[Pretherapeutic misclassification of esophageal cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction : Possibilities and clinical consequences]. / Prätherapeutische Fehlklassifikationen bei Ösophaguskarzinomen und Adenokarzinomen des ösophagogastralen Übergangs : Möglichkeiten und klinische Konsequenzen.

During the course of a malignant disease, the tumor needs to be classified repeatedly in order to facilitate decision-making in treatment and to estimate patients prognosis; however, a wrong classification of tumors can occur in different stages of the disease course with tremendous consequences for the affected patients. This review discusses the possible misclassifications which can occur in patients with esophageal cancer or adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), along with the consequences.

[Perioperative safety of intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy : Analysis of our first 111 pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) procedures]. / Perioperative Sicherheit der intraperitonealen Aerosolchemotherapie : Analyse unserer ersten 111 PIPAC("pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy")-Prozeduren.

BACKGROUND: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new tool in the treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. The aerosol containing chemotherapeutic drugs is administered laparoscopically into the abdominal cavity to achieve a local treatment effect. This can be carried out in combination with systemic chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within the framework of a register study, we prospectively documented and evaluated the data of our first 111 PIPAC procedures. The analysis focused on perioperative patient safety and safety at the workplace. Perioperative clinical patient data were analyzed and the platinum concentration in the operating room was checked by wipe samples. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were scheduled for PIPAC and 121 operations were carried out. In 9 procedures a secure access to the abdomen could not be found and 54 patients received 111 PIPAC treatments. One patient died as a result of intestinal perforation, six bowel lesions were treated immediately and healed without further complications. A further patient developed a postoperative renal failure. Otherwise, there was no major complications and no cases of toxicity. CONCLUSION: The PIPAC procedure can be used as a supplement to systemic drug treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis. An exact selection of suitable patients is important. The PIPAC is a low-risk procedure when performed under strict inclusion criteria and under standardized conditions, for the patients and also the surgical staff.

[Laparoscopic proctocolectomy technique : Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis. Video article]. / Technik der laparoskopischen Proktokolektomie : Restaurative Proktokolektomie mit ileopouchanaler Anastomose bei Colitis ulcerosa. Videobeitrag.

Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) constitutes a curative treatment option for therapy-refractory ulcerative colitis. A two-stage procedure with loop ileostomy at the time of IPAA is the most frequent variant of surgery. The aim of the procedure is the complete removal of the colon and rectum with simultaneous restoration of gastrointestinal continuity and preservation of continence functions. Long-term quality of life following laparoscopic proctocolectomy with IPAA is good and comparable with a healthy reference population. The surgical technique is demonstrated in detail with the help of a video of the operation, which is available online.

[How does the ileoanal pouch keep its promises? : Functioning of the ileoanal pouch after restorative proctocolectomy]. / Wie hält der ileoanale Pouch was er verspricht? : Die Funktion des ileoanalen Pouches nach restaurativer Proktokolektomie.

Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileoanal pouch anastomosis (IAPA) is the surgical therapy of choice for patients with refractory ulcerative colitis and/or associated (pre)neoplastic lesions. It is predominantly performed laparoscopically. Reconstruction with a J­pouch is the most frequently applied variant due to the ideal combination of technical simplicity and good long-term results. In the present review, potential postoperative pouch complications, their risk factors, diagnostics and surgical management, as well as mid-term and long-term quality of life after pouch construction are differentially presented based on the current literature.

Achalasia-an unnecessary long way to diagnosis.

Although achalasia presents with typical symptoms such as dysphagia, regurgitation, weight loss, and atypical chest pain, the time until first diagnosis often takes years and is frustrating for patients and nevertheless associated with high costs for the healthcare system. A total of 563 patients were interviewed with confirmed diagnosis of achalasia regarding their symptoms leading to diagnosis along with past clinical examinations and treatments. Included were patients who had undergone their medical investigations in Germany. Overall, 527 study subjects were included (male 46%, female 54%, mean age at time of interview 51 ± 14.8 years). Dysphagia was present in 86.7%, regurgitation in 82.9%, atypical chest pain in 79%, and weight loss in 58% of patients before diagnosis. On average, it took 25 months (Interquartile Range (IQR) 9-65) until confirmation of correct diagnosis of achalasia. Though, diagnosis was confirmed significantly quicker (35 months IQR 9-89 vs. 20 months IQR 8-53; p < 0.01) in the past 15 years. The majority (72.1%) was transferred to three or more specialists. Almost each patient underwent at least one esophagogastroduodenoscopy (94.2%) and one radiological assessment (89.3%). However, esophageal manometry was performed in 70.4% of patients only. The severity of symptoms was independent with regard to duration until first diagnosis (Eckardt score 7.14 ± 2.64 within 12 months vs. 7.29 ± 2.61 longer than 12 months; P = 0.544). Fifty-five percent of the patients primarily underwent endoscopic dilatation and 37% a surgical myotomy. Endoscopic dilatation was realized significantly faster compared to esophageal myotomy (1 month IQR 0-4 vs. 3 months IQR 1-11; p < 0.001). Although diagnosis of achalasia was significantly faster in the past 15 years, it still takes almost 2 years until the correct diagnosis of achalasia is confirmed. Alarming is the fact that although esophageal manometry is known as the gold standard to differentiate primary motility disorders, only three out of four patients had undergone this diagnostic pathway during their diagnostic work-up. Better education of medical professionals and broader utilization of highly sensitive diagnostic tools, such as high-resolution manometry, are strictly necessary in order to correctly diagnose affected patients and to offer therapy faster.