Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Letermovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Adolescent Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Letermovir is a cytomegalovirus (CMV) terminase complex inhibitor approved for prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in adult CMV-seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) recipients (R+). We report pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of letermovir in adolescent (12-18 years) allogeneic HCT recipients from an ongoing clinical study. METHODS: In this phase 2b, multicenter, open-label study (NCT03940586), 28 adolescents received 480 mg letermovir [240 mg with cyclosporin A (CsA)] once daily orally or intravenously. Blood was collected for intensive (n = 14) plasma concentrations of letermovir. Intensive PK data were used for dose confirmation. Target exposure range 34,400-100,000 h × ng/mL for pediatric median exposures was based on model-predicted phase 3 population PK simulations in adult HCT recipients. RESULTS: All participants were CMV-seropositive (body weight 28.7-95.0 kg). Of 12 PK-evaluable participants, 8 receiving 480 mg letermovir without CsA and 4 receiving 240 mg letermovir with CsA achieved exposures comparable to the adult exposure range. Exposure above the target but below the adult clinical program maximum was observed in 1 patient. Safety was consistent with previously described safety in adults. The proportion of participants with clinically significant CMV infection through week 24 post-HCT was comparable (24%) to that in the pivotal phase 3 study in adults (37.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of adult letermovir doses in this adolescent cohort resulted in exposures within adult clinical program margins and was associated with safety and efficacy similar to adults. Results support a letermovir dose of 480 mg (240 mg with CsA) in adolescent allo-HCT recipients.

Developing a mechanistic understanding of the nonlinear pharmacokinetics of letermovir and prospective drug interaction with everolimus using physiological-based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Letermovir is approved for use in cytomegalovirus-seropositive hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and is investigated in other transplant settings. Nonlinear pharmacokinetics (PKs) were observed in clinical studies after intravenous and oral dosing across a wide dose range, including the efficacious doses of 240 and 480 mg. A physiologically-based PK (PBPK) model for letermovir was built to develop a plausible explanation for the nonlinear PKs observed in clinical studies. In vitro studies suggested that letermovir elimination and distribution are mediated by saturable uridine glucuronosyltransferases (UGT)-metabolism and by saturable hepatic uptake via organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATP) 1B. A sensitivity analysis of parameters describing the metabolism and distribution mechanisms indicated that the greater than dose-proportional increase in letermovir exposure is best described by a saturable OATP1B-mediated transport. This PBPK model was further used to evaluate the drug interaction potential between letermovir and everolimus, an immunosuppressant that may be co-administered with letermovir depending on regions. Because letermovir inhibits cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and everolimus is a known CYP3A substrate, an interaction when concomitantly administered is anticipated. The drug-drug interaction simulation confirmed that letermovir will likely increase everolimus are under the curve by 2.5-fold, consistent with the moderate increase in exposure observed with midazolam in the clinic. The output highlights the importance of drug monitoring, which is common clinical practice for everolimus to maintain safe and efficacious drug concentrations in the targeted patient population when concomitantly administered with letermovir.

Evaluation of the inhibitory effects of itraconazole on letermovir.

AIMS: Letermovir, a cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA terminase complex inhibitor, is a substrate of ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein; P-gp), organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1/3, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A1, UGT1A3 and possibly ABCG2 (breast cancer resistance protein; BCRP). A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of itraconazole, a prototypic ABCB1/ABCG2 inhibitor, on letermovir pharmacokinetics (PK) and the effects of letermovir on itraconazole PK. METHODS: In an open-label, fixed-sequence study in 14 healthy participants, 200 mg oral itraconazole was administered once daily for 4 days. Following a 10-day washout, 480 mg oral letermovir was administered once daily for 14 days (Days 1-14) and then coadministered with 200 mg itraconazole once daily for 4 days (Days 15-18). Intensive PK sampling was performed for letermovir and itraconazole. PK and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: Letermovir geometric mean ratio (GMR; 90% confidence interval [CI]) for area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24 ) was 1.33 (1.17, 1.51) and for maximum concentration (Cmax ) was 1.21 (1.05, 1.39) following administration with/without itraconazole. Itraconazole GMR (90% CI) for AUC0-24 was 0.76 (0.71, 0.81) and for Cmax was 0.84 (0.76, 0.92) following administration with/without letermovir. Coadministration of letermovir with itraconazole was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in letermovir exposure with coadministration of itraconazole is likely predominantly due to inhibition of intestinal ABCB1 and potentially ABCG2 transport. The mechanism for the decrease in itraconazole exposure is unknown. The modest changes in letermovir and itraconazole PK are not considered clinically meaningful.

A drug-drug interaction study with letermovir and acyclovir in healthy participants.

Letermovir inhibits renal tubular organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3) in vitro and is predicted to inhibit OAT3 in vivo. Acyclovir, a substrate for OAT3, is likely to be coadministered with letermovir; therefore, letermovir may increase acyclovir concentrations. A drug-drug interaction study was conducted in healthy participants (N = 16) to assess the effect of letermovir on acyclovir pharmacokinetics. On Day 1, participants received a single oral dose of 400 mg acyclovir; on Days 2-7, participants received oral doses of 480 mg letermovir once daily with a single oral dose of 400 mg acyclovir coadministered on Day 7. Coadministration with letermovir resulted in geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for acyclovir area under the concentration-time curve from administration to infinity and maximum plasma concentration of 1.02 (0.87-1.20) and 0.82 (0.71-0.93), respectively. No notable safety issues were reported. No clinically significant interaction was observed between letermovir and acyclovir in healthy participants and no dose adjustment is required for coadministration.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Letermovir Following Single- and Multiple-Dose Administration in Healthy Japanese Subjects.

Letermovir is a human cytomegalovirus terminase inhibitor for the prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of letermovir were assessed in healthy Japanese subjects in 2 phase 1 trials: trial 1-single ascending oral doses (240, 480, and 720 mg) and intravenous (IV) doses (240, 480, and 960 mg), and trial 2-multiple oral doses (240 and 480 mg once daily for 7 days). Following administration of oral single and multiple doses, letermovir was absorbed with a median time to maximum plasma concentration of 2 to 4 hours, and concentrations declined in a biphasic manner with a terminal half-life of ≈10 to 13 hours. The post absorption plasma concentration-time profile of letermovir following oral administration was similar to the profile observed with IV dosing. There was minimal accumulation with multiple-dose administration. Letermovir exposure in healthy Japanese subjects was ≈1.5- to 2.5-fold higher than that observed in non-Japanese subjects. Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis, weight differences primarily accounted for the higher exposures observed in Asians. Letermovir was generally well tolerated following oral and IV administration to healthy Japanese subjects.

Drug-Drug Interaction of Letermovir and Atorvastatin in Healthy Participants.

Letermovir (MK-8228/AIC246) is a cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA terminase complex inhibitor for CMV prophylaxis in adult patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant. It is cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibitor and inhibits organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1/3 and breast cancer resistance protein transporters. Atorvastatin (ATV), a commonly used treatment for hypercholesterolemia, is a substrate of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1, potentially breast cancer resistance protein, and CYP3A. As letermovir may be coadministered with ATV, the effect of multiple-dose letermovir 480 mg once daily on the pharmacokinetics of single-dose ATV 20 mg and its metabolites (ortho-hydroxyatorvastatin [o-OH-ATV] and para-hydroxyatorvastatin [p-OH-ATV]) was evaluated in an open-label trial in healthy female adults (N = 14). ATV area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) increased ≈3-fold with letermovir coadministration. The time to ATV Cmax also increased, while apparent clearance decreased. The exposures of o-OH-ATV and p-OH-ATV were comparable in the presence versus absence of letermovir; however, o-OH-ATV Cmax decreased by 60% with coadministration, while p-OH-ATV Cmax was similar. Due to the increase in ATV exposure with letermovir coadministration, statin-associated adverse events such as myopathy should be closely monitored following coadministration. The dose of ATV should not exceed 20 mg daily when coadministered with letermovir.

Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Gefapixant (MK-7264), a P2X3 Receptor Antagonist, and the OATP1B1 Drug Transporter Substrate Pitavastatin.

Gefapixant (MK-7264, AF-219), a first-in-class P2X3 antagonist, is being developed as oral treatment for refractory or unexplained chronic cough. Based on in vitro data, gefapixant exerts inhibitory activity on the organic anion transporter (OAT) P1B1 transporter. Therefore, a drug-drug interaction study evaluating the potential effects of gefapixant on the OATP1B1 drug transporter, using pitavastatin as a sensitive probe substrate, was conducted. An open-label, 2-period, fixed-sequence study in 20 healthy adults 18 to 55 years old was conducted. In period 1, a 1-mg oral dose of pitavastatin was administered to each participant. After a ≥4-day washout, in period 2 participants received a 45-mg oral dose of gefapixant twice daily on days 1 through 4. On day 2 of period 2, pitavastatin was coadministered with the morning dose of gefapixant. Pitavastatin exposures following single-dose administration with and without multiple doses of gefapixant were similar: geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of pitavastatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) (pitavastatin + gefapixant/pitavastatin alone) was 0.97 (0.93-1.02). The ratio of pitavastatin lactone AUC0-∞ to pitavastatin AUC0-∞ was also comparable between treatments. Administration of gefapixant and pitavastatin was generally well tolerated, with no safety findings of concern. These results support that gefapixant has a low potential to inhibit the OATP1B1 transporter.

Acute and Chronic Effects of Rifampin on Letermovir Suggest Transporter Inhibition and Induction Contribute to Letermovir Pharmacokinetics.

Rifampin has acute inhibitory and chronic inductive effects that can cause complex drug-drug interactions. Rifampin inhibits transporters including organic-anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and induces enzymes and transporters including cytochrome P450 3A, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A, and P-gp. This study aimed to separate inhibitory and inductive effects of rifampin on letermovir disposition and elimination (indicated for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients). Letermovir is a substrate of UGT1A1/3, P-gp, and OATP1B, with its clearance primarily mediated by OATP1B. Letermovir (single-dose) administered with rifampin (single-dose) resulted in increased letermovir exposure through transporter inhibition. Chronic coadministration with rifampin (inhibition plus potential OATP1B induction) resulted in modestly decreased letermovir exposure vs. letermovir alone. Letermovir administered 24 hours after the last rifampin dose (potential OATP1B induction) resulted in markedly decreased letermovir exposure. These data suggest rifampin may induce transporters that clear letermovir; the modestly reduced letermovir exposure with chronic rifampin coadministration likely reflects the net effect of inhibition and induction. OATP1B endogenous biomarkers coproporphyrin (CP) I and glycochenodeoxycholic acid-sulfate (GCDCA-S) were also analyzed; their exposures increased after single-dose rifampin plus letermovir, consistent with OATP1B inhibition and prior reports of inhibition by rifampin alone. CP I and GCDCA-S exposures were substantially reduced with letermovir administered 24 hours after the last dose of rifampin vs. letermovir plus chronic rifampin coadministration. This study suggests that OATP1B induction may contribute to reduced letermovir exposure after chronic rifampin administration, although given the complexity of letermovir disposition alternative mechanisms are not fully excluded.

Absorption, Metabolism, Distribution, and Excretion of Letermovir.

BACKGROUND: Letermovir is approved for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in cytomegalovirus-seropositive hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. OBJECTIVE: HSCT recipients are required to take many drugs concomitantly. The pharmacokinetics, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of letermovir and its potential to inhibit metabolizing enzymes and transporters in vitro were investigated to inform on the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs). METHODS: A combination of in vitro and in vivo studies described the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and routes of elimination of letermovir, as well as the enzymes and transporters involved in these processes. The effect of letermovir to inhibit and induce metabolizing enzymes and transporters was evaluated in vitro and its victim and perpetrator DDI potentials were predicted by applying the regulatory guidance for DDI assessment. RESULTS: Letermovir was a substrate of CYP3A4/5 and UGT1A1/3 in vitro. Letermovir showed concentration- dependent uptake into organic anionic transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1/3-transfected cells and was a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). In a human ADME study, letermovir was primarily recovered as unchanged drug and minor amounts of a direct glucuronide in feces. Based on the metabolic pathway profiling of letermovir, there were few oxidative metabolites in human matrix. Letermovir inhibited CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP3A, and UGT1A1 in vitro, and induced CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 in hepatocytes. Letermovir also inhibited OATP1B1/3, OATP2B1, OAT3, OCT2, BCRP, BSEP, and P-gp. CONCLUSION: The body of work presented in this manuscript informed on the potential for DDIs when letermovir is administered both intravenously and orally in HSCT recipients.

Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Letermovir and Fluconazole in Healthy Participants.

Letermovir is a prophylactic agent for cytomegalovirus infection and disease in adult cytomegalovirus-seropositive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. As the antifungal agent fluconazole is administered frequently in transplant recipients, a drug-drug interaction study was conducted between oral letermovir and oral fluconazole. A phase 1 open-label, fixed-sequence study was performed in healthy females (N = 14, 19-55 years). In Period 1, a single dose of fluconazole 400 mg was administered. Following a 14-day washout, a single dose of letermovir 480 mg was administered (Period 2), and after a 7-day washout, single doses of fluconazole 400 mg and letermovir 480 mg were coadministered in Period 3. Pharmacokinetics and safety were evaluated. The pharmacokinetics of fluconazole and letermovir were not meaningfully changed following coadministration. Fluconazole geometric mean ratio (GMR; 90% confidence interval [CI]) with letermovir for area under the concentration-versus-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) was 1.03 (0.99-1.08); maximum concentration (Cmax ) was 0.95 (0.92-0.99). Letermovir AUC0-∞ GMR (90%CI) was 1.11 (1.01-1.23), and Cmax was 1.06 (0.93-1.21) following coadministration with fluconazole. Coadministration of fluconazole and letermovir was generally well tolerated.

A phase 1 pooled PK/PD analysis of bone resorption biomarkers for odanacatib, a Cathepsin K inhibitor.

To develop a framework for evaluating the resorption effects of Cathepsin K (CatK) inhibitors and to inform dose regimen selection, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for odanacatib (ODN) was developed based upon data from Phase 1 studies. Pooled PK/PD data from 11 studies (N = 249) were fit reasonably to a population inhibitory sigmoid Emax model. Body weight on E0 (baseline uNTx/Cr, urinary N-terminal telopeptide normalized by creatinine) and age on Emax (fractional inhibition of the biomarker response) were significant covariates for biomarker response. Simulations of typical osteoporosis patients (by age, sex and weight) indicated minimal differences between sexes in concentration-uNTx/Cr relationship. There was no evidence that regimen (daily vs. weekly dosing) influenced the PK/PD relationship of resorption inhibition for odanacatib. PK/PD models based on data from odanacatib (ODN) Phase 1 studies demonstrated that uNTx/Cr was an appropriate bone resorption biomarker for assessment of the effects of a CatK inhibitor. The models also identified the determinants of response in the PK/PD relationship for ODN (body weight on E0 and age on Emax).

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of the Cathepsin K Inhibitor Odanacatib: Insights Into Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factor Effects on Exposure in Postmenopausal and Elderly Women.

This analysis developed a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for odanacatib, characterized demographic and concomitant medication covariates effect, and provided odanacatib exposure estimates for subjects in phase 2/3 studies. Data from multiple phase 1 (P005, P025, and P014), phase 2b (P004 and P022), and phase 3 (Long-Term Odanacatib Fracture Trial; P018) studies were pooled to create a data set of 1280 postmenopausal women aged 45 to 91 years (102 from phase 1, 514 from phase 2b, and 664 from phase 3) who received weekly oral odanacatib doses ranging from 3 to 100 mg. A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption, dose-dependent relative bioavailability (F1), and first-order elimination best described odanacatib PK. F1 decreased from the 100% reference bioavailability for a 3-mg oral dose to 24.5% for a 100-mg dose. Eight statistically significant covariates were included in the final PK model: body weight, age, race, and concomitant cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A inhibitors on apparent clearance; body weight on apparent central volume of distribution; and concomitant hydrochlorothiazide, high-fat breakfast, and a study effect on F1. All fixed- and random-effects parameters were estimated with good precision (%standard error of the mean ≤29.5%). This population PK analysis provides insights into intrinsic- and extrinsic-factor effects on odanacatib exposure in postmenopausal and elderly women with osteoporosis. The magnitude of the intrinsic-factor effects was generally modest (odanacatib exposure geometric mean ratios, 0.80-1.21) even in subjects aged >80 years, or in subsets with multiple combinations of factors.

A Single- and Multiple-Dose Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of Fixed-Dose Grazoprevir/Elbasvir in Healthy Chinese Participants.

PURPOSE: The burden of hepatitis C virus infection is particularly high in Asian countries, and new treatments are urgently needed. The purpose of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of the fixed-dose combination tablet of elbasvir/grazoprevir in healthy Chinese participants. PATIENT AND METHODS: In this Phase I, single-site, open-label, 3-period study in healthy Chinese adults, participants received a single tablet of elbasvir 50 mg/grazoprevir 100 mg, followed by blood sampling for up to 96 hrs (http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/ CTR20160034; Protocol PN071). Participants then received 1 tablet daily for 10 days, followed by a minimum 10-day washout, after which participants received a single dose of 2 tablets (elbasvir 100 mg/grazoprevir 200 mg). Elbasvir and grazoprevir PK were assessed following single and multiple doses. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. RESULTS: Twelve participants (50% male) were enrolled in and completed the study. Following single-dose oral administration of elbasvir 50 mg/grazoprevir 100 mg or elbasvir 100 mg/grazoprevir 200 mg, the median Tmax was 3-4 hrs and elimination half-life was 18 hrs (elbasvir) and 30 hrs (grazoprevir). Multiple-dose administration resulted in AUC0-24 accumulation ratios of 1.58 (elbasvir) and 2.35 (grazoprevir). Both elbasvir 50 mg/grazoprevir 100 mg and 100 mg/200 mg regimens were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Single-dose administration of elbasvir 50 mg/grazoprevir 100 mg or 100 mg/200 mg and once-daily administration of elbasvir 50 mg/grazoprevir 100 mg for 10 days has been adequately characterized, with PK values within the expected range, and was generally well tolerated in healthy Chinese male and female participants.

Pharmacogenetic Analysis of OATP1B1, UGT1A1, and BCRP Variants in Relation to the Pharmacokinetics of Letermovir in Previously Conducted Clinical Studies.

The cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral terminase inhibitor letermovir is indicated for prevention of CMV infection in CMV-seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. In this analysis, functional variants in solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 (SLCO1B1), uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1), and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) were assessed for effects on letermovir pharmacokinetics (PK) using pooled genetic information from 296 participants in 12 phase 1 studies. Letermovir area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was increased in carriers of the SLCO1B1 variant rs4149056 C allele relative to noncarriers with a geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 1.18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.30) for carriers of 1 copy and 1.42 (1.10-1.84) for carriers of 2 copies of the risk allele C compared with noncarriers. The SLCO1B1 variant rs4149032 T allele was associated with a decrease in letermovir AUC with GMR (95%CI) of 0.93 (0.85-1.02) and 0.82 (0.73-0.92) for carriers of 1 and 2 copies of the risk allele T, respectively, compared with noncarriers. The UGT1A1*6 variant rs4148323 A allele was present predominantly in Asian participants and was associated with an increase in letermovir AUC compared with noncarriers (GMR, 1.36; 95%CI, 1. 1.07-1.74). SLCO1B1 variant rs2306283, UGT1A1*28 TA promoter repeat, and BCRP variant rs2231142 had no effect on letermovir PK. Together, these data suggest that variants of enzymes and transporters that are involved in the disposition of letermovir in vitro may account for some variability in letermovir PK, but do not affect exposure to a clinically relevant extent.

Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions Between Letermovir and the Immunosuppressants Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, and Mycophenolate Mofetil.

Letermovir (AIC246, MK-8228) is a human cytomegalovirus terminase inhibitor indicated for the prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients that is also being investigated for use in other transplant settings. Many transplant patients receive immunosuppressant drugs, of which several have narrow therapeutic ranges. There is a potential for the coadministration of letermovir with these agents, and any potential effect on their pharmacokinetics (PK) must be understood. Five phase 1 trials were conducted in 73 healthy female participants to evaluate the effect of letermovir on the PK of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, and mycophenolic acid (active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]), as well as the effect of cyclosporine and MMF on letermovir PK. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Coadministration of letermovir with cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus resulted in 1.7-, 2.4-, and 3.4-fold increases in area under the plasma concentration-time curve and 1.1-, 1.6-, and 2.8-fold increases in maximum plasma concentration, respectively, of the immunosuppressants. Coadministration of letermovir and MMF had no meaningful effect on the PK of mycophenolic acid. Coadministration with cyclosporine increased letermovir area under the plasma concentration-time curve by 2.1-fold and maximum plasma concentration by 1.5-fold, while coadministration with MMF did not meaningfully affect the PK of letermovir. Given the increased exposures of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus, frequent monitoring of concentrations should be performed during administration and at discontinuation of letermovir, with dose adjustment as needed. These data support the reduction in clinical dosage of letermovir (to 240 mg) upon coadministration with cyclosporine.

Correction to: Effect of CYP3A Inhibition and Induction on the Pharmacokinetics of Suvorexant: Two Phase I, Open-Label, Fixed-Sequence Trials in Healthy Subjects.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake.

Effect of CYP3A Inhibition and Induction on the Pharmacokinetics of Suvorexant: Two Phase I, Open-Label, Fixed-Sequence Trials in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Suvorexant is an orexin receptor antagonist indicated for the treatment of insomnia, characterized by difficulties with sleep onset and/or sleep maintenance. As suvorexant is metabolized primarily by Cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A), and its pharmacokinetics may be affected by CYP3A modulators, the effects of CYP3A inhibitors (ketoconazole or diltiazem) or an inducer (rifampin [rifampicin]) on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of suvorexant were investigated. METHODS: In two Phase I, open-label, fixed-sequence trials (Studies P008 and P038), healthy subjects received a single oral dose of suvorexant followed by co-administration with multiple once-daily doses of strong/moderate CYP3A inhibitors (ketoconazole/diltiazem) or a strong CYP3A inducer (rifampin). Treatments were administered in the morning: suvorexant 4 mg with ketoconazole 400 mg (Study P008; N = 10), suvorexant 20 mg with diltiazem 240 mg (Study P038; N = 20), and suvorexant 40 mg with rifampin 600 mg (Study P038; N = 10). Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), half-life (t½), and time to Cmax (tmax) were derived from plasma concentrations of suvorexant collected at prespecified time points up to 10 days following CYP3A inhibitor/inducer co-administration. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: Co-administration with ketoconazole resulted in increased exposure to suvorexant [AUC0-∞: geometric mean ratio (GMR); 90% confidence interval (CI) 2.79 (2.35, 3.31)] while co-administration with diltiazem resulted in a lesser effect [GMR (90% CI): 2.05 (1.82, 2.30)]. Co-administration with rifampin led to a marked decrease (88%) in suvorexant exposure. Consistent with morning administration and known suvorexant pharmacology, somnolence was the most frequently reported AE. CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with expectations that strong CYP3A inhibitors and inducers exert marked effects on suvorexant pharmacokinetics. In the context of a limited sample size, single suvorexant doses were generally well tolerated in healthy subjects when co-administered with/without a CYP3A inhibitor/inducer.

Clinical and translational pharmacology of the cathepsin K inhibitor odanacatib studied for osteoporosis.

Cathepsin K (CatK) is a cysteine protease abundantly expressed by osteoclasts and localized in the lysosomes and resorption lacunae of these cells. CatK is the principal enzyme responsible for the degradation of bone collagen. Odanacatib is a selective, reversible inhibitor of CatK at subnanomolar potency. The pharmacokinetics of odanacatib have been extensively studied and are similar in young healthy men, postmenopausal women and elderly men, and were qualitatively similar throughout Phase 1 development and in-patient studies. Following 3 weeks of 50 mg once weekly dosing the geometric mean area under the curve from 0 to 168 hours was 41.1 µM h, the concentration at 168 hours was 126 nM and the harmonic mean apparent terminal half-life was 84.8 hr. Odanacatib exposure increased in a less than dose proportional manner due to solubility limited absorption. It is estimated that approximately 70% of the absorbed dose of odanacatib is eliminated via metabolism, 20% is excreted as unchanged drug in the bile or faeces, and 10% is excreted as unchanged drug in the urine. The systemic clearance was low (approximately 13 mL/min). Odanacatib decreases the degradation of bone matrix proteins and reduces the efficiency of bone resorption with target engagement confirmed by a robust decrease in serum C-telopeptides of type 1 collagen (approximately 60%), urinary aminoterminal crosslinked telopeptides of type 1 collagen to creatinine ratio (approximately 50%) and total urine deoxypyridinoline/Cr (approximately 30%), with an increase in serum cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (approximately 55%). The 50-mg weekly dosing regimen evaluated in Phase 3 achieved near maximal reduction in bone resorption throughout the treatment period. The extensive clinical programme for odanacatib, together with more limited clinical experience with other CatK inhibitors (balicatib and ONO-5334), provides important insights into the clinical pharmacology of CatK inhibition and the potential role of CatK in bone turnover and mineral homeostasis. Key findings include the ability of this mechanism to: (i) provide sustained reductions in resorption markers, increases in bone mineral density, and demonstrated fracture risk reduction; (ii) be associated with relative formation-sparing effects such that sustained resorption reduction is achieved without accompanying meaningful reductions in bone formation; and (iii) lead to increases in osteoclast number as well as other osteoclast activity (including build-up of CatK enzyme), which may yield transient increases in resorption following treatment discontinuation and the potential for nonmonotonic responses at subtherapeutic doses.

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Letermovir Coadministered With Azole Antifungals (Posaconazole or Voriconazole) in Healthy Subjects.

Letermovir is a human cytomegalovirus terminase inhibitor for cytomegalovirus infection prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Posaconazole (POS), a substrate of glucuronosyltransferase and P-glycoprotein, and voriconazole (VRC), a substrate of CYP2C9/19, are commonly administered to transplant recipients. Because coadministration of these azoles with letermovir is expected, the effect of letermovir on exposure to these antifungals was investigated. Two trials were conducted in healthy female subjects 18 to 55 years of age. In trial 1, single-dose POS 300 mg was administered alone, followed by a 7-day washout; then letermovir 480 mg once daily was given for 14 days with POS 300 mg coadministered on day 14. In trial 2, on day 1 VRC 400 mg was given every 12 hours; on days 2 and 3, VRC 200 mg was given every 12 hours, and on day 4 VRC 200 mg. On days 5 to 8, letermovir 480 mg was given once daily. Days 9 to 12 repeated days 1 to 4 coadministered with letermovir 480 mg once daily. In both trials, blood samples were collected for the assessment of the pharmacokinetic profiles of the antifungals, and safety was assessed. The geometric mean ratios (90%CIs) for POS+letermovir/POS area under the curve and peak concentration were 0.98 (0.83, 1.17) and 1.11 (0.95, 1.29), respectively. Voriconazole+letermovir/VRC area under the curve and peak concentration geometric mean ratios were 0.56 (0.51, 0.62) and 0.61 (0.53, 0.71), respectively. All treatments were generally well tolerated. Letermovir did not affect POS pharmacokinetics to a clinically meaningful extent but decreased VRC exposure. These results suggest that letermovir may be a perpetrator of CYP2C9/19-mediated drug-drug interactions.

Assessment of the Abuse Potential of the Orexin Receptor Antagonist, Suvorexant, Compared With Zolpidem in a Randomized Crossover Study.

Suvorexant is a dual orexin receptor antagonist approved in the United States and Japan for the treatment of insomnia at a maximum dose of 20 mg. This randomized double-blind crossover study evaluated the abuse potential of suvorexant in 36 healthy recreational polydrug users with a history of sedative and psychedelic drug use. Single doses of suvorexant (40, 80, and 150 mg: 2-7.5 × maximum dose), zolpidem (15 and 30 mg: 1.5-3 × maximum dose), and placebo were administered, with a 10-day washout between treatments. Subjective and objective measures, including visual analog scales (VASs), Addiction Research Center Inventory, and cognitive/psychomotor tests, were evaluated for 24-hour postdose. Suvorexant had significantly greater peak effects on "drug liking" VAS (primary endpoint) than placebo. Although effects of suvorexant on abuse potential measures were generally similar to zolpidem, they remained constant across doses, whereas zolpidem often had greater effects at higher doses. Suvorexant (all doses) had significantly fewer effects than zolpidem 30 mg on secondary measures, such as "high" VAS, Bowdle VAS, and Addiction Research Center Inventory morphine-benzedrine group. The overall incidence of abuse-related adverse events, such as euphoric mood and hallucination, was numerically lower with suvorexant than zolpidem. In agreement with its classification as a schedule IV drug, suvorexant demonstrated abuse potential, compared with placebo. The abuse potential was similar to zolpidem using certain measures, but with a reduced incidence of abuse-related adverse events. Although this suggests that the overall abuse liability of suvorexant may be lower than zolpidem, the actual abuse rates will be assessed with the postmarketing experience.