Scoring system for diagnosis and pretreatment risk assessment of neuroblastoma using urinary biomarker combinations.

The urinary catecholamine metabolites, homovanillic acid (HVA) and vanillylmandelic acid (VMA), are used for the adjunctive diagnosis of neuroblastomas. We aimed to develop a scoring system for the diagnosis and pretreatment risk assessment of neuroblastoma, incorporating age and other urinary catecholamine metabolite combinations. Urine samples from 227 controls (227 samples) and 68 patients with neuroblastoma (228 samples) were evaluated. First, the catecholamine metabolites vanillactic acid (VLA) and 3-methoxytyramine sulfate (MTS) were identified as urinary marker candidates through comprehensive analysis using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The concentrations of these marker candidates and conventional markers were then compared among controls, patients, and numerous risk groups to develop a scoring system. Participants were classified into four groups: control, low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk, and the proportional odds model was fitted using the L2-penalized maximum likelihood method, incorporating age on a monthly scale for adjustment. This scoring model using the novel urine catecholamine metabolite combinations, VLA and MTS, had greater area under the curve values than the model using HVA and VMA for diagnosis (0.978 vs. 0.964), pretreatment risk assessment (low and intermediate risk vs. high risk: 0.866 vs. 0.724; low risk vs. intermediate and high risk: 0.871 vs. 0.680), and prognostic factors (MYCN status: 0.741 vs. 0.369, histology: 0.932 vs. 0.747). The new system also had greater accuracy in detecting missing high-risk neuroblastomas, and in predicting the pretreatment risk at the time of screening. The new scoring system employing VLA and MTS has the potential to replace the conventional adjunctive diagnostic method using HVA and VMA.

Comparative evaluation of radionuclide therapy using 90Y and 177Lu.

OBJECTIVE: Both 90Y and 177Lu are attractive ß-emitters for radionuclide therapy and have been used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, comparative evaluation between 90Y- and 177Lu-labeled molecules has not been fully conducted. Thus, in this study, the features of 90Y and 177Lu for radionuclide therapy were assessed in tumor-bearing mice. METHODS: Two tumor cell lines with different growth rates were used. Biodistribution studies of 177Lu-labeled antibodies (177Lu-Abs) were conducted in each tumor-bearing mouse model. Subsequently, the therapeutic effect of 90Y- and 177Lu-Ab were assessed in tumor-bearing mice. The absorbed radiation dose for the tumor was estimated using the Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: 177Lu-Abs demonstrated high tumor accumulation in both tumor-xerograph. In the fast-growing tumor model, 90Y-Ab showed a better therapeutic effect than 177Lu-Ab, reflecting a higher absorbed radiation dose of 90Y-Ab than that of 177Lu-Ab. In the slow-growing tumor model, both 90Y- and 177Lu-Ab showed an excellent therapeutic effect; however, 177Lu-Ab had a longer efficacy period than 90Y-Ab, which could be attributed to the longer half-life and better dose uniformity of 177Lu than those of 90Y. CONCLUSIONS: To accomplish a maximum therapeutic effect, selecting 90Y or 177Lu, to depend on the growth rate of individual cancer, would be helpful.

Nonclinical study and applicability of the absorbed dose conversion method with a single biodistribution measurement for targeted alpha-nuclide therapy.

BACKGROUND: We recently reported a new absorbed dose conversion method, RAP (RAtio of Pharmacokinetics), for 211At-meta-astatobenzylguanidine (211At-MABG) using a single biodistribution measurement, the percent injected dose/g. However, there were some mathematical ambiguities in determining the optimal timing of a single measurement of the percent injected dose/g. Thus, we aimed to mathematically reconstruct the RAP method and to examine the optimal timing of a single measurement. METHODS: We derived a new formalism of the RAP dose conversion method at time t. In addition, we acquired a formula to determine the optimal timing of a single measurement of the percent injected dose/g, assuming the one-compartment model for biological clearance. RESULTS: We investigated the new formalism's performance using a representative RAP coefficient with radioactive decay weighting. Dose conversions by representative RAP coefficients predicted the true [211At]MABG absorbed doses with an error of 10% or less. The inverses of the representative RAP coefficients plotted at 4 h post-injection, which was the optimal timing reported in the previous work, were very close to the new inverses of the RAP coefficients 4 h post-injection. Next, the behavior of the optimal timing was analyzed by radiolabeled compounds with physical half-lives of 7.2 h and 10 d on various biological clearance half-lives. Behavior maps of optimal timing showed a tendency to converge to a constant value as the biological clearance half-life of a target increased. The areas of optimal timing for both compounds within a 5% or 10% prediction error were distributed around the optimal timing when the biological clearance half-life of a target was equal to that of the reference. Finally, an example of RAP dose conversion was demonstrated for [211At]MABG. CONCLUSIONS: The RAP dose conversion method renovated by the new formalism was able to estimate the [211At]MABG absorbed dose using a similar pharmacokinetics, such as [131I]MIBG. The present formalism revealed optimizing imaging time points on absorbed dose conversion between two radiopharmaceuticals. Further analysis and clinical data will be needed to elucidate the validity of a behavior map of the optimal timing of a single measurement for targeted alpha-nuclide therapy.