Environmental health and clinicians: time to promote more action.

Climate change and ambient air pollution are threats to human health, with dramatic short- and long-term effects on mortality and morbidity. Pollution generates fears among citizens who rarely receive adequate information for risk mitigation. A large burden of evidence is describing since decades the health effects of pollution, linking environmental exposure to pathophysiological mechanisms (mainly, low-grade chronic inflammation) that lead to an array of chronic non-communicable diseases. Epidemiologists are deeply involved to depict environment-related diseases, identify risk factors as well as to offer suggestions for prevention policies. However, their warnings are frequently disregarded by clinicians and policymakers. In clinical practice, diagnostic evidence is the basis for therapeutic interventions. Conversely, epidemiological evidence in the field of environmental health rarely generates appropriate preventive and clinical actions. Despite the great interest and concerns of citizens and epidemiologists, the perception of pollution as a major hazard to health is often scarce among clinicians, as witnessed by the poor presence of environmental health in the majority of clinical guidelines, meetings of scientific societies, and medical curricula. As a consequence, inaction is not uncommon among clinicians, who often fail to routinely engage in counseling their patients on how to reduce their health risks from living in an unsafe environment nor to act as advocates in order to enact changes in the community. This gap should be urgently bridged by creating opportunities for health professionals to be adequately informed and trained to play an active role in tackling environmental risks.

Response to the Comment: "Advocating prudent D-dimer testing: constructive perspectives and comments on "How we manage a high D-dimer".

Not available.

Drug prescription appropriateness in hospitalized older patients: 15-year results and lessons from a countrywide register.

The global increase of aging with the related increase of multiple noncommunicable diseases is inevitably accompanied by the associated issue of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The latter is not without peculiar consequences on health, because it has been shown to be associated with drug-related adverse events, mainly due to poor prescription appropriateness and drug-drug interactions. To contribute to tackle this gigantic problem, a registry of drug dispensation in hospitalized older patient has been initiated in Italy in 2008. Through the last 15 years, data on nearly 11,000 older people have been accrued during their hospital stay in internal medicine and geriatric wards. This review article summarizes the main findings obtained, and how these data contribute to tackle the issue of appropriateness of drug prescription and the need of deprescribing in hospitalized older people affected by the most common noncommunicable diseases.

Tranexamic Acid: An Evergreen Hemostatic Agent.

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an important antifibrinolytic agent, which inhibits plasminogen activation and fibrinolysis. Several controlled randomized trials have investigated the role of TXA in preventing or decreasing blood loss across different surgical interventions or medical conditions characterized by excessive bleeding, consistently documenting its effectiveness and safety. Although the first clinical use of TXA dates back to more than 60 years ago, TXA remains the focus of intense research. This narrative review summarizes the more recent results and indications on the clinical use of TXA.

Statins, ACE/ARBs drug use, and risk of pneumonia in hospitalized older patients: a retrospective cohort study.

The aims of this study is to evaluate the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARBs) and/or statin use with the risk of pneumonia, as well as and with in-hospital and short-term outpatient mortality in hospitalized older patients with pneumonia. Patients aged 65 years or older hospitalized in internal medicine and/or geriatric wards throughout Italy and enrolled in the REPOSI (REgistro Politerapuie SIMI-Società Italiana di Medicina Interna) register from 2010 to 2019 were screened to assess the diagnosis of pneumonia and classified on whether or not they were prescribed with at least one drug among ACE-I, ARBs, and/or statins. Further study outcomes were mortality during hospital stay and at 3 months after hospital discharge. Among 5717 cases included (of whom 18.0% with pneumonia), 2915 (51.0%) were prescribed at least one drug among ACE-I, ARBs, and statins. An inverse association was found between treatment with ACE-I or ARBs and pneumonia (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95). A higher effect was found among patients treated with ACE-I or ARBs in combination with statins (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.85). This study confirmed in the real-world setting that these largely used medications may reduce the risk of pneumonia in older people, who chronically take them for cardiovascular conditions.

How we manage a high D-dimer.

D-dimer, a soluble fibrin degradation product that originates from plasmin-induced degradation of cross-linked fibrin, is an important biomarker of coagulation activation and secondary fibrinolysis that is routinely used to rule out venous thromboembolism (VTE), and to evaluate the risk of VTE recurrence, as well as the optimal duration of anticoagulant therapy. Besides VTE, D-dimer may be high due to physiologic conditions, including aging, pregnancy, and strenuous physical activity. In addition, several disorders have been associated with increased D-dimer levels, ranging from disseminated intravascular coagulation to infectious diseases and cancers. Thus, it is far from unusual for hematologists to have to deal with ambulatory individuals with increased D-dimer without signs or symptoms of thrombus formation. This narrative review is dedicated to the management of these cases by the hematologist.

Emicizumab: the hemophilia A game changer.

In hemophilia, the unmet needs regarding adherence to prophylaxis and lack of effective longterm prophylaxis regimens, especially in patients with inhibitors, led to the production of emicizumab, the first non-factor medicine for subcutaneous administration in patients with severe and moderate hemophilia A with or without factor VIII inhibitors. This article describes the research steps behind the development of this game-changer medication, its success for the prophylaxis of bleeding episodes as witnessed by the results of pivotal clinical trial but also by real life use in the frame of a still expanding global market. We shall also discuss potential and actual adverse events and the nuances related to clinical use such as laboratory monitoring, development of neutralizing anti-drug-antibodies, risk of thrombosis/hypercoagulability and use in the management of surgical operations. The potential of using emicizumab to prevent bleeding in other congenital and acquired coagulation disorders will also be sketched.

Joint Dysfunction as a Cause of Spontaneous Subclinical Bleeding in Infants with Hemophilia.

Hemophilia is an inherited hemorrhagic disorder; its main clinical manifestations being bleeding in muscles and joints. Ankles, knees, and elbows are the most frequently affected joints, followed by shoulders and hips. The clinical signs of joint involvement are reduced mobility, swelling and walking difficulties. Bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia are usually divided into traumatic and spontaneous, but we believe that the latter are not truly spontaneous but rather the result of joint stresses owing to motion actions that create dysfunctions starting from infancy. Pharmacological prophylaxis with factor replacement therapies or non-replacement drugs markedly reduces musculoskeletal hemorrhages. However, the onset of subclinical joint stress can be reduced only by associating this therapeutic approach with the accurate observation of the child motion patterns and restoring them if dysfunctional, thereby primarily preventing subclinical bleeding and ultimately the onset or progression of hemophilic arthropathy.

Post-recovery impact of the second and third SARS-CoV-2 infection waves on healthcare resource utilization in Lombardy, Italy.

The administrative claims database of the Italian region Lombardy, the first in Europe to be hit by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, was employed to evaluate the impact on healthcare resource utilization following recovery from the second (mainly alpha-related variant) and third (delta-related) infection waves. 317,164 individuals recovered from the infection and became negative after the second wave, 271,180 after the third. Of them, 1571 (0.5%) and 1575 (0.6%) died in the first 6 post-negativization months. In the remaining cases (315,593 after the second wave and 269,605 after the third), hospitalizations, attendances to emergency rooms and outpatient visits were compared with those recorded in the same pre-pandemic time periods in 2019. Dispensation of drugs as well as of imaging, and functional and biochemical diagnostic tests were also compared as additional proxies of the healthcare impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection waves. Following both waves, hospitalizations, attendances at emergency rooms, and outpatient visits were similar in number and rates to the pre-pandemic periods. However, there was an increased dispensation a number of drugs and diagnostic tests, particularly those addressing the cardiorespiratory and blood systems. In a large region such as Lombardy taken as a relevant model because early and severely hit by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the post-COVID burden on healthcare facilities was mildly relevant in cases who recovered from the second and third infection waves regarding such pivotal events as deaths, hospitalizations, and need for emergency room and outpatient visits, but was high regarding the dispensation of some drug classes and types of diagnostic tests.

Clinical efficacy of simoctocog alfa versus extended half-life recombinant FVIII concentrates in hemophilia A patients undergoing personalized prophylaxis using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison method.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to indirectly compare the efficacy of personalized prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) versus three extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) concentrates. METHODS: Treatment effects were compared using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons after matching individual patient-level baseline characteristics for simoctocog alfa (pharmacokinetic [PK]-guided personalized prophylaxis) against published aggregate personalized prophylaxis data for efmoroctocog alfa, damoctocog alfa pegol, and rurioctocog alfa pegol. RESULTS: A higher percentage (p < .001) of patients with zero bleeds was found with simoctocog alfa compared with efmoroctocog alfa (75% vs. 45%), damoctocog alfa pegol (77% vs. 38%), and rurioctocog alfa pegol (target trough level 1%-3%; 78% vs. 42%). Similar efficacy was found comparing simoctocog alfa against rurioctocog alfa pegol 8%-12% (77% vs. 62%). The mean total annualized bleeding rate was lower (p < .001) with simoctocog alfa than damoctocog alfa pegol (1.5 vs. 4.9). Consistent with approved dosing, the mean FVIII weekly dose was higher (p < .001) for simoctocog alfa than efmoroctocog alfa, damoctocog alfa pegol, or rurioctocog alfa pegol 1%-3%, but lower (p < .001) than rurioctocog alfa pegol 8%-12%. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect comparisons demonstrated that PK-guided, personalized prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa can lead to higher zero bleed rates compared with personalized EHL rFVIII concentrate regimens, albeit with higher weekly doses, and a lower percentage of patients treated twice weekly or less.

Hemophilia patients: are they naturally anticoagulated?

Hemophilia is an X-linked bleeding disorder, characterized by low plasma levels of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) (hemophilia A) or FIX (hemophilia B). Because of this, hemophilia patients (HP) were considered as naturally-anticoagulated and therefore protected from thrombosis. Over the last decades hemophilia care underwent striking changes by the introduction of prophylaxis with repeated injections of standard or modified coagulation factor products that maintain steady-state trough levels of the deficient factor. Meanwhile, new medications, not based on replacement therapy, were developed (i.e., emicizumab and others). However, emicizumab (the only licensed drug) can be used only for prophylaxis; during acute bleeding or surgery, HP require additional therapies, supplementing emicizumab with FVIII/IX concentrates or with bypassing agents (e.g., recombinant activated FVII or activated prothrombin complex concentrate). Owing to the new therapeutic strategies, the hemostatic competency of HP is now much better assured than in the past and therefore their life expectancy is considerably improved. Furthermore, the combined effects of the improved life-expectancy and of the steady-state hemostatic competence achieved by prophylaxis, make HP to be near(normal). They are, therefore, liable to be affected by the circumstantial risk factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) that are common in the general population. Furthermore, HP undergo frequent surgery/invasive procedures (especially major orthopedic surgery) when they are treated with coagulation factor concentrates or bypassing agents that may increase the risk of post-operative VTE. Therefore, one wonders if HP should be considered for perioperative antithrombotic prophylaxis to prevent postoperative VTE.Clinical data on the value of antithrombotic prophylaxis in this setting are scanty. Indeed, data from an observational multicentre prospective study of 46 HP who underwent orthopedic surgery concluded that the prevalence of postoperative symptomatic VTE was similar to that estimated in the general population. Multicenter prospective trials are warranted to address the value of antithrombotic prophylaxis to avoid post-operative VTE in HP, especially during major surgery when regular prophylaxis is supplemented with additional coagulation factor products or bypassing agents. Until this information is available, HP undergoing major surgery whilst on antihemorrhagic prophylaxis supplemented with coagulation factor concentrates or bypassing agents, should at least receive intermittent pneumatic compression.