RESUMEN
High energy pelvic injuries sustain significant mortality rates, due to acute exsanguination and severe associated injuries. Managing the hemodynamically unstable trauma patient with a bleeding pelvic fracture still forms a major challenge in acute trauma care. Various approaches have been applied through the last decades. At present the concept of Damage Control Resuscitation (DCR) is universally accepted and applied in major trauma centers internationally. DCR combines hemostatic blood transfusions to restore blood volume and physiologic stability, reduced crystalloid fluid administration, permissive hypotension, and immediate hemorrhage control by operative or angiographic means. Different detailed algorithms and orders of hemostatic procedures exist, without clear consensus or guidelines, depending on local traditions and institutional setups. Fracture reduction and immediate stabilization with a binder constitute the basis for angiography and embolization (AE) or pelvic packing (PP) in the hemodynamically unstable patient. AE is time consuming and may not be available 24/7, whereas PP offers a quick and technically easy procedure well suited for the patient in extremis. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has also been described as a valuable adjunct in hemostatic non-responders, but merely constitute a bridge to surgical or angiographic hemostasis and its definitive role in DCR is not yet clearly established. A swift algorithmic approach to the hemodynamically unstable pelvic injury patient is required to achieve optimum results. The present paper summarizes the available literature on the acute management of the bleeding pelvic trauma patient, with emphasis on initial assessment and damage control resuscitation including surgical and angiographic hemostatic procedures. Furthermore, initial treatment of open fractures and associated injuries to the nervous and genitourinary system is outlined.
RESUMEN
Background The advantage of pronator quadratus (PQ) repair following internal fixation via the volar approach in distal radius fracture (DRF) surgery remains unconfirmed in the literature. The aim of this study was to compare grip strength, patient-reported outcomes, and functional results between patients with an intact PQ and those with a ruptured PQ before undergoing surgery with a volar locking plate for dorsally displaced unstable extra-articular DRFs. Methods A total of 120 patients aged 55 years and older were included in a randomized controlled trial comparing a volar locking plate with a dorsal nail plate. Of the 60 patients randomized to the volar plate group, the integrity of the PQ muscle was recorded during surgery for 55 patients, who were included in this study. The outcomes measured were the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Outcome Measure (QuickDASH) score, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, the EQ-5D index, the visual analog scale (VAS) score, grip strength, and range of motion (ROM). Results The median age was 67 years (range 55 to 88), and the one-year follow-up rate was 98%. Patients with an identified intact PQ (28/55) before surgical release had better QuickDASH scores after one year (2.5 vs 8.0, mean difference 5.5, 95% CI: 1.3 to 9.8, p=0.028). Patients in the intact group also had better EQ-5D Index scores after one year (0.94 vs 0.85, mean difference 0.089, 95% CI: 0.004 to 0.174, p=0.031), and demonstrated better grip strength throughout the trial; after one year: 24 kg vs 20 kg (mean difference 3.9; 95% CI: 0.3 to 7.6, p=0.016). After one year, the intact group had regained 96% of their grip strength and the nonintact group had regained 93% of their grip strength compared to the uninjured side. The observed differences may be of questionable clinical importance, as they were lower than those of previously proposed minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs). Conclusions Patients with a DRF and a ruptured PQ prior to surgery exhibited higher QuickDASH scores and lower EQ-5D index scores after one year. The integrity of the PQ should be reported in future studies.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Surgery is widely recognised as the treatment of choice for suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures, because of the assumption that these injuries yield instability of the ankle joint. Stability assessment of ankle fractures using weightbearing radiographs is now used regularly to guide the treatment of transsyndesmotic and infrasyndesmotic ankle fractures. Patients with a congruent ankle joint on weightbearing radiographs can be treated non-operatively with excellent results. Weightbearing radiographs are, however, rarely performed on suprasyndesmotic fractures due to the assumed unstable nature of these fractures. If weightbearing radiographs can be used to identify suprasyndesmotic fractures suitable for non-operative treatment, we may save patients from the potential burdens of surgery.Our aim is to compare the efficacy of operative and non-operative treatment of patients with suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures that reduce on weightbearing radiographs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A non-inferiority randomised controlled trial involving 120 patients will be conducted. A total of 120 patients with suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures with an initial radiographic medial clear space of <7 mm will be subjected to weightbearing radiographs. If the tibio-talar joint is completely reduced, we will randomise in a 1:1 ratio to either operative treatment including reduction and fixation of the syndesmosis or non-operative treatment with an orthosis. The primary study outcome is patient-reported ankle function and symptoms as measured by the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score at 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, range of motion, radiographic results and rates of adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research South East, group A (permission number: 169307), has granted ethics approval. The results of this study will provide valuable insights for developing future diagnostic and treatment strategies for a common fracture type. The findings will be shared through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04615650.