Management of post-radiation carotid blowout syndrome in patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication that can occur in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), especially with a history of radiotherapy. This study aimed to review and initially compare managements for post-radiation CBS in patients with HNC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of published studies was performed. Information including management, survival, and complication were collected. RESULTS: A total of 39 articles and 917 cases were included in the systematic review. The interval between radiation therapy and CBS ranged from 1.2 years to 17.8 years. The managements of CBS included embolization, stent, bypass surgery, surgical ligation, electrocoagulation, flap coverage, arterial repair, and nasopharyngeal packing. The cumulative 30-day, 1-year, and 2-year overall survival rates were 85.2 %, 48.9 %, and 37.0 %, respectively, with a median survival time of 11.3 months. Disease progression and rebleeding were the most common death causes. The lowest rebleeding rate and neurologic complications rate were presented in cases receiving bypass surgery at 1.4 % and 10.8 %, respectively. The highest rebleeding rate of 35.6 % was showed in cases underwent stent, and the highest neurologic complications rate of 32.0 % was showed in cases underwent ligation. CONCLUSION: Post-radiation CBS in patients with HNC had a low survival rate and high complication rate. Rebleeding and neurologic complication were common complications. Endovascular embolization and stent were the mainstream management, and bypass surgery presented a promising outcome in survival and complication for selected patients.

Extracranial/Intracranial Vascular Bypass in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer - Related Carotid Blowout Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the endovascular intervention or extracranial/intracranial (EC/IC) vascular bypass in the management of patients with head and neck cancer-related carotid blowout syndrome (CBS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical data of patients with head and neck cancer-related CBS treated by endovascular intervention and/or EC/IC vascular bypass, analysis of its bleeding control, neurological complications, and survival results. RESULTS: Thrity-seven patients were included. Twenty-five were associated with external carotid artery (ECA); twelve were associated with internal or common carotid artery (ICA/CCA). All patients with ECA hemorrhage were treated with endovascular embolization. Of the 12 patients with ICA/CCA hemorrhage, 9 underwent EC/IC bypass, 1 underwent endovascular embolization, and 3 underwent endovascular stenting. For patients with ECA-related CBS, the median survival was 6 months, and the 90-day, 1-year, and 2-year survival rates were 67.1%, 44.7%, and 33.6%, respectively; the estimated rebleeding risk at 1-month, 6-month, and 2-year was 7.1%, 20.0%, and 31.6%, respectively. For patients with ICA/CCA-related CBS, the median survival was 22.5 months, and the 90-day, 1-year, and 2-year survival rates were 92.3%, 71.8%, and 41.0%, respectively; the estimated rebleeding risk at 1 month, 6 months, and 2 years is 7.7%,15.4%, and 15.4%, respectively. ICA/CCA-related CBS patients have significantly longer survival time and lower risk of rebleeding, which may be related to the more use of EC/IC vascular bypass as a definite treatment. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with ICA/CCA-related CBS, if there is more stable hemodynamics, longer expected survival, EC/IC vascular bypass is preferred. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:1548-1556, 2021.