Does intensity matter? A randomized crossover study of the role of acute exercise intensity on cognitive performance and motor speed and accuracy.

There is a well-recognized, yet nuanced, positive relationship between acute physical activity and cognitive function. However, the precise impact of exercise intensity remains ambiguous. We tested learning and memory, working memory and processing speed, and motor speed and accuracy across three distinct exercise intensities. A sample of 207 participants (100 female) between 18 and 44 years (mean age: 22.5±3.7years) completed all study procedures. Utilizing a within-subjects, cross-over design, participants completed moderate (35% VO2 Max), vigorous (70% VO2 Max), and sedentary (no exercise) conditions. Cognitive and motor assessments, including the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Typing Speed Test, and Ten Key Data Entry Task, were conducted approximately 60min post-exercise. There were no significant differences in primary cognitive or motor outcome measures across the three exercise intensities, even with the study being strongly powered. There was, however, a small difference on the fastest trial of the PASAT, where vigorous-intensity exercise yielded slightly better performance compared to both sedentary and moderate-intensity exercise. This effect was no longer significant when including VO2 Max or maximum heart rate as indicators of fitness. There were no interactions on outcome variables by exercise intensity when including biological sex in the models. Thus, a single bout of acute exercise, regardless of its intensity, did not alter cognitive and motor performance when measured approximately 1h post-exercise. Findings highlight the importance of large samples and suggest that the temporal dynamics post-exercise might play a pivotal role in cognitive outcomes.

A Multilingual Chatbot Can Effectively Engage Arthroplasty Patients Who Have Limited English Proficiency.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, English language proficiency is widely accepted as a key social determinant of health. For patients with limited English proficiency (LEP), language barriers can make the delivery of perioperative instructions challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a multilingual chatbot could effectively engage LEP patients and improve their outcome after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: We identified 1,282 TJA patients (705 knees, 577 hips) who enrolled in a short message service (SMS) chatbot from 2020-2022. Forty-seven patients enrolled in the chatbot received their messages in a language other than English. A historical control of 68 LEP patients not enrolled in the chatbot was identified. Chi-squared, Fisher's exact test, and t-tests were performed to measure the effect that conversational engagement had on emergency department (ED) visits, hospital readmissions, and reoperations. RESULTS: There was no difference in the conversational engagement between LEP patients and those with English as their primary language (EPL) (12.3 versus 12.2 text responses, P = .959). The LEP cohort who enrolled in the chatbot had fewer readmissions (0% versus 8.3%, P = .013) and a near significant reduction in ED visits (0.9% versus 8.0%, P = .085) compared to those not enrolled. There was no difference in reoperations between the 2 cohorts. CONCLUSION: LEP and EPL patients engaged equally with the multilingual chatbot. LEP patients who enrolled in the chatbot had fewer readmissions and a near significant reduction in ED visits. Multilingual platforms such as this chatbot may provide more equitable care to our frequently encountered LEP patients.

Animal models in compartment syndrome: a review of existing literature.

Objective: Extremity compartment syndrome (ECS) is a morbid condition resulting in permanent myoneural damage. Currently, the diagnosis of compartment syndrome relies on clinical symptoms and/or intracompartment pressure measurements, both of which are poor predictors of ECS. Animal models have been used to better define cellular mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of ECS. However, no standardized model exists. The purpose of this study was to identify existing animal research on extremity compartment syndrome to summarize the current state of the literature and to identify weaknesses that could be improved with additional research. Methods: A MEDLINE database search and reverse inclusion protocol were utilized. We included all animal models of ECS. Results: Forty-one studies were included. Dogs were the most commonly used model species, followed by pigs and rats. Most studies sought to better define the pathophysiology of compartment syndrome. Other studies evaluated experimental diagnostic modalities or potential treatments. The most common compartment syndrome model was intracompartment infusion, followed by tourniquet and intracompartment balloon models. Few models incorporated additional soft tissue or osseous injury. Only 65.9% of the reviewed studies confirmed that their model created myoneural injury similar to extremity compartment syndrome. Conclusions: Study purpose, methodology, and outcome measures varied widely across included studies. A standardized definition for animal compartment syndrome would direct more consistent research in this field. Few animal models have investigated the pathophysiologic relationship between traumatic injury and the development of compartment syndrome. A validated, clinically relevant animal model of extremity compartment syndrome would spur improvement in diagnosis and therapeutic interventions.

The impact of exercise intensity on neurophysiological indices of food-related inhibitory control and cognitive control: A randomized crossover event-related potential (ERP) study.

Food-related inhibitory control, the ability to withhold a dominant response towards highly palatable foods, influences dietary decisions. Food-related inhibitory control abilities may increase following a bout of aerobic exercise; however, the impact of exercise intensity on both food-related inhibitory control and broader cognitive control processes is currently unclear. We used a high-powered, within-subjects, crossover design to test how relative intensity of aerobic exercise influenced behavioral (response time, accuracy) and neural (N2 and P3 components of the scalp-recorded event-related potential [ERP]) measures of food-related inhibitory and cognitive control. Two hundred and ten participants completed three separate conditions separated by approximately one week in randomized order: two exercise conditions (35% VO2max or 70% VO2max) and seated rest. Directly following exercise or rest, participants completed a food-based go/no-go task and a flanker task while electroencephalogram data were recorded. Linear mixed models showed generally faster response times (RT) and improved accuracy following 70% VO2max exercise compared to rest, but not 35% VO2max; RTs and accuracy did not differ between 35% VO2max exercise and rest conditions. N2 and P3 amplitudes were larger following 70% VO2max exercise for the food-based go/no-go task compared to rest and 35% VO2max exercise. There were no differences between exercise conditions for N2 amplitude during the flanker task; however, P3 amplitude was more positive following 70% VO2max compared to rest, but not 35% VO2max exercise. Biological sex did not moderate exercise outcomes. Results suggest improved and more efficient food-related recruitment of later inhibitory control and cognitive control processes following 70% VO2max exercise.