Levels of bacterial contamination in fresh extraction sites after a saline rinse.

PURPOSE: To determine the level of bacterial contamination in immediate implantation or augmentation sites vs pristine bone, before and after saline rinses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bacterial samples were taken from fresh extraction sites (17 patients) and pristine bone (15 patients) before performing implant dentistry surgical procedures. Levels of bacterial contamination were estimated before and after saline rinses. Samples from the socket were placed on an agar plate for total bacterial account and on selective plates for Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis counts. RESULTS: The level of bacterial contamination before saline rinse was 1.2 × 10(4) units of bacterial colony (CFU)/mL in fresh extraction sites (study group) and 5 × 10(2) CFU/mL in pristine bone sites (control group). After a saline rinse, the bacterial level was lowered significantly to 5.2 × 10(3) CFU/mL in the study group and to zero in the control group (P < .05). Levels of bacterial contamination were higher in the mandibular sockets (7.5 × 10(3) CFU/ml) than in the maxillary sockets (5.6 × 10(3) CFU/mL), and the difference was statistically significant (P = .034). All implanted/augmented fresh or pristine sites survived in the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Fresh extraction sockets with clinical signs of infection show bacterial presence. Pristine bone shows a lower bacterial level. Saline rinse in addition to a decontamination protocol may reduce the level of bacterial contamination significantly both in fresh extraction sites and pristine bone.

Transition from hopeless dentition to full-arch fixed-implant-supported rehabilitation by a staged extraction approach: rationale and technique.

Transition from a hopeless dentition to a fixed-implant-supported full-arch reconstruction can be difficult for patients if wearing a transitional removable denture is involved. In addition, an increased risk for trauma to bone augmentation areas and to the implant-bone interface exists when using a removable transitional complete denture during the implant healing period; such risk can compromise implant success or increase crestal bone loss around implants before the final restoration. This article describes a treatment approach that allows replacement of the hopeless dentition with an osseointegrated fixed prosthesis, without rendering the patient totally edentulous before the delivery of the final implant-supported prosthesis. A staged approach using a few hopeless teeth to support a provisional fixed restoration during the healing process can help avoid discomfort and improve implants' outcome. A treatment plan for a maxillary arch reconstruction is used to illustrate the staged approach protocol. This protocol addresses patients' psychologic need to remain dentate during partial or full-mouth rehabilitation, while providing good esthetics and function during restoration of a dental arch.

An ortho-surgical approach to severe impaction using bone crestal bridge: a case report.

Impaction of both mandibular canine and lateral incisor is a rare clinical finding which is often treated by way of surgical extraction. This decision is often taken because of the anatomical limitations presented by the mandible, and the horizontal position of the impacted teeth, which have occasionally transmigrated, placing them in close proximity to the roots of neighboring teeth and with a high risk for causing their resorption. In addition, this condition significantly increases the likelihood that the area involved will undergo gingival recession and loss of crestal bone if an unsophisticated ortho-surgical approach is undertaken. The present report describes a novel ortho-surgical technique which maintains the alveolar crestal bone and utilizes a lingual arch attached to the first molars with traction through tunneling with super-elastic springs. This combined approach eliminated the need for extraction of the impacted teeth, and accomplished their full alignment without any of the aforementioned side effects. Every dentist (general practitioners as well as specialists) should be aware of this procedure and refer patients to a specialist.

A retrospective analysis of replacing dental implants in previously failed sites.

OBJECTIVE: Overall first-year failure rate for dental implants may reach 3%-8% as the result of various complications. Accordingly, reimplantation accounts for an ever-growing portion of clinic's practice. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the survival rate of dental implants that were performed in sites where failed implants were previously removed and to evaluate the factors affecting outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Three certified oral and maxillofacial surgeons inserted 144 implant replacement in previously failed sites in 144 patients (1994-2009). Clinical and epidemiologic data were collected retrospectively and analyzed regarding survival rates. RESULTS: Survival rate of the implants replacing previously failed ones was 93% (133/144). A third placement in the same site was performed in 7 of 11 patients with a survival rate of 85% (6/7) up to the last follow-up. No correlations were found between replaced implant failures with any of the parameters examined. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that a previous implant failure should not discourage practitioners from a second or even a third attempt.

Histomorphometric analysis following augmentation of the anterior atrophic maxilla with cancellous bone block allograft.

PURPOSE: Grafting with bone blocks may be required to restore the alveolar process in extremely atrophic maxillae prior to implant placement to ensure both function and esthetics. The present study was conducted to histologically and histomorphometrically evaluate the application of allograft cancellous bone blocks for the augmentation of the anterior atrophic maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with severe atrophy in the anterior maxilla underwent augmentation with cancellous bone block allografts. Bony deficiencies of at least 3 mm horizontally and up to 3 mm vertically according to computed tomographic para-axial reconstructions served as inclusion criteria. After 6 months, implants were placed and a cylindric sample core from the graft area was collected. All specimens were prepared for histologic and histomorphometric examination. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in the study. Eighty-three implants were placed in bone that was augmented with 60 cancellous freeze-dried bone block allografts. The implant survival rate was 98.8%. Mean follow-up was 48 ± 22 months (range, 14 to 82 months). The mean percentage of newly formed bone was 33% ± 18%, that of the residual cancellous block allograft was 26% ± 17%, and marrow and connective tissue comprised 41% ± 2%. Statistically significant histomorphometric differences regarding newly formed bone and residual cancellous block allograft were found between younger (< 40 years) and older (≥ 40 years) patients, respectively. Age did not appear to influence the percentage of marrow and connective tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Cancellous bone block allograft is biocompatible and osteoconductive, permitting new bone formation following augmentation of extremely atrophic anterior maxillae in a two-stage implant placement procedure. New bone formation was age-dependent.

Histomorphometrical analysis following augmentation of infected extraction sites exhibiting severe bone loss and primarily closed by intrasocket reactive soft tissue.

BACKGROUND: Intrasocket reactive soft tissue can be used for primary closure during augmentation of infected extraction sites exhibiting severe bone loss prior to implant placement. The present study evaluated the histological characteristics of the initially used intrasocket reactive soft tissue, the overlying soft tissue, and the histomorphometry of the newly formed bone during implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six consecutive patients (43 sites) were included in the study. Extraction sites demonstrating extensive bone loss on preoperative periapical and panoramic radiographs served as inclusion criteria. Forty-three implants were inserted after a healing period of 6 months. Porous bovine xenograft bone mineral was used as a single bone substitute. The intrasocket reactive soft tissue was sutured over the grafting material to seal the coronal portion of the socket. Biopsies of the intrasocket reactive soft tissue at augmentation, healed mucosa, and bone cores at implant placement were retrieved and evaluated. RESULTS: The intrasocket reactive soft tissue demonstrated features compatible with granulation tissue and long junctional epithelium. The mucosal samples at implant placement demonstrated histopathological characteristics of keratinized mucosa with no residual elements of granulation tissue. Histomorphometrically, the mean composition of the bone cores was - vital bone 40 ± 19% (13.7-74.8%); bone substitute 25.7 ± 13% (0.6-51%); connective tissue 34.3 ± 15% (13.8-71.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Intrasocket reactive soft tissue used for primary closure following ridge augmentation is composed of granulation tissue and long junctional epithelium. At implant placement, clinical and histological results demonstrate its replacement by keratinized gingiva. The histomorphometrical results reveal considerable bone formation. Fresh extraction sites of hopeless teeth demonstrating chronic infection and severe bone loss may be grafted simultaneously with their removal.

Post-traumatic implant-supported restoration of the anterior maxillary teeth using cancellous bone block allografts.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the outcome of dental implants placed in the post-traumatic anterior maxilla after ridge augmentation with cancellous freeze-dried block bone allografts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients presenting with a history of anterior dentoalveolar trauma with bony deficiencies in the sagittal (≥3 mm) and vertical (<3 mm) planes according to computed tomography were included. The recipient sites were reconstructed with cancellous bone block allografts. After 6 months of healing, implants were placed. The primary outcomes of interest were 1) bone measurements taken before grafting, at the time of implant placement, and at stage 2 operations; 2) implant survival; and 3) complications. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 20 consecutive patients with a mean age of 25 ± 7 years. We used 28 cancellous allogeneic bone blocks, and 31 implants were inserted. Of the 31 implants, 12 were immediately restored. The mean follow-up was 42 ± 15 months. Graft and implant survival rates were 92.8% and 96.8%, respectively. Mean bone gain in the sagittal and vertical planes was 5 ± 0.5 mm horizontally and 2 ± 0.5 mm (P < .001). Successful restoration was achieved in all patients with fixed implant-supported prostheses. Soft tissue complications occurred in 7 patients (35%). Complications after cementation of the crowns were seen in 3 implants (9.6%). All implants remained clinically osseointegrated at the end of the follow-up examination. There was no crestal bone loss around the implants beyond the first implant thread. CONCLUSION: Cancellous block allograft can be used successfully for post-traumatic implant-supported restoration in the anterior maxilla.

Histomorphometric analysis following augmentation of the posterior mandible using cancellous bone-block allograft.

The present study was conducted to histologically and histomorphometrically evaluate the application of cancellous bone-block allografts for the augmentation of the posterior atrophic mandible. Twenty-four consecutive patients underwent augmentation with cancellous bone-block allografts in the posterior mandible. A bony deficiency of at least 3 mm horizontally and/or vertically according to CT para-axial reconstruction served as inclusion criteria. Following 6 months, 85 implants were placed and a cylindrical sample core was collected. All specimens were prepared for histological and histomorphometrical examination. Implant survival rate was 95.3%. Follow-up ranged 12-66 months (mean 43 ± 19 months). The mean newly formed bone was 44 ± 28%, that of the residual cancellous bone-block allograft 29 ± 24%, and of the marrow and connective tissue 27 ± 21%. Statistically significant histomorphometric differences regarding newly formed bone (69% vs. 31%, p = 0.05) were found between younger (< 45 years) and older (> 45 years) patients, respectively. Histomorphometric differences regarding residual cancellous bone-block allograft (17% vs. 35%) and of the marrow and connective tissue (14% vs. 34%) were not statistically significant. Cancellous bone-block allograft is biocompatible and osteoconductive, permitting new bone formation following augmentation of extremely atrophic posterior mandible with a two-stage implant placement procedure. New bone formation was age-dependent.

Efficacy of cancellous block allograft augmentation prior to implant placement in the posterior atrophic mandible.

BACKGROUND: The present study evaluated the outcome of ridge augmentation with cancellous freeze-dried block bone allografts in the posterior atrophic mandible followed by placement of dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A bony deficiency of at least 3 mm, horizontally, vertically, or both, according to computerized tomography (CT) para-axial reconstruction served as inclusion criteria. Implants were inserted after a healing period of 6 months. Bone measurements were taken prior to bone augmentation, during implant placement, and at second-stage surgery. Marginal bone loss and crown-to-implant ratio were also measured. RESULTS: Twenty-nine cancellous allogeneic bone blocks were placed in 21 patients. The mean follow-up was 37 months. Bone block survival rate was 79.3%. Mean horizontal and vertical bone gains were 5.6 and 4.3 mm, respectively. Mean buccal bone resorption was 0.5 mm at implant placement and 0.2 mm at second-stage surgery. A total of 85 implants were placed. Mean bone thickness buccal to the implant neck was 2.5 mm at implant placement and 2.3 mm at second-stage surgery. There was no evidence of vertical bone loss between implant placement and second-stage surgery. Implant survival rate was 95.3%. All patients received a fixed implant-supported prosthesis. At the last follow-up, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.5 mm. The mean crown-to-implant ratio was 0.96. CONCLUSION: Implant placement in the posterior atrophic mandible following augmentation with cancellous freeze-dried bone block allografts may be regarded as a viable treatment alternative.

Cancellous bone block allografts for the augmentation of the anterior atrophic maxilla.

BACKGROUND: Pre-implant augmentative surgery is a prerequisite in many cases in the anterior maxilla to achieve a stable, long-term esthetic final result. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of ridge augmentation with cancellous freeze-dried block bone allografts in the anterior atrophic maxilla followed by placement of dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients were included in the study. A bony deficiency of at least 3 mm horizontally and up to 3 mm vertically according to computerized tomography (CT) served as inclusion criteria. Sixty-three implants were inserted after a healing period of 6 months. Nineteen of sixty-three implants were immediately restored. Bone measurements were taken prior to bone augmentation, during implant placement, and at second-stage surgery. RESULTS: Forty-six cancellous allogeneic bone blocks were used. The mean follow-up was 34 ± 16 months. Mean bone gain was 5 ± 0.5 mm horizontally, and 2 ± 0.5 mm vertically. Mean buccal bone resorption was 0.5 ± 0.5 mm at implant placement, and 0.2 ± 0.2 mm at second-stage surgery. Mean bone thickness buccal to the implant neck was 2.5 ± 0.5 mm at implant placement, and 2.3 ± 0.2 mm at second-stage surgery. There was no evidence of vertical bone loss between implant placement and second-stage surgery. Block and implant survival rates were 95.6 and 98%, respectively. All patients received a fixed implant-supported prosthesis. CONCLUSION: Cancellous block allografts appear to hold promise for grafting the anterior atrophic maxilla.

Factors affecting changes in sinus graft height between and above the placed implants.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic dimensional changes of sinus graft height above and between placed implants, and evaluate the factors effecting these changes with 2 different grafting materials and both combination. STUDY DESIGN: The study group comprised 42 patients (50 sinus augmentation procedures). Four consecutive panoramic radiographs were evaluated for changes in sinus graft height between and above the placed implants. Factors that may influence graft height reduction were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean percentage of autogenous bone height reduction was 23% between implants and 13% above the implants. Bovine xenograft showed a mean of 6.5% graft height reduction between implants and 0% above implants. The only 2 parameters that correlated with reduction of graft height above and between the implants were time elapsed from surgery and the type of bone graft. Autogenous bone graft presented significantly more reduction (P = .022), whereas anorganic bovine bone graft had only minor or no changes in height. CONCLUSION: The most important factor influencing reduction in vertical bone height on the time axis, following sinus augmentation is the grafting material, followed by the presence of a functional implant. Anorganic bovine bone was found superior in graft height maintenance in an up to 10 years of follow-up.

Implant-supported restoration of congenitally missing teeth using cancellous bone block-allografts.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with congenitally missing teeth may present with undeveloped alveolar bone morphology, making implant reconstruction a challenge. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of dental implants after ridge augmentation with cancellous freeze-dried block bone allografts in patients with congenitally missing teeth. STUDY DESIGN: Twelve patients with a mean age of 21 ± 4 years, were included. Congenitally missing teeth included maxillary lateral incisors, a maxillary canine, and mandibular central and lateral incisors. A bony deficiency of ≥3 mm horizontally and ≤3 mm vertically according to computerized tomography served as inclusion criteria. Twenty-one implants were inserted after a healing period of 6 months. Five out of 21 implants were immediately restored. Bone measurements were taken before bone augmentation, during implant placement, and at second-stage surgery. RESULTS: Nineteen cancellous allogeneic bone-blocks were used. The mean follow-up time was 30 ± 16 months. Bone block and implant survival rates were 100% and 95.2%, respectively. Mean bone gain was statistically significant (P < .001): 5 ± 0.5 mm horizontally and 2 ± 0.5 mm vertically. All of the patients received a fixed implant-supported prosthesis. Soft tissue complications occurred in 4 patients (30%). Complications after cementation of the crowns were seen in 1 implant (4.8%). All implants remained clinically osseointegrated at the end of the follow-up examination. There was no crestal bone loss around the implants beyond the first implant thread. CONCLUSION: Cancellous bone block-allografts can be used successfully for implant-supported restorations in patients with congenitally missing teeth.

Analysis of complications following augmentation with cancellous block allografts.

BACKGROUND: Bone grafting may be associated with soft and hard tissue complications. Recipient site complications encountered using cancellous block allografts for ridge augmentation are analyzed. METHODS: A total of 101 consecutive patients (62 females and 39 males; mean age 44 ± 17 years) were treated with implant-supported restoration of 137 severe atrophic alveolar ridges augmented with cancellous bone-block allografts. Alveolar ridge deficiency locations were classified as anterior maxilla (n = 58); posterior maxilla (n = 32 sinuses); posterior mandible (n = 32); and anterior mandible (n = 15). A total of 271 rough-surface implants were placed. Recipient site complications associated with block grafting (infection, membrane exposure, incision line opening, perforation of mucosa over the grafted bone, partial graft failure, total graft failure, and implant failure) were recorded. RESULTS: Partial and total bone-block graft failure occurred in 10 (7%) and 11 (8%) of 137 augmented sites, respectively. Implant failure rate was 12 (4.4%) of 271. Soft tissue complications included membrane exposure (42 [30.7%] of 137); incision line opening (41 [30%] of 137); and perforation of the mucosa over the grafted bone (19 [14%] of 137). Infection of the grafted site occurred in 18 (13%) of 137 bone blocks. Alveolar ridge deficiency location had a statistically significant effect on the outcome of recipient site complications. More complications were noted in the mandible compared to the maxilla. Age and gender had no statistically significant effect. CONCLUSIONS: Failures caused by complications were rarely noted in association with cancellous block grafting. The incidence of complications in the mandible was significantly higher. Soft tissue complications do not necessarily result in total loss of cancellous block allograft.

Late signs and symptoms of maxillary sinusitis after sinus augmentation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of late signs and symptoms of acute and chronic maxillary sinusitis after sinus augmentation and to correlate them with predisposing factors. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 137 individuals (54 male and 83 female; 153 sinus augmentation procedures) were evaluated retrospectively for signs and symptoms of maxillary sinusitis, 12-80 months after surgery, using a questionnaire and clinical and radiographic examinations. RESULTS: The incidence of acute and chronic sinusitis after sinus augmentation was low (<5%). History of preoperative sinusitis (P = .001) and sinuses with thick mucosa (P < .0001) were statistically significant factors correlated with late signs and symptoms of sinusitis. There was a slight correlation between chronic sinusitis and women (P = .079) or 2-stage procedures (P = .098). There was no statistical correlation to intraoperative complications, such as membrane perforation and excessive bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of postoperative chronic sinusitis appears to be limited to patients with history of preoperative sinusitis and sinuses with thick mucosa, despite control of the disease before sinus augmentation. Intraoperative surgical complications have negligible effect. Patients presenting with preoperative sinusitis and sinuses with thick mucosa need to be informed of the increased risk. They require a close follow-up and prompt treatment in the event of signs and symptoms of sinusitis.

Challenges associated with reentry maxillary sinus augmentation.

OBJECTIVE: This study was a retrospective assessment of reentry sinus augmentation compared with sinus augmentation performed for the first time. STUDY DESIGN: There were 38 subjects who required sinus augmentation. The study group (17 patients, 21 sinuses) included subjects following failure of a previous sinus augmentation procedure that required reentry augmentation. The control group (21 patients, 21 sinuses) included subjects in which sinus augmentation was performed for the first time. Patients' medical files were reviewed. A preformed questionnaire was used to collect data regarding demographic parameters, medical and dental health history, habits, and intra- and postoperative data. RESULTS: Operative challenges in the study group included adhesions of the buccal flap to the Schneiderian membrane (62%, 13/21, P<.001), bony fenestration of the lateral wall with adhesions (71%, 15/21, P<.001), limited mobility of a clinical fibrotic Schneiderian membrane (71%, 15/21, P<.001), and increased incidence of membrane perforations (47%, 10/21, versus 9.5%, 2/21, P=.03). In the control group the Schneiderian membrane was thin and flexible. Sinus augmentation succeeded in all cases of both groups. Implant failure was significantly higher in the study group (11% versus 0%, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical success of reentry sinus augmentation is predictable despite its complexity. Clinicians should be aware of anatomical changes caused by previous failure of this procedure. Patients should be informed about the lower success rate of implants when reentry sinus augmentation is required.

Histomorphometric analysis after maxillary sinus floor augmentation using cancellous bone-block allograft.

BACKGROUND: Cancellous bone-block allografts may contribute to improved initial implant stability during sinus augmentation in cases with posterior atrophic maxillary ridge height < or =4 mm. The present study histologically and histomorphometrically evaluates the application of cancellous bone-block allografts for maxillary sinus-floor augmentation. METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients, 16 females and 15 males (age range, 25 to 65 years; mean age: 54 +/- 9 years) underwent sinus augmentation with simultaneous implant placement with cancellous bone-block allografts. After 9 months, a second-stage surgery was performed. The previous window location was determined. A cylindrical sample core was collected. All specimens were prepared for histologic and histomorphometric examinations. RESULTS: Seventy-two of 76 implants were clinically osseointegrated (94.7%). All patients received a fixed implant-supported prosthesis. The mean t values of newly formed bone, residual cancellous bone-block allograft, marrow and connective tissue were 26.1% +/- 15% (range: 10% to 58%); 24.7% +/- 19.4% (range: 0.6% to 71%), and 49.2% +/- 20.4% (range: 14.9% to 78.9%), respectively. No statistically significant histomorphometric differences regarding newly formed bone were found between genders (27.02% in males versus 25.68% in females; P = 0.446), ages (29.82% in subjects < or =40 years old versus 24.43% in subjects >40 years old; P = 0.293), presence of membrane perforations (25.5% in non-perforated sinuses versus 27.3% in perforated sinuses; P = 0.427), and residual alveolar bone height (25.85% for residual alveolar bone height <2 mm versus 26.48% for residual alveolar bone height of 2 to 4 mm; P = 0.473). CONCLUSION: The cancellous bone-block allograft is biocompatible and osteoconductive and permits new bone formation in sinus augmentations with simultaneous implant-placement procedures in extremely atrophic posterior maxillae.

Characteristics of early versus late implant failure: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Implant failures can be divided into early and late according to the timing of failure. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare both types. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 194 patients (98 men and 96 women) who presented after dental implant failures during a 6-year period (2000 to 2006). The patient served as the unit of analysis. A history of at least 1 failed and removed dental implant served as the inclusion criterion. Patients were excluded from this study whenever their files had missing data. The collected data included a patient's characteristics, failure characteristics, and the anatomic status of the alveolar ridge after failure. RESULTS: Late failures were associated with moderate to severe bone loss, a larger number of failed implants per patient, a higher incidence in men, and mostly in posterior areas. Early failures were associated with minimal bone loss, occurred more in women, at a younger age, and in most cases the implants were intended to support single crowns. CONCLUSIONS: Meticulous follow-up is needed to reveal and treat failing or ailing implants. Once established as hopeless, they should be removed as soon as possible to prevent further bone loss.

Immediate provisionalization of single-tooth implants in fresh-extraction sites at the maxillary esthetic zone: up to 6 years of follow-up.

AIM: Numerous studies demonstrate successful immediate loading of dental implants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term survival of single-tooth implants immediately placed in fresh extraction sites at the anterior maxilla with immediate infraocclusion-provisional restorations and nonfunctional immediately loading. METHODS: A total of 24 implants were placed in 16 patients. The fixed provisional restorations were connected to a prefabricated plastic abutment. Occlusal contacts were avoided. Follow-up starting at implantation day ranged from 24 to 72 months with a mean of 40.7 months. RESULTS: One implant failed 1 month after placement due to the unscrewing of a temporary abutment that resulted in implant overload. Overall implant survival rate resulted in 95.8%. The mean marginal bone loss increased by 0.9 +/- 1.1 mm. starting from implant placement. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this study, the data indicate that nonfunctional immediate loading of single-tooth implants placed in fresh extraction sites in the anterior maxilla can result in successful implant integration and stable peri-implant conditions up to 6 years.

Intrasocket reactive soft tissue for primary closure after augmentation of extraction sites with severe bone loss before implant placement.

PURPOSE: The normal bone resorption after tooth extraction can be significantly aggravated in the case of pre-existing severe bone loss and chronic infection. Bone augmentation procedures have been proposed, but they require adequate closure of soft tissues. We propose the use of intrasocket reactive tissue to cover extraction sites augmented by bovine bone mineral graft to promote the success of the graft procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 24 patients with severe bone loss and chronic pathology in 27 sites. The intrasocket reactive soft tissue was elevated from the bony walls in a subperiosteal plane. Porous bovine or allograft bone mineral was placed in the extraction site without membranes, and the intrasocket reactive soft tissue was sutured over the grafting material to seal the coronal portion of the socket. Twenty-seven implants were placed 6 months after bone augmentation. RESULTS: Healing progressed uneventfully. Postoperative morbidity was minimal. There was no leakage or infection of the grafting material. The mean time to implant placement was 7.8 months. Supplemental augmentation was not needed. There were no implant failures. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 months (mean, 15 months). All implants were rehabilitated with fixed prostheses. CONCLUSIONS: Intrasocket reactive soft tissue can be used predictably to obtain primary closure of augmented extraction sites with severe bone loss with minimal postoperative morbidity.

The patient's perception of recovery after maxillary sinus augmentation: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Little information is available that documents a patient's perception of recovery after sinus-floor augmentation. The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the patient's perception of immediate postoperative recovery after sinus-floor augmentation. METHODS: Seventy-six patients (41 males and 35 females) who had been scheduled for sinus-floor augmentation were asked to enroll in a prospective clinical study. A health-related quality-of-life questionnaire was given to the patient, which was designed to assess patient perception of recovery in four main areas: pain, oral function, general activity, and other symptoms. The questionnaire was compared to the surgical chart that described the surgery details and its outcome. RESULTS: Average pain peaked on postoperative day (POD) 1 and improved on POD 5. Maximal pain peaked on POD 1 and improved on POD 4. Difficulty in mouth opening peaked on POD 1 and improved on POD 3. Work attendance, on POD 1 to POD 3, most of the patients did not go to work, and most of the patients returned to work on POD 4. Swelling was greatest on POD 2 and improved on POD 5. CONCLUSIONS: The average patient undergoing sinus-floor augmentation should expect, in general, recovery within 5 days. Patients whose recovery is predicted to be worst, especially young women, might require additional counseling and more attentive post-surgery care than others.