Process development of a SARS-CoV-2 nanoparticle vaccine.

One of the outcomes from the global COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has been an acceleration of development timelines to provide treatments in a timely manner. For example, it has recently been demonstrated that the development of monoclonal antibody therapeutics from vector construction to IND submission can be achieved in five to six months rather than the traditional ten-to-twelve-month timeline using CHO cells [1], [2]. This timeline is predicated on leveraging existing, robust platforms for upstream and downstream processes, analytical methods, and formulation. These platforms also reduce; the requirement for ancillary studies such as cell line stability, or long-term product stability studies. Timeline duration was further reduced by employing a transient cell line for early material supply and using a stable cell pool to manufacture toxicology study materials. The development of non-antibody biologics utilizing traditional biomanufacturing processes in CHO cells within a similar timeline presents additional challenges, such as the lack of platform processes and additional analytical assay development. In this manuscript, we describe the rapid development of a robust and reproducible process for a two-component self-assembling protein nanoparticle vaccine for SARS-CoV-2. Our work has demonstrated a successful academia-industry partnership model that responded to the COVID-19 global pandemic quickly and efficiently and could improve our preparedness for future pandemic threats.

Investigation of a failed DNA assay leads to identification of an unexpected contaminant in a commonly used chromatography buffer.

For mammalian cell-derived recombinant biotherapeutics, controlling host cell DNA levels below a threshold is a regulatory requirement to ensure patient safety. DNA removal during drug substance manufacture is accomplished by a series of chromatography-based purification steps and a qPCR-based analytical method is most used to measure DNA content in the purified drug substance to enable material disposition. While the qPCR approach is mature and its application to DNA measurement is widespread in the industry, it is susceptible to trace levels of process-related contaminants that are carried forward. In this study, we observed failures in spike recovery studies that are an integral component of the qPCR-based DNA testing, suggesting the presence of an inhibitory compound in the sample matrix. We generated hypotheses around the origin of the inhibitory compound and generated multiple sample matrices and deployed a suite of analytical techniques including Raman and NMR spectroscopy to determine the origin and identity of the inhibitory compound. The caustic wash step and depth filter extractables were ruled out as root causes after extensive experimentation and DNA testing. Subsequently, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES), a buffer used in the chromatography unit operations, was identified as the source of the contaminant. A 500-fold concentration followed by Raman and NMR spectroscopy analysis revealed the identity of the inhibitory compound as polyvinyl sulfone (PVS), an impurity that originates in the MES manufacturing process. We have implemented PVS concentration controls for incoming MES raw material, and our work highlights the need for rigor in raw material qualification and control.