Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 133(2): 331-5, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20093244

RESUMEN

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recently abandoned its recommendation for drawing a discard tube when performing a prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR) or an activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Because there is currently no evidence that a discard tube is necessary for more specialized coagulation assays, we studied the need for a discard tube for some of these tests. Blood was obtained from 88 subjects in 2 subsequent citrate tubes. Platelet-free plasma was tested for PT, APTT, antithrombin, protein C, and factors II, V, VIII, IX, and X. Difference and bias between tubes were tested using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Bland-Altman plots. For only APTT, antithrombin, and protein C was a small, statistically significant mean bias found (0.5 seconds; P = .001; -0.7%, P = .002; and -0.8%, P < .0001, respectively), but the bias of individual samples was not clinically relevant. This was also true for the other parameters tested. The recent CLSI recommendation that a discard tube is not necessary for PT/INR and APTT can be extended to include more specialized plasma-based coagulation assays as identified in this study.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas de Coagulación Sanguínea/métodos , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/métodos , Flebotomía/métodos , Humanos , Tiempo de Tromboplastina Parcial/métodos , Plasma , Tiempo de Protrombina/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA