[The diagnostic effectiveness of criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in the Russian clinical practice]. / Diagnosticheskaya effektivnost' kriteriev zabolevanii spektra optikoneiromielita v rossiiskoi klinicheskoi praktike.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic criteria of 2006 (DC 2006) and 2015 (DC 2015) in the Russian population of patients with suspected neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), with the calculation of their sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and predictive value. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed medical records of suspected NMOSD patients who were therefore examined for the presence of serum autoantibodies targeting the aquaporin-4 water channel protein (AQP4-IgG) in 6 specialized Russian (Nizhny Novgorod and Moscow) medical centers. One hundred patients (78 female), aged 17 to 74 years (mean 38.1±13.3 years), were included. The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 108 months (mean 59.7±31.6 months). RESULTS: During the follow-up the diagnosis of NMOSD was confirmed in 32 people, and 68 patients had diagnoses different from NMOSD. At the disease onset, 68.8% of patients were seropositive for AQP4-IgG. The mean time for confirming NMOSD diagnosis was 15.2±14.2 months. At the disease onset, 36% of patients fulfilled the DC 2015, the diagnosis was subsequently confirmed in 77.8% out of them. 26% of the patients fulfilled the DC 2006, the diagnosis was subsequently confirmed in 84.6% out of them. The sensitivity of DC 2006/DC 2015 was 69%/88%, specificity 94%/88%, accuracy 86%/88%, negative predictive value 85%/94%, positive predictive value 86%/78%. CONCLUSION: The specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of modern diagnostic criteria for NMOSD In Russian patients is comparable to those obtained in foreign studies. DC 2015 helps to diagnose NMOSD earlier than DC 2006, but they have a lower specificity.

[The analysis of demand in pathoanatomists applying staff standards].

The objective analysis of state of medical personnel, along with assessment of real need for specialists, is the basis of improving activities of any health care service. In relation to pathologists, there is unique opportunity to perform similar analysis, based on application of current corresponding staff standards that consider volume of workload of physicians in order to determine required number of positions. The implementation of corresponding original methodology permitted to establish that the actual number of staff positions of pathologists in 2022 amounted up to average 40.6% of the number required according to staffing standards in the Irkutsk Oblast. The physician staffing ratio, calculated on the basis of required number of positions found according to proposed methodology, decreases to 29.1% and staffing with physicians excluding combined jobs to 17.1%. At that, implemented workload per one pathologist reaches 5.9 of standard positions. The deficiency of representatives of this specialty in the region, even if current combined jobs ratio is maintained, is 154 specialists.

[The personified accounting and intra-team distribution of the workload of pathologists, by using a procedure for their work quota setting]. / Personifitsirovannyi uchet i vnutribrigadnoe raspredelenie nagruzki vrachei-patologoanatomov na osnove ispol'zovaniia metodiki normirovaniia ikh truda.

The paper considers approaches to applying the methods for setting work quotas in pathologists for the personified accounting and intra-team distribution of their workload. These approaches include an algorithm and all necessary formulas for the calculation of the relevant indicators that make it possible to use the methods for work quota setting. The essence of the proposed approaches is demonstrated with a specific example.

[Work quota setting and man-hour productivity estimation in pathologists]. / Normirovanie truda i otsenka trudozatrat vrachei patologoanatomicheskikh otdelenii.

The paper considers the development and current state of the regulation of work quota setting and remuneration in pathologists. Reasoning from the current staff standards for morbid anatomy departments (units), the authors present a method to calculate the load of pathologists. The essence of the proposed method is demonstrated using a specific example.