Conventional vs. endoscopic-assisted curettage of benign bone tumours. An experimental study.

BACKGROUND: This experimental study aimed at directly comparing conventional and endoscopic-assisted curettage towards (1) amount of residual tumour tissue (RTT) and (2) differences between techniques regarding surgical time and surgeons' experience level. METHODS: Three orthopaedic surgeons (trainee, consultant, senior consultant) performed both conventional (4x each) and endoscopic-assisted curettages (4x each) on specifically prepared cortical-soft cancellous femur and tibia sawbone models. "Tumours" consisted of radio-opaque polyurethane-based foam injected into prepared holes. Pre- and postinterventional CT-scans were carried out and RTT assessed on CT-scans. For statistical analyses, percentage of RTT in relation to total lesion's volume was used. T-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied to assess differences between surgeons and surgical techniques regarding RTT and timing. RESULTS: Median overall RTT was 1% (IQR 1 - 4%). Endoscopic-assisted curettage was associated with lower amount of RTT (median, 1%, IQR 0 - 5%) compared to conventional curettage (median, 4%, IQR 0 - 15%, p = 0.024). Mean surgical time was prolonged with endoscopic-assisted (9.2 ± 2.9 min) versus conventional curettage (5.9 ± 2.0 min; p = 0.004). No significant difference in RTT amount (p = 0.571) or curetting time (p = 0.251) depending on surgeons' experience level was found. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic-assisted curettage appears superior to conventional curettage regarding complete tissue removal, yet at expenses of prolonged curetting time. In clinical practice, this procedure may be reserved for cases at high risk of recurrence (e.g. anatomy, histology).

Keystone Flap Type IIIB: A New Variation for Coverage of Defects at Joint Regions.

Soft tissue defect reconstruction at joint regions is a challenging problem due to the sparse excessive tissue and late complication of constrigent scar formation. Priorly irradiated tissue, often the case in sarcoma patients, is especially problematic. The keystone design perforator island flap is safe and reliable. We now present a new keystone flap design, which is particularly suitable for the reconstruction of large soft tissue defects at joint regions. It provides a cutaneous component without the need for a skin graft and therefore minimizes the risk of contracture. Donor site morbidity is negligible. Furthermore, it offers a favorable aesthetic result compared to other flaps, eg, a muscular flap. We propose a new keystone flap design as an extension of Behan's classification, the Keystone flap type IIIb.

Epiphyseal lymphoid infiltrates of the knee in adolescents.

We present three adolescents with focal lesions of the distal femur that were shown to be benign aggregates of small lymphocytes and plasma cells of unknown origin. The patients were within the age of 12 and 14 years. All lesions presented with similar MRI findings and provided the same histopathological findings in the biopsy. Although all lesions increased in size, only one patient remained symptomatic and underwent subsequent tumor resection. To our best knowledge, tumor or pseudotumoral epiphyseal lymphoid infiltrates as seen in these three patients have not previously been described. We recommend a biopsy to rule out a malignant tumor or an infection. Observation, without further invasive testing in asymptomatic patients, is recommended until the resolution of the lesions. However, if a lesion becomes symptomatic, surgical resection should be considered.

The impact of biopsy sampling errors and the quality of surgical margins on local recurrence and survival in chondrosarcoma.

PURPOSE: To examine the frequency of computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy sampling errors in chondrosarcomas, as well as the impact of these errors and the achieved surgical margins on local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 68 consecutive patients treated for chondrosarcoma from 2000-2015 were retrospectively reviewed with a minimum follow-up duration of 2 years. RESULTS: The primary location was at the extremities in 46 patients (67.6%) and at the axial skeleton in 22 patients (32.4%). Seven patients underwent planned intralesional curettage. Surgical margins were assessed in the remaining 53 patients and included 21 wide (39.6%), 25 marginal (47.1%), and seven intralesional (13.2%) resections. Biopsy sampling errors occurred in ten patients (14.7%). LRFS was 82.2±7.8% at 5 years and 76.9±7.8% at 10 years. An intact anatomical barrier was associated with the most preferable LRFS of 89±10.5% after 10 years. DSS was 79.2±8.5% at 5 years and 75.5±6.4% at 10 years. The metric distance of the surgical margin and the presence of a biopsy sampling error did not affect either LRFS or DSS. CONCLUSION: Even though histological grading in chondrosarcoma is difficult, sampling errors in preoperative biopsies are relatively rare and do not adversely affect outcomes. The presence of an anatomical barrier has a greater impact on LRFS than the metric distance of the surgical margins.