Pre-emptive treatment of heart failure exacerbations in patients managed with the HeartLogic™ algorithm.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic disease affecting 64 million people worldwide and places a severe burden on society because of its mortality, numerous re-hospitalizations and associated costs. HeartLogic™ is an algorithm programmed into implanted devices incorporating several biometric parameters which aims to predict HF episodes. It provides an index which can be monitored remotely, allowing pre-emptive treatment of congestion to prevent acute decompensation. We aim to assess the impact and security of pre-emptive HF management, guided by the HeartLogic™ index. METHODS AND RESULTS: The HeartLogic™ France Cohort Study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multi-centre, non-randomized study. Three hundred ten patients with a history of HF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%; or at least one episode of clinical HF with elevated NT-proBNP ≥450 ng/L) and implanted with a cardioverter defibrillator enabling HeartLogic™ index calculation will be included across 10 French centres. The HeartLogic™ index will be monitored remotely for 12 months and in the event of a HeartLogic™ index ≥16, the local investigator will contact the patient for assessment and adjust HF treatment as necessary. The primary endpoint is unscheduled hospitalization for HF. Secondary endpoints are all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, HF-related death, unscheduled hospitalizations for ventricular or atrial arrhythmia and HeartLogic™ index evolution over time. Blood samples will be collected for biobanking, and quality of life will be assessed. Finally, the safety of a HeartLogic™-triggered strategy for initiating or increasing diuretic therapy will be assessed. A blind and independent committee will adjudicate the events. CONCLUSIONS: The HeartLogic™ France Cohort Study will provide robust real-world data in a cohort of HF patients managed with the HeartLogic™ algorithm allowing pre-emptive treatment of heart failure exacerbations.

Effects of hyperbaric exposure on mechanical and electronic parameters of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

AIMS: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is the standard adjuvant treatment for life-threatening or disabling pathologies. Currently, mechanical and electronic variations of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in hyperbaric conditions have not been evaluated. As a result, many patients eligible for HBOT but ICD recipients cannot undergo this therapy, even in emergency situations. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-two explanted ICD of various brands and models were randomized in two groups: single hyperbaric exposure at an absolute pressure of 4000 hPa and 30 iterative hyperbaric exposures at an absolute pressure of 4000 hPa. Mechanical and electronic parameters of these ICD were blindly assessed before, during, and after hyperbaric exposures. Regardless of the hyperbaric exposure, we could not find any mechanical distortion, inappropriate occurrence of anti-tachycardia therapies, dysfunction of tachyarrhythmia therapeutic programming, or dysfunction of programmed pacing parameters. CONCLUSION: Dry hyperbaric exposure seems harmless on ICD tested ex vivo. This result may lead to a reconsideration of the absolute contraindication of emergency HBOT to ICD recipients. A real-life study in these patients with an indication to HBOT should be performed to assess their tolerance to the treatment.

Predictors of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism or Arterial Thrombotic Events during and after Anticoagulation for a First Venous Thromboembolism.

After first episodes of venous thromboembolism (VTE), patients are at increased risk of recurrent VTE and arterial thrombotic events (ATE) compared with the general population, two disorders that are influenced by anticoagulation. However, risk factors of these conditions occurring during and after anticoagulation are little described. Using cause-specific hazard regression models, we aimed to determine risk factors of the composite outcome recurrent VTE/ATE, and separately recurrent VTE or ATE, during and after anticoagulation in patients with first episodes of VTE from a prospective cohort. Hazard ratios (HRs) are given with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 2,011 patients treated for at least 3 months were included. A total of 647 patients had recurrent VTE/ATE (incidence: 4.69% per patient-years) during overall follow-up (median: 92 months). Of these events, 173 occurred during anticoagulation (incidence: 3.67% per patient-years). Among patients free of events at the end of anticoagulation, 801 had a post-anticoagulation follow-up ≥3 months; and 95 had recurrent VTE/ATE (incidence: 1.27% per patient-years). After adjustment for confounders, cancer-associated VTE (HR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.70-4.11) and unprovoked VTE (HR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.35-2.81) were the identified risk factors of recurrent VTE/ATE during anticoagulation (vs. transient risk factor-related VTE). Risk factors of recurrent VTE/ATE after anticoagulation included 50 to 65 years of age (vs. < 50, HR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.04-3.81), older than 65 years (vs. < 50, HR: 5.28, 95% CI: 3.03-9.21), and unprovoked VTE (vs. transient risk factor-related VTE, HR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.27-3.34). Cancer-associated VTE and unprovoked VTE are the main risk factors of recurrent VTE/ATE during anticoagulation, while older age and unprovoked VTE mainly predict the risk of these events after anticoagulation.

Anticoagulation for VTE: Impact on the Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events.

BACKGROUND: It was recently established that patients who developed VTE are at increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared with the general population. However, whether the anticoagulation used for VTE influences the risk of MACE remains undescribed. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the anticoagulant treatment for VTE affect the risk of subsequent MACE? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study included patients from a large prospective cohort who received only one family of anticoagulant treatment after the acute phase of VTE, including vitamin K antagonist (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). MACE included nonfatal acute coronary syndrome, nonfatal stroke, and all-cause death. The secondary outcome, MACE-2, included cardiovascular death instead of all-cause death. Cox proportional and Fine-Gray models served to study the relationship between anticoagulation characteristics and the risk of outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3,790 patients (47.2% male; mean age, 60.48 years) were included. A total of 1,228 patients (32.4%) were treated for 0 to 3 months (median in overall population, 6 months). Compared with these patients, those treated for 3 to 12 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.76) or > 12 months (HR, 0.47, 95% CI, 0.39-0.56) had a significant reduced risk of MACE following adjustment for confounders. Findings were similar for MACE-2 (sub-HR for 3-12 months, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.79]; sub-HR > 12 months, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.39-0.68]). After adjustment for confounders, there was a reduced risk of MACE (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39-0.71) and MACE-2 (sub-HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.77) in patients treated with DOACs (vs VKAs). INTERPRETATION: Treatment of VTE for > 3 months is associated with a reduced risk of MACE, as is treatment with DOACs vs VKAs. These findings, which may influence the choice of anticoagulation strategies for VTE, need confirmation by randomized clinical trials.

Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Death after Venous Thromboembolism: Results from a Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular deaths (CVDTs) are more frequent in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) than in the general population; however, risk factors associated with this increased risk of CVDT in patients with VTE are not described. METHODS: To determine the risk factors of CVDT in patients with VTE from a multicenter prospective cohort study, Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models were conducted. RESULTS: Of the 3,988 included patients, 426 (10.7%) died of CVDT during a median follow-up of 5 years. The risk factors of CVDT after multivariate analyses were: age of 50 to 65 years (vs. <50 years, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67-6.62), age >65 years (vs. <50 years, HR: 7.60, 95% CI: 3.73-15.52), cancer-associated VTE (vs. transient risk factor-related VTE, HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.15-2.61), unprovoked VTE (vs. transient risk factor-related VTE, HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02-2.00), past tobacco use (vs. never, HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.06-1.94), current tobacco use (vs. never, HR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.15-3.01), hypertension (HR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.51-2.96), chronic heart failure (HR: 2.28, 95% CI: 1.37-3.79), chronic respiratory failure (HR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.02-2.89), and atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.06-2.60). The risk of CVDT was significantly reduced with direct oral anticoagulants (vs. vitamin-K antagonists) and with longer duration of treatment (>3 months). CONCLUSION: Risk factors of CVDT after VTE include some traditional cardiovascular risk factors and other risk factors that are related to characteristics of VTE, and patients' comorbidities.

Risk Factors for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Major Adverse Limb Events after Venous Thromboembolism: A Large Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: There is an increased risk of arterial events including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE) after venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, their risk factors remain little explored. METHODS: We aimed to determine the risk factors for MACE (acute coronary syndrome/stroke/cardiovascular death) and MALE (limb ischemia/critical limb ischemia/non-traumatic amputation/any limb revascularization) after VTE. Competing risk models (Fine-Gray) were used in a multicenter prospective cohort of 4,940 patients (mean age: 64.6 years and median follow-up: 64 months). RESULTS: MACE occurred in 17.3% of participants (2.35% per patient-years) and MALE in 1.7% (0.27% per patient-years). In multivariable analysis, the identified risk factors for MACE were the age of 50 to 65 years (vs. <50 years, hazard ratio [HR]: 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-2.91), age >65 years (vs. <50 years, HR 4.85, 95% CI: 3.35-7.02), pulmonary embolism + deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (vs. isolated-DVT, HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.02-1.55), unprovoked-VTE (vs. transient risk factor associated-VTE, HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04-1.59), current tobacco use (vs. never, HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.07-1.98), hypertension (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.30-1.98), past history of symptomatic atherosclerosis (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.17-1.98), heart failure (HR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.21-2.42), atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.15-2.08), and vena cava filter insertion (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.03-2.08). The identified risk factors for MALE were the age of 50-65 years (vs. <50 years, HR: 3.49, 95% CI: 1.26-9.65) and atrial fibrillation (HR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.15-4.89). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for MACE and MALE after VTE included some traditional cardiovascular risk factors, patient's comorbidities, and some characteristics of VTE.

Risk factors of arterial thrombotic events after unprovoked venous thromboembolism, and after cancer associated venous thromboembolism: A prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The increased risk of arterial thrombotic (ATE) after VTE, particularly when they are unprovoked or cancer-associated has been established. However, the risk factors of ATE after these VTE remain unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using cause-specific hazard regression models, we determined risk factors of ATE (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute limb ischemia, digestive tract ischemia, or renal ischemia) in 2242 patients with unprovoked VTE and in 914 patients with cancer-associated VTE from a multi-center prospective cohort. RESULTS: Of patients with unprovoked-VTE, 174 developed ATE (7.8%, incidence: 1.26 per 100 patient-years) during follow-up (median: 68 months). Among patients with cancer-associated VTE, 57 developed ATE (6.2%, incidence: 1.98 per 100 patient-years) during follow-up (median: 30 months). After multivariable analysis, the identified risk factors of ATE in patients with unprovoked-VTE were age > 65 years (vs. <50 years, HR 2.59, 95% CI: 1.56-4.29), past history of symptomatic atherosclerosis (HR 2.11, 95% CI: 1.40-3.19), and treatment with low molecule weight heparin (vs. vitamin K antagonists, HR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.13-4.52). In patients with cancer-associated VTE, the identified risk factors of ATE were: past history of symptomatic atherosclerosis (HR: 3.13, 95% CI: 1.72-5.67), and ongoing anticoagulation at the diagnosis of VTE (HR: 2.77, 95% CI: 1.07-7.22). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of ATE after unprovoked VTE and after cancer-associated VTE, is determined by some classic cardiovascular risk factors and appears to be influenced by anticoagulant treatment introduced for VTE, as well as the presence or absence of ongoing anticoagulation at the diagnosis of VTE.

One year outcome and analysis of peri-device leak of left atrial appendage occlusion devices.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of peri-device leak (PDL) of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices has been previously reported. However, there have been only few data that compared different existing devices. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of PDL with both devices WATCHMAN®, Boston Scientific and AMPLATZER Amulet®, Abbott Laboratories and to evaluate the clinical outcome at 12 months. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent LAAO between January 2018 and 2020 were randomly assigned to either WATCHMAN or AMPLATZER Amulet implantation based on a systematic 2-week alternation between both devices. LAA measurements were assessed using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) prior to and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during the procedure. At 8 weeks post-LAAO, patients underwent TEE and/or CCTA to identify the presence of PDL and/or device-related complications. Patients were then followed for 12 months to identify major adverse cardiovascular/embolic events. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 51 patients (25 WATCHMAN, 26 AMPLATZER Amulet; mean age 76 ± 7 years; male gender 76%). Both groups were identically matched for demographics, comorbidities, and indication for LAAO. There were 19 patients who had PDL (13 WATCHMAN vs. 6 AMPLATZER Amulet, P-value = 0.033). Of them, 8 (15%) patients had significant PDL (7 WATCHMAN vs. 1 AMPLATZER Amulet, P-value = 0.018). On CCTA, the landing zone maximal diameter of the AMPLATZER Amulet device had the strongest correlation with the final deployed device size (Spearman's rho 0.92, P-value < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, male gender and device type were independent predictors of any PDL (P-values 0.016 and 0.031, respectively). On a mean follow-up of 12 months, the total number of events was more prevalent in the WATCHMAN group (P-value 0.008), but the incidence of cardio-embolic events reached borderline significance (16% vs. 0%, P-value = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who underwent LAAO, almost 15% had significant PDL with the majority belonging to the WATCHMAN group. Still, larger studies are warranted to evaluate its effectiveness in stroke prevention.