Whether Primary Bone-Only Oligometastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Benefit From Radiotherapy to the Bones on the Basis of Palliative Chemotherapy Plus Locoregional Radiotherapy?-A Large-Cohort Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: Whether to perform local radiotherapy on metastatic bone for primary bone-only oligometastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients remains unclear. Therefore, we analyzed the treatment methods and their survival and developed a prognostic model to predict outcomes and guide personalized treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 308 primary bone-only oligometastatic NPC patients who were treated with either palliative chemotherapy (PCT) alone, PCT combined with locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT), or PCT, LRRT, and radiotherapy to metastatic bones (bRT). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Cox regression was utilized to identify independent prognostic factors, leading to the construction of a nomogram model. Patients were stratified into two risk groups based on median prognostic scores, and treatment modalities were compared using log-rank test while employing the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to balance baseline characteristics and adjust for sample size differences between risk groups. RESULTS: The best OS was observed in the group treated with PCT, LRRT, and bRT (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.45-0.81, p = 0.002). Multivariable analysis revealed that age, N stage, pre-treatment levels of LDH, and EBV DNA were independent prognostic factors for OS. In total, 155 patients were in low-risk group while 153 were in high-risk group. Before and after IPTW, the high-risk group benefited from the PCT, LRRT, and bRT regimen (adjusted HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.42-0.67, p < 0.001; unadjusted HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42-0.83, p = 0.007), while the low-risk group did not (adjusted HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.56-1.11, p = 0.345; unadjusted HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.37-1.14, p = 0.309). CONCLUSION: Best outcomes of the whole cohort were seen with PCT + LRRT + bRT. Our study identified age, N stage, pre-treatment LDH levels, and EBV DNA levels as independent prognostic factors for OS. The high-risk group demonstrated a longer OS when treated with PCT + LRRT + bRT, whereas the low-risk group did not benefit from the combinatorial treatment.

Individualised cumulative cisplatin dose for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients based on induction chemotherapy response and tumour volume.

Background and objectives: To evaluate the prognostic value of an integrated model consisting of tumour response to induction chemotherapy (IC) and gross tumour volume (GTV) after IC in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and elucidate optimal cumulative cisplatin dose (CCD) in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for different subgroups. Design and methods: This retrospective study enrolled 896 patients with NPC diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 receiving IC plus radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Cut-off points for GTV were combined with IC response to develop an integrated model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for potential confounders. Survival outcomes and acute toxicity were compared between the different CCD groups. Results: Unsatisfactory IC response and large GTV after IC were correlated with poor survival outcomes; the AUC increased to 0.668 when these factors were incorporated. The integrated model classified patients into three groups. After PSM, radiotherapy alone and CCRT demonstrated similar efficacy in the low-risk group (complete response (CR)/partial response (PR) and GTV <68 cm3 after IC). In the intermediate-risk group (CR/PR but GTV ⩾68 cm3), CCD of >200 mg/m2 and 101-200 mg/m2 increased the 5-year DFS rates (83.7% vs 81.1% vs 65.3%, p = 0.042). In the high-risk group (stable disease/progressive disease and any GTV), the use of different CCDs did not result in significantly different survival outcomes (p = 0.793). Additionally, high CCD was significantly associated with increased incidence of grade 1-4 acute toxicity. Conclusion: The integrated model incorporating IC response and GTV after IC demonstrates satisfactory value in risk stratification and the potential to guide individualised decision-making in CCD selection. Balancing toxicity and efficacy, RT alone seems to be the optimal treatment for patients in low-risk groups and 200 mg/m2 might be the optimal dose for intermediate-risk groups. Moreover, increasing CCD does not benefit patients in high-risk groups, and treatment options for these patients require further consideration.

Phase I dose-escalation study of nab-paclitaxel combined with cisplatin and capecitabin as induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Nab-paclitaxel is a promising albumin-bound paclitaxel with a therapeutic index superior to that of docetaxel, but the optimal dose of nab-paclitaxel combined with cisplatin and capecitabine as induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, single-arm study investigating the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel + cisplatin + capecitabin as IC for three cycles, followed by cisplatin CCRT, conducted by using the standard "3 + 3" design in LA-NPC. If more than one-third of the patients in a cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the dose used in the previous cohort was designated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was defined as one level below the MTD. RESULTS: From 29 May 2021 to 17 March 2022, 19 patients with LA-NPC were enrolled, one patient withdrew informed consent. Two DLTs occurred in cohort 4 (grade 4 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy), and an MTD was established as 225 mg/m2. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (16.7 %), hypertriglyceridemia (16.7 %), leukopenia (5.6 %) and peripheral neuropathy (5.6 %) during IC. CONCLUSION: The RP2D is nab-paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on day 1, combined with cisplatin 75 mg/mg2 on day 1 and capecitabin1000 mg/m2 on days 1-14, twice a day, every 3 weeks, for three cycles as an IC regimen prior to CCRT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04850235.

Radiomic signatures reveal multiscale intratumor heterogeneity associated with tissue tolerance and survival in re-irradiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Post-radiation nasopharyngeal necrosis (PRNN) is a severe adverse event following re-radiotherapy for patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LRNPC) and associated with decreased survival. Biological heterogeneity in recurrent tumors contributes to the different risks of PRNN. Radiomics can be used to mine high-throughput non-invasive image features to predict clinical outcomes and capture underlying biological functions. We aimed to develop a radiogenomic signature for the pre-treatment prediction of PRNN to guide re-radiotherapy in patients with LRNPC. METHODS: This multicenter study included 761 re-irradiated patients with LRNPC at four centers in NPC endemic area and divided them into training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts. We built a machine learning (random forest) radiomic signature based on the pre-treatment multiparametric magnetic resonance images for predicting PRNN following re-radiotherapy. We comprehensively assessed the performance of the radiomic signature. Transcriptomic sequencing and gene set enrichment analyses were conducted to identify the associated biological processes. RESULTS: The radiomic signature showed discrimination of 1-year PRNN in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts (area under the curve (AUC) 0.713-0.756). Stratified by a cutoff score of 0.735, patients with high-risk signature had higher incidences of PRNN than patients with low-risk signature (1-year PRNN rates 42.2-62.5% vs. 16.3-18.8%, P < 0.001). The signature significantly outperformed the clinical model (P < 0.05) and was generalizable across different centers, imaging parameters, and patient subgroups. The radiomic signature had prognostic value concerning its correlation with PRNN-related deaths (hazard ratio (HR) 3.07-6.75, P < 0.001) and all causes of deaths (HR 1.53-2.30, P < 0.01). Radiogenomics analyses revealed associations between the radiomic signature and signaling pathways involved in tissue fibrosis and vascularity. CONCLUSIONS: We present a radiomic signature for the individualized risk assessment of PRNN following re-radiotherapy, which may serve as a noninvasive radio-biomarker of radiation injury-associated processes and a useful clinical tool to personalize treatment recommendations for patients with LANPC.

Reduced-dose radiotherapy for Epstein-Barr virus DNA selected staged III nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A single-arm, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy-related toxicities of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) caused by a standard dose of 70 Gy remain a critical issue. Therefore, we assessed whether a radiotherapy dose of 60 Gy was non-inferior to the standard dose in patients with low-risk stage III NPC with a favourable response to induction chemotherapy (IC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We did a single-arm, single-centre, phase II clinical trial in China. Patients with low-risk (Epstein-Barr virus [EBV] DNA level <4000 copies/ml) stage III NPC were treated with two cycles IC. Patients with complete/partial response and undetectable EBV DNA level were assigned 60 Gy intensity-modulated radiotherapy concurrently with three cycles of cisplatin. The primary end-point was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03668730. RESULTS: One patient quit because of withdrawal of informed consent after IC. In total, 215 patients completed two cycles of IC, after which 116 (54.0%) and 99 (46.0%) patients were assigned 60 and 70 Gy radiotherapy, respectively. For 215 patients, the 2-year PFS was 90.7% (95% CI, 86.8%-94.6%) with a median follow-up of 43.9 months (interquartile range [IQR], 39.8-46.2). For patients treated with 60 Gy radiotherapy, the 2-year PFS rate was 94.8% (95%CI 90.7%-98.9%) with a median follow-up of 43.9 months (IQR 40.2-46.2). The most common late toxicity was grade 1-2 dry mouth (incidence rate: 54.3%). No grade 3+ long-term adverse event was observed, and most quality-of-life items, domains, and symptom scores returned to baseline by 6 months. CONCLUSION: Reduced-dose radiation (60 Gy) is associated with favourable survival outcomes and limited treatment-related toxicities in patients with low-risk stage III NPC sensitive to IC.

Paclitaxel liposome, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil-based induction chemotherapy followed by de-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin in stage IVA-IVB childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma in endemic area: a phase II, single-arm trial.

Background: Previous studies demonstrated that induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by de-escalated chemoradiotherapy adapted to tumor response was effective in treating childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the toxicity profile of this treatment strategy, and whether childhood patients with advanced stages can obtain enough benefits from it requires further investigation. Methods: We conducted a single-center phase II trial (NCT03020329). All participants received 3 cycles of paclitaxel liposome, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF)-based IC. Patients who showed complete or partial response received de-escalated radiotherapy of 60 Gy with 3 cycles of concurrent cisplatin, and those who showed stable or progressive disease received standard-dose radiotherapy of 70 Gy with concurrent cisplatin. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate at the end of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Findings: From November 2016 to March 2021, 44 patients were recruited in the cohort. The CR rate was 80% (35/44, 95% CI, 65-90) of the whole cohort. All patients achieved CR 3 months after CCRT. By the last follow-up, the 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 91% (95% CI, 82-99) and 100% respectively. Dry mouth was the most common late toxicity, with an incidence of 41% (18/44), followed by skin fibrosis and hearing impairment. No patient suffered from severe late toxicity and growth retardation. Interpretation: Our results proved the efficacy and safety of TPF regimen followed by de-escalated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin in treating stage IVa-b childhood NPC patients. Funding: A full list of funding bodies that contributed to this study can be found in the Acknowledgements section.

A phase II randomised controlled trial of adjuvant tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes for pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA-selected high-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

PURPOSE: The safety and objective clinical responses were observed in the phase I study using adjuvant autologous tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred fifty-six patients with stage III-IVb and pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA levels of ≥4000 copies/ml were randomly assigned to receive CCRT combined with TIL infusion (n = 78) or CCRT alone (n = 78). All patients received CCRT and patients assigned to the TIL group received TIL infusion within 1 week after CCRT. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 62.3 months, no significant difference was observed in the 3-year PFS rate between the CCRT plus TIL infusion group and CCRT alone group (75.6% versus 74.4%, hazard ratios, 1.08; 95% confidence intervals, 0.62-1.89). TIL infusion was safe without grade 3 or 4 adverse events and all the high-grade adverse effects were associated with myelosuppression caused by CCRT. Exploratory analysis showed that a potential survival benefit was observed with TILs in patients with lower levels of circulating CD8+TIM3+ cells, serum IL-8 or PD-L1. The infused TIL products in patients with favourable outcomes were associated with increased transcription of interferon-γ and a series of inflammatory related genes and a lower exhausted score. CONCLUSION: The primary objective of prolonging PFS with CCRT plus TILs in high-risk NPC patients was not met. These findings may provide evidence for the design of future trials investigating the combination of TILs plus immune checkpoint inhibitors based on CCRT in high-risk NPC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02421640.

Camrelizumab combined with apatinib in patients with first-line platinum-resistant or PD-1 inhibitor resistant recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-arm, phase 2 trial.

Immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic targeted therapy has improved the treatment of certain solid tumors, but effective regimens remain elusive for refractory recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC). We conducted a phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety and activity of camrelizumab plus apatinib in platinum-resistant (cohort 1, NCT04547088) and PD-1 inhibitor resistant NPC (cohort 2, NCT04548271). Here we report on the primary outcome of objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints of safety, duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The primary endpoint of ORR was met for cohort 1 (65%, 95% CI, 49.6-80.4, n = 40) and cohort 2 (34.3%; 95% CI, 17.0-51.8, n = 32). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were reported in 47 (65.3%) of 72 patients. Results of our predefined exploratory investigation of predictive biomarkers show: B cell markers are the most differentially expressed genes in the tumors of responders versus non-responders in cohort 1 and that tertiary lymphoid structure is associated with higher ORR; Angiogenesis gene expression signatures are strongly associated with ORR in cohort 2. Camrelizumab plus apatinib combination effectiveness is associated with high expression of PD-L1, VEGF Receptor 2 and B-cell-related genes signatures. Camrelizumab plus apatinib shows promising efficacy with a measurable safety profile in RM-NPC patients.

The map of bone metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A real-world study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the metastatic patterns of synchronous bone metastasis (SBM) and metachronous bone metastasis (MBM) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: This study included bone metastases in NPC patients from 2005 to 2016 in a Chinese hospital. Cohort 1 was collected from 2005 to 2010 for discovery, and Cohort 2 from 2011 to 2016 for validation. The chi-squared test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and Kaplan-Meier technique were used to compare site, time, and survival between cohorts 1 and 2. Prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate or multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: Cohort 1 had 112 individuals with SBM and 394 with MBM, and cohort 2 had 328 with SBM and 307 with MBM. The thoracic vertebra was the most frequently affected site of metastasis. Patients with SBM more often had metastasis to the cervical vertebrae compared with patients with MBM (34.5% vs. 22.3%, p < 0.05). Patients with SBM had better overall survival (42.2 months, 95% CI: 33.9-50.7) than patients with MBM (24.9 months, 95% CI: 22.2-28.7). Age at bone metastasis detection, metastasis to other organs, and more bone metastasis locations were associated with worse prognosis. The majority of MBMs occurred at 7 to 18 months after NPC diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy does not modify the metastatic patterns of NPC bone metastases. Patients with SBM tend to have metastasis to the cervical vertebra, which is close to the nasopharynx. Paying more attention to bone metastases during follow-up in the first 2 years after an NPC diagnosis.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine versus cisplatin-fluorouracil chemotherapy for N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma have a high risk of treatment being unsuccessful despite the current practice of using a concurrent adjuvant cisplatin-fluorouracil regimen. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine with cisplatin-fluorouracil in N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial at four cancer centres in China. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years with untreated, non-keratinising, stage T1-4 N2-3 M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously) on days 1, 22, and 43 of intensity-modulated radiotherapy followed by either gemcitabine (1 g/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenously for 4 h on day 1) once every 3 weeks or fluorouracil (4 g/m2 in continuous intravenous infusion for 96 h) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenously for 4 h on day 1) once every 4 weeks, for three cycles. Randomisation was done using a computer-generated random number code with a block size of six, stratified by treatment centre and nodal category. The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of chemoradiotherapy. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03321539, and patients are currently under follow-up. FINDINGS: From Oct 30, 2017, to July 9, 2020, 240 patients (median age 44 years [IQR 36-52]; 175 [73%] male and 65 [27%] female) were randomly assigned to the cisplatin-fluorouracil group (n=120) or cisplatin-gemcitabine group (n=120). As of data cutoff (Dec 25, 2022), median follow-up was 40 months (IQR 32-48). 3-year progression-free survival was 83·9% (95% CI 75·9-89·4; 19 disease progressions and 11 deaths) in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group and 71·5% (62·5-78·7; 34 disease progressions and seven deaths) in the cisplatin-fluorouracil group (stratified hazard ratio 0·54 [95% CI 0·32-0·93]; log rank p=0·023). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events that occurred during treatment were leukopenia (61 [52%] of 117 in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group vs 34 [29%] of 116 in the cisplatin-fluorouracil group; p=0·00039), neutropenia (37 [32%] vs 19 [16%]; p=0·010), and mucositis (27 [23%] vs 32 [28%]; p=0·43). The most common grade 3 or worse late adverse event (occurring from 3 months after completion of radiotherapy) was auditory or hearing loss (six [5%] vs ten [9%]). One (1%) patient in the cisplatin-gemcitabine group died due to treatment-related complications (septic shock caused by neutropenic infection). No patients in the cisplatin-fluorouracil group had treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that concurrent adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine could be used as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of patients with N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma, although long-term follow-up is required to confirm the optimal therapeutic ratio. FUNDING: National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research, Sci-Tech Project Foundation of Guangzhou City, Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program, Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province for Distinguished Young Scholar, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Postdoctoral Innovative Talent Support Program, Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou, Planned Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province, Key Youth Teacher Cultivating Program of Sun Yat-sen University, the Rural Science and Technology Commissioner Program of Guangdong Province, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Nasopharyngeal necrosis contributes to overall survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma without distant metastasis: a comprehensive nomogram model.

OBJECTIVES: This study focused on developing and validating a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) without distant metastasis based on their clinical characteristics, serum biomarkers, and presence of nasopharyngeal (NP) necrosis. METHODS: This study included 9298 patients with NPC. Patients from January 2009 to December 2014 were randomly categorized into the training cohort and validation cohort A. Validation cohort B, whose data were collected from January 2015 to December 2017, was also included. OS was the primary endpoint of this study. Cox regression analysis was used to detect independent risk variables. Decision curve analysis, calibration curve, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and concordance index (C-index) were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram model. RESULTS: A total of 267 patients developed NP necrosis after the first routine radiotherapy. After radiotherapy, patients with NP necrosis had significantly lower OS than other patients in all three cohorts (p < 0.001). Eleven factors, including NP necrosis, were involved in the nomogram, which had favorable discrimination and calibration with a C-index of 0.768 in the training cohort, 0.749 in validation cohort A, and 0.739 in validation cohort B. The nomogram exhibited a significantly larger area under the ROC curve for predicting OS than the TNM stage and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the TNM system and EBV DNA, we established a nomogram model with an accurate prognostic prediction for patients with NPC, which might help with patient management in NPC. KEY POINTS: • This study included 9298 patients with NPC, and 11 factors were involved in the final model. • The nomogram had a significantly higher C-index and area under the ROC curve than the TNM stage and EBV DNA. • We established the first nomogram model for NPC involving the occurrence of NP necrosis, which was valuable for providing individual counseling and clinical assessments.

Construction and validation of a biochemical signature to predict the prognosis and the benefit of induction chemotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

This study aimed to develop and validate a biochemical signature for predicting the prognosis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and explore roles of the constructed signature for screening optimal candidates for induction chemotherapy (IC). The biochemical signature was constructed based on a retrospective cohort of 3742 patients from January 2008 to December 2010; 2078 patients from prospective studies from January 2011 to December 2012 and 2153 patients from January 2013 to December 2016 served as validation cohort A and validation cohort B. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator coefficients on the Cox regression model were calculated to construct the prediction model with the data of 33 biochemical indicators. A total of six prognostic indicators, including sodium, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, indirect bilirubin, and cystatin-C, were screened for constructing the biochemical signature. The patients were divided into low-risk and high-risk groups using an optimal cut-off value of 0.823. The patients in high-risk group had significantly lower OS and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) compared with patients in low-risk group in three cohorts (P < 0.05). Furthermore, among patients with high-risk scores in the combined cohort, the addition of IC to CCRT further improved their OS and DMFS, whereas patients with low-risk scores did not benefit from IC. Our study developed and validated a clinically useful biochemical signature that could predict the survival outcomes in NPC patients. This signature can help clinicians design personalized treatment strategies.

Cost-Effectiveness analysis of combining plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA testing and different surveillance imaging modalities for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients in first remission.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of stage-based post-radiotherapy (PRT) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) surveillance strategies. METHODS: Four post-radiotherapy surveillance strategies were established by a Markov model based on data from 1664 patients: 1) clinical follow-up (CFP) with biannual Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA (EBV DNA strategy); 2) CFP with biannual EBV DNA, annual head and neck magnetic resonance imaging (HNMRI), chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasonography, bone scan (only for the first two years) for five years (MCWU strategy); 3) CFP with biannual EBV DNA, annual HNMRI, chest, abdomen, pelvic computerized tomography (CT) and bone scan for the first two years, followed by annual MCWU strategy (without bone scans) for the last three years (CT strategy); 4) CFP with biannual EBV DNA, annual whole-body positron emission/computerized tomography (PET/CT) for the first two years and biannual EBV DNA for the last three years (PET/CT strategy). RESULTS: Compared with the EBV DNA strategy, the MCWU, CT, and PET/CT strategies gained 0.017, 0.047, and 0.082 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for stage I-II patients. For stage III and IVa patients, the PET/CT strategy had a favorable incremental effectiveness (ICERs) of 0.277 and 0.385 QALY, respectively. The ICERs for the MCWU, CT, and PET/CT strategies were $74,037, $34,882, and $34,696 for stage III and $62,364, $27,981, and $28,340 for stage IVa, respectively. CONCLUSION: EBV DNA strategy was cost-effective for the long-term surveillance of stage I-II NPC patients with CR. PET/CT strategy was recommeded for patients having IVa NPC. As for stage III NPC, PET/CT strategy was still acceptable with the development of economy in China.

Effect of Induction Chemotherapy With Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Capecitabine vs Cisplatin and Fluorouracil on Failure-Free Survival for Patients With Stage IVA to IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multicenter Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Induction chemotherapy added to concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly improves survival for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but the optimal induction regimen remains unclear. Objective: To determine whether induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine (TPC) improves survival vs cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF) prior to chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial recruited 238 patients at 4 hospitals in China from October 20, 2016, to August 29, 2019. Patients were 18 to 65 years of age with treatment-naive, nonkeratinizing stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive induction chemotherapy with two 21-day cycles of TPC (intravenous paclitaxel [150 mg/m2, day 1], intravenous cisplatin [60 mg/m2, day 1], and oral capecitabine [1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily, days 1-14]) or PF (intravenous cisplatin [100 mg/m2, day 1] and fluorouracil [800 mg/m2 daily, days 1-5]), followed by chemoradiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was failure-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary end points included distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, overall survival, tumor response, and safety. Results: Overall, 238 eligible patients (187 men [78.6%]; median age, 45 years [range, 18-65 years]) were randomly assigned to receive TPC (n = 118) or PF (n = 120). The median follow-up duration was 48.4 months (IQR, 39.6-53.3 months). Failure-free survival at 3 years was 83.5% (95% CI, 77.0%-90.6%) in the TPC group and 68.9% (95% CI, 61.1%-77.8%) in the PF group (stratified hazard ratio [HR] for recurrence or death, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.79; P = .004). Induction with the TPC regimen resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of distant metastases (stratified HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.24-0.98]; P = .04) and locoregional recurrence (stratified HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.18-0.93]; P = .03) compared with the PF regimen. However, there was no effect on early overall survival (stratified HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.17-1.18]; P = .10). The incidences of grade 3 to 4 acute adverse events and late-onset toxicities were 57.6% (n = 68) and 13.6% (16 of 118), respectively, in the TPC group and 65.8% (n = 79) and 17.9% (21 of 117), respectively, in the PF group. One treatment-related death occurred in the PF group. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that induction chemotherapy with 2 cycles of TPC for patients with stage IVA to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma improved failure-free survival compared with 2 cycles of PF, with no increase in the toxicity profile. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02940925.

Establishment and validation of a recursive partitioning analysis based prognostic model for guiding re-radiotherapy in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to establish and validate an integrated prognostic model for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (lrNPC) patients, and evaluate the benefit of re-radiotherapy (re-RT) in patients with different risk levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 531 patients with lrNPC were retrospectively reviewed in this study, including 271 patients from 2006 to 2012 as the training cohort and 260 patients from 2013 to 2016 as the validation cohort. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Multivariate analysis was performed to select the significant prognostic factors (P < 0.05). A prognostic model for OS was derived by recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) combining independent predictors using the algorithm of optimized binary partition. RESULTS: Three independent prognostic factors (age, relapsed T [rT] stage, and Epstein-Barr virus [EBV] DNA) were identified from multivariate analysis. Five prognostic groups were derived from an RPA model that combined rT stage and EBV DNA. After further pair-wise comparisons of survival outcome in each group, three risk groups were generated. We investigated the role of re-RT in different risk groups, and found that re-RT could benefit patients in the low (P < 0.001) and intermediate-risk subgroups (P = 0.017), while no association between re-RT and survival benefit was found in the high-risk subgroup (P = 0.328). The results of risk stratification and re-RT efficacy were verified in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: Age, rT stage and EBV DNA were identified as independent predictors for lrNPC. We established an integrated RPA-based prognostic model for OS incorporating rT stage and EBV DNA, which could guide individual treatment for lrNPC.

Deintensified Chemoradiotherapy for Pretreatment Epstein-Barr Virus DNA-Selected Low-Risk Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Phase II Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

PURPOSE: Cumulative doses of 200 mg/m2 for concurrent cisplatin (DDP) were indicated by retrospective studies as sufficient in conferring survival benefit for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). We performed an open-label, phase II, randomized, controlled trial to test the noninferiority of a two-cycle 100 mg/m2 concurrent DDP regimen over three-cycle in patients with low-risk LA-NPC with pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA levels < 4,000 copies/mL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive two cycles or three cycles concurrent DDP-based chemoradiotherapy. The primary end point was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points included overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, etc. RESULTS: Between September 2016 and October 2018, 332 patients were enrolled, with 166 in each arm. After a median follow-up of 37.7 months, the estimated 3-year PFS rates were 88.0% in the two-cycle group and 90.4% in the three-cycle group, with a difference of 2.4% (95% CI, -4.3 to 9.1, Pnoninferiority = .014). No differences were observed between groups in terms of PFS, overall survival, and the cumulative incidences of locoregional relapse and distant metastasis. Patients in the three-cycle group developed significantly more grade 3-4 mucositis (41 [24.8%] v 25 [15.1%]), hyponatremia (26 [15.8%] v 14 [8.4%]), and dermatitis (9 [5.5%] v 2 [1.2%]). The overall all-grade and grade 3-4 toxicity burdens were heavier in three-cycle group (T-scores, 12.33 v 10.57, P < .001 for all grades; 1.76 v 1.44, P = .05 for grade 3-4). Patients in the three-cycle group also showed more all-grade hearing impairment, dry mouth and skin fibrosis, and impaired long-term quality of life. CONCLUSION: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus two cycles of concurrent 100 mg/m2 DDP could be an alternative treatment option for patients with low-risk LA-NPC.

Effect of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Nedaplatin vs Cisplatin on the Long-term Outcomes of Survival and Toxic Effects Among Patients With Stage II to IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A 5-Year Follow-up Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Nedaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) regimen at 2 years was noninferior to cisplatin-based regimen in patients with locoregional, stage II to IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and was associated with fewer late adverse events, but longer-term outcomes and toxicity are unclear. Objective: To evaluate the 5-year outcomes and late toxicity profile of nedaplatin-based CCRT in patients with locoregional, stage II to IVB NPC. Design, Settings, and Participants: This 5-year follow-up secondary analysis of an open-label, noninferiority, multicenter randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with nonkeratinizing stage II to IVB NPC between January 16, 2012, and July 16, 2014, with a median follow-up duration of 78 months (IQR, 3-99 months). Data analysis was conducted from November 10, 2020, to July 8, 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive nedaplatin (100 mg/m2)- or cisplatin (100 mg/m2)-based chemotherapy every 3 weeks for 3 cycles concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and locoregional relapse-free survival. Results: A total of 402 eligible participants were enrolled (median [IQR] age, 45 [18-65] years; 302 [75.1%] male). Patients were randomly assigned to receive nedaplatin- or cisplatin-based CCRT (n = 201 for each): 196 patients (97.5%) started nedaplatin-based CCRT and 197 patients (98.0%) started cisplatin-based CCRT. Intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated a 5-year progression-free survival rate of 81.4% (95% CI, 75.9%-86.9%) for the cisplatin group and 79.8% (95% CI, 74.1%-85.5%) for nedaplatin group, with a difference of 1.6% (95% CI, -6.3% to 9.5%; P = .002 for noninferiority). No significant survival differences were observed between the cisplatin and nedaplatin groups for 5-year overall survival (89.4% vs 88.8%, P = .63), distant metastasis-free survival (85.9% vs 90.4%, P = .17), and locoregional relapse-free survival (92.6% vs 89.6%, P = .17) rates. The cisplatin group had a higher incidence of grade 3 and 4 auditory toxic effects than the nedaplatin group (35 [17.7%] vs 21 [10.5%], P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, long-term analysis confirmed that nedaplatin-based CCRT could be regarded as an alternative doublet treatment strategy to cisplatin-based CCRT in stage II to IVB NPC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01540136.

The Effect of Prolonged Duration of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is the most important primary treatment for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Generally, the treatment duration of radiotherapy takes six or six and half weeks with 30 to 33 fractions. The current study was conducted to evaluate the association between prognosis and the duration of radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. METHODS: Patients with primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma who were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with or without induction chemotherapy between January, 2008 and December, 2013 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: In total, 1292 patients were included. At a median follow-up of 71.0 months (range 2.0-126.0 months), locoregional recurrence, distant failure and death were observed in 8.8%, 12.2% and 15.6% of all patients, respectively. Estimated 5-year locoregional relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with radiation ≤ 7 weeks versus patients with radiation >7 weeks were: 93.2% versus 87.0% (P < 0.001), 89.4% versus 84.4% (P = 0.016), 79.8% versus 70.6% (P < 0.001) and 87.2% versus 78.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged duration of radiotherapy with a significantly higher risk of distant metastasis and death in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Understanding this point, healthcare providers should make efforts to avoid prolonged duration of radiotherapy to minimize the risk of treatment failure.

Impact of smoking on survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cohort study with 23,325 patients diagnosed from 1990 to 2016.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the survival outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who had different smoking behaviors and were treated with two- or three-dimensional radiotherapy (2D/3DRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with a long-term follow up. METHODS: From 1990 to 2016, 23,325 patients with NPC were included. The primary endpoint of this study was overall survival (OS). The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to assess the patients' survival outcomes. RESULTS: The 5-year OS rates in the entire cohort were 76.4%, 68.9%, and 79.8% in the former, current, and never smokers, respectively. In the IMRT cohort, the OS rates showed the same trend. Compared with the never smokers, the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was lower in the former (P = 0.004) and current smokers (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis of the IMRT cohort, the risk of death (P = 0.003) and recurrence (P = 0.027) was higher in the current smokers, while the risk of metastasis was higher in the former and current smokers (P = 0.031 and P = 0.019, respectively) than the never smokers. A total of 53.9% of the effect of smoking status on OS was through sex, age, and Epstein-Barr virus DNA, which were significant mediators. CONCLUSION: In the IMRT era, being a former smoker or current smoker was an independent risk factor for DMFS. The difference in OS and locoregional relapse-free survival was significant only between the current smokers and never smokers.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Schedules for Cisplatin Treatment in Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Previous studies suggest that a cumulative cisplatin dose of 200 mg/m2 might be adequate in the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) era for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). However, two cycles of once-every-3-weeks cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 has never been prospectively compared with standard once-a-week cisplatin regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This trial was conducted at three hospitals from 2011 to 2016. Patients who met the eligibility criteria were recruited (ChiCTR-TRC-12001979) and randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated sequence to receive once-every-3-weeks cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 for two cycles or once-a-week cisplatin at 40 mg/m2 for six cycles concurrently with IMRT. Primary endpoint was failure-free survival and between-group absolute difference of 10% as the noninferiority margin. RESULTS: A total of 510 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up time was 58.3 months with 85.4% of 3-year failure-free survival in the once-every-3-weeks group and 85.6% in the once-a-week group. An absolute difference of -0.2% (95% confidence interval, -6.3 to 5.9; P noninferiority = 0.0016). Acute toxicities of grade 3 or higher occurred in 55.8% in the once-every-3-weeks group and 66.3% in the once-a-week group (P = 0.015). The most common acute toxicities were hematologic abnormalities, including leukopenia (16% vs. 27%; P = 0.0022) and thrombocytopenia (1% vs. 5%; P = 0.015). The late grade 3-4 auditory loss rate was significantly lower in the once-every-3-weeks group than the once-a-week group (6% vs. 13%; P = 0.0039). CONCLUSIONS: Once-every-3-weeks cisplatin as concurrent chemoradiotherapy is noninferior to once-a-week cisplatin in the treatment efficacy in the LANPC. Although both regimens are well tolerated, severe acute toxicities and late-onset auditory loss are higher in the once-a-week group.