Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Health Popul Nutr ; 43(1): 127, 2024 Aug 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39160610

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Understanding healthcare-seeking behavior and examining health expenditures can help determine possible barriers to accessing healthcare and direct more effective and inclusive healthcare systems. This study aimed to evaluate healthcare-seeking behavior and out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in a sample of the population in Erbil, Iraq. METHODS: We conducted this cross-sectional study in Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, from October to December 2023. A convenience sample of 414 adults completed a self-administered online survey. The following data were collected: recent illness, sociodemographic characteristics, type of healthcare received, and cost of healthcare. RESULTS: The most common health conditions reported were communicable diseases (16.3%), musculoskeletal problems (13.1%), and noncommunicable diseases (12.7%). Approximately 85% of patients with health conditions requiring care sought healthcare; most visited private clinics (46.3%) and private hospitals (18.6%). The median total out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in US dollars was 117.3 (interquartile range (IQR) = 45.6-410.0). The median total cost was much greater for participants who first visited a private health facility (USD 135.5, IQR = 57.3-405.6) than those who first visited a public facility (USD 76.8, IQR = 16.1-459.7). Participants ≥ 60 years spent significantly more than those < 14 years (USD 332, 95% CI = 211-453, p < 0.001). Evermarried participants spent significantly more than unmarried (USD 97, 95% CI = 1 to 192, p = 0.047). Health expenditures were significantly greater for noncommunicable diseases than infectious diseases (USD 232, 95% CI = 96-368, p = 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, age ≥ 60 years was independently associated with higher spending (USD 305, 95% CI = 153-457, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most participants sought care from formal health services, preferring the private sector. Seeking care from private facilities incurred significantly higher costs than seeking care from public ones, which suggests potential barriers to accessing healthcare, particularly affordability. The findings underscore the importance of evaluating existing healthcare policies to enhance effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. This study can help policymakers and healthcare providers design effective interventions, allocate resources efficiently, and improve healthcare delivery.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Irak , Masculino , Femenino , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Adulto , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/economía , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/terapia , Adolescente , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Transmisibles/economía , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles/terapia
2.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 17(9): 1221-1230, 2023 09 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37824355

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Human perceptions and behavioural responses to the risk of epidemics have always been crucial factors in studying and containing disease spread. This study aims to assess and understand the risk perception and the behavioural response of a sample of the population in the Kurdistan Region toward COVID-19. METHODOLOGY: A self-administered online survey (designed on Google Forms) was designed to get a rapid appraisal of the risk perception and behavioural response of people living in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region about COVID-19 from 17-25 November 2020. RESULTS: A total of 390 individuals responded to the survey. Many respondents (65.6%) recognized COVID-19 as a high or very high threat level. The most frequently applied protective behaviours included avoiding spitting on the ground (76.2%), avoiding contacting ill persons (75.9%) and wearing face masks (75.6%). The main source of information about COVID-19 was Internet news (46.2%), followed by social media (44.9%). Significantly higher perceptions of the threat of COVID-19 were found among females (p = 0.004) and those having family members with chronic diseases (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the general public's risk perception toward the COVID-19 infection is essential for determining effective protective measures and can be used to guide proper preventive behaviour.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Epidemias , Femenino , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Irak/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
PLoS One ; 17(11): e0265799, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36318575

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Understanding the perspectives of the key players in the community regarding female genital cutting (FGC) is very important for directing preventive programs. Religious leaders help shape community behaviors, which is highly pertinent in the case of FGC as it is frequently perceived to be a religious requirement. This study assesses religious leaders' knowledge, attitudes, and positions towards FGC in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. It included a purposive sample of 147 local religious leaders (khateebs) representing the three governorates of Erbil, Sulaimaniyah, and Duhok. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data about the religious leaders' knowledge, attitude, and position towards FGC. RESULTS: The participants identified reduction of the sexual desire of women as the main benefit (37%) and risk (24%) of FGC. Cultural tradition and religious requirements were the main reported reasons for practicing FGC. About 59% of the religious leaders stated that people ask for their advice on FGC. Around 14% of the participants supported performing FGC, compared to 39.1% who opposed it. Religious (73.9%) and cultural (26.1%) rationales were the main reasons given for supporting FGC. Being a cultural practice with harmful effects (53.5%) and lack of clear religious evidence (46.6%) were the main reasons for being against FGC. Around 52% of the participants recommended banning FGC by law, while 43.5% did not support banning it. A statistically significant association (P = 0.015) was found between religious leaders' residence and their position on performing FGC. More than 46% of those residing in Duhok were against performing FGC, compared to lower proportions in Erbil (38.8%) and Sulaimaniyah (30%). CONCLUSION: Religious leaders believed that cultural tradition was the main reason behind practicing FGC and they believed that FGC is not common in KRI, and even that it is decreasing. The religious leaders in our study reported that they could have an influential role in the FGC issue due to their position in the community. There was no statistically significant association between religious leaders' age, education level, or work experience and their position on performing FGC. However, a statistically significant association was found between religious leaders' residence and their position on performing FGC. A conclusive decision concerning the prohibition of FGC needs to be made by religious authorities. Health awareness activities incorporating FGC risks should be carried out to inform religious leaders at different levels of religious positions. Further research exploring perspectives of religious authorities concerning religious leaders' inconclusive judgment about FGC is deemed necessary.


Asunto(s)
Circuncisión Femenina , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Irak , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
J Interpers Violence ; 37(13-14): NP11811-NP11835, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33637006

RESUMEN

There is increasing concern about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown's social and economic consequences on gender-based violence. This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gender-based violence by comparing the prevalence of spousal violence against women before and during the COVID-19 related lockdown periods. This study was conducted in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq using a self-administered online questionnaire survey after the COVID-19 lockdown period in June 2020. Data were collected from a sample of 346 married women about the occurrence, frequency, and forms of spousal violence before and during the lockdown period. Significant increases in violence were observed from the pre-lockdown period to the lockdown period for any violence (32.1% to 38.7%, p = .001), emotional abuse (29.5% to 35.0%, p = .005), and physical violence (12.7% to 17.6%, p = .002). Regarding emotional abuse, humiliation (24.6% to 28.3%, p = .041) and scaring or intimidation (14.2% to 21.4%, p < .001) significantly increased during the lockdown. For physical violence, twisting the arm or pulling hair (9.0% to 13.0%, p = .004) and hitting (5.2% to 9.2%, p = .003) significantly increased during the lockdown. Forcing to have sexual intercourse also significantly increased during lockdown (6.6% to 9.5%., p = .021). The concerned authorities and women's rights organizations should collaborate to enhance the prevention of violence against women. An effective prevention strategy should emphasize recognizing and acknowledging the extent of the problem, raising awareness about the problem and the available resources to address it, and ensuring social and economic stability. Lessons learned about the increased prevalence of spousal violence against women during the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to adopt appropriate strategies to prevent and address it will be valuable for similar future crises.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Maltrato Conyugal , COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Femenino , Humanos , Irak , Pandemias/prevención & control , Prevalencia , Maltrato Conyugal/psicología
5.
Soc Work Public Health ; 36(4): 474-485, 2021 05 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33866952

RESUMEN

This study explores the risk perceptions and behavioral responses of university academics and students toward the COVID-19 pandemic. All universities in Iraqi Kurdistan were invited to take part in a self-administered online survey; 976 individuals ultimately completed it. The survey included eight main questions about personal risk perception and behavioral response to COVID-19 based on a five- or nine-point ordinal scale. A high percentage of the respondents perceived it as highly unlikely they were at risk of getting infection (26.9%), serious illness (29.7%), and death (41.7%). The percentage of the respondents who applied protective measures frequently or always was high for most protective behavior types, except for wearing masks, wearing gloves, and avoiding touching the face. There was a significant (P < .001) weak positive correlation between risk perception and protective behaviors. The respondents followed protective behavior measures reasonably, but the frequency of undertaking some important protective behaviors was relatively low.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/psicología , Docentes/psicología , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/psicología , Estudiantes/psicología , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Irak/epidemiología , Masculino , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Universidades
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA