, reconstruction is difficult and amputation is performed to avoid prolonged rehabilitation that is often associated with a poor outcome. In these cases, the maintenance of length and function presents a reconstructive challenge. METHODS: We reviewed 11 patients who underwent extensive phalangeal reconstruction with non-vascularized bone graft from the iliac crest using a key-in-slot-joint technique to provide acceptable function and bony union. RESULTS: In each case, non-vascularized bone graft with a length of 1.4-6.0 cm was used to reconstruct the phalanx. Follow-up ranged from 6 weeks to 5 months, and in all cases, there was bony union after 6 weeks. We evaluated range of motion, function, and as well pain and grip strength of the fingers. CONCLUSIONS: This case series suggests that a key-in-slot technique allows non-vascularized bone graft to be used in complex large phalangeal bone defects. Due to better bone contact, a sufficient perfusion and revascularisation of the non-vascularized bone graft can be achieved for a quicker and stable bony union. This method appears to be an alternative to amputation in selected cases with a satisfactory soft-tissue envelope.

[Analysis of Diagnosis Related Groups and their Impact on Health Care in Post Massive Weight Loss Surgery]. / Analyse von Fallpauschalen und deren versorgungsrelevante Effekte in der postbariatrischen Wiederherstellungschirurgie.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) were introduced in Germany as a medico-economic classification system in 2004. In this analysis, we looked at restorative surgery after massive weight loss, focusing on reimbursement of this fee-per-case system in comparison to costs to deduce possible effects on health care over time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: First we analysed the algorithms for the relevant DRGs including data about length of stay and reimbursement. Furthermore, we integrated cost data from German reference hospitals of the last 5 years as well as single-centre data from a university hospital. RESULTS: Due to a diagnosis-related algorithm, coding will constantly lead to DRG K07Z. In 2016, a new diagnosis code specific to massive weight loss was introduced, which now leads to DRG J10B. As a result, reimbursement is reduced by more than half. In the cost matrix, staff, general ward, operation theatre and anaesthesia were identified as the main cost drivers. As expected, there was a statistically significant correlation between general ward costs and time of stay in hospital as well as operation theatre costs and incision-suture time. Considering the cost data of the reference hospitals, there was an average excess of EUR 781 per case whereas our own cost data revealed a deficit of EUR 1 700 to 2 700 per case. This is mainly due to the fact that approximately one third of our patient cohort underwent highly elaborate circular body lifts. CONCLUSION: It has to be questioned whether a newly introduced main diagnosis code can be applied as such without any underlying cost data having been collected in previous years. Given unchanged treatment measures, the main cost drivers identified by us remain the same, which means that there is no rationale for a drop in revenue. In addition to providing incentives for an efficient use of resources and quality optimisation, this system should offer medical service providers a sustainable and realistic possibility to break even.

[Technique of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Severe Radiocarpal Arthrosis: Status Quo after 24 Months]. / Technik der autologen Chondrozytenimplantation bei ausgeprägter Radiokarpalarthrose: Status quo nach 24 Monaten.

We illustrate the operative technique of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) to restore a 4° cartilage damage of the radius surface in the case of a 22-year-old patient, and report on the clinical and radiological results at 6 and 24 months postoperatively.

[Development of diagnosis-related groups in different surgical disciplines]. / Entwicklung der Fallpauschalenvergütung in verschiedenen chirurgischen Fachgebieten.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of Diagnosis-Re-lat-ed Groups (DRGs) in Germany, the variables of remuneration have continuously changed. Subjectively, reimbursement by DRG has a negative connotation among all specialities. We analysed the development of reimbursement and length of stay in different surgical specialties. MATERIAL AND METHODS: By grouping the top-10-diagnoses and therapies in hand surgery, trauma surgery, general surgery as well as cardiothoracic and vascular surgery between 2004 and 2010, DRGs were obtained, compared and the data deduced. RESULTS: While the lower threshold of length of stay remained almost the same, mean value and upper threshold became shorter in most of the top-10-diagnoses. During the observation period, total reimbursement increased by 30 % in hand surgery, 20 % in general surgery and 17 % in cardiothoracic and vascular surgery, while in trauma surgery it decreased by 1 %. This corresponds to mean annual growth rates of 4.47 %, 3.08 %, 2.68 % and - 0.15 %, respectively. No correlation was found between the 4 disciplines and macro-economic parameters. CONCLUSION: Reductions of mean and upper thresholds of length of stay are present in all surgical disciplines. Total reimbursements developed partially in a contradictory manner. Negative growth involves the danger that hospital investments cannot be realised, especially in the presence of high personnel costs.

[Economic profit of different injuries in a centre for hand surgery - replantation vs. amputation]. / Ökonomischer Profit von Fingerverletzungen in einem handchirurgischen Zentrum - Replantation vs. Amputation.

INTRODUCTION: The Institute for Reimbursements in Hospital (InEK) annually provides an updated DRG system to ensure the medical service providers with a cost-covering remunera-tion. However, the underlying cost data are often opaque and disclosure of the basis of calculation does not take place. On the basis of cost and revenue data from our clinic between 2010 and 2012, a profit statement for amputations and replantation of one or more fingers was employed and compared with the nationwide data of the calculation clinics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inpatient days, the revenue and the costs incurred in our clinic based on the cost matrix of InEK costing manual [4] were determined for amputation (DRG X05B), replantation of one (DRG X07B) and several fingers (DRG X07A). The profit was calculated as the difference between revenues and costs. Further-more, a comparison of our data with the nationwide data of InEK was applied. RESULTS: For each of the 3 DRGs the actual costs in our clinic were higher than the costs generated by InEK. Only amputation appeared profitable, while all limb-preserving interventions were associated with losses for our hospital. There was a clear discrepancy between the data of cost of InEK GmbH to the data of our clinic. CONCLUSION: In order not to create any monetary disincentives at the expense of quality of care of individual patients, a cost-covering patient care for all case groups mentioned above should be ensured. The general distrust in the InEK's data that results from such a discrepancy in the cost data can only be rebutted by increasing transparency and disclosure of the calculation basis.

Severe posttraumatic radiocarpal cartilage damage: first report of autologous chondrocyte implantation.

STUDY DESIGN: Case report. CLINICAL QUESTION: Traumatic articular cartilage defects predispose to secondary osteoarthritis accompanied by impairment or complete loss of function in the corresponding joint. On this account, the timely and correct diagnosis as well as the selection of an appropriate therapy for reconstruction of articular cartilage defects is important. METHODS: A 22-year-old healthy male patient with history of traumatic intra-articular distal radius fracture is presented with in the course detectable 4° cartilage damage in the fovea scaphoidea and into the fovea lunata. For the first time, autologous chondrocyte implantation by the use of an in situ polymerizable albumin-hyaluronic acid gel was performed to restore the articular cartilage. RESULTS: The assessment 6 months after autologous chondrocyte implantation using the standard DASH questionnaire for upper extremity pointed out an improvement in the patient outcome (DASH score pre-operative: 10.8 and 6 months post-operative: 7.5). The clinical examination also showed an improvement in the range of movement of the wrist without pain. The radiological control investigation (MRI- examination) of the wrist 6 months after implantation also revealed a good integration of the implant. CONCLUSION: The case presented here demonstrates the first use of autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage reconstruction using an in situ polymerizable albumin-hyaluronic acid gel after traumatic cartilage lesion with 4° cartilage damage of the wrist in a 22-year-old non-smoking, active and healthy man. Initial results are promising in terms of mobility, pain and patient outcome. However, further clinical studies have to be performed with larger number of cases.

Reimbursement for tissue reconstruction by pedicled and free flaps across five European countries. The importance of autologous breast reconstruction.

AIM: Case payment mechanisms have become the principle means of remunerating hospitals in many countries. We analysed the reimbursement for different types of autologous tissue transfer in five European countries. METHODS: We looked at common surgical options for breast reconstruction and flaps at other body regions. The principle diagnosis was systematically modified and processed with national grouper software to identify the relevant Diagnosis-Related Groups. RESULTS: The mean difference in payment was 4509 € in breast reconstruction versus only 2599 € in other locations. According to the underlying diagnosis for reconstruction, procedures after resection of malignant breast cancer showed higher reimbursement (mean 8319 €) than of other body parts (mean 6454 €). Sweden had the highest mean reimbursement (9589 €) followed by Austria (8032 €), Germany (7259 €), Italy (6667 €) and the UK (6037 €). Austria, Italy and the UK showed significant differences of reimbursement between pedicled flaps of the breast and other parts of the body. CONCLUSION: International data for the benchmarking and refinement of a national compensation system can be a useful instrument in identifying ways of improving each system. Across a spectrum of European countries, reimbursement for the reconstruction of the breast and other body parts was analysed and characteristics were identified. As rationalisation of healthcare becomes widespread in European countries, the need for individualised reimbursement which correlates accordingly is becoming ever more important.

A European comparison of reimbursement in breast reconstruction.

AIMS: Case payment mechanisms have become the principal means of remunerating hospitals in most developed countries. The purpose of this study was to make an international comparison of reimbursement for breast reconstructive surgery. METHODS: We analysed remuneration for unilateral and bilateral female breast reconstruction (pedicled flaps, free flaps, alloplastic procedures) across five different European countries. National grouper software was used to identify Diagnosis Related Groups from which the proceeds were derived. RESULTS: The mean reimbursement was € 5593 for pedicled flaps, € 9149 for free flaps and € 4037 for implant-based reconstructions. The highest payments were in Sweden and the lowest in Italy. When adjusting payments by purchasing power parities, the relation among the countries did not change. The Austrian system makes a clear distinction between one-stage and two-stage delayed reconstructive interventions whereas reimbursement in other countries favoured a two-stage approach. Only one of five national reimbursement systems distinguishes between unilateral and bilateral reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS: Across a spectrum of European countries, reimbursement for breast reconstruction was based on similar procedure-specific systems, although there was a wide variation in tariffs and consideration of other factors such as underlying diagnosis. As delivery of healthcare becomes more rationalised, there is a need for individualised reimbursement which correlates directly with activity. Drawing on the experience of different healthcare systems may lead to development of a more robust and fair system of reimbursement.

[Comparison between the Austrian and German DRG systems in hand surgery]. / Vergleich der Handchirurgie im österreichischen und deutschen Fallpauschalensystem.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) are a patient classification system grouping related types of patients treated to the resources they consumed. In this analysis, we compared the Austrian and the German DRG systems. METHOD: The 15 most common hand surgical diagnoses and their corresponding operative treatment were transferred into the Austrian system. Thus, the length of stay and the reimbursement of both countries could be obtained and compared. RESULTS: The mean values and the median values of the upper and lower thresholds of length of stay as well as the average length of stay were all lower in Austria compared to Germany. Reimbursement in Germany was higher in 13 of 19 cases. Total proceeds amounted to 1.67 million in the German and 1.70 million in the Austrian health care system. Considering the purchasing power applying consumer prize parities, the difference of reimbursement between the countries rose to 130,000 which equals a difference of almost 8%. CONCLUSION: Reimbursement of the top 15 diagnoses in hand surgery in Austria is 8% higher than in Germany. Except for one case, mean values as well as upper and lower thresholds of length of stay are considerably shorter in Austria. Comparison of international data to refine a national compensation system is advocated.

[Development of length of stay and reimbursement in elective hand surgery after the introduction of DRGs in Germany]. / Entwicklung von Verweildauer und Vergütung handchirurgischer Elektiveingriffe durch Einführung der DRGs in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Since its introduction in Germany, the DRG (Diagnosis-Related Groups) system is often fraught with negative connotations. Frequent points of criticism are a deterioration of patient care by decreasing length of stay (LOS) in hospital and a decline in reimbursement. The following investigation analyzes and compares the development of length of stay and reimbursement in hand surgery based on the 3 most common elective procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The main diagnoses scaphoid nonunion (PSA), Dupuytren's contracture (DK) and rhizarthrosis (RIA) were evaluated for number of cases, length of stay, reimbursement per day and total reimbursement in 2000 as well as 2010 based on the data of our clinic. Patients covered by the Employers' Liability Insurance were not included. Only inpatient cases were considered. RESULTS: In PSA and RIA an increase in the number of cases is reported (PSA: +11 cases; RIA: +26 cases) and a decrease in DK ( - 7 cases). The sum of the total hospital days declined despite rising case numbers predominantly between 65 (RIA) and 260 days (DK). The average LOS decreased by 3.1 days at DK (48.4%) to 4.1 days at PSA (52.6%). Average revenues per day in 2000 amounted to 379 €, which corresponds to 442 € adjusted for inflation in 2010. Average revenue per day in 2010 was 755 € (RIA), 797 € (PSA) and 876 € (DK). Revenue per case in 2010 were only higher than in 2000, when 5 (RIA) or 6 hospital days (DK and PSA) were not exceeded. CONCLUSION: With declining revenue per case, the average income per day increased by a reduction in hospital days. A positive or at least equivalent revenue situation can thus only be achieved by a distinct concentration of labor and reduction of hospital days under the DRG-system.

An international opinion research survey of the etiology, diagnosis, therapy and outcome of Kienböck's disease (KD).

OBJECTIVES: Every fourth publication on Kienböck's disease (KD) is based for the most part on rather divergent expert opinion. We therefore surveyed expert opinion on KD in three European countries: (1) for the suspected aetiologies; (2) routinely used diagnostic tools; (3) recommended treatment and (4) expected outcome. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of 16 questions was handed out at the national meetings for surgery of the hand in Germany (DE), France (FR) in 2009 and in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2010. RESULTS: Among the 126 surgeons who participated in the survey, 82 had a national diploma for surgery of the hand. None of the most commonly discussed etiopathological hypotheses were estimated as being very likely. Hand/arm vibration exposure was considered less likely among respondents in France and the UK than among respondents in Germany. Treatment recommendations are very heterogeneous for stage IIIB according to Lichtman. CONCLUSIONS: Expert opinions on diagnostic criteria, the pathogenesis and the choice of treatment are not consistent and may vary from one country to another.

[Development of DRGs in reconstructive breast surgery]. / Fallpauschalenentwicklung in der rekonstruktiven Mammachirurgie.

Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) were introduced in Germany in 2004 as a medico-economic classification system. In this analysis, we looked at reconstructive surgery after breast cancer, focusing on changes of the fee-per-case system in the last 6 years. Immediate, delayed, pedicle and free flaps as well as alloplastic reconstructive methods were analysed using data from German reference hospitals. We analysed the length of stay, reimbursements, costs and profits. The biggest profit margin was found in free perforator flaps. These were up to 3 times higher than in alloplastic reconstruction and pedicle flaps. Due to the fact that the underlying costs for the calculation of reimbursement are always retrospective, we accounted for the rate of price increase. In spite of increasing mean profits, foregone profits of up to €574 per case due to inflation were not taken into consideration. Contrary to actual guidelines, neither the immediate reconstruction of the breast by autologous tissue, nor the bilateral reconstruction is taken into account economically. Although a more differentiated reimbursement of breast reconstruction by DRG has taken place in the last years, the subject still remains a classical example for insufficient mapping of new medical standards in our DRG system. As the choice of surgical therapy is increasingly influenced by free market mechanisms, the risk for economic selection in contradiction to clinical recommendations becomes a real problem. Even 9 years after its introduction, the German DRG system is far from being a learning or quick adapting system.

[100 years after Kienböck's description: review of the etiology of Kienböck's disease from a historical perspective]. / 100 Jahre nach Kienböck: Literaturübersicht über die Ursachenforschung der Mondbeinnekrosen.

Kienböck's disease (KD) leads to collapse of the lunate bone with severe consequences for the wrist function which for some patients may result in occupational invalidity. The many synonyms of KD (aseptic necrosis or avascular necrosis) insinuate that the true etiopathology remains poorly understood. This reviews aims at exploring the level of evidence which brought forward the different hypotheses on the origin of KD. The widespread theories about the origin were formed about 100 years ago but a specific therapy is still not within reach. Although the cause of the disease remains essentially unknown it is officially recognized as an occupational disease in Germany. Empirical attempts to explain the etiopathology are based on compression of the lunate, impaired vascularity through vibration exposition, fracture and dislocation of the lunate from the radiolunate fossa. The level of evidence urges a cautious interpretation of currently discussed hypotheses on the etiology of KD.

Reimbursement of burns by DRG in four European countries: an analysis.

PURPOSE: To analyze the German, Austrian, Italian and Spanish Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG)-systems regarding burns. METHODS: We analyzed 78 cases of inpatients with burns which were processed by national DRG-groupers. DRGs were linked to thresholds concerning length of stay as well as reimbursement tables of the respective countries. MAIN FINDINGS: Fifty-one % of cases showed higher reimbursement in Germany compared to Austria, 55% compared to Italy and 67% as against Spain. Total proceeds are highest in Austria with 1,577,000 €, followed by Italy with 1,569,000 €, Germany with 1,502,000 € and Spain with 902,596 €. No correlation was found between macroeconomic key figures and our data. CONCLUSIONS: International comparison of reimbursement of burns by DRG could be a useful instrument for benchmarking while not depending solely on political decisions or country-specific cost data. For better comparability, hospital indices based on healthcare baskets should be discussed.

[Primary treatment of complicated flexor tendon injuries of the hand]. / Primärversorgung komplizierter Beugesehnenverletzungen an der Hand.

Complicated flexor tendon injuries are classified into lacerations, avulsions, ruptures, and defects. They are often a challenge for hand surgeons and frequently they present unsatisfactory functional results postoperatively. Lacerations and avulsions are usually treated by pull-out sutures and suture anchors. In ruptures, the causality should be sought. Tendon-linking, transposition and tenodesis/arthrodesis are the domain of rheumatoid arthritis. The primary transplantation of tendons is rarely indicated, ideally in non-contaminated flexor tendon defects in zones III-V with an uninjured surrounding soft tissue situation. Postoperative rehabilitation programs are very the same as in normal flexor tendon injuries.

[Comparison of hand surgery in the German and Italian DRG systems]. / Vergleich der Handchirurgie im deutschen und italienischen DRG-System.

Diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) are a patient classification system grouping related types of patients treated to the resources they consumed. In this analysis we compared the Italian and the German DRG systems regarding hand surgery with an emphasis on reimbursement of clinical cases. The 15 most common hand surgical diagnoses and their corresponding operative treatment in our clinic in 2009 were processed using a DRG grouper. The underlying data were transferred to the Italian system. Thus, the length of stay and the reimbursement of both countries could be obtained and compared. The latter was adjusted and corrected by the purchasing power of each country. The mean of the upper threshold of length of stay was 10 days in the German as well as the Italian system whereas the median was 2 times higher in Italy (6 vs. 12 days). Fifteen out of 19 cases showed higher reimbursement in Germany. The case mix index (CMI) of 0.917 in Germany represents a mean payment of 2,676 € per case. In Italy the hypothetical CMI of 0.635 resulted in a mean reimbursement of 1,853 € per case. The biggest difference in remuneration could be found for replantation of multiple fingers. For this service the German health-care system pays 12,320 € more than the Italian. Total proceeds of the top 15 diagnoses applying the number of cases treated in our clinic revealed 1.7 million € in the German and 1.2 million € in the Italian DRG system. Considering the purchasing power utilizing consumer prize parities, the difference of reimbursement between the countries decreased to 300,000 €. There is no mean length of stay per DRG in Italy, only the upper threshold of length of stay is determined. In most cases the latter is higher in Italy compared to Germany. The consumption of resources for finger replantation is not adequately represented in the Italian DRG system compared to finger amputation. Reimbursement of inpatient care is influenced by multiple factors not being subject to the free market economy. For this reason only descriptive comparison is feasible.

[Comparison of pedicle and free tissue transfers in the German DRG system]. / Abbildung gestielter und freier Lappenplastiken im deutschen Fallpauschalensystem.

Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) are a patient classification system grouping related types of patients to the resources they have consumed. In this analysis, we compared pedicle and free flaps in plastic and reconstructive surgery in the actual German DRG system. After grouping common flaps while systematically modifying the diagnosis, the operative procedure(s), and the receptor site, reimbursement and thresholds of length of stay were identified. The mean value of the average length of stay was higher in free flaps as compared to pedicle flaps (15 vs. 9 days) and the mean reimbursement in free flaps was almost twice as high as in pedicle flaps (8 936 € vs. 4 582 €). Regarding the diagnosis, third-grade open fractures in pedicle flaps and full-thickness burns in free flaps are in the vanguard of reimbursement. Higher DRG conformity is generally found with free flaps. Different possibilities in coding the procedures and the strong dependence on the underlying diagnosis lead to variations of remuneration and length of stay, which are not explainable and sometimes even seem paradoxical. Furthermore, mixed calculation creates DRGs that lose the ability to describe the real effort.

[Development of DRG-reimbursement in hand surgery]. / Entwicklung der Vergütung von DRG-Fällen in der Handchirurgie.

Since the introduction of Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) in 2004 in Germany the variables of remuneration changed continuously. Subjectively, reimbursement of DRG in hand surgery has a negative connotation among colleagues. We analyzed the development of reimbursement as well as the length of stay of inpatients over time in Hand Surgery considering various parameters concentrating on trends and correlation with macroeconomic parameters. The Top 10 diagnoses and therapies between 2004 and 2010 in our clinic were grouped and resulting DRGs with further linked data could be obtained. In addition to the Base Rate the Pay Base Rate (the effective Base Rate in a certain hospital considering compensatory payment) and the Z-Bax (the value that was reimbursed by the national health insurance per Base Rate) were used to calculate reimbursement. These were multiplied with the number of cases treated in 2009 obtaining the different total annual remuneration. The lower threshold of length of stay was constant over time, the middle length of stay became shorter in most of the Top 10 diagnoses whereas the upper threshold of length of stay was reduced to half of the time. The Base Rate and the Pay Base Rate increased by the end of the period but were outmatched by the Z-Bax as an indicator for the general level of reimbursement in Germany. Total remuneration between 2004 and 2009 was compared applying the Z-Bax and the Base Rate as well as the Pay Base Rate, respectively. For the latter, a surplus of 244 000 Euros and 311 000 Euros were calculated, respectively. No correlation with the Gross National Product or the Rate of Inflation could be found. The Pay Base Rate as the rate of effective payment in our clinic declined by 7% whereas the consumer price index gained 8,6% resulting in a loss of purchasing power of almost 16% in a 6-year period.