RESUMEN
Sick building syndrome (SBS) is an increasingly common problem, although continued skepticism exists regarding its validity. Because of this, the attribution of complaints to psychogenic causes or mas hysteria persists. In this study (N = 111), self-report measures of psychopathology (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory [Hathaway & McKinley, 1983] and SCL-90-R [Derogatis, 1983]) and physical symptom reports failed to discriminate symptomatic from nonsymptomatic workers in an affected building but could more generally differentiate workers in the target building from control subjects. These results suggest that SBS cannot be justifiably attributed to psychological factors alone, although working in a contaminated environment appeared to have deleterious psychological consequences for some workers. Smoking history (in pack/years [packs per day x number of years smoked]) was reliably associated with the development of symptoms in exposed workers. Issues related to the assessment of psychological complaints in SBS are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior , Procesos de Grupo , Histeria/psicología , Trastornos Somatomorfos/psicología , Humanos , Examen Neurológico , Inventario de Personalidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicometría , Factores de Riesgo , Medio SocialRESUMEN
"Sick building syndrome" (SBS) is one of the more colorful terms describing an increasingly common pattern of symptoms found among workers in modern office buildings. Core symptoms include lethargy, mucous membrane irritation, headache, eye irritation, and dry skin. To prompt a diagnosis of SBS, these otherwise common symptoms must be "excessively" reported and primarily "work-related." The World Health Organization now estimates that 30% of new or remodeled office buildings show signs of SBS, and that between 10% and 30% of the occupants of these buildings are affected by SBS. Despite such figures, SBS remains poorly researched and even more poorly understood. The following review provides the clinician an overview of SBS that will allow a more accurate differential diagnosis and will help to prevent the widespread suffering that can accrue when SBS is not quickly recognized.
Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Oftalmopatías/etiología , Cefalea/etiología , Enfermedades Faríngeas/etiología , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiología , Fases del Sueño/fisiología , Aire Acondicionado/efectos adversos , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/prevención & control , Oftalmopatías/diagnóstico , Arquitectura y Construcción de Instituciones de Salud/normas , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Arquitectura y Construcción de Hospitales/normas , Humanos , Laboratorios/normas , Enfermedades Faríngeas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Ventilación/normasRESUMEN
Aggressive behavior in children and adolescents is a heterogeneous phenomenon occurring in a wide variety of illnesses. No single etiologic model seems adequate to explain this phenomenon. In many cases, pharmacotherapy may prove to be a useful adjunct to treatment. Potentially useful medications are described in reference to psychiatric diagnosis. Pharmacological treatment can be helpful in the management of the aggressive youth when judiciously applied in the context of a comprehensive treatment plan.
Asunto(s)
Agresión/efectos de los fármacos , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Niño , HumanosRESUMEN
The relationship between juvenile delinquency and psychiatric disorders remains poorly understood. However, it is becoming more apparent that the spectrum of psychiatric illness present in juvenile delinquents is broader than once believed. Fifteen female juvenile delinquents committed to a residential treatment program were assessed for DSM-III diagnoses, using a structured diagnostic interview, the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents (DICA). A search of the literature revealed no other reports using the DICA in female juvenile delinquents. A broad spectrum of current and past diagnoses was discovered, including conduct disorder (100%), substance abuse/dependence (87%), major depression (67%), and anxiety disorders (47%). The average number of lifetime diagnoses per subject was 4.7; current diagnoses averaged 3.4 per subject. Additionally, criminal and status offense records were obtained for each subject. No significant relationship was noted between diagnoses and categories of offense. These results add further evidence for the presence of frequent and severe psychiatric disturbances in this population, and the need for increased clinical and research efforts by the psychiatric community.