Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
1.
Urology ; 181: 55-62, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37544519

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the association between high-volume surgical kidney cancer centers and decreased mortality. To identify quality metrics that mediate this association. METHODS: We designed a cohort of 14,044 patients who were diagnosed with kidney cancer between 2004 and 2013 and underwent a partial or radical nephrectomy using SEER-Medicare data. Hospitals were divided into quartiles based on their total nephrectomy volume for the study period. We investigated 6 quality metrics as potential mediators of the association between hospital volume and mortality using a mediation model. RESULTS: At the highest volume centers, survival was higher at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year time intervals, respectively (91% vs 89%, 80% vs 76%, 70% vs 66%, 45% vs 38%, P < .001) compared to the lowest quartile nephrectomy centers. Receipt of partial nephrectomy for stage ≤T1a tumors explains 52.3% of the total association between hospital nephrectomy volume and mortality. Additionally, patients at the highest-volume centers were more likely to be younger (20% vs 26% 80≤ years old, P < .001), white (82% vs 78%, P < .001), reside in more densely populated counties (≥1 million residents, 62% vs 42%, P > .001), have a shorter mean length of stay (5.03 vs 5.88days, P < .001) when compared to those in the lowest-volume quartile. CONCLUSION: This analysis of SEER-Medicare data is the first to suggest that partial nephrectomy in the setting of T1a tumors mediates the association between hospital volume and mortality. Quality metrics that reduce mortality should be harnessed to develop more efficient and higher-quality health systems.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medicare , Nefrectomía , Riñón , Neoplasias Renales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía
2.
Urol Pract ; 8(3): 409-416, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37145664

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Our urology residency program transitioned to a night float system, where dedicated residents cover nights and are off duty during the day. Junior residents previously covered 5 hospitals every 5 to 7 nights and worked the following day (home call). This prospective observational study compared the 2 systems before and after the transition. METHODS: A validated survey was administered to residents and faculty to evaluate patient care, communication, quality of life, resident education, and duty hour violations. A separate survey was administered to nurses evaluating the on-call resident. Sleep was measured using actigraphy. RESULTS: Survey response rates were 80% to 100%. Junior residents rated night float as equivalent to home call for surgical case volume and superior in all other respects (p <0.05). Senior residents rated night float as superior for continuity of care, compassion, safety, efficiency for the day team, communication with nurses, quality of life, and time for reading and research (p <0.05). Faculty rated night float as superior for efficiency for the day team, handoffs, quality of life, and time for research (p <0.05). Nurses rated night float higher for availability, knowledge of plan for patient, respectfulness, communication, and ability to identify the resident on call (p <0.05). Mean duration of sleep was 2.5 and 7.1 hours for home call and night float, respectively (p <0.001). Junior residents reported fewer violations of the 80-hour and 8-hour-off rules with night float (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and nurses perceived night float to improve multiple domains. Residents slept more and had fewer duty hour violations on night float.

3.
Urology ; 148: 224-229, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32961225

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the geographic and pharmacy-type variation in costs for generic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) medications in order to improve drug price transparency and reduce health disparities. Medical therapy for BPH can be expensive, having significant implications for uninsured and underinsured patients. METHODS: We generated a 20% random sample of all pharmacies in Pennsylvania and queried each for the uninsured cash price of a 30-day prescription of tamsulosin 0.4mg daily, finasteride 5mg daily, oxybutynin immediate release 5mg TID and oxybutynin XL 10mg daily. Our primary objectives were to identify price variation based on pharmacy type (i.e., big chain and independent) and between geographic regions (predetermined by the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council Database). We fit multivariable quantile regression models to test for an association between drug price and region after controlling for pharmacy type. RESULTS: Among 575 retail pharmacies contacted, 473 responded (82% response rate). The median cash price was significantly higher for big chain pharmacies than for independent pharmacies for tamsulosin ($66 vs. $15), finasteride ($68 vs. $15), oxybutynin immediate release ($49 vs. $35), and oxybutynin XL ($79 vs. $31) (all p < 0.05). When controlling for region, the median and 75th percentile price of all drugs was significantly higher for big chain pharmacies. When controlling for pharmacy type, regional variation was noted in all four drugs at the 75th percentile price and was greater for independent pharmacies. CONCLUSION: Compared to independent pharmacies, big chain pharmacies charged significantly more for generic BPH medications to uninsured patients. However, independent pharmacies demonstrated more regional variation in their pricing.


Asunto(s)
Costos y Análisis de Costo , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Finasterida/economía , Ácidos Mandélicos/economía , Hiperplasia Prostática/economía , Tamsulosina/economía , Finasterida/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Ácidos Mandélicos/uso terapéutico , Pennsylvania , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Tamsulosina/uso terapéutico
4.
Cancer ; 127(2): 257-265, 2021 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33002197

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgeons play a pivotal role in combating the opioid crisis that currently grips the United States. Changing surgeon behavior is difficult, and the degree to which behavioral science can steer surgeons toward decreased opioid prescribing is unclear. METHODS: This was a single-institution, single-arm, pre- and postintervention study examining the prescribing of opioids by urologists for adult patients undergoing prostatectomy or nephrectomy. The primary outcome was the quantity of opioids prescribed in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) after hospital discharge. The primary exposure was a multipronged behavioral intervention designed to decrease opioid prescribing. The intervention had 3 components: 1) formal education, 2) individual audit feedback, and 3) peer comparison performance feedback. There were 3 phases to the study: a pre-intervention phase, an intervention phase, and a washout phase. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-two patients underwent prostatectomy, and 306 patients underwent nephrectomy. The median OMEs decreased from 195 to 19 in the prostatectomy patients and from 200 to 0 in the nephrectomy patients (P < .05 for both). The median OMEs prescribed did not increase during the washout phase. Prostatectomy patients discharged with opioids had higher levels of anxiety than patients discharged without opioids (P < .05). Otherwise, prostatectomy and nephrectomy patients discharged with and without opioids did not differ in their perception of postoperative pain management, activity levels, psychiatric symptoms, or somatic symptoms (P > .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a multipronged behavioral intervention significantly reduced opioid prescribing for patients undergoing prostatectomy or nephrectomy without compromising patient-reported outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Nefrectomía , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Prostatectomía , Administración Oral , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/psicología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Cirujanos/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Urólogos/psicología
5.
Can J Urol ; 27(1): 10138-10141, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32065873

RESUMEN

Renal artery aneurysms can present with gross hematuria and are potentially life-threatening in cases of rupture. We report a case of a young male with no prior genitourinary history who presents to an emergency department with sudden onset gross hematuria, clot retention, and right-sided flank pain. On evaluation, he was found to have a renal artery aneurysm bleeding into his collecting system and underwent renal artery embolization and rapid resolution of his hematuria. Renal vascular pathology should be considered in the differential diagnosis and timely diagnosis of this condition is imperative as surgical interventions have proven to be life-saving.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/complicaciones , Hematuria/etiología , Arteria Renal , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
6.
Urology ; 139: 84-89, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32061826

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of the introduction of the Pennsylvania Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) on discharge postoperative opioid prescriptions in patients undergoing major urologic procedures within a large single tertiary care hospital. Opioids have historically been prescribed to control postoperative pain, but with growing concern regarding opioid overdose, misuse, and diversion, measures have been introduced to curb opioid prescribing. Numerous states have introduced PDMP programs as a method to search patients' prior opioid prescriptions. These programs have reduced opioid prescriptions in emergency department and outpatient settings, but their effectiveness, and the use of a prescriber query mandate, in reducing postoperative opioid prescribing has not been established. METHODS: We identified 582 patients who underwent major prostate or renal surgery between July 1st 2016 and June 30th 2017 at a single large academic hospital. We examined prescribing trends in both opioid naive and opioid tolerant patients measuring 5mg oxycodone equivalents before and after a PDMP query was mandated on January 1st 2017. RESULTS: There was no significant difference is the number of opioid prescriptions given after introduction of the required PDMP query, but there was an 18% decrease in the median number of 5mg oxycodone equivalents prescribed before and after the PDMP query (P < .001). This was consistent in both an opioid naive and opioid exposed population. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to establish that required PDMP queries may reduce the number of discharge opioid pills prescribed in a surgical setting. Required PDMP queries may help reduce the harm associated with opioid overprescribing.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos , Eficiencia Organizacional , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Programas de Monitoreo de Medicamentos Recetados , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Urología/métodos , Urología/normas
7.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 18(3): 201-209.e2, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31917172

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We use observational methods to compare impact of perioperative chemotherapy timing (ie, neoadjuvant and adjuvant) on overall survival (OS) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer because there is no head-to-head randomized trial, and patient factors may influence decision-making. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, we identified patients receiving cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2013. Patients were classified as receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity of receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy was determined using gradient boosted models. Inverse probability of treatment weighted survival curves were adjusted for 13 demographic, socioeconomic, temporal, and oncologic covariates. RESULTS: We identified 1342 patients who received neoadjuvant (n = 676) or adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 666) with a median follow-up of 23 months (interquartile range, 9-55 months). Inverse probability of treatment weighted adjustment allows comparison of the groups head-to-head as well as counterfactual scenarios (eg, effect if those getting one treatment were to receive the other). The average treatment effect (ie, "head-to-head" comparison) of adjuvant compared with neoadjuvant on OS was not significant (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.31). However, the average treatment effect of the treated (ie, the effect if the neoadjuvant patients were to receive adjuvant instead) was associated with a 33% increase in risk of mortality if they were given adjuvant therapy instead (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.57). CONCLUSION: Significant treatment selection bias was noted in peri-cystectomy timing, which limits the ability to discriminate differential efficacy of these 2 approaches with observational data. However, patients with higher propensity to receive neoadjuvant therapy were predicted to have increased OS with approach, in keeping with existing paradigms from trial data.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Músculos/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Medicare , Neoplasias de los Músculos/patología , Invasividad Neoplásica , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
8.
Eur Urol Focus ; 6(2): 242-248, 2020 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31031042

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) may improve prostate cancer risk stratification and decrease the need for repeat biopsies in men on prostate cancer active surveillance (AS). However, the impact of mpMRI on AS-related healthcare spending has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the impact of mpMRI on AS-related Medicare expenditures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare files, we identified men ≥66 yr old with localized prostate cancer diagnosed during 2008-2013. OUTCOME MEASURES AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: With a validated algorithm, we classified men into AS with and without mpMRI groups. We then determined Medicare spending on AS in each group using inflation-adjusted, price-standardized Medicare payments for AS-related procedures (ie, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] tests, prostate biopsies, biopsy complications, and mpMRI). Multivariable median regression compared Medicare spending on AS for men who received mpMRI and those who did not. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified 9081 men on AS with a median follow-up of 45 mo (interquartile range 29-64 mo). Thirteen percent (N = 1225) received mpMRI. On multivariable median regression, receipt of mpMRI was associated with an additional $447 (95% confidence interval $409-487) in Medicare spending per year. We observed greater frequency of AS-related procedures and higher spending for identical procedures (eg, PSA or prostate biopsy) in the mpMRI group than in the non-mpMRI group (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare beneficiaries on AS, mpMRI is associated with additional annual Medicare spending. Future studies are needed to determine optimal use of mpMRI during AS to maximize value. PATIENT SUMMARY: Prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) helps physicians determine which prostate cancers are aggressive and which can be monitored safely. We studied whether using MRI during prostate cancer monitoring (also called active surveillance) resulted in increased healthcare spending. There was a modest increase in spending, but this may be worthwhile if the use of MRI allows physicians to monitor prostate cancer more accurately.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud , Medicare , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica/economía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Espera Vigilante/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
9.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 23(1): 144-150, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31462701

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The prostate biopsy pathology report represents a critical document used for decision-making in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, yet the content exceeds the health literacy of most patients. We sought to create and compare the effectiveness of a patient-centered prostate biopsy report compared with standard reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a modified Delphi approach, prostate cancer experts identified critical components of a prostate biopsy report. Patient focus groups provided input for syntax and formatting of patient-centered pathology reports. Ninety-four patients with recent prostate biopsies were block randomized to the standard report with or without the patient-centered report. We evaluated patient activation, self-efficacy, provider communication skills, and prostate cancer knowledge. RESULTS: Experts selected primary and secondary Gleason score and the number of positive scores as the most important elements of the report. Patients prioritized a narrative design, non-threatening language and information on risk classification. Initial assessments were completed by 87% (40/46) in the standard report group and 81% (39/48) in the patient-centered report group. There were no differences in patient activation, self-efficacy, or provider communication skills between groups. Patients who received the patient-centered report had significantly improved ability to recall their Gleason score (100% vs. 85%, p = 0.026) and number of positive cores (90% vs. 65%, p = 0.014). In total, 86% of patients who received the patient-centered report felt that it helped them better understand their results and should always be provided. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-centered pathology reports are associated with significantly higher knowledge about a prostate cancer diagnosis. These important health information documents may improve patient-provider communication and help facilitate shared decision-making among patients diagnosed with prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Informe de Investigación , Anciano , Biopsia/métodos , Biopsia/normas , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodos
10.
Urology ; 135: 106-110, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31626857

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine long- and short-term outcomes using cell salvage with a commercially available leukocyte depletion filter following radical cystectomy in an oncologic population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients, 87 of whom received a cell salvage transfusion, were retrospectively identified from chart review. Ninety-day outcomes as well as long-term mortality and cancer recurrence data were collected. Chi-square, Student's t, or Mann-Whitney U tests were used as appropriate. Multivariable regressions of survival were performed with a Cox proportional-hazards model. RESULTS: Those who received a cell salvage transfusion did not show any differences in rate of cancer recurrence (23%) vs those who did not receive a cell salvage transfusion (24%; P = .85). There were also no differences noted in mortality rates between the 2 populations (12% vs 17%; P = .36). Furthermore, no differences were noted in postoperative complication rates, length of hospital stay, 90-day culture positive infections or readmissions (P >.05). CONCLUSION: There are no significant differences in short-term or long-term patient outcomes between those who did and did not receive an intraoperative cell salvage transfusion. Cell salvage transfusions with a leukocyte depletion filter are safe and effective methods to reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusions while controlling for the theoretical risk of metastatic spread.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Transfusión de Sangre Autóloga/efectos adversos , Cistectomía/efectos adversos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recuperación de Sangre Operatoria/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Transfusión de Sangre Autóloga/métodos , Femenino , Filtración/instrumentación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos de Reducción del Leucocitos/instrumentación , Leucocitos/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Siembra Neoplásica , Recuperación de Sangre Operatoria/instrumentación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
11.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 17(6): e1171-e1180, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31543443

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Regionalization of complex surgical care results in increasing need for patients to travel for complex oncologic procedures such as cystectomy in bladder cancer. We examined the association between travel distance to a cystectomy center, readmission, and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data, we identified bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy during 2004-2011. Patients were grouped into quartiles of distance to cystectomy center in miles (< 6 [close], 6-16.9 [moderately close], 17-47.9 [moderately far], ≥ 48 [far]). Multivariable logistic regression, accounting for clustering within hospitals, was used to assess the association between travel distance and readmission. A secondary analysis examined the association between travel distance and survival using multivariable proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: Among 4556 patients who underwent cystectomy, 1857 (41%) were readmitted, and 1251 (67%) of readmissions were to the index hospital. With increasing travel distance there was no significant difference in the overall rate of 90-day readmission. However, the farther a patient traveled, the lower the odds of being readmitted to the index hospital (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] as follows: moderately close, 0.43 miles [0.29-0.63]; moderately far, 0.14 miles [0.10-0.19]; and far, 0.07 [0.05-0.11]). Increasing travel distance was associated with improved survival. CONCLUSION: With greater distance traveled to a cystectomy center, rates of readmission to nonindex centers increased. Survival differences may be explained by the impact of travel burden on processes of care and case mix. Future efforts should focus on improving care coordination between index and nonindex hospitals and ensuring equitable access to cystectomy and other critical cancer services.


Asunto(s)
Cistectomía/métodos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Programa de VERF , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Viaje , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidad
12.
Urology ; 133: 40-45, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31255539

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To model the risk of radiation-induced malignancy from computed tomography urography (CTU) in evaluation of gross hematuria and contrast this with the benefits of urinary tract cancer detection when compared to renal ultrasound. METHODS: A PUBMED-based literature search was performed to identify model inputs. Estimates of radiation-induced malignancy rates were obtained from the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII report with dose extrapolation using the linear no-threshold model. RESULTS: Male gender and age over 50 years were associated with a relative risk of upper tract malignancy of 2.04 and 2.95, respectively. The risk of upper tract malignancy missed by renal ultrasound ranged from 0.055% in females under 50 to 0.51% in males over 50. Risk of CTU-induced malignancy with associated loss of life expectancy ranged from 0.25% and 0.027 years in females under 50 to 0.08% and 0.0054 years in males over 50. For CTU to be superior to renal ultrasound, an undiagnosed upper tract malignancy would have to carry a loss of life expectancy of 49.2 years in females under 50, 13.4 years in males under 50, 2.6 years in females over 50, and 1.1 years in males over 50. CONCLUSION: In low-risk patients, CTU for evaluation of gross hematuria may carry a significant risk of radiation-induced secondary malignancy relative to the diagnostic benefit offered over renal ultrasound.


Asunto(s)
Hematuria/diagnóstico por imagen , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Urografía/efectos adversos , Urografía/métodos , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Hematuria/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Ultrasonografía/efectos adversos
13.
Urol Oncol ; 37(7): 462-469, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31053530

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Contemporary guidelines recommend cystectomy with neoadjuvant or adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy given with curative intent for patients with resectable muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, rates and appropriateness of perioperative chemotherapy utilization remain unclear. We therefore sought to characterize use of perioperative chemotherapy in older radical cystectomy MIBC patients and examine factors associated with use. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data, we identified patients with MIBC diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 and treated with radical cystectomy. We classified patients into 3 treatment groups: cystectomy alone, neoadjuvant, or adjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was classified by regimen. We then fit a multinomial multivariable logistic regression model to assess association between patient factors with the receipt of each treatment. RESULTS: We identified 3,826 eligible patients. The majority (484; 65%) received cystectomy alone. Neoadjuvant (676; 18% overall, 69% cisplatin-based), and adjuvant chemotherapy (666, 17% overall, 55% cisplatin-based) were used in similar proportions of cystectomy patients. Over the study period, the odds of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy decreased by 7.5%, whereas neoadjuvant therapy increased by 27.5% (both P < 0.001). There was an increase in use of cisplatin-based regimens in the neoadjuvant setting (35 to 72%, P < 0.001), but not the adjuvant setting. Female gender, lower comorbidity, married status, and lower stage disease were associated with greater odds of receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: From 2004 to 2013 use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for MIBC increased while use of adjuvant chemotherapy decreased. Future studies examining barriers to appropriate chemotherapy use, and the comparative effectiveness of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Terapia Neoadyuvante/tendencias , Atención Perioperativa/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/normas , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/normas , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/tendencias , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Cistectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estado Civil/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/normas , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
14.
Urology ; 130: 99-105, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30940480

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in male Medicare beneficiaries electing active surveillance for prostate cancer. mpMRI has emerged as a tool that may improve risk-stratification and decrease repeated biopsies in men electing active surveillance. However, the extent to which mpMRI has been implemented in active surveillance has not been established. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry data linked to Medicare claims data, we identified men with localized prostate cancer diagnosed between 2008 and 2013 and managed with active surveillance. We classified men into 2 treatment groups: active surveillance without mpMRI and active surveillance with mpMRI. We then fit a multivariable logistic regression models to examine changing mpMRI utilization over time, and factors associated with the receipt of mpMRI. RESULTS: We identified 9467 men on active surveillance. Of these, 8178 (86%) did not receive mpMRI and 1289 (14%) received mpMRI. The likelihood of receiving mpMRI over the entire study period increased by 3.7% (P = .004). On multivariable logistic regression, patients who were younger, white, had lower comorbidity burden, lived in the northeast and west, had higher incomes and lived in more urban areas had greater odds of receiving mpMRI (all P < .05). CONCLUSION: From 2008 to 2013, use of mpMRI in active surveillance increased gradually but significantly. Receipt of mpMRI among men on surveillance for prostate cancer varied significantly across demographic, geographic, and socioeconomic strata. Going forward, studies should investigate causes for this variation and define ideal strategies for equitable, cost-effective dissemination of mpMRI technology.


Asunto(s)
Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Espera Vigilante , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Estados Unidos
15.
BJU Int ; 123(6): 968-975, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30758125

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe the rate and determinants of palliative care use amongst Medicare beneficiaries with bladder cancer and encourage a national dialogue on improving coordinated urological, oncological, and palliative care in patients with genitourinary malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, we identified patients diagnosed with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) between 2008 and 2013. Our primary outcome was receipt of palliative care, defined as the presence of a claim submitted by a Hospice and Palliative Medicine subspecialist. We examined determinants of palliative care use using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Over the study period, 7303 patients were diagnosed with MIBC and 262 (3.6%) received palliative care. Of 2185 patients with advanced bladder cancer, defined as either T4, N+ , or M+ disease, 90 (4.1%) received palliative care. Most patients that received palliative care (>80%, >210/262) did so within 24 months of diagnosis. On multivariable analysis, patients receiving palliative care were more likely to be younger, female, have greater comorbidity, live in the central USA, and have undergone radical cystectomy as opposed to a bladder-sparing approach. The adjusted probability of receiving palliative care did not significantly change over time. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care provides a host of benefits for patients with cancer, including improved spirituality, decrease in disease-specific symptoms, and better functional status. However, despite strong evidence for incorporating palliative care into standard oncological care, use in patients with bladder cancer is low at 4%. This study provides a conservative baseline estimate of current palliative care use and should serve as a foundation to further investigate physician-, patient-, and system-level barriers to this care.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Programa de VERF , Factores Socioeconómicos , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
17.
Urology ; 123: 101-107, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30149041

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of prescription opioids in patients undergoing major prostate and kidney operations. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study that includes opioid naïve patients who underwent a major prostate or kidney operation from January 2017-May 2017. A telephone survey was conducted 3-4 weeks postoperatively. The survey assessed the number of 5 mg oxycodone-equivalents prescribed, opioid use, and disposal. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were included in our analysis. Most patients were male (86%), most were married (74%), the median was age 64 (interquartile range 59-70), and the majority were Caucasian (84%). Most patients reported social alcohol use (56%), but most denied current tobacco use (77%) or current and/or previous drug use (76%). Opioid prescribing exceeded use from 1.9- to 6.8-fold for all procedural categories. Overall, a total of 4065 oxycodone-equivalents were prescribed during this study and 60% of pills prescribed went unused. This resulted in 2622 excess pills in the community. CONCLUSION: Opioids are prescribed far in excess of need following major open and minimally invasive urologic procedures. Overall, 60% of prescribed opioids were unused. These data provide initial benchmarks for appropriate opioid prescribing after major prostate and kidney procedures. Future work to validate this initial guideline and improve patient counseling regarding appropriate perioperative opioid use and disposal is needed.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Nefrectomía , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Prostatectomía , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
18.
Urology ; 124: 223-228, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30359708

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize geographic variability of generic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) medications in order to improve drug price transparency and improve patient access to affordable medication sources. This is of interest because BPH is one of the most common chronic diseases in men and contributes to individual healthcare cost. Medical therapy is the main treatment modality for BPH, burdening patients with lifelong medication expenses which may impact adherence and subsequent outcomes. With an aging population, this is compounded by many older individuals requiring multiple daily medications. METHODS: All pharmacies within a 25-mile radius of our institution were identified and classified as chain, wholesale or independent. The out-of-pocket price for a 30-day supply of tamsulosin (0.4 mg), finasteride (5 mg), oxybutynin (5 mg TID), and oxybutynin 10 mg XL were obtained using a scripted telephone survey. Multivariable linear regression assessed the association between census-tract level demographic and socioeconomic factors and disparate generic out-of-pocket drug-pricing. RESULTS: The response rate was 93% with 255 pharmacies across 173 census tracts providing data. By pharmacy type, there was up to 5.5-fold variation in median out-of-pocket drug prices for the most common BPH medications. Demographic and socioeconomic factors were not significantly associated with generic BPH drug price variation. CONCLUSION: The out-of-pocket price of generic medications for BPH varies significantly between pharmacies in a geographically-confined area. This study highlights the need for quality improvement initiatives that empower patients to price-compare and improve drug price transparency.


Asunto(s)
Comercio/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Pennsylvania
20.
BJU Int ; 122(5): 754-759, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29896932

RESUMEN

Opioid abuse and addiction is causing widespread devastation in communities across the USA and resulting in significant strain on our healthcare system. There is increasing evidence that prescribers are at least partly responsible for the opioid crisis because of overprescribing, a practice that developed from changes in policy and reimbursement structures. Surgeons, specifically, have been subject to scrutiny as 'adequate treatment' of post-surgical pain is poorly defined and data suggest that many patients receive much larger opioid prescriptions than needed. The consequences of overprescribing include addiction and misuse, dispersion of opioids into the community, and possible potentiation of illicit drug/heroin use. Several solutions to this crisis are currently being enacted with variable success, including Prescription Drug Monitoring Programmes, policy-level interventions aimed to de-incentivize overprescribing, limiting opioid exposures through Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols, and the novel idea of creating surgery- and/or procedure-specific prescribing guidelines. This problem is likely to require not one, but several potential solutions to reverse its trajectory. It is critical, however, that we as physicians and prescribers find a way to stop the needless overprescribing while still treating postoperative pain appropriately.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prescripción Inadecuada , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Epidemias , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Cultura Organizacional , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Cirujanos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA