Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Heart Rhythm O2 ; 5(1): 34-40, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38312199

RESUMEN

Background: Long-term rhythm monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) following a cryptogenic stroke (CS) is well established. However, the burden of organized atrial arrhythmias in this population is not well defined. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and risk factors for organized atrial arrhythmias in patients with CS. Methods: We evaluated all patients with CS who received an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) between October 2014 and April 2020. All ICM transmissions categorized as AF, tachycardia, or bradycardia were reviewed. We evaluated the time to detection of organized AF and the combination of either organized atrial arrhythmia or AF. Results: A total of 195 CS patients with ICMs were included (51% men; mean age 66 ± 12 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASC score 4.6). Over mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 11.2 months, organized atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30 seconds were detected in 45 patients (23%), of whom 62% did not have AF. Seventeen patients had both organized atrial arrhythmia and AF, and another 21 patients had AF only. Compared to those with normal left atrial size, patients with left atrial enlargement had a higher adjusted risk for development of atrial arrhythmias (mild left atrial enlargement: hazard ratio 1.99; 95% confidence interval 1.06-3.75; moderate/severe left atrial enlargement: hazard ratio 3.06; 95% confidence interval 1.58-5.92). Conclusion: Organized atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30 seconds are detected in nearly one-fourth of CS patients. Two-thirds of these patients did not have AF. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of organized atrial arrhythmias on recurrent stroke risk.

2.
Pulm Circ ; 10(1): 2045894020910685, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32215200

RESUMEN

Atrial arrhythmias are common during episodes of acute respiratory failure in patients with chronic lung disease-associated pulmonary hypertension. Expert opinion suggests that management of atrial arrhythmias in patients with pulmonary hypertension should aim to restore sinus rhythm. This is clinically challenging in pulmonary hypertension patients with coexisting chronic lung disease, as there is controversy on the use of rhythm control agents; generally, in regard to either their pulmonary toxicity profile or the lack of evidence supporting their use. Rate control methods are largely focused on the use of beta blockers and calcium channel blockers. Concerns regarding their use involve their negative inotropic properties in cor pulmonale, the risk of bronchospasm associated with beta blockers, and the potential for ventilation/perfusion mismatching associated with calcium channel blockers. While digoxin has been associated with promising outcomes during acute right ventricular failure, there is limited evidence to suggest its routine use. Electrical cardioversion is associated with a high failure rate and it frequently requires multiple attempts. Radiofrequency catheter ablation is a more definitive approach, but concerns surrounding mechanical ventilation and sedation limit its applicability in decompensated pulmonary hypertension. Individual approaches are needed to address atrial arrhythmia management during acute episodes of respiratory failure.

3.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20152015 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26670895

RESUMEN

A 44-year-old woman with no medical history presented to the emergency department with a 2 h history of sudden onset chest pressure, palpitations, diaphoresis and shortness of breath. She reported a 90-pound unintentional weight loss, increased appetite, irritability, night sweats and palpitations for 2 months. Physical examination revealed a heart rate (HR) of 269 bpm and a blood pressure of 116/94 mm Hg. Her ECG revealed a wide-complex tachycardia with right bundle branch morphology and an HR of 265 bpm. Intravenous adenosine was administered with resolution of the arrhythmia and symptoms. Her subsequent ECG revealed sinus tachycardia with δ waves, which was consistent with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. Laboratory findings confirmed thyroid storm and treatment began with intravenous hydrocortisone, methimazole, metoprolol, amiodarone and iodine drops. Graves' disease was confirmed based on the presence of serum thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody. The patient underwent successful WPW accessory tract ablation 6 weeks after initial presentation.


Asunto(s)
Crisis Tiroidea/complicaciones , Síndrome de Wolff-Parkinson-White/complicaciones , Síndrome de Wolff-Parkinson-White/diagnóstico , Adenosina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Ablación por Catéter , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Enfermedad de Graves/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Graves/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Taquicardia/tratamiento farmacológico , Taquicardia/etiología , Crisis Tiroidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Wolff-Parkinson-White/cirugía
5.
JAMA ; 301(16): 1661-70, 2009 Apr 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19383957

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Allowing nonelectrophysiologists to perform implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) procedures is controversial. However, it is not known whether outcomes of ICD implantation vary by physician specialty. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of implanting physician certification with outcomes following ICD implantation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort study using cases submitted to the ICD Registry performed between January 2006 and June 2007. Patients were grouped by the certification status of the implanting physician into mutually exclusive categories: electrophysiologists, nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, thoracic surgeons, and other specialists. Hierarchical logistic regression models were developed to determine the independent association of physician certification with outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital procedural complication rates and the proportion of patients meeting criteria for a defibrillator with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) who received that device. RESULTS: Of 111,293 ICD implantations included in the analysis, 78,857 (70.9%) were performed by electrophysiologists, 24,399 (21.9%) by nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 1862 (1.7%) by thoracic surgeons, and 6175 (5.5%) by other specialists. Compared with patients whose ICD was implanted by electrophysiologists, patients whose ICD was implanted by either nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists or thoracic surgeons were at increased risk of complications in both unadjusted (electrophysiologists, 3.5% [2743/78,857]; nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 4.0% [970/24,399]; thoracic surgeons, 5.8% [108/1862]; P < .001) and adjusted analyses (relative risk [RR] for nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 1.11 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.01-1.21]; RR for thoracic surgeons, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.15-1.79]). Among 35,841 patients who met criteria for CRT-D, those whose ICD was implanted by physicians other than electrophysiologists were significantly less likely to receive a CRT-D device compared with patients whose ICD was implanted by an electrophysiologist in both unadjusted (electrophysiologists, 83.1% [21 303/25,635]; nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 75.8% [5950/7849]; thoracic surgeons, 57.8% [269/465]; other specialists, 74.8% [1416/1892]; P < .001) and adjusted analyses (RR for nonelectrophysiologist cardiologists, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.91-0.95]; RR for thoracic surgeons, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.74-0.88]; RR for other specialists, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.94-0.99]). CONCLUSIONS: In this registry, nonelectrophysiologists implanted 29% of ICDs. Overall, implantations by a nonelectrophysiologist were associated with a higher risk of procedural complications and lower likelihood of receiving a CRT-D device when indicated compared with patients whose ICD was implanted by an electrophysiologist.


Asunto(s)
Electrofisiología Cardíaca , Certificación , Competencia Clínica , Desfibriladores Implantables , Medicina , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Especialización , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Desfibriladores Implantables/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos/normas , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis/normas , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
6.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 31(9): 1108-12, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18834460

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sinus node dysfunction (SND) is a well-known early complication of orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). Its incidence over the lifetime of transplant recipients is less well characterized. The goal of this study was to determine the incidence and timing of SND treated with a permanent pacemaker in a large cohort of OHT recipients. METHODS: The databases of the Yale University Heart Transplant and Electrophysiology Services were reviewed and cross referenced. Patients who received pacemakers for SND were identified for analysis. A total of 241 patients underwent OHT using biatrial anastamoses from 1984 to 2006. Two hundred sixteen patients, 149 men and 55 women, mean age 50.2 +/- 11.6 years, survived > 5 days post-OHT. These, minus 12 lost to follow-up, were included in the analysis. RESULTS: These 204 patients were followed in the Yale Heart Transplant Clinic and had yearly electrocardiograms and 24-hour ambulatory monitoring. Of these patients, 24 (four female, 20 male, mean age at transplant 49 +/- 12 years) were felt to have clinically significant SND and received a pacemaker. Fourteen patients received pacemakers within 30 days of OHT; 10 patients received pacemakers 45 to 4,329 days after OHT. CONCLUSIONS: Although frequently seen as an early complication of OHT, SND remains a risk throughout the lifetime of OHT recipients. Its mechanism is likely multifactorial, and whether this risk can be mitigated over the long term by newer techniques such as bicaval anastamoses remains to be established.


Asunto(s)
Arritmia Sinusal/mortalidad , Arritmia Sinusal/prevención & control , Trasplante de Corazón/mortalidad , Marcapaso Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Trasplante/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Connecticut/epidemiología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA