Efficacy and safety of RS plus bevacizumab versus RS plus fruquintinib as the third-line therapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of the combination of raltitrexed, S-1 (RS), and fruquintinib with the combination of RS and bevacizumab in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort included mCRC patients who received the RS plus fruquintinib or regorafenib as the third-line therapy from May 2019 to April 2023. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to balance the baseline characteristics of all patients. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and safety of the two regimens were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 153 patients enrolled, 123 patients received the RS plus bevacizumab and 30 patients received the RS plus fruquintinib. After PSM, 30 pairs were analyzed. Patients treated with RS plus fruquintinib had a longer PFS than those treated with RS plus bevacizumab before PSM (5.0 months vs. 4.3 months, p = 0.008) and after PSM (5.0 months vs. 4.4 months, p = 0.012). A longer OS was also observed in RS plus fruquintinib group before PSM and after PSM, but there was no statistic difference between two groups after PSM. Both objective response rate and disease control rate were higher in the RS plus fruquintinib cohort than those in the RS plus bevacizumab cohort before PSM, and the difference in values between the two groups reduced after PSM. The adverse effects (AEs) of both groups were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In patients with refractory mCRC, RS plus fruquintinib demonstrated a superior OS, PFS than RS plus bevacizumab and had manageable AEs.

Case report of penile cancer recurrence treated with cetuximab combined with anlotinib.

Penile squamous cell carcinoma with pelvic lymph node metastases/recurrence has a poor prognosis. We reported a case with recurrent pSCC was administered cetuximab and anlotinib after failure of first-line treatment and achieved an effective response. Cetuximab combined with anlotinib may be a new choice for relapsed pSCC.

Bevacizumab Combined with S-1 and Raltitrexed for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies: A Phase II Study.

LESSONS LEARNED: Bevacizumab combined with S-1 and raltitrexed demonstrated positive antitumor efficacy and acceptable toxicity. This combination might represent a treatment option for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. BACKGROUND: In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies, S-1 plus raltitrexed showed a good objective response rate (ORR) and significant survival benefit in our previous study. In the present study, we assessed the activity and safety of bevacizumab combined with S-1 and raltitrexed. METHODS: This investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial was performed at West China Hospital in China. Patients with mCRC who had disease progression after fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin and had at least one measurable lesion were eligible for this trial. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (for tumors with wild-type RAS) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in the first or second line was allowed, but patients who had been treated with bevacizumab across two consecutive chemotherapy regimens were excluded. Patients received bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg on day 1), oral S-1 (80-120 mg per day for 14 days), and raltitrexed (3 mg/m2 on day 1) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: From September 2015 to November 2019, 44 patients were enrolled. Tumor response evaluation was available in 44 patients at the time of the analysis. There were no complete responses; the ORR was 15.9%, and the disease control rate was 54.5%. Median PFS and OS were 110 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.0-155.0) and 367 days (95% CI, 310.4-423.6), respectively. The combination was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab combined with S-1 and raltitrexed showed promising antitumor activity and safety in refractory mCRC.

Chemoradiotherapy Is Inferior to Chemotherapy Alone in Adjuvant Setting for Signet Ring Cell Containing Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Signet ring cell containing gastric cancer (SRCGC) is a rare subtype of gastric cancer, and its adjuvant therapy is based on general gastric cancer. However, the effectiveness of radiotherapy for those SRCGC patients remains unknown. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to analyze whether the addition of radiotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) can benefit survival in resected SRCGC patients. METHODS: Patients with SRCGC, who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT), were retrospectively collected. According to the proportion of signet ring cells, patients were histologically classified as pure SRCGC (pSRCGC) containing 100% of signet ring cells, mixed SRCGC (mSRCGC) containing >50% of signet ring cells, and contaminated SRCGC (cSRCGC) containing <50% of signet ring cells. Among the 272 patients, 156 were treated by CT alone and 116 by CRT. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival rate (3-year OS rate). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 80.5 months, the 3-year OS rate was significantly higher in the CT group (70.5% vs. 58.6%, HR = 0.633, P = 0.017) compared with CRT group. Three independent characteristics were predictive of a poor overall survival: CRT treatment (P = 0.019), tumor size ≥5 cm (P < 0.001), and the presence of vessel invasion (P = 0.009). Subgroup analyses showed CRT significantly impaired prognosis in SRCGC patients in the cSRCGC subset, as well as lesions located in lower-middle sites, subtotal gastrectomy, male, <60 year, and no vessel invasion. Peritoneal was the most common recurrence site in SRCGC patients. The adverse events leukopenia and neutropenia were more common in the CRT group (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with poor survival compared with adjuvant chemotherapy in SRCGC patients with D2 gastrectomy.

S-1 plus Raltitrexed for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase II Trial.

LESSONS LEARNED: The upregulation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and thymidylate synthase (TS) are important mechanisms of resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after long exposure to 5-FU.S-1 (containing a DPD inhibitor) combined with raltitrexed (a TS inhibitor) showed a moderate effect, which needs further study as a third- or later-line therapy in mCRC. BACKGROUND: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a fundamental drug in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients with mCRC are often exposed to 5-FU and/or its analogues for a long time because of its central role in treatment regimens. The upregulation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and/or thymidylate synthase (TS) are important mechanisms of resistance of 5-FU. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 (containing a DPD inhibitor) and raltitrexed (a TS inhibitor) for refractory mCRC, a one-center, single-arm, prospective phase II trial was conducted. METHODS: Patients who had mCRC that had progressed after treatment with fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin and who had at least one measurable lesion were eligible for this trial. Patients received oral S-1 (80-120 mg for 14 days every 3 weeks) plus an intravenous infusion of raltitrexed (3 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: In total, 46 patients were enrolled. Three patients did not complete the first assessment because of adverse events and unwillingness, leaving tumor response evaluation available in 43 patients. Of 43 evaluable patients, the ORR was 13.9% and disease control rate was 58.1%. In the intention-to-treat population (n = 46), the ORR was 13.0% and disease control rate was 54.3%. Median PFS and median OS were 107 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.3-117.7) and 373 days (95% CI, 226.2-519.8), respectively. Most of the adverse effects were mild to moderate. CONCLUSION: S-1 combined with raltitrexed for refractory mCRC showed moderate effect, and it is worthy of further study as third- or later-line therapy in mCRC.

Prognostic factors of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric cancer: A retrospective study from a single center.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of gastric origin is currently recognized as a terminal disease with a poor prognosis. Advancements in novel therapeutic approaches, including intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC), have recently been made and it is believed that this may have contributed to the improved survival observed in patients with PC. The present study aimed to investigate overall survival (OS) and the associated prognostic factors in patients with PC of gastric origin who underwent IPC. A total of 57 patients were studied, with a median age of 51 years. The median follow-up time was 12.4 months. PC was diagnosed in all patients with gastric cancer. The median survival time of all patients was 10.1 months, whilst the OS rate at 1, 2 and 3 years was observed to be 46, 19 and 12%, respectively. Symptomatic ascites and a signet ring cell (SRC) histopathological type were demonstrated to signify a poor prognosis. Complete resection of all gross disease (CCR-0) and an increased number of cycles of systemic chemotherapy were independent factors that were observed to correlate with increased OS. The most common morbidities of grade 3/4 adverse effects were bone marrow suppression, nausea or vomiting, and diarrhea. In conclusion, IPC is an important treatment option for patients with PC that has originated from gastric cancer. Symptomatic ascites and SRC adenocarcinoma serve as negative clinicopathological prognostic factors, whilst CCR-0 and increased systemic chemotherapy cycles (≥4 cycles) may prove to be an important therapeutic option for PC patients.

Clinical significance of serum CA125 in diffuse malignant mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a rare and fatal neoplasm. For diffuse malignant mesothelioma (DMM) patients that were not suitable for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy is the main treatment. There are no convenient tumor markers to predict the efficacy of treatment and disease progression. This study aimed to evaluate serum CA125 level as a biochemical marker of response to therapy and prognosis in patients with DMM. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in a single medical institution from April 2008 to April 2014. Overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included with a median age of 53 years. The median OS of all patients was 10 months. Patients with baseline CA125 > 280 U/ml had worse OS compared with the patients that baseline CA125 ≤ 280 U/ml. Baseline level of CA125, stage of disease, primary tumor location and systemic chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors associated with OS. In patients who received systemic chemotherapy, the decline in serum CA125 was associated with favorable OS and objective response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The baseline level of serum CA125, accompanied with stage of disease, primary tumor location and systemic chemotherapy, could be regarded as independent prognostic factors for DMM patients. Otherwise, the change in serum CA125 can predict OS and response to systemic chemotherapy.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin combined with S-1 and leucovorin (SOL) for Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin are widely used for patients with colorectal cancer. This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of S-1, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin (SOL) in the treatment of Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Eligible patients with untreated mCRC from four hospitals in China received intravenous oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) on day 1, oral S-1 twice daily (80-120 mg per day) on day 1-7, and leucovorin twice daily (50 mg per day) simultaneously with S-1, every 2 weeks. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Forty patients were enrolled in our study. In total, 296 cycles of SOL were administered. The overall response rate was 50.0%. At a median follow-up of 27 months, progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0-10.6 months) and 22.2 months (95% CI 15.1-29.3 months), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 non-hematological adverse events were diarrhea (n = 8, 20.0%), nausea (n = 3, 7.5%), and vomiting (n = 3, 7.5%). The most common grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were thrombocytopenia (n = 3, 7.5%), neutropenia (n = 1, 2.5%), and abnormal alanine transaminase/aspartate transaminase levels (n = 1, 2.5%). There was one treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that the SOL regimen is effective and moderately tolerated in Chinese patients with mCRC. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: ChiCTR-TNRC-100000838.

Pegylated filgrastim is comparable with filgrastim as support for commonly used chemotherapy regimens: a multicenter, randomized, crossover phase 3 study.

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a single subcutaneous injection of pegylated filgrastim with daily filgrastim as a prophylaxis for neutropenia induced by commonly used chemotherapy regimens. Fifteen centers enrolled 337 chemotherapy-naive cancer patients with normal bone marrow function. All patients randomized into AOB and BOA arms received two cycles of chemotherapy. Patients received a single dose of pegylated filgrastim 100 µg/kg in cycle 1 (AOB) or cycle 2 (BOA) and daily doses of filgrastim 5 µg/kg/day in cycle 1 (BOA) or cycle 2 (AOB). Efficacy and safety parameters were recorded. The primary end point was the rate of protection against grade 4 neutropenia after chemotherapy [defined as the rate at which the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) remained >0.5×10(9)/l throughout the entire cycle]. Ninety-four percent of patients receiving pegylated filgrastim or filgrastim did not develop grade 4 neutropenia. The incidence of ANC<1.0×10(9)/l was 16.0% (50/313) after support with either pegylated filgrastim or filgrastim. The incidences of febrile neutropenia and antibiotic administration were similar in both groups. Notably, faster ANC recovery was observed with pegylated filgrastim support. The ANC nadir was also earlier with pegylated filgrastim (day 7) support than with filgrastim support (day 9), although the depth of nadir was not significantly different. A single subcutaneous injection of pegylated filgrastim 100 µg/kg provided adequate and safe neutrophil support comparable with daily subcutaneous injections of unmodified filgrastim 5 µg/kg/day in patients receiving commonly used standard-dose mild-to-moderate myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer: a phase I study of radiotherapy with dose escalation of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX regimen).

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy begins to be more and more widely accepted as a standard adjuvant treatment in gastric cancer. And oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) also reveals to be a very effective regimen in gastric cancer. But the safety and the dosages of FOLFOX combining with radiotherapy are still unknown. This study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity of FOLFOX with higher-dose concurrent radiotherapy (RT) as adjuvant treatment in patients with gastric cancer. Patients with Stage II/III gastric cancer after surgery were recruited. They received one cycle of induction chemotherapy (standard FOLFOX4). Then, they received 50.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions in combination with two cycles of concurrent FOLFOX, and oxaliplatin among this regimen was administered with escalating doses. Dose-limiting toxicity including grade 3 or grade 4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities was investigated. Fifteen patients were enrolled at the following dose levels: oxaliplatin 55 mg/m(2) (3 patients), 65 mg/m(2) (6 patients), and 75 mg/m(2) (6 patients). Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 1 patient at 65 mg/m(2) (grade 4 leukopenia) and in 3 patients at 75 mg/m(2) (1 patient had grade 4 leukopenia, 1 had grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and 1 had grade 3 stomatitis). Combination chemotherapy FOLFOX with oxaliplatin 65 mg/m(2), d 1; leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), 2 h, d1-2; 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2), iv, d 1-2 and 600 mg/m(2) civ, 22 h, d 1-2 given concurrently with RT (50.4 Gy) can be recommended as a safer and preferable regimen for the adjuvant treatment of patients with gastric cancer.

Antiemetic activity of megestrol acetate in patients receiving chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Several trials had independently noted that patients receiving megestrol acetate had less nausea and vomiting, but this antiemetic activity of megestrol acetate has not been reported separately in the literature. Our objective was to evaluate the antiemetic ability of megestrol acetate in patients receiving chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either megestrol acetate 320 mg PO or placebo before the first day of chemotherapy, followed on days 1-4 by megestrol acetate 320 mg PO combined with granisetron 3 mg IV and metoclopramide 20 mg IM or only granisetron 3 mg IV combined with metoclopramide 20 mg IM in a crossover manner during two consecutive cycles. Rates of complete protection against both vomiting and moderate-to-severe nausea was the primary end point. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled in the study. The antiemetic regimen containing megestrol acetate was superior in providing complete protection from nausea and vomiting (45% megestrol acetate regimen vs.17% no megestrol acetate regimen). Complete response of acute phase in both antiemetic regimens was different (85% megestrol acetate regimen vs. 72% no megestrol acetate regimen). Complete response of delayed emesis was also different (49% megestrol acetate regimen vs. 18% no megestrol acetate regimen). Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate. There were no serious drug-related adverse events between the two antiemetic regimens. CONCLUSION: Megestrol acetate was shown to be an effective antiemetic agent. Megestrol acetate might be a new antiemetic option for chemotherapy.

[Relationship between expression of Cat V and clinicopathologic character of myasthenia gravis in patients with thymoma].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of expression of Cat V with the clinicopathologic variables of myasthenia gravis (MG) in patients with thymoma. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with thymomas were involved. Immunohistochemical method was adopted in investigating the protein expression of Cat V in the thymomas and thymic tissues adjacent to thymomas. RESULTS: The protein of Cat V could be detected in both thymomas and thymic tissues. And the cortex was the main expressive domain of Cat V in thymus. The positive ratio of Cat V expression in thymoma was significantly increased in patients with MG, compared with that in patients without MG (82.50% vs 26.33%, P < 0.01), and similar results were observed in thymic tissues adjacent to tumors (77.50% vs 31.58%, P < 0.01). Analysis on the relationship of the clinical subtypes of MG with expression of Cat V revealed that the positive ratio in type II (92.00%) and type III (83.33%) was much higher than that in type I (55.56%) (P < 0.05). The expression of Cat V was significantly raised in the epithelial-rich and mixed cell thymomas when compared with that in the lymphocyte-rich ones. No statistically significant difference was found on the variables such as perioperative myasthenic crisis, sex or age of patient, duraton of sickness and expression of Cat V. CONCLUSION: The overexpression of Cat V in thymomas may be associated with MG.

[Treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a multi-center randomized controlled phase II clinical study].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of daily administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF), and a single subcutaneous injection of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF), a sustained-duration rhG-CSF, in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. METHODS: In the present randomized, open-label, match and cross-over study, enrolled 104 patients with previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and with normal bone marrow function from 13 centers were randomly divided into 2 matched groups, AB and BA group. Each patient received two cycles of chemotherapy of identical regimen. In the study cycle, the patients received a single subcutaneous injection of PEG-rhG-CSF 100 microg/kg on day 3; and in control cycle, daily subcutaneous infection of rhG-CSF 5 microg x kg(-1) x d(-1) began on day 3 and continued for 14 days or until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) became > or = 5.0 x 10(9)/L twice after it decreased to the nadir. Efficacy and safety parameters were monitored. RESULTS: The incidence rates of ANC < 1.5 x 10(9)/L in the 103 evaluable study cycles and 100 evaluable control cycles were 30.00% and 20.00% with the duration of 2.39 days and 2.35 days respectively. The incidence rates of grade 3 neutropenia were 7.77% and 7.00%; and that of grade 4 neutropenia were 5.80% and 4.00% respectively in the trial and control cycles. However, all the difference mentioned above did not reached statistical significance. None of the patients experienced febrile neutropenia. The ANC nadir was (7.55 +/- 5.25) x 10(9)/L and (8.42 +/- 5.57) x 10(9)/L (P = 0.257) respectively after receiving PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF. Compared with that of rhG-CSF group, the ANC profile of PEG-rhG-CSF group exhibited limited "overshoot" of neutrophils after the nadir. Subgroup analysis according to disease type yielded similar results. The safety profiles of the PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF groups were similar. Musculoskeletal pain or arthralgia occurred in 16.5% of the study cycles and 26.00% of the control cycles (P = 0.963), mostly mild or moderate. Other adverse effects such as fever, fatigue, dizziness, gastrointestinal effects and injection-site pain, were transient and easily manageable. CONCLUSION: A single subcutaneous injection of PEG-rhG-CSF 100 microg/kg provides neutrophil support and a safety profile comparable to regimen of daily subcutaneous injection of rhG-CSF 5 microg x kg(-1) x d(-1) in Chinese patients receiving a variety of myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens.