Identification of pathogenic GCK variants in patients with common type 2 diabetes can lead to discontinuation of pharmacological treatment.

Background: Functionally disruptive variants in the glucokinase gene (GCK) cause a form of mild non-progressive hyperglycemia, which does not require pharmacological treatment. A substantial proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) carry GCK variants. We aimed to investigate whether carriers of rare GCK variants diagnosed with T2D have a glycemic phenotype and treatment response consistent with GCK-diabetes. Methods: Eight patients diagnosed with T2D from the Danish DD2 cohort who had previously undergone sequencing of GCK participated. Clinical examinations at baseline included an oral glucose tolerance test and continuous glucose monitoring. Carriers with a glycemic phenotype consistent with GCK-diabetes took part in a three-month treatment withdrawal. Results: Carriers of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants had lower median fasting glucose and C-peptide levels compared to carriers of variants of uncertain significance and benign variants (median fasting glucose: 7.3 (interquartile range: 0.4) mmol/l vs. 9.5 (1.6) mmol/l, p = 0.04; median fasting C-peptide 902 (85) pmol/l vs. 1535 (295) pmol/l, p = 0.03). Four participants who discontinued metformin treatment and one diet-treated participant were reevaluated after three months. There was no deterioration of HbA1c or fasting glucose (median baseline HbA1c: 49 (3) vs. 51 (6) mmol/mol after three months, p = 0.4; median baseline fasting glucose: 7.3 (0.4) mmol/l vs. 7.0 (0.6) mmol/l after three months, p = 0.5). Participants did not consistently fulfill best practice guidelines for GCK screening nor clinical criteria for monogenic diabetes. Discussion: Carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic GCK variants identified by unselected screening in T2D should be reported, as they have a glycemic phenotype and treatment response consistent with GCK-diabetes. Variants of uncertain significance should be interpreted with care. Systematic genetic screening of patients with common T2D receiving routine care can lead to the identification and precise care of patients with misclassified GCK-diabetes who are not identifiable through common genetic screening criteria.

The Gut-Bone Axis in Diabetes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe recent advances in the understanding of how gut-derived hormones regulate bone homeostasis in humans with emphasis on pathophysiological and therapeutic perspectives in diabetes. RECENT FINDINGS: The gut-derived incretin hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is important for postprandial suppression of bone resorption. The other incretin hormone, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), as well as the intestinotrophic glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) has been shown to suppress bone resorption in pharmacological concentrations, but the role of the endogenous hormones in bone homeostasis is uncertain. For ambiguous reasons, both patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes have increased fracture risk. In diabetes, the suppressive effect of endogenous GIP on bone resorption seems preserved, while the effect of GLP-2 remains unexplored both pharmacologically and physiologically. GLP-1 receptor agonists, used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity, may reduce bone loss, but results are inconsistent. GIP is an important physiological suppressor of postprandial bone resorption, while GLP-1 and GLP-2 may also exert bone-preserving effects when used pharmacologically. A better understanding of the actions of these gut hormones on bone homeostasis in patients with diabetes may lead to new strategies for the prevention and treatment of skeletal frailty related to diabetes.

The glucagon receptor antagonist LY2409021 does not affect gastrointestinal-mediated glucose disposal or the incretin effect in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes.

Objective: Gastrointestinal-mediated glucose disposal (GIGD) during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) reflects the percentage of glucose disposal caused by mechanisms elicited by the oral route of glucose administration. GIGD is reduced in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) due to a reduced incretin effect and possibly also due to inappropriate suppression of glucagon after oral glucose. We investigated the effect of glucagon receptor antagonism on GIGD, the incretin effect and glucose excursions in patients with T2D and controls without diabetes. Design: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled crossover study was conducted. Methods: Ten patients with T2D and 10 gender-, age- and BMI-matched controls underwent two 50 g OGTTs and 2 isoglycaemic i.v. glucose infusions, succeeding (~10 h) single-dose administration of 100 mg of the glucagon receptor antagonist LY2409021 or placebo, respectively. Results: Compared to placebo, LY2409021 reduced fasting plasma glucose in patients with T2D and controls. Plasma glucose excursions after oral glucose assessed by baseline-subtracted area under the curve were increased by LY2409021 compared to placebo in both groups, but no effect of LY2409021 on GIGD or the incretin effect was observed. LY2409021 increased fasting glucagon concentrations three-fold compared to placebo concentrations. Conclusions: Glucagon receptor antagonism with LY2409021 had no effect on the impaired GIGD or the impaired incretin effect in patients with T2D and did also not affect these parameters in the controls. Surprisingly, we observed reduced oral glucose tolerance with LY2409021 which may be specific for this glucagon receptor antagonist.

The glucagon receptor antagonist LY2409021 has no effect on postprandial glucose in type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) pathophysiology includes fasting and postprandial hyperglucagonemia, which has been linked to hyperglycemia via increased endogenous glucose production (EGP). We used a glucagon receptor antagonist (LY2409021) and stable isotope tracer infusions to investigate the consequences of hyperglucagonemia in T2D. DESIGN: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study was conducted. METHODS: Ten patients with T2D and ten matched non-diabetic controls underwent two liquid mixed meal tests preceded by single-dose administration of LY2409021 (100 mg) or placebo. Double-tracer technique was used to quantify EGP. Antagonist selectivity toward related incretin receptors was determined in vitro. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, LY2409021 lowered the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from 9.1 to 7.1 mmol/L in patients and from 5.6 to 5.0 mmol/L in controls (both P < 0.001) by mechanisms involving reduction of EGP. Postprandial plasma glucose excursions (baseline-subtracted area under the curve) were unaffected by LY2409021 in patients and increased in controls compared to placebo. Glucagon concentrations more than doubled during glucagon receptor antagonism. The antagonist interfered with both glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptors, complicating the interpretation of the postprandial data. CONCLUSIONS: LY2409021 lowered FPG concentrations but did not improve postprandial glucose tolerance after a meal in patients with T2D and controls. The metabolic consequences of postprandial hyperglucagonemia are difficult to evaluate using LY2409021 because of its antagonizing effects on the incretin receptors.

Liraglutide does not change bone turnover in clozapine- and olanzapine-treated schizophrenia overweight patients with prediabetes - randomized controlled trial.

Schizophrenia is associated with a lowered bone mineral density. The antidiabetic and body weight lowering glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide has shown to mitigate overweight and impaired glucose tolerance associated with olanzapine and clozapine. As liraglutide has been proposed to affect bone metabolism, we evaluated the effect of liraglutide on bone turnover markers (BTM) in patients with prediabetes and schizophrenia treated with olanzapine or clozapine. Patients diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder treated with the antipsychotic compounds clozapine and/or olanzapine, having prediabetes and a BMI above 27 kg/m2 were randomized to 16 weeks of treatment with liraglutide or placebo. Fasting state serum sampled in the morning from patients (n=78) were analysed for the BTM collagen type 1 C-telopeptide (CTX) and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP). After 16 weeks of treatment, no significant changes of neither P1NP nor CTX were observed when comparing liraglutide to placebo. No association between changes of bone turnover markers and change of body weight were found in the group treated with liraglutide. In conclusion, no treatment effect on CTX nor P1NP was observed, and thus, this study does not raise any concerns in patients with schizophrenia and prediabetes treated with liraglutide regarding bone-related adverse effects.

The Role of Glucagon in the Acute Therapeutic Effects of SGLT2 Inhibition.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) effectively lower plasma glucose (PG) concentration in patients with type 2 diabetes, but studies have suggested that circulating glucagon concentrations and endogenous glucose production (EGP) are increased by SGLT2i, possibly compromising their glucose-lowering ability. To tease out whether and how glucagon may influence the glucose-lowering effect of SGLT2 inhibition, we subjected 12 patients with type 2 diabetes to a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, crossover, double-dummy study comprising, on 4 separate days, a liquid mixed-meal test preceded by single-dose administration of either 1) placebo, 2) the SGLT2i empagliflozin (25 mg), 3) the glucagon receptor antagonist LY2409021 (300 mg), or 4) the combination empagliflozin + LY2409021. Empagliflozin and LY2409021 individually lowered fasting PG compared with placebo, and the combination further decreased fasting PG. Previous findings of increased glucagon concentrations and EGP during acute administration of SGLT2i were not replicated in this study. Empagliflozin reduced postprandial PG through increased urinary glucose excretion. LY2409021 reduced EGP significantly but gave rise to a paradoxical increase in postprandial PG excursion, which was annulled by empagliflozin during their combination (empagliflozin + LY2409021). In conclusion, our findings do not support that an SGLT2i-induced glucagonotropic effect is of importance for the glucose-lowering property of SGLT2 inhibition.

Bone Turnover Markers in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and/or Type 2 Diabetes During Oral Glucose and Isoglycemic Intravenous Glucose.

Context: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and vice versa, and both conditions are associated with an increased risk of fractures and altered bone turnover. Although patients with NAFLD typically suffer from decreased bone mineral density (BMD), T2D is associated with normal to high BMD. The pathophysiology is uncertain but may involve the gut-bone axis. Objective: We investigated the influence of the gut on glucose-induced changes in plasma bone turnover markers in healthy controls and patients with T2D and/or biopsy-verified NAFLD. Design: Cross-sectional cohort study. Patients: Patients with NAFLD with normal glucose tolerance, patients with NAFLD and T2D, patients with T2D without liver disease, and healthy controls. Interventions: Four-hour 50-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and an isoglycemic intravenous glucose infusion (IIGI). Main Outcome Measures: Collagen type 1 C-telopeptide (CTX), osteocalcin, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), and parathyroid hormone. Results: Plasma glucose levels achieved during OGTTs were successfully matched on corresponding IIGI days. Patients with NAFLD and T2D exhibited similar CTX suppression during the two glucose challenges (P = 0.46) and pronounced suppression of P1NP during IIGI compared with OGTT. Conversely, remaining groups showed greater (P < 0.05) CTX suppression during OGTT and similar suppression of bone formation markers during IIGI and OGTT. Conclusions: OGTT-induced CTX suppression seems to be impaired in patients with NAFLD and T2D, but preserved in patients with either NAFLD or T2D, suggesting that coexistence of T2D and NAFLD may affect gut-bone axis.