RESUMEN
Little is known about the clinical characteristics of hospital patients who do not meet standard utilization review criteria for acute care settings. This study examined whether patients with either inappropriate hospital admissions or days of care were less severely ill on a number of indicators compared to those designated as appropriate by a widely used utilization review instrument. Using data from a probability sample of 6063 medical and surgical hospitalizations at 50 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers, we found strong associations between the appropriateness of admissions and days of care and four indicators of severity of illness. These results suggest that utilization management programs and preadmission screening probably successfully screen out less severely ill patients who have less need of hospital-level services.
Asunto(s)
Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estado Civil , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This study indicates that the majority of patients admitted to VA hospitals for medical detoxification could have those services provided on an outpatient or less intensive basis. However, inpatient medical detoxification services appear to be appropriate for those alcoholics at risk for potential life-threatening complications of withdrawal such as delirium tremens, or those with concurrent associated medical conditions such as pancreatitis, gastrointestinal bleeding, or complications of cirrhosis. Data were obtained from a national random sample of hospitalizations in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) inpatient medical and surgical units. Medical records for 144 alcoholism-related medical admissions to 35 VA medical centers were reviewed using the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP), a clinically based utilization review instrument widely used in the private sector. The medical records for the admission and each day of medical/surgical inpatient stay were reviewed using clinical criteria for the appropriateness of acute inpatient care as opposed to lower levels of care.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/terapia , Unidades Hospitalarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Inactivación Metabólica/fisiología , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos , Alcoholismo/complicaciones , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Hospitales de Veteranos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the determinants of primary care office visit rates. DATA SOURCES: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Iowa subscriber information was sorted by residence into geographic health service areas. Cost-sharing information was also obtained from Blue Cross. Physician supply data were obtained from The University of Iowa, Office of Community-Based Programs. Hospital data were reported by the Iowa Hospital Association. STUDY DESIGN: Cases were classified into ambulatory care groups (ACGs). Use rates were computed for each group in each service area. Ordinary least squares regression models were developed to model geographic variation in each ACG-specific primary care visit rate. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Regression models were not significant for five out of eleven ACGs studied. Out-of-pocket expense significantly affected utilization in three out of six. The number of primary care practices per capita had a significant effect on utilization in two ACGs. The supply of hospital outpatient services was significant in one ACG. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings reveal that some ACGs are price-sensitive and some are not. Policies aimed at changing levels of primary care use should taken into account whether varying cost-sharing will influence consumer behavior in the desired direction.
Asunto(s)
Áreas de Influencia de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria/clasificación , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Planes de Seguros y Protección Cruz Azul/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Geografía , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Iowa , Masculino , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/provisión & distribución , Análisis de Regresión , Análisis de Área PequeñaRESUMEN
This paper presents strategies and empirical examples of comparative physician profiling under conditions of limited patient sample sizes and varying patient severity. A method by which clinical and cost outcomes may be evaluated simultaneously is also presented. Physician economic and clinical performance are compared using data abstracted from nine hospitals into the MedisGroups clinical information management system for inpatients treated from July, 1990 through June, 1992. The main outcome measures are comparative total and ancillary adjusted charges, and morbidity status. Results suggest that objective comparative outcome data provide useful information to assist in evaluating physician performance. A simultaneous comparison of clinical outcomes and adjusted charges identifies physicians who experience favorable outcomes at lower charges, as well as those who have higher charges and/or poorer outcomes. Strategies outlined in this paper may be of value to clinicians, governing boards, and third party payors. These strategies may be used to assist with privileging and other peer review activities when pursued proactively within a Continuous Quality Improvement framework to improve care.
Asunto(s)
Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/normas , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Servicios Técnicos en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Precios de Hospital , Humanos , Iowa/epidemiología , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Morbilidad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Gestión de la Calidad TotalRESUMEN
Rural hospitals have been threatened by declining revenues. Control over costs will be necessary to help these hospitals survive. Investigation of the determinants of hospital costs in Iowa reveals that costs are primarily caused by environmental factors, rather than variables over which managers have control. Furthermore, efforts by policy makers to improve hospital efficiency by stimulating competition among hospitals may have been ineffective, since the level of competition was not found to be associated with hospital production costs.
Asunto(s)
Eficiencia Organizacional/economía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Rurales/economía , Áreas de Influencia de Salud/economía , Áreas de Influencia de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Costos , Competencia Económica , Administración Financiera de Hospitales , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Hospitales Rurales/organización & administración , Hospitales Rurales/estadística & datos numéricos , Renta , Iowa , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Análisis de Regresión , Impuestos , Atención no RemuneradaRESUMEN
One important question for a utilization management program is whether the utilization review instrument is consistent or stable when used on many occasions by the same abstractor (intrarater reliability) or by several abstractors (inter-rater reliability). As part of a nationwide study of inappropriate utilization of inpatient services by the Department of Veterans Affairs, we conducted a thorough investigation of the inter-rater reliability of a widely used utilization review instrument by 27 nurse abstractors. All abstractors were extensively trained, both by the developers of the instrument and by use of practice medical records. A standard protocol for resolving questions was implemented, with immediate communication of decisions to abstractors. The results of three reliability assessments, conducted immediately after formal training, after several weeks of reviewing practice records, and midway through review of the study records, demonstrated good to excellent reliability, both when comparing the nurse abstractors with a physician gold standard and among themselves. Therefore, with appropriate training and monitoring, utilization management programs in large hospitals, multihospital systems, and other health care organizations needing to examine inpatient utilization should feel confident that they can achieve reviews that would be in close agreement with physician and other nurse abstractors. Such confidence should increase the acceptability of utilization management programs.
Asunto(s)
Indización y Redacción de Resúmenes/normas , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos/normas , Toma de Decisiones en la Organización , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/educación , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/educación , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
This study assessed the importance of the hospital sector to a regional economy by examining the estimated effects of direct and indirect hospital spending on the income and employment of a metropolitan region in Iowa and Illinois. The evaluation included the role of hospital services as a regional "export." In addition, the stabilizing impact of hospital spending during business cycles was examined. Results of the study indicated that the hospitals played a vital role in the economic stability and growth of the local community.
Asunto(s)
Relaciones Comunidad-Institución/economía , Administración Financiera de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Empleo/economía , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Empleo/tendencias , Administración Financiera de Hospitales/tendencias , Gastos en Salud , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Illinois , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Renta/tendencias , Iowa , Modelos EconómicosRESUMEN
Readmission rates are being proposed as an outcome indicator of hospital-level quality despite the lack of evidence of a relationship between a readmission and the quality of care provided during the preceding hospital stay. This study examined this relationship by comparing the quality of care provided to samples of 134 unplanned readmissions and 158 nonreadmissions from 50 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. Four groups of commonly used quality indicators and seven readmission risk factors were included in a logistic regression analysis. Inclusion of the quality indicators significantly increased the predictive power of the logistic models, with "unexpected transfer to a special care unit" being the only significant variable.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales de Veteranos/normas , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Grupos Raciales , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
There is much concern about administrative costs in health care. But little has been written on the market for health managers. This article discusses Bureau of Labor Statistics data estimating a total of 362,500 health managers in the United States in 1990 and projections showing an increase to 517,800 in 2005. The article further discusses the composition of health care employment in terms of settings and functions, and evaluates the implications of a rapidly changing market for health administrators. The authors conclude that sufficient demand exists for AUPHA programs to produce more graduates, but that curriculum should be revised and should place greater emphasis on efficient production of health services. This will provide qualitative differentiation and give health management training a competitive advantage over business and other educational backgrounds.
Asunto(s)
Administradores de Instituciones de Salud/provisión & distribución , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/tendencias , Selección de Profesión , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Curriculum/normas , Curriculum/tendencias , Educación de Postgrado/tendencias , Eficiencia Organizacional , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Predicción , Administradores de Instituciones de Salud/educación , Administración Hospitalaria/educación , Competencia Profesional/normas , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The Department of Veterans Affairs is a primary source of health care services for many of the nation's uninsured and underinsured. Changes in congressionally mandated eligibility criteria and limited increases in appropriations have forced the Department to adopt a policy of discharging chronic but stable outpatients who have been treated for non-service-connected health conditions. Survey data from one VA medical center suggest that many, but not all, of those discharged: 1) have either Medicare or private insurance coverage; 2) have not sought or found alternative physician services in their local communities; 3) have discontinued taking previously prescribed medications; 4) report worsened health status since discharge; and, 5) have been hospitalized. In general, discharged patients from the lowest income group report the greatest financial access barriers. Preliminary analyses of the discharge policy suggest the potential for decreased access to needed medical services due to financial factors and cost-shifting from the VA to patients and other federal, state and local payers and providers.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente , Enfermedad Crónica/economía , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Hospitales de Veteranos/economía , Hospitales de Veteranos/organización & administración , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Indigencia Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/economía , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/organización & administración , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
In 1989 the Catholic Health Association, in conjunction with the University of Iowa Center for Health Services Research, surveyed chief executive officers (CEOs) of rural hospitals regarding their hospital's viability and strategic behaviors and orientations. An extensive questionnaire was sent to the CEOs of all Catholic, all other religious not-for-profit, and all investor-owned rural hospitals, as well as to a 50 percent random sample of government and other not-for-profit rural hospitals. CEOs on average perceived that their hospital's viability relative to that of other rural hospitals was higher in 1989 than it had been in 1987. Ninety-four percent of hospitals whose CEOs perceived an increase in viability had been medium- or low-viability hospitals two years earlier. Thus, despite reports of deteriorating conditions for rural hospitals, rural hospital CEOs appeared to be relatively optimistic regarding their institution's viability. Changes in strategic direction accompanied these perceived increases in viability. The predominant strategic orientation adopted by rural hospitals in 1987 was that of the defender, but many hospitals that used this approach switched to the analyzer orientation by 1989. Significant shifts also occurred toward the reactor orientation from the analyzer and defender orientations. A greater percentage of hospitals with a perceived increase in viability between 1987 and 1989 altered their organizational role. The most common change for these hospitals was from limited care to basic care.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Hospitales Rurales/estadística & datos numéricos , Innovación Organizacional , Catolicismo , Directores de Hospitales/psicología , Directores de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Planificación Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Planificación Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales Religiosos/organización & administración , Hospitales Religiosos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Rurales/organización & administración , Técnicas de Planificación , Rol , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
While there is little agreement at the individual patient level of analysis, estimates of mean NI-attributed days of stay for the two methods were essentially the same. The lack of agreement at the individual patient level may reflect fundamental differences in the methods used to derive these estimates: incorporation of noninfected patient data versus exclusive reliance on data from infected patients; and, focus on length of stay rather than the actual care being received. The potential advantages of the AEP-based method include the following: 1) all patients with NI can be included in developing estimates; 2) estimates are based on the care provided rather than simple length of stay differences; 3) data on which to form the NI-day estimates are readily available in the medical record; 4) the AEP is a validated and commonly used utilization review instrument; 5) the AEP-based method has acceptable reliability; 6) this method is designed to provide individual and group estimates of NI-attributed days; 7) because every day of stay is reviewed, additional information is available, which results in greater precision of study of the development, diagnosis, and treatment of the NI relative to the other care that originally brought the patient into the hospital. The AEP-based method for estimating NI-days is a promising alternative to the historical cohort approach. Additional applications of this approach are encouraged to further assess its reliability,validity, and additional information yield.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Iowa/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
A critical issue for utilization management programs is how much of the hospitalization should be reviewed and whether information relative to the admission provides information about the subsequent days of stay. This study evaluates the relationship between the appropriateness (defined as overutilization of acute, inpatient services) of admissions and all days of stay in a probability sample of 6,063 hospitalizations from 50 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMCs). Results suggest that preadmission reviews in hospital-based utilization management programs may eliminate not only unnecessary admissions but also, in most cases, completely inappropriate hospitalizations. In addition, except where inpatient-appropriate surgeries are not performed in a timely manner, review of the rest of the stay may not be an efficient use of time and resources.
Asunto(s)
Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos/organización & administración , Recolección de Datos , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
As the rural healthcare environment changes, the abilities to assess the situation quickly and to implement decisions under conditions of uncertainty are crucial success factors. Rural healthcare providers and rural communities must examine certain assumptions underlying the delivery of healthcare services in rural areas, including the following: The rural renaissance of the 1970s will return. Rural communities need and want hospitals. Local physicians are the backbone of rural healthcare delivery. Transportation is a major barrier to healthcare service delivery. Competition in the delivery of healthcare services is appropriate for rural areas. The questionable validity of these assumptions implies that the current infrastructures for delivering rural healthcare services may no longer be appropriate. To adapt to changes, providers must (1) ensure changes fit with local conditions, (2) consider regionalization, (3) integrate all human services, not just health services, into a cooperative arrangement, (4) consider alternative configurations for providing physician services, and (5) place greater emphasis on transportation and telecommunication systems as means for ensuring timely access.
Asunto(s)
Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Hospitales Rurales/organización & administración , Toma de Decisiones en la Organización , Competencia Económica , Clausura de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/provisión & distribución , Innovación Organizacional , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Criteria are needed for use in designating some rural hospitals as essential so that they may receive state or federal assistance. Three types of criteria are considered in this analysis: hospital volume measures, hospital competitiveness measures, and community need measures. The criteria sets reflect different assumptions about the relationship between need and demand for health services. Analysis of available data reveals that neither hospital volume nor competitiveness is correlated with community need, meaning that different hospitals would be designated as essential under each system. Implications are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Política de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Hospitales Rurales/economía , Ocupación de Camas , Competencia Económica , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud , Hospitales Rurales/clasificación , Hospitales Rurales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Iowa , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estados Unidos , United States Office of Technology AssessmentRESUMEN
This study examined the relationships between appropriateness of readmission within two weeks of discharge and appropriateness of previous admission and discharge, bed section, type of readmission, and patient demographic, medical condition, and hospital stay characteristics. Using the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Patient Treatment File and medical records, 445 readmissions to a highly affiliated midwestern VA Medical Center in fiscal year 1984 were examined. Appropriateness was determined by four trained medical record abstractors using InterQual admission and discharge standards. Type of readmission was based on a pilot-tested flowchart. Appropriateness of readmission was significantly associated with that of the previous admission and discharge, with the relationship varying by admission, discharge, and readmission bed sections. Reasons for inappropriate admissions, discharges, and readmissions also varied by bed section. For the majority of inappropriate readmissions, there was clear written evidence in the medical record during the previous hospital stay that the patient was directed to return for readmission. Inappropriate readmissions were more likely than appropriate readmissions to have a primary diagnosis of neoplasm or digestive disorder. These results indicate the importance of examining both the operational efficiencies during the previous admission and the clinical criteria for admitting, discharging, and readmitting patients in assessing the appropriateness of readmissions.