Comparison of SNCG and NEFH Promoter-Driven Expression of Human SIRT1 Expression in a Mouse Model of Glaucoma.

Purpose: Adeno-associated virus (AAV) demonstrates promise in delivering therapeutic genes to retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Delivery of neuroprotective genes is constrained by packaging size and/or cell selectivity. This study compares the ability of the RGC-selective gamma-synuclein (SNCG) promoter and the smaller RGC-selective neurofilament heavy chain (NEFH) promoter, as well as portions of the RGC-selective atonal bHLH transcription factor 7 (ATOH7) enhancer, to drive gene expression in RGCs. Methods: AAV2 constructs with green fluorescent protein (GFP) or human sirtuin 1 (hSIRT1) driven by cytomegalovirus (CMV) enhancer and NEFH promoter (AAV2-eCMV-NEFH) or distal active sequences of the ATOH7 enhancer (DiATOH7) with the SNCG promoter (AAV2-DiATOH7-SNCG) were intravitreally injected into C57BL/6J mice. RGCs were immunolabeled with Brn3a antibodies and counted. AAV constructs with the utmost transduction efficiency were used to test the therapeutic efficacy of the hSIRT1 gene in 12-week-old C57BL/6J mice subjected to microbead (MB)-induced intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation. Visual function was measured using optokinetic responses (OKRs). Results: The eGFP transduction efficiency of AAV2-eCMV-NEFH was similar to that of AAV2-eCMV-SNCG and AAV2-DiATOH7-SNCG. When combined with the SNCG promoter, a larger ATOH7 enhancer was less efficient than the shorter DiATOH7 enhancer. Similarly, the hSIRT1 efficiency of AAV2-eCMV-NEFH was similar to that of AAV2-eCMV-SNCG. The latter two vectors were equally efficient in increasing RGC survival and improving visual function in the mouse model of MB-induced IOP elevation. Conclusions: SNCG and NEFH promoters represent two equally efficient and comparable RGC selective promoter sequences; however, the NEFH promoter offers a smaller packaging size. Translational Relevance: Smaller enhancer-promoter combinations can be used to deliver larger genes in human cells and for treatment in optic neuropathies including glaucoma.

Comparison of Brn3a and RBPMS Labeling to Assess Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss During Aging and in a Model of Optic Neuropathy.

Purpose: Retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss provides the basis for diagnosis and stage determination of many optic neuropathies, and quantification of RGC survival is a critical outcome measure in models of optic neuropathy. This study examines the accuracy of manual RGC counting using two selective markers, Brn3a and RBPMS. Methods: Retinal flat mounts from 1- to 18-month-old C57BL/6 mice, and from mice after microbead (MB)-induced intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation, are immunostained with Brn3a and/or RBPMS antibodies. Four individuals masked to the experimental conditions manually counted labeled RGCs in three copies of five images, and inter- and intra-person reliability was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: A larger population (approximately 10% higher) of RGCs are labeled with RBPMS than Brn3a antibody up to 6 months of age, but differences decrease to approximately 1% at older ages. Both RGC-labeled populations significantly decrease with age. MB-induced IOP elevation is associated with a significant decrease of both Brn3a- and RBPMS-positive RGCs. Notably, RGC labeling with Brn3a provides more consistent cell counts than RBPMS in interpersonal (ICC = 0.87 to 0.11, respectively) and intra-personal reliability (ICC = 0.97 to 0.66, respectively). Conclusions: Brn3a and RBPMS markers are independently capable of detecting significant decreases of RGC number with age and in response to IOP elevation despite RPBMS detecting a larger number of RGCs up to 6 months of age. Brn3a labeling is less prone to manual cell counting variability than RBPMS labeling. Overall, either marker can be used as a single marker to detect significant changes in RGC survival, each offering distinct advantages.