Technical Development and In Silico Implementation of SyntheticMR in Head and Neck Adaptive Radiation Therapy: A Prospective R-IDEAL Stage 0/1 Technology Development Report.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the technical feasibility of integrating the quantitative maps available from SyntheticMR into the head and neck adaptive radiation oncology workflow. While SyntheticMR has been investigated for diagnostic applications, no studies have investigated its feasibility and potential for MR-Simulation or MR-Linac workflow. Demonstrating the feasibility of using this technique will facilitate rapid quantitative biomarker extraction which can be leveraged to guide adaptive radiation therapy decision making. APPROACH: Two phantoms, two healthy volunteers, and one patient were scanned using SyntheticMR on the MR-Simulation and MR-Linac devices with scan times between four to six minutes. Images in phantoms and volunteers were conducted in a test/retest protocol. The correlation between measured and reference quantitative T1, T2, and PD values were determined across clinical ranges in the phantom. Distortion was also studied. Contours of head and neck organs-at-risk (OAR) were drawn and applied to extract T1, T2, and PD. These values were plotted against each other, clusters were computed, and their separability significance was determined to evaluate SyntheticMR for differentiating tumor and normal tissue. MAIN RESULTS: The Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient between the measured and phantom reference values was above 0.98 for both the MR-Sim and MR-Linac. No significant levels of distortion were measured. The mean bias between the measured and phantom reference values across repeated scans was below 4% for T1, 7% for T2, and 4% for PD for both the MR-Sim and MR-Linac. For T1 vs. T2 and T1 vs. PD, the GTV contour exhibited perfect purity against neighboring OARs while being 0.7 for T2 vs. PD. All cluster significance levels between the GTV and the nearest OAR, the tongue, using the SigClust method was p < 0.001. SIGNIFICANCE: The technical feasibility of SyntheticMR was confirmed. Application of this technique to the head and neck adaptive radiation therapy workflow can enrich the current quantitative biomarker landscape.

Markov models for clinical decision-making in radiation oncology: A systematic review.

The intrinsic stochasticity of patients' response to treatment is a major consideration for clinical decision-making in radiation therapy. Markov models are powerful tools to capture this stochasticity and render effective treatment decisions. This paper provides an overview of the Markov models for clinical decision analysis in radiation oncology. A comprehensive literature search was conducted within MEDLINE using PubMed, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only studies published from 2000 to 2023 were considered. Selected publications were summarized in two categories: (i) studies that compare two (or more) fixed treatment policies using Monte Carlo simulation and (ii) studies that seek an optimal treatment policy through Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). Relevant to the scope of this study, 61 publications were selected for detailed review. The majority of these publications (n = 56) focused on comparative analysis of two or more fixed treatment policies using Monte Carlo simulation. Classifications based on cancer site, utility measures and the type of sensitivity analysis are presented. Five publications considered MDPs with the aim of computing an optimal treatment policy; a detailed statement of the analysis and results is provided for each work. As an extension of Markov model-based simulation analysis, MDP offers a flexible framework to identify an optimal treatment policy among a possibly large set of treatment policies. However, the applications of MDPs to oncological decision-making have been understudied, and the full capacity of this framework to render complex optimal treatment decisions warrants further consideration.

Advancing equitable and personalized cancer care: Novel applications and priorities of artificial intelligence for fairness and inclusivity in the patient care workflow.

Patient care workflows are highly multimodal and intertwined: the intersection of data outputs provided from different disciplines and in different formats remains one of the main challenges of modern oncology. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize the current clinical practice of oncology owing to advancements in digitalization, database expansion, computational technologies, and algorithmic innovations that facilitate discernment of complex relationships in multimodal data. Within oncology, radiation therapy (RT) represents an increasingly complex working procedure, involving many labor-intensive and operator-dependent tasks. In this context, AI has gained momentum as a powerful tool to standardize treatment performance and reduce inter-observer variability in a time-efficient manner. This review explores the hurdles associated with the development, implementation, and maintenance of AI platforms and highlights current measures in place to address them. In examining AI's role in oncology workflows, we underscore that a thorough and critical consideration of these challenges is the only way to ensure equitable and unbiased care delivery, ultimately serving patients' survival and quality of life.

Interdisciplinary collaboration in critical care alarm research: A bibliometric analysis.

BACKGROUND: Alarm fatigue in nurses is a major patient safety concern in the intensive care unit. This is caused by exposure to high rates of false and non-actionable alarms. Despite decades of research, the problem persists, leading to stress, burnout, and patient harm resulting from true missed events. While engineering approaches to reduce false alarms have spurred hope, they appear to lack collaboration between nurses and engineers to produce real-world solutions. The aim of this bibliometric analysis was to examine the relevant literature to quantify the level of authorial collaboration between nurses, physicians, and engineers. METHODS: We conducted a bibliometric analysis of articles on alarm fatigue and false alarm reduction strategies in critical care published between 2010 and 2022. Data were extracted at the article and author level. The percentages of author disciplines per publication were calculated by study design, journal subject area, and other article-level factors. RESULTS: A total of 155 articles with 583 unique authors were identified. While 31.73 % (n = 185) of the unique authors had a nursing background, publications using an engineering study design (n = 46), e.g., model development, had a very low involvement of nursing authors (mean proportion at 1.09 %). Observational studies (n = 58) and interventional studies (n = 33) had a higher mean involvement of 52.27 % and 47.75 %, respectively. Articles published in nursing journals (n = 32) had the highest mean proportion of nursing authors (80.32 %), while those published in engineering journals (n = 46) had the lowest (9.00 %), with 6 (13.04 %) articles having one or more nurses as co-authors. CONCLUSION: Minimal involvement of nursing expertise in alarm research utilizing engineering methodologies may be one reason for the lack of successful, real-world solutions to ameliorate alarm fatigue. Fostering a collaborative, interdisciplinary research culture can promote a common publication culture across fields and may yield sustainable implementation of technological solutions in healthcare.

Intra-brain vascular models within the ICRP mesh-type adult reference phantoms for applications to internal dosimetry.

Objective. Phantoms of the International Commission on Radiological Protection provide a framework for standardized dosimetry. The modeling of internal blood vessels-essential to tracking circulating blood cells exposed during external beam radiotherapy and to account for radiopharmaceutical decays while still in blood circulation-is, however, limited to the major inter-organ arteries and veins. Intra-organ blood is accounted for only through the assignment of a homogeneous mixture of parenchyma and blood [single-region (SR) organs]. Our goal was to develop explicit dual-region (DR) models of intra-organ blood vasculature of the adult male brain (AMB) and adult female brain (AFB).Approach. A total of 4000 vessels were created amongst 26 vascular trees. The AMB and AFB models were then tetrahedralized for coupling to the PHITS radiation transport code. Absorbed fractions were computed for monoenergetic alpha particles, electrons, positrons, and photons for both decay sites within the blood vessels and for tissues outside these vessels. RadionuclideS-values were computed for 22 and 10 radionuclides commonly employed in radiopharmaceutical therapy and nuclear medicine diagnostic imaging, respectively.Main results. For radionuclide decays, values ofS(brain tissue ← brain blood) assessed in the traditional manner (SR) were higher than those computed using our DR models by factors of 1.92, 1.49, and 1.57 for therapeutic alpha-emitters, beta-emitters, and Auger electron-emitters, respectively in the AFB and by factors of 1.65, 1.37, and 1.42 for these same radionuclide categories in the AMB. Corresponding ratios of SR and DR values ofS(brain tissue ← brain blood) were 1.34 (AFB) and 1.26 (AMB) for four SPECT radionuclides, and were 1.32 (AFB) and 1.24 (AMB) for six common PET radionuclides.Significance. The methodology employed in this study can be explored in other organs of the body for proper accounting of blood self-dose for that fraction of the radiopharmaceutical still in general circulation.

Predicting Severity of Radiation Induced Lymphopenia in Individual Proton Therapy Patients for Varying Dose Rate and Fractionation Using Dynamic 4-Dimensional Blood Flow Simulations.

PURPOSE: Radiation-induced lymphopenia has gained attention recently as the result of its correlation with survival in a range of indications, particularly when combining radiation therapy (RT) with immunotherapy. The purpose of this study is to use a dynamic blood circulation model combined with observed lymphocyte depletion in patients to derive the in vivo radiosensitivity of circulating lymphocytes and study the effect of RT delivery parameters. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We assembled a cohort of 17 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with proton RT alone in 15 fractions (fx) using conventional dose rates (beam-on time [BOT], 120 seconds) for whom weekly absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) during RT and follow-up were available. We used HEDOS, a time-dependent, whole-body, blood flow computational framework, in combination with explicit liver blood flow modeling, to calculate the dose volume histograms for circulating lymphocytes for changing BOTs (1 second-300 seconds) and fractionations (5 fx, 15 fx). From this, we used the linear cell survival model and an exponential model to determine patient-specific lymphocyte radiation sensitivity, α, and recovery, σ, respectively. RESULTS: The in vivo-derived patient-specific α had a median of 0.65 Gy-1 (range, 0.30-1.38). Decreasing BOT to 1 second led to an increased average end-of-treatment ALC of 27.5%, increasing to 60.3% when combined with the 5-fx regimen. Decreasing to 5 fx at the conventional dose rate led to an increase of 17.0% on average. The benefit of both increasing dose rate and reducing the number of fractions was patient specificࣧpatients with highly sensitive lymphocytes benefited most from decreasing BOT, whereas patients with slow lymphocyte recovery benefited most from the shorter fractionation regimen. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that increasing dose rate at the same fractionation reduced ALC depletion more significantly than reducing the number of fractions. High-dose-rates led to an increased sparing of lymphocytes when shortening the fractionation regimen, particularly for patients with radiosensitive lymphocytes at elevated risk.

HEDOS-a computational tool to assess radiation dose to circulating blood cells during external beam radiotherapy based on whole-body blood flow simulations.

We have developed a time-dependent computational framework, hematological dose (HEDOS), to estimate dose to circulating blood cells from radiation therapy treatment fields for any treatment site. Two independent dynamic models were implemented in HEDOS: one describing the spatiotemporal distribution of blood particles (BPs) in organs and the second describing the time-dependent radiation field delivery. A whole-body blood flow network based on blood volumes and flow rates from ICRP Publication 89 was simulated to produce the spatiotemporal distribution of BPs in organs across the entire body using a discrete-time Markov process. Constant or time-varying transition probabilities were applied and their impact on transition time was investigated. The impact of treatment time and anatomical site were investigated using imaging data and dose distributions from a liver cancer and a brain cancer patient. The simulations revealed different dose levels to the circulating blood for brain irradiation compared to liver irradiation even for similar field sizes due to the different blood flow properties of the two organs. The volume of blood receiving any dose (V>0 Gy) after a single radiation fraction increases from 1.2% for a 1 s delivery time to 20.9% for 120 s delivery time for the brain cancer treatment, and from 10% (1 s) to 48.7% (120 s) for a liver cancer treatment. Other measures of the low-dose bath to the circulating blood such as the dose to small volumes of blood (D2%) decreases with longer delivery time. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the blood dose-volume histogram is highly sensitive to changes in the treatment time, indicating that dynamic modeling of blood flow and radiation fields is necessary to evaluate dose to circulating blood cells for the assessment of radiation-induced lymphopenia. HEDOS is publicly available and allows for the estimation of patient-specific dose to circulating blood cells based on organ DVHs, thus enabling the study of the impact of different treatment plans, dose rates, and fractionation schemes.