Berlin survey on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI).

PURPOSE: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) complicate about 5% of vaginal births. The risk of anal incontinence is increased. OASI detection rates improve with knowledge and experience. This study describes Berlin's medical care 10 years after starting training focusing on standards set at the German speaking country guideline on third degree tears. METHODS: In 2018, women experiencing OASIs in Berlin's obstetric departments were informed about the study, including standardized after-care. Descriptive analysis in respect to anal sphincter function and risk factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: 207 OASIs occurred in Berlin. 189 women participated. In 148 cases guideline according terminology was applied (n = 57 IIIa, n = 58 IIIb, n = 23 IIIc, n = 10 IV). Minor tears predominated. Minor and major tears differed in respect to birthweight (p = 0.047). N = 75 reported no sphincter function affection. Macrosomia compromised sphincter function (p = 0.008). Univariate analysis showed age (p < 0.001), male infants (p = 0.017) and higher parity (p = 0.013) to be risk factors. Symptomatic women had weaker pelvic floor muscle (p = 0.009) and suffered from urinary incontinence (p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed an association of St. Mark's Scores ≥ 5 with parity (CI 0.191-0.847, p = 0.016) and ≥ 10 with maternal age (CI 1.077-1.396, p = 0.002) and for urinary incontinence with birthweight (CI 1.000-1.002, p = 0.032 and St. Mark's categories ((0-4, 5-9, > 10) CI 2.657-10.904, p = 0.005)). CONCLUSION: Overall, Berlin's medical care of OASI is based on guideline standards. Anal and urinary incontinence correlate. Parity and higher age are risk factors in developing severe anal symptoms.

Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of the study was to analyze anatomical and functional outcomes after sacrocolpopexy (SCP) for vaginal vault prolapse pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) II-III by random use of absorbable (Vicryl) and non-absorbable sutures (Ethibond) for vaginal mesh fixation. METHODS: This study was designed as a two-center randomized controlled study (RCT). The primary objective was to evaluate the anatomical outcome. Success was defined when the vaginal apex (point C; POPQ) did not descend more than 50% of the total vaginal length (tvl) during Valsalva. Patients completed a pelvic examination incorporating the POPQ and questionnaires (the German pelvic floor questionnaire and the PISQ-12 questionnaire) at baseline and 6 months postsurgery. Perioperative adverse events (AE) were recorded. Sample size calculations, based on a 10% non-inferiority limit required 100 participants per group, with power = 90%. RESULTS: In 190 out of 195 women (ETH group n = 96; VIC group n = 94) anatomical success was achieved. The relative risk of anatomical success failure in the VIC group versus the ETH group was 0.69, with a 95% confidence interval 0.12-4.02. The change in the symptom scores did not differ significantly between the ETH and the VIC group. In the ETH group, three suture penetrations into the vagina were observed, and none in the VIC group 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical success after SCP for vaginal vault prolapse POPQ II-III is not affected by suture type for vaginal monofilament mesh attachment. Moreover, we did not see any differences in functional outcomes between the two groups. Three suture penetrations into the vagina were observed in the ETH group, and none in the VIC group 6 months postoperatively.

Comparison of two retropubic tension-free vaginal tape procedures in women with stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled multicenter trial.

PURPOSE: Midurethral slings are a well-established treatment option in women suffering stress urinary incontinence. Various different products and methods are used, therefore, the aim of our study was to compare two inside-out retropubic slings (TVT exact® vs. RetroArc®) inserted in two different ways regarding perioperative and mid-term outcomes. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority multicentre trial, primary endpoint was postoperative cure rate, both objective (negative cough test) and subjective (absence of leakage during physical activity using the UDI-6 questionnaire). Secondary endpoints were patients' satisfaction (Likert scale; ICIQ-UI-SF questionnaires). In addition, intra-and postoperative complications were evaluated. The TVT®-group was operated with an empty bladder, a 18 CH catheter was used with a straight inserter as instructed. Patients randomized into the RetroArc®-group were operated without inserter leading to a reduced catheter size (14 CH), bladder was filled (200 ml) during the procedure. RESULTS: Of the 303 women, 152 were randomized to the TVT® and 151 to the RetroArc® operation. At 3 months, n = 288 (95.0%) and at 12 months n = 229 (75.6%) were assessed. In postoperative objective cure the RetroArc®-procedure was not inferior to TVT® (p = 0.144). In subjective cure, however, the TVT exact® procedure achieved significant better results (TVT® 76.1%, RetroArc® 54.3%, p = 0.002). Perioperative complications were in majority voiding difficulties and lower after the TVT exact®-procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Retropubic sling procedures are safe and successful to treat female stress urinary incontinence. However, different materials and techniques result in differences between outcomes also experienced surgeons should be aware of.

Vaginal hysterectomy with apical fixation and anterior vaginal wall repair for prolapse: surgical technique and medium-term results.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Stabilization of the vaginal apex (level 1) is an important component of operations to correct pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We report functional and anatomical results and patient-reported outcomes of our technique of vaginal vault fixation at the time of vaginal hysterectomy. METHODS: One hundred and nine patients-mean 69 years, range 50.4-83.8; body mass index (BMI) 26.3, range 17.7-39.5-with symptomatic stage 2-3 uterine prolapse combined with stage 3-4 cystocele underwent vaginal hysterectomy with anterior vaginal wall repair; the apex was formed with high closure of the peritoneum and incorporation of the uterosacral and round ligaments. Only absorbable sutures were used. Follow-up included clinical examination with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q) scoring, introital ultrasonography, quality of life (QoL) Likert scale, and the German Pelvic Floor Questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy patients (64%) were available for a follow-up after a mean of 2.8 years (range, 1.6-4.2). At follow-up, point C was stage 0 in 55 (78.6%) women and stage 1 in 15 (21.4%). The anterior vaginal wall was stage 0 or 1 in 35 (50%), stage 2 (no cystocele beyond the hymen) in 34 (49%), and stage 3 in 1 (1.4%). Vaginal length (VL) was 9 cm. Four women (4%) were reoperated for prolapse: two for recurrent anterior compartment prolapse and two for de novo rectocele. Postvoid residuals >150 ml were seen in 21(30%) patients preoperatively and resolved postoperatively in 20. Urgency occurred in nine (13%), stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in ten (14%), and nocturia in 19 (27%). No patient had discomfort at the vaginal vault and 62 patients (87%) reported improved QoL, which did not correlate with anatomical results. Cystocele ≥ 2° at follow-up was associated with BMI >25 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our surgical technique without permanent material offers good apical support and functional and subjective results. Anatomical improvement was achieved in all cases of cystocele repair. Recurrent cystoceles are often asymptomatic.

Clinical experience with urethral retro-resistance pressure measurement: a prospective pre- and postoperative evaluation in women with stress urinary incontinence.

AIMS: To identify possible correlations of urethral retro-resistance pressure (URP) with clinically and urodynamically proven stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and the outcome of anti-incontinence surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: URP was measured using the Monitorr system in women with clinically and urodynamically proven SUI without prolapse before and after anti-incontinence surgery (colposuspension n = 8, tension-free vaginal tape n = 6, tension-free transobturator tape n = 34). RESULTS: Forty-eight women (mean age 61.8 +/- 8.9 years) were evaluated preoperatively and on average 10 weeks postoperatively. Mean URP was 75.6 +/- 20.8 cm H(2)O preoperatively versus 75.4 +/- 17.9 cm H(2)O postoperatively (P = 0.898). The type of anti-incontinence surgery performed had no significant effect on postoperative URP. While no association was found between age and URP (P = 0.35), there was a positive correlation between URP and body mass index (BMI; r = 0.49, P = 0.0004). There was no correlation of URP with the preoperative pad test (P = 0.17) and urethral closure pressure at rest (P = 0.51). Finally, URP did not correlate significantly with the preserved length of the continence zone (0-1/3-2/3-3/3) as determined by the urethral stress profile (P = 0.37-0.72) or with the objective cure rate (negative pad test). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative URP does not correlate with SUI in all women, has no predictive value, and does not correlate with the outcome of anti-incontinence surgery. However, there seems to be an association with biomechanical factors such as obesity, which may open up a new area of application for URP measurement in urogynecologic diagnosis.