Lymphedema Rates Following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection With and Without Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction: A Prospective Trial.

BACKGROUND: Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) has been proposed to decrease lymphedema rates. The primary aim of our study was to determine whether ILR decreased the incidence of lymphedema in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). METHODS: We conducted a two-site pragmatic study of ALND with or without ILR, employing surgeon-level cohort assignment, based on breast surgeons' preferred standard practice. Lymphedema was assessed by limb volume measurements, patient self-reporting, provider documentation, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. RESULTS: Overall, 230 patients with breast cancer were enrolled; on an intention-to-treat basis, 99 underwent ALND and 131 underwent ALND with ILR. Of the 131 patients preoperatively planned for ILR, 115 (87.8%) underwent ILR; 72 (62.6%) were performed by one breast surgical oncologist and 43 (37.4%) by fellowship-trained microvascular plastic surgeons. ILR was associated with an increased risk of lymphedema when defined as ≥10% limb volume change on univariable analysis, but not on multivariable analysis, after propensity score adjustment. We did not find a statistically significant difference in limb volume measurements between the two cohorts when including subclinical lymphedema (≥5% inter-limb volume change), nor did we see a difference in grade between the two cohorts on an intent-to-treat or treatment received basis. For all patients, considering ascertainment strategies of patient self-reporting, provider documentation, and ICD-10 codes, as a single binary outcome measure, there was no significant difference in lymphedema rates between those undergoing ILR or not. CONCLUSION: We found no significant difference in lymphedema rates between patients undergoing ALND with or without ILR.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Postoperative Nausea and Length of Stay in Mastectomy Patients With Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery is a mainstay of curative breast cancer treatment and is associated with postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) negatively impacting the patient experience. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are a combination of evidence-based strategies applied to traditional perioperative practices with the goal to reduce postoperative complications. ERAS protocols have been traditionally underutilized in breast surgery. We investigated if the implementation of an ERAS protocol was associated with decreased rates of PONV as well as length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing mastectomy with breast reconstruction. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review case-control study in which we compared PONV and LOS between ERAS cases and non-ERAS controls. Our data set consisted of 138 ERAS cases and 96 non-ERAS controls. All patients were >18 y old and underwent mastectomy with immediate implant or tissue expander-based reconstruction between 2018 and 2020. The non-ERAS group consisted of procedure-matched controls that were treated prior to implementation of the ERAS protocol. RESULTS: In univariate comparisons, patients who underwent the ERAS protocol had significantly decreased postoperative nausea (mean 37.5% of controls versus 18.1% of ERAS, P < 0.001) and shorter LOS (1.21 versus 1.49 d, P < 0.001). Using a multivariable regression to control for potential confounders, ERAS protocol was associated with less postoperative nausea (odds ratio [OR] = 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13-0.5), LOS 1 d versus > 1 d (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.1-0.35), and less postoperative ondansetron use (OR = 0.03, 95% CI = 0.01-0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that implementation of the ERAS protocol in women undergoing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction is associated with improved patient outcomes in postoperative nausea and LOS.

Nutrition Intervention for Reduction of Cardiovascular Risk in African Americans Using the 2019 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Primary Prevention Guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: The 2019 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Prevention Guidelines emphasize reduction in dietary sodium, cholesterol, refined carbohydrates, saturated fat and sweetened beverages. We hypothesized that implementing this dietary pattern could reduce cardiovascular risk in a cohort of volunteers in an urban African American (AA) community church, during a 5-week ACC/AHA-styled nutrition intervention, assessed by measuring risk markers and adherence, called HEART-LENS (Helping Everyone Assess Risk Today Lenten Nutrition Study). METHODS: The study population consisted of 53 volunteers who committed to eat only home-delivered non-dairy vegetarian meals (average daily calories 1155, sodium 1285 mg, cholesterol 0 mg; 58% carbohydrate, 17% protein, 25% fat). Body mass index (BMI) and fasting serum markers of cardiometabolic and risk factors were measured, with collection of any dietary deviation. RESULTS: Of 53 volunteers, 44 (mean age 60.2 years, 37 women) completed the trial (88%); 1 was intolerant of the meals, 1 completed both blood draws but did not eat delivered food, and 7 did not return for the tests. Adherence to the diet was reported at 93% in the remaining 44. Cardiometabolic risk factors improved significantly, highlighted by a marked reduction in serum insulin (-43%, p = 0.000), hemoglobin A1c (6.2% to 6.0%, p = 0.000), weight and BMI (-10.2 lbs, 33 to 31 kg/m2, p = 0.000), but with small reductions of fasting glucose (-6%, p = 0.405) and triglyceride levels (-4%, p = 0.408). Additionally, improved were trimethylamine-N-oxide (5.1 to 2.9 µmol/L, -43%, p = 0.001), small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) (24.2 to 19.1 mg/dL, -21%, p = 0.000), LDL (121 to 104 mg/dL, -14%, p = 0.000), total cholesterol (TC) (190 to 168 mg/dL, -12%, p = 0.000), and lipoprotein (a) (LP(a)) (56 to 51 mg/dL, -11%, p = 0.000); high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) was widely variable but reduced by 16% (2.5 to 2.1 ng/mL, p = NS) in 40 subjects without inflammatory conditions. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator (suPAR) levels were not significantly changed. The ACC/AHA pooled cohort atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk scores were calculated for 41 and 36 volunteers, respectively, as the ASCVD risk could not be calculated for 3 subjects with low lipid fractions at baseline and 8 subjects after intervention (p = 0.184). In the remaining subjects, the mean 10-year risk was reduced from 10.8 to 8.7%, a 19.4% decrease (p = 0.006), primarily due to a 14% decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and a 10 mm Hg (6%) reduction in systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective 5-week non-dairy vegetarian nutrition intervention with good adherence consistent with the 2019 ACC/AHA Guidelines in an at-risk AA population, markers of cardiovascular risk, cardiometabolism, and body weight were significantly reduced, including obesity, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) density, LP(a), inflammation, and ingestion of substrates mediating production of trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO). Albeit reduced, hs-CRP and suPAR, were not lowered consistently. This induced a significant decrease in the 10-year ASCVD risk in this AA cohort. If widely adopted, this could dramatically reduce and possibly eradicate, the racial disparity in ASCVD events and mortality, if 19% of the 21% increase is eliminated by this lifestyle change.