RESUMEN
Increased aortic stiffness predisposes cardiac afterload and influences cardiac function. Congenital heart diseases involving aortic arch malformation and extended cardiovascular surgery, i.e. univentricular heart diseases, can lead to increased aortic stiffness. This study aimed to investigate whether Fontan patients (FO) have increased aortic stiffness within distinct aortic segments, and whether these parameters relate to Fontan-specific haemodynamics. In a prospective case-control study, 20 FO and 49 heart-transplanted control subjects with biventricular circulation underwent invasive cardiac catheterisation. We invasively measured pulse wave velocity (PWV) in the ascending aorta and along the entire aorta. Haemodynamic parameters, including end-diastolic pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, the cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance index were also assessed. FO exhibited significantly higher ascending aorta PWV (aPWV) than controls (FO: 7.2 ± 2.4 m/s|Controls: 4.9 ± 0.7 m/s, p < 0.001) and compared to the inner group central aorta PWV (cPWV; FO: 5.5 ± 1.2 m/s|Controls: 5.3 ± 1.0 m/s). Multivariate analysis confirmed this aPWV elevation in FO even after adjusting for age and BMI. aPWV and cPWV were almost identical within the control group. Correlation analyses revealed associations between cPWV and blood pressure in controls, while correlations were less apparent in FO. We detected no significant association between the aPWV and other haemodynamic parameters in any of our groups. FO exhibit increased aPWV, indicating specific vascular stiffness in the ascending aorta, while their overall aortic stiffness remains comparable to controls. Further research is needed to understand the implications of these findings on Fontan circulation and long-term cardiovascular health. CENTRAL MESSAGE: Fontan patients show increased aortic arch pulse wave velocity, suggesting specific vascular stiffness. PERSPECTIVE STATEMENT: Our study offers rare insights into pulse wave velocity in Fontan patients, highlighting increased arterial stiffness in the aortic arch. Vascular stiffness was particularly increased in the area of surgical reconstruction. This indicates the need for further research on vascular stiffness in Fontan circulation to understand its impact on cardiovascular health. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: German clinical trial registration, DRKS00015066.
RESUMEN
(1) Background: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is known to be a prognostic factor regarding long-term morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to develop a standardized Stair Climbing Test (SCT) with a reliable correlation to spiroergometry and the 6MWT which can be used in healthy children as well as patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) and a restricted exercise capacity. (2) Methods: A total of 28 healthy participants aged 10-18 years were included. We tested the individuals' CRF by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on a treadmill, the 6MWT, and a newly developed Stair Climbing Test (SCT). For the SCT, we defined a standardized SCT protocol with a total height of 13.14 m to achieve maximal exercise effects while recording time and vital parameters. To compare the SCT, the 6 Min Walking Test, and CPET, we introduced an SCT-Index that included patient data (weight, height) and time. To assess the SCT's feasibility for clinical practice, we also tested our protocol with five adolescents with complex congenital heart disease (i.e., Fontan circulation). (3) Results: A strong correlation was observed between SCT-Index and O2 pulse (r = 0.921; p < 0.001). In addition, when comparing the time achieved during SCT (tSCT) with VO2max (mL/min/kg) and VO2max (mL/min), strong correlations were found (r = -0.672; p < 0.001 and r = -0.764; p < 0.001). Finally, we determined a very strong correlation between SCT-Index and VO2max (mL/min) (r = 0.927; p = <0.001). When comparing the 6MWD to tSCT, there was a moderate correlation (r = -0.544; p = 0.003). It appears to be feasible in patients with Fontan circulation. (4) Conclusions: We were able to demonstrate that there is a significant correlation between our standardized SCT and treadmill CPET. Therefore, we can say that the SCT can be used as an easy supplement to CPET and in certain contexts, it can also be used as a screening tool when CPET is not available. The advantages would be that the SCT is a simple, quick, cost-effective, and reliable standardized (sub)maximal exercise test to evaluate CRF in healthy children on a routine basis. We can even assume that it can be used in patients with congenital heart disease.