Does Pallidal Physiology Determine the Success of Unilateral Deep Brain Stimulation in Cervical Dystonia?

Pallidal deep brain stimulation is a well-known surgical treatment for cervical dystonia. The resolution of dystonia typically requires bilateral pallidal stimulation, but in some instances, unilateral stimulation has been successful. In such instances, generally, the stimulated hemisphere was contralateral to the dystonic sternocleidomastoid, but rarely it was ipsilateral. We sought for the physiological features that determine the basis for success and laterality of deep brain stimulation for cervical dystonia with prominent torticollis. We found that pallidal physiology such as high burst to tonic ratio and significant interhemispheric differences in the neuronal firing rate and regularity are critical determinants of successful treatment with unilateral deep brain stimulation. We also found that higher lateralized differences in pallidal physiological parameters predict more robust improvement. In three out of four patients, the stimulation of the hemisphere ipsilateral to the dystonic sternocleidomastoid muscle was effective. These patients did not have any structural brain abnormalities on clinically available imaging studies. One patient responded to the unilateral deep brain stimulation in the hemisphere contralateral to the dystonic sternocleidomastoid. This patient had a structural putamen lesion on brain MRI. These results provide objective parameters determining the success of pallidal deep brain stimulation for treatment of cervical dystonia. The results also depict differences in the pallidal physiology in patients where ipsilateral versus contralateral deep brain stimulation was effective.

Hyperactivity of Basal Ganglia in Patients With Parkinson's Disease During Internally Guided Voluntary Movements.

The contribution of different brain areas to internally guided (IG) and externally triggered (ET) movements has been a topic of debate. It has been hypothesized that IG movements are performed mainly through the basal ganglia-thalamocortical loop while ET movements are through the cerebello-thalamocortical pathway. We hypothesized that basal ganglia activity would be modified in patients with Parkinson's disease during IG movement as compared with normal subjects. We used functional MRI (fMRI) to investigate the differences between IG and ET motor tasks. Twenty healthy participants and 20 Parkinson's disease patients (OFF-state) were asked to perform hand movements in response to sound stimuli (ET) and in advance of the stimuli (IG). We showed that ET movements evoked activation of a few large clusters in the contralateral motor areas: the sensorimotor and premotor cortex, supplementary motor area (SMA), insula, putamen, motor thalamus and ipsilateral cerebellum. IG movements additionally evoked activation of a large number of small clusters distributed in different brain areas including the parietal and frontal lobes. Comparison between the activity of Parkinson's disease patients and healthy volunteers showed few important differences. We observed that along with the activity of the posterior areas, an activation of the anterior areas of putamen was observed during IG movements. We also found hyperactivity of the ventral thalamus for both movements. These results showed that IG movements in PD patients were made with the involvement of both sensorimotor and associative basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops.