Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 522, 2024 May 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783175

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) are a critical public health threat globally; however, there are inadequate surveillance data, especially in intensive care units (ICU), to inform infection prevention and control in many resource-constrained settings. Here, we assessed the prevalence of CR-GNB infections and risk factors for acquisition in a Kenyan ICU. METHODS: A hospital-based cross-sectional study design was adopted, recruiting 162 patients clinically presenting with bacterial infection after 48 h of ICU admission, from January to October 2022 at the Nairobi West Hospital, Kenya. Demographics and clinical data were collected by case report form. The type of sample collected, including blood, tracheal aspirate, ascitic tap, urine, stool, and sputum depended on the patient's clinical presentation and were transported to the hospital Microbiology laboratory in a cool box for processing within 2 h. The samples were analyzed by cultured and BD Phoenix system used for isolates' identity and antimicrobial susceptibility. RESULTS: CR-GNB infections prevalence was 25.9% (42/162), with Klebsiella pneumoniae (35.7%, 15/42) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (26.2%, 11/42) predominating. All isolates were multidrug-resistant (MDR). P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii were 100% colistin-resistant, while K. pneumoniae (33.3%) was tigecycline-resistant. History of antibiotics (aOR = 3.40, p = 0.005) and nasogastric tube (NGT) use (aOR = 5.84, p = < 0.001) were the risk factors for infection. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights high MDR- and CR-GNB infections in ICU, with prior antibiotic exposure and NGT use as risk factors, and diminishing clinical value of colistin and tigecycline. In this study setting and beyond, strict implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs and adherence to infection prevention and control through monitoring, evaluation and feedback are warranted to curb CR-GNB infections, especially among the risk groups.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Carbapenémicos , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Humanos , Kenia/epidemiología , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Femenino , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Prevalencia , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Adulto Joven
2.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ; 22(1): 85, 2023 Sep 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37710247

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) are at risk of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) infections, especially those caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates, increasing morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. However, epidemiological surveillance data on MDR bacteria to inform infection prevention and control (IPCs) interventions is limited in our study setting. Here we assessed the prevalence and factors associated with GNB infections in ICU- patients admitted in our study setting. METHODS: This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study among patients admitted to ICU at the Nairobi West Hospital, Kenya, between January and October 2022. Altogether, we recruited 162 patients, excluding those hospitalized for less than 48 h and declining consent, and collected demographics and clinical data by case report form. Blood, wound and throat swab, ascetic tap, stool, urine, tracheal aspirate, and sputum samples were collected cultured. Isolates identity and antimicrobial susceptibility were elucidated using the BD Phoenix system. RESULTS: The prevalence of GNB infections was 55.6%, predominated by urinary tract infections (UTIs). We recovered 13 GNB types, with Escherichia coli (33.3%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (31.1%) as the most common isolates. Factors associated with GNB infections were a history of antibiotic use (aOR = 4.23, p = 0.001), nasogastric tube use (NGT, aOR = 3.04, p = 0.013), respiratory tract (RT, aOR = 5.3, p = 0.005) and cardiovascular (CV, aOR = 5.7, p = 0.024) conditions. 92% of the isolates were MDR,predominantly Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CONCLUSION: We report a high prevalence of MDR-GNB infections, predominated by UTI, in ICU, whereby patients with a history of antibiotic use, using the NGT, and having RT and CV conditions were at increased risk. To improve the management of ICU-admitted patients, continuous education, training, monitoring, evaluation and feedback on infection prevention and control are warranted in our study setting.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Humanos , Kenia/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae
3.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 14(2): 256-264, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31422786

RESUMEN

On August 14, 2017, a 6-kilometer mudslide occurred in Regent Area, Western Area District of Sierra Leone following a torrential downpour that lasted 3 days. More than 300 houses along River Juba were submerged; 1141 people were reported dead or missing and 5905 displaced. In response to the mudslide, the World Health Organization (WHO) Country Office in Sierra Leone moved swiftly to verify the emergency and constitute an incident management team to coordinate the response. Early contact was made with the Ministry of Health and Sanitation and health sector partners. A Public Health Emergency Operations Center was set up to coordinate the response. Joint assessments, planning, and response among health sector partners ensured effectiveness and efficiency. Oral cholera vaccination was administered to high-risk populations to prevent a cholera outbreak. Surveillance for 4 waterborne diseases was enhanced through daily reporting from 9 health facilities serving the affected population. Performance standards from the WHO Emergency Response Framework were used to monitor the emergency response. An assessment of the country's performance showed that the country's response was well executed. To improve future response, we recommend enhanced district level preparedness, update of disaster response protocols, and pre-disaster mapping of health sector partners.


Asunto(s)
Deslizamientos de Tierra/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Pública/métodos , Defensa Civil/instrumentación , Defensa Civil/tendencias , Humanos , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Sierra Leona
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA