[New trends in neuromonitoring patients with with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage].

Neurointensive care of patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage is based on the theory that clinical outcome is the consequence of the primary haemorrhage and a number of secondary insults in the acute post haemorrhage period. Several neuromonitoring techniques have been introduced or accomplished into clinical practice in the last decade with the purpose of monitoring different but related aspects of brain physiology, such as cerebral blood flow (CBF), pressure within the cranial cavity, metabolism, and oxygenation. The aim of these techniques is to obtain information that can improve knowledge on brain pathophysiology, and especially to detect secondary insults which may cause permanent neurological damage if undetected and untreated in "real time", at the time when they can still be managed. These techniques include intracranial pressure (ICP) measurements, jugular venous oxygen saturation, near-infrared spectroscopy, brain tissue monitoring, and transcranial Doppler. The available devices are limited because they measure a part of complex process indirectly. Expense, technical difficulties, invasiveness, limited spatial or temporal resolution and the lack of sensitivity add to the limitation of any individual monitor. These problems have been partially addressed by the combination of several monitors known as multimodality monitoring. In this review, we describe the most common neuromonitoring methods in patients with subarachnoidal hemorrhage that can assess nervous system function, cerebral haemodynamics and cerebral oxygenation.

[Difference between values of gas analysis of arteries and internal jugular vein in patients with cerebral infarction].

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral infarction is more and more frequently present by massive participation and high percentage of mortality even in young population. It is notified as very hard, vitally endangered disease. OBJECTIVE: To prove whether there is a difference in the gas analyses of the arterial and cerebral venous blood between the patients with the cerebral infarction of the left and right hemisphere and why it is significant for the treatment of those patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-five (65) patients of both sexes who were diagnosed by CT as: cerebral infarction, cerebral multiinfarctions and cerebral haemorrhagic infarctions were investigated. Under the same conditions their radial artery and left and right internal jugular vein were tapped--on the fourth, eighth and tenth day of their disease. Gas analysis, calculation of oxygen content and statistical comparison of testing results were performed from the samples of arterial and venous blood. RESULTS: By continuous monitoring of gas analysis parameters of arterial and cerebral venous blood from internal jugular vein, we can follow up the phases of disease, the velocity of changes of gas analysis parameters and adequacy of brain circulation and to correct therapy adequately for the purpose of preventing basic disease complications and to estimate the results of treatment. CONCLUSION: There is a significant difference between the results of gas analysis of arteries and the internal jugular vein, in patients with infarctions of the left and right hemisphere of the brain.