The challenge of adequately reporting preeclampsia for epidemiological surveillance: An example from a referral center in a middle-income country.

Adequately reporting of preeclampsia is a challenge. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnosis of preeclampsia based on clinical and laboratory findings and ICD-10 codes (International Classification of Diseases) at admission and discharge in a referral center, over a one-year period. Among 2,839 women admitted for childbirth, 208 presented confirmed preeclampsia, based on chart audits. Among these, 77.4% at admission presented ICD-10 codes assigned as hypertension, and 47.1% at discharge. In 14.4% of confirmed preeclampsia, ICD-10 codes for hypertension were not used. Adequate reporting of preeclampsia is key for clinical surveillance, counselling and guiding public health interventions.

Can pre-eclampsia explain higher cesarean rates in the different groups of Robson's classification?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of pre-eclampsia on cesarean delivery by using the Robson classification. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study including all women who delivered in a referral maternity hospital in southeast Brazil from January 2017 to February 2018. Women were classified into 1 of 10 Robson groups and then further subdivided into pre-eclampsia (PE) and non-PE (NPE) groups. Frequency of cesarean was determined for each group and compared by using χ2 and prevalence ratio. RESULTS: Overall, 3102 women were included, of whom 1578 (50.9%) delivered by cesarean. Classification in Robson group 5 was the most frequent among all women (n=727, 23.4%). In the PE group (n=258, 8.3%), group 10 was the most frequent classification (n=120, 46.5%); in NPE, Robson group 5 was the most frequency (n=682, 24.0%). Pre-eclampsia was associated with a higher occurrence of cesarean (77.5% vs 48.4%; prevalence ratio, 2.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.82-2.82), owing to higher rates in Robson groups 1, 5, and 10. CONCLUSION: Pre-eclampsia was associated with a higher occurrence of cesarean delivery in some Robson groups. Robson classification may be used to evaluate the impact of specific conditions at a facility level to help plan future interventions to optimize the use of cesarean.

Validation of the fullPIERS model for prediction of adverse outcomes in preeclampsia at a referral center.

OBJECTIVES: To validate the use of fullPIERS to predict maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes in a referral center. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including all pregnant women with preeclampsia (PE) at a referral center in southeast Brazil. The prevalence of PE and adverse outcomes were assessed. The fullPIERS score was tested on three composites of adverse outcomes: maternal adverse outcome; fetal adverse outcomes; and the combination of these two. Furthermore, the fullPIERS risk calculator, was considered to define the cutoff that better estimates adverse outcomes. RESULTS: 2839 women were screened in a one year period, with 208 (7.3%) cases of PE; most were preterm (56.7%); with severe features (74.5%). HELLP syndrome (6.7%), eclampsia (3.8%) and placental abruption (2.4%) were the most frequent complications. FullPIERS assessement had a median of 1.2% (0.45 - 2.3%) and the score had an excelent performance to predict adverse maternal outcome (AUC = 0.845, confidence interval 0.776 - 0.914, p-value < 0.01). For perinatal adverse outcomes (AUC = 0.699, confidence interval 0.581 - 0.816, p-value < 0.01) and the composite of maternal and perinatal adverse outcome (AUC = 0.804, confidence interval 0.736 - 0.872, p-vale < 0.01), fullPIERS score had a suboptimal performance. The cutoff value that best performed for the assessment of maternal adverse outcome was 2.15% (sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 83%). CONCLUSION: Preeclampsia was a significant complication during pregnancy. The fullPIERS model was an excellent tool to predict maternal adverse outcomes; with a cutoff value of 2.15% in the tested population.

Quality of life and vaginal symptoms of postmenopausal women using pessary for pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The use of pessary is an option for the conservative treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). However, here are few studies assess the quality of life (QoL) after inserting the pessary for POP. We have hypothesized that the use of pessary would modify QoL in women with POP. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was performed that included 19 women with advanced POP. Pessary was introduced, and the SF-36 (general quality of life) and ICIQ-VS (vaginal symptoms and quality of life subdomain) questionnaires were applied before the introduction and after six months. A single question about the satisfaction regarding the use of the device was presented (subjective impression). RESULTS: The mean age of the women included was 76 years. Most of them were non-caucasian (52.6%), with no prior pelvic surgery (57.5%), with urinary symptoms (78.9%). A third of the patients reported sexual activity. After treatment, 22.2% of them presented vaginal infection, and 27.7% increased vaginal discharge. Urinary symptoms remained unaltered. Women reported 100% satisfaction after using the pessary (77.7% partial improvement; 22.3% total improvement). SF-36 had significant improvement in three specific domains: general state of health (p=0.090), vitality (p=0.0497) and social aspects (p=0.007). ICIQ-VS presented a reduction in the vaginal symptoms (p < 0.0001) and an improvement in QoL (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of pessary for six months improved the QoL and reduced vaginal symptoms for women with advanced POP.

Quality of life and vaginal symptoms of postmenopausal women using pessary for pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective study

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The use of pessary is an option for the conservative treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). However, here are few studies assess the quality of life (QoL) after inserting the pessary for POP. We have hypothesized that the use of pessary would modify QoL in women with POP. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was performed that included 19 women with advanced POP. Pessary was introduced, and the SF-36 (general quality of life) and ICIQ-VS (vaginal symptoms and quality of life subdomain) questionnaires were applied before the introduction and after six months. A single question about the satisfaction regarding the use of the device was presented (subjective impression). RESULTS: The mean age of the women included was 76 years. Most of them were non-caucasian (52.6%), with no prior pelvic surgery (57.5%), with urinary symptoms (78.9%). A third of the patients reported sexual activity. After treatment, 22.2% of them presented vaginal infection, and 27.7% increased vaginal discharge. Urinary symptoms remained unaltered. Women reported 100% satisfaction after using the pessary (77.7% partial improvement; 22.3% total improvement). SF-36 had significant improvement in three specific domains: general state of health (p=0.090), vitality (p=0.0497) and social aspects (p=0.007). ICIQ-VS presented a reduction in the vaginal symptoms (p < 0.0001) and an improvement in QoL (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of pessary for six months improved the QoL and reduced vaginal symptoms for women with advanced POP.

RESUMO OBJETIVO: O pessário é uma opção para o tratamento conservador do prolapso genital. MÉTODOS: Um estudo prospectivo e observacional foi realizado com 19 mulheres com prolapso genital avançado. A avaliação da qualidade de vida e dos sintomas vaginais foi mensurada pelos questionários SF-36 e ICIQ-VS antes e seis meses depois da colocação do pessário. Uma pergunta simples sobre satisfação do uso do dispositivo foi também feita (impressão subjetiva). RESULTADOS: A idade média das mulheres foi de 76 anos. A maioria era parda/negra (52,6%), sem cirurgias pélvicas (57,5%), com sintomas urinários (78,9%). Um terço das pacientes relatou atividade sexual. Depois do tratamento, 22,2% apresentaram infecção vaginal e 27,7% fluxo vaginal aumentado. Não houve alteração da prevalência dos sintomas urinários. As mulheres relataram 100% de satisfação (77,7% melhora parcial e 22,3% melhora completa) depois do uso do pessário. Houve melhora em três domínios do SF-36: saúde em geral (p=0,090), vitalidade (p=0,0497) e aspectos sociais (p=0,007). O ICIQ-VS apresentou redução nos sintomas vaginais (p<0,0001) e melhora da qualidade de vida (p<0,0001). CONCLUSÕES: O uso do pessário por seis meses em mulheres com prolapso genital melhorou a qualidade de vida e reduziu os sintomas vaginais.