Surgical aspects and early morbidity of patients undergoing open recurrent inguinal hernia repair.

PURPOSE: This study aims to characterize the patterns of recurrence associated with specific types of primary inguinal hernia repair techniques used for and their respective correlations with early morbidity, in patients undergoing open repair for their first hernia recurrence. METHODS: After ethics approval was obtained, a retrospective review of charts from patients who underwent open surgery for repair of a first recurrence after a previous inguinal hernia repair during 2013-2017 was completed. Statistical analyses were performed and p-values < .05 are reported as statistically significant. RESULTS: 1393 patients underwent 1453 surgeries for recurrent inguinal hernias at this institution. Operations for recurrence were longer (61.9 ± 21.1 vs. 49.3 ± 11.9; p < .001), required more frequent intra-operative surgical consultation (1% vs. 0.2%; p < .001) and had a higher incidence of surgical-site infections (0.8% vs. 0.4%; p = .03) than primary inguinal hernia repairs. When comparing the patterns of recurrence among different techniques of primary repairs, patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair presented with a higher incidence of indirect recurrences. Reoperations after a Shouldice repair and open mesh repair represented markers for higher surgical difficulty in the recurrent operation (longer operative time, higher identification of heavy scarring, less nerve identification, and higher frequency of intra-operative consultation), but not higher rates of complications when compared with other techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Open reoperations for inguinal hernia first recurrences are more complex, with noticeable differences according to the index operation, and associated with higher morbidity when compared with primary hernia repairs. This complexity varies according to the type of primary surgery, with a previous Shouldice repair and open hernia repair with mesh presenting higher surgical difficulties although this did not translate to higher incidence of early complications. This information may allow adequate allocation of surgeons with an expertise in recurrent hernias and choice of recurrent repair method (laparoscopic or open) based on the primary surgery.

The incidence of occult paraumbilical hernias in patients undergoing primary umbilical hernia repair.

PURPOSE: The primary goal of this study was to determine the incidence of occult paraumbilical hernias during open primary umbilical hernia repair. The secondary objective was to further characterize the clinical features of these patients and hernias. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing primary umbilical hernia repair at Shouldice Hospital, from 2007 to 2017. Inclusion criteria were utilized to elucidate patients, where a concomitant occult paraumbilical hernia was found. Descriptive statistics were used throughout. RESULTS: 5850 patients underwent primary umbilical hernia repair, 459 (7.85%) patients had concomitant primary umbilical and paraumbilical hernias. There was a preoperative suspicion/diagnosis of a paraumbilical hernia in 166 (2.8%) of these patients. In 293 (5.01%) patients who had open primary umbilical hernia repair, at least one associated occult paraumbilical defect was found during surgery. Most of umbilical and concomitant occult paraumbilical hernias were small and medium size defects. The great majority of the reported occult paraumbilical hernias were found in the supraumbilical position at a distance of 3 cm or less from the top of the umbilical defect. CONCLUSION: The incidence of concomitant occult paraumbilical hernias in patients mildly overweight undergoing primary umbilical hernia repair is 5.01%, relevant to surgical decision-making. Since the great majority of these paraumbilical defects are superior to the umbilical defect, an adequate incision and dissection for at least 3 cm above the umbilical hernia may reduce the number of missed concomitant hernias and result in less presumed recurrences.

Correction to: Pure tissue repairs: a timely and critical revival.

In the original publication, author group, abstract text, position of Figure 1, Figure 5 legend, Figure 6 (duplication of figure panels) and the conflict of interest statement were incorrectly published. The corrected text and the figures are given here.

Pure tissue repairs: a timely and critical revival.

"The majority of hernias can be satisfactorily repaired by using the tissues at hand. The use of mesh prosthesis should be restricted to those few hernias in which tension or lack of good fascial structures prevents a secure primary repair. This group includes large direct inguinal hernias and incisional hernias in which the defect is too large to close primarily without undue tension. Most recurrent hernias, because of this factor are best repaired with mesh prosthesis". These words, penned in 1960 by Francis Usher have reconfirmed what had been a mantra of the Shouldice Hospital (Usher in 81:847-854, 1960). The Shouldice Hospital has specialized in the treatment of abdominal wall hernias since 1945. It has, since its beginning, insisted on the fact that a thorough knowledge of anatomy coupled with large volumes of surgical cases would lead to unparalleled expertise. It was Cicero who taught us that "Practice, not intelligence or dexterity, will win the day"! Since the seminal contribution of Bassini (1844-1924), there have been no less than 80 procedures imitating his inguinal herniorrhaphy and much more since the introduction of mesh and mesh devices (Iason in Hernia. The Blakiston Company, Philadelphia, pp 475-604, 1940). All have failed to some extent and it appears that the common denominator for these failures was the inability to understand the importance of entering the preperitoneal space. Only Shouldice and McVay (Lotheissen, Narath) realized the shortcoming and have continued to thrive as a successful procedure. Entering the preperitoneal space eliminates any temptation to plicate the posterior inguinal wall, a layer normally deficient in direct inguinal hernias, but it also allows the identification of muscle layers rectus, transversus and internal oblique muscles which will go to reconstruct the posterior inguinal wall, without tension as reported by Schumpelick (Junge in 7(1):17-20, 2003).