RESUMEN
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of cancer and all-cause and cause-specific mortality rates among a cohort of patients with severe PsA receiving TNF inhibitor (TNFi) with those of the general UK population. Methods: Cancers and deaths were identified from the national cancer and the national death registers in patients with PsA included in the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register from start of TNFi until 31 December 2012. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated using published cancer and death rates for the general population. SIRs were calculated for both overall cancer risk and non-melanoma skin cancer. SMRs were calculated for (1) all-cause mortality, (2) death from malignancy and (3) death from circulatory disease. Gender-specific analyses were also performed. Results: Thirty-four cancers and 41 deaths among 709 patients were observed. The risk of malignancy overall was not increased (SIR 0.94; 95% CI: 0.65, 1.34). However, there was a significantly increased incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (SIR 2.12; 95% CI: 1.19, 3.50). The all-cause mortality rate in our cohort was increased (SMR 1.56; CI: 1.12, 2.11). Death from malignancy was not increased, but death from coronary heart disease was increased (SMR 2.42; 95% CI: 1.11, 4.59). Conclusion: In our cohort of patients with severe PsA, the overall incidence of malignancy was similar to that of the general population, although the incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer was increased. All-cause mortality was significantly increased, in part due to excess of deaths attributed to coronary heart disease.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Psoriásica/mortalidad , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Anciano , Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Causas de Muerte , Enfermedad Coronaria/inducido químicamente , Enfermedad Coronaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lymphomas comprise a heterogeneous group of malignant diseases with highly variable prognosis. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with a twofold increased risk of both Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). It is unknown whether treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) affect the risk of specific lymphoma subtypes. METHODS: Patients never exposed to (bionaïve) or ever treated with bDMARDs from 12 European biologic registers were followed prospectively for the occurrence of first ever histologically confirmed lymphoma. Patients were considered exposed to a bDMARD after having received the first dose. Lymphomas were attributed to the most recently received bDMARD. RESULTS: Among 124 997 patients (mean age 59 years; 73.7% female), 533 lymphomas were reported. Of these, 9.5% were HL, 83.8% B-cell NHL and 6.8% T-cell NHL. No cases of hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma were observed. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most frequent B-cell NHL subtype (55.8% of all B-cell NHLs). The subtype distributions were similar between bionaïve patients and those treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). For other bDMARDs, the numbers of cases were too small to draw any conclusions. Patients with RA developed more DLBCLs and less chronic lymphocytic leukaemia compared with the general population. CONCLUSION: This large collaborative analysis of European registries has successfully collated subtype information on 533 lymphomas. While the subtype distribution differs between RA and the general population, there was no evidence of any modification of the distribution of lymphoma subtypes in patients with RA treated with TNFi compared with bionaïve patients.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma/epidemiología , Linfoma/etiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Linfoma/patología , Linfoma de Células B/epidemiología , Linfoma de Células B/etiología , Linfoma no Hodgkin/epidemiología , Linfoma no Hodgkin/etiología , Linfoma de Células T/epidemiología , Linfoma de Células T/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis TumoralRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) compared with subjects without RA, with the increased risk driven potentially by inflammation. Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) may modulate the risk and severity of MI. We compared the risk and severity of MI in patients treated with TNFi with that in those receiving synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs). METHODS: This analysis included patients with RA recruited from 2001 to 2009 to the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis starting TNFi (etanercept/infliximab/adalimumab) and a biologic-naïve comparator cohort receiving sDMARD. All patients were followed via physician and patient questionnaires and national death register linkage. Additionally, all patients were linked to the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project, a national registry of hospitalisations for MI. Patients were censored at first verified MI, death, 90â days following TNFi discontinuation, last physician follow-up or 20 April 2010, whichever came first. The risk of first MI was compared between cohorts using COX regression, adjusted with propensity score deciles (PD). MI phenotype and severity were compared using descriptive statistics. 6-month mortality post MI was compared using logistic regression. RESULTS: 252 verified first MIs were analysed: 58 in 3058 patients receiving sDMARD and 194 in 11â 200 patients receiving TNFi (median follow-up per person 3.5â years and 5.3â years, respectively). The PD-adjusted HR of MI in TNFi referent to sDMARD was 0.61 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.89). No statistically significant differences in MI severity or mortality were observed between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA receiving TNFi had a decreased risk of MI compared with patients with RA receiving sDMARD therapy over the medium term. This might be attributed to a direct action of TNFi on the atherosclerotic process or better overall disease control.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of lymphoma compared with the general population. There are concerns that tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) may exacerbate this risk. However, since the excess risk of lymphoma in RA is related to the cumulative burden of inflammation, TNFi may conversely reduce the risk of lymphoma by decreasing the burden of inflammation. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of lymphoma in subjects with RA treated with TNFi with those treated with non-biological therapy. METHODS: Subjects diagnosed by a rheumatologist with RA enrolled in the British Society for Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis Register (BSRBR-RA), a prospective cohort study, were followed until first lymphoma, death or until 30 November 2013. Rates of lymphoma in the TNFi and non-biological-treated cohorts were compared using Cox regression. RESULTS: 11â 931 TNFi-treated patients were compared with 3367 biological-naive patients. 84 lymphomas (88 (95% CI 70 to 109) per 100â 000 person-years) were reported in the TNFi cohort and 30 lymphomas (154 (95% CI 104 to 220)) in the biological-naive cohort. After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, there was no difference in the risk of lymphoma for the TNFi versus the biological-naive group: HR 1.00 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.80). No risk differences were observed for individual TNFi. CONCLUSIONS: In medium-term follow-up, there is no evidence that tumour necrosis factor inhibition influences the risk of lymphoma over the background risk in subjects with RA.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Linfoma/epidemiología , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Some studies have reported a possible association between exposure to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and an increased risk of melanoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of invasive cutaneous melanomas in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with TNF inhibitors (TNFi), other biologic disease modifying drugs and non-biologic therapy. METHODS: Eleven biologic registers from nine European countries participated in this collaborative project. According to predefined exposure definitions, cohorts of patients with RA were selected. Using the country-specific general population of each register as reference, age, sex and calendar year standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) of invasive histology-confirmed cutaneous melanoma were calculated within each register. Pooled SIR and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) comparing biologic cohorts to biologic-naïve were calculated across countries by taking the size of the register into account. RESULTS: Overall 130â 315 RA patients with a mean age of 58â years contributing 579â 983 person-years were available for the analysis and 287 developed a first melanoma. Pooled SIRs for biologic-naïve, TNFi and rituximab-exposed patients were 1.1 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.4), 1.2 (0.99 to 1.6) and 1.3 (0.6 to 2.6), respectively. Incidence rates in tocilizumab and abatacept-exposed patients were also not significantly increased. IRR versus biologic-naïve patients were: TNFi 1.1 (95% CI 0.8 to 1.6); rituximab 1.2 (0.5 to 2.9). CONCLUSIONS: This large European collaborative project did not confirm an overall increased risk of melanoma following exposure to TNFi.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Abatacept/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Rituximab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at an increased risk of ischemic stroke. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) may influence risk and mortality after ischemic stroke by reducing inflammation. This study was undertaken to examine the association of TNFi with the risk of incident ischemic stroke and with 30-day and 1-year mortality after ischemic stroke. METHODS: Patients with RA starting therapy with TNFi and a biologics-naive comparator group treated with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) only were recruited to the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis from 2001 to 2009. Patients were followed up via clinical and patient questionnaires as well as the national death register. Incident strokes were classified as ischemic if brain imaging reports suggested ischemia or if ischemic stroke was reported as the underlying cause of death on a death certificate. Patients with a previous stroke were excluded. Risk of ischemic stroke was compared between patients receiving synthetic DMARDs only and those ever-exposed to TNFi using a Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusted for potential confounders. Mortality after ischemic stroke was compared between synthetic DMARD-treated patients and TNFi-treated patients using logistic regression, adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: To April 2010, 127 verified incident ischemic strokes (21 in 3,271 synthetic DMARD-treated patients and 106 in 11,642 TNFi-treated patients) occurred during 11,973 and 61,226 person-years of observation, respectively (incidence rate 175 versus 173 per 100,000 person-years). After adjustment for confounders, there was no association between ever-exposure to TNFi and ischemic stroke (hazard ratio 0.99 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.54-1.81]). Mortality 30 days or 1 year after ischemic stroke was not associated with concurrent TNFi exposure (odds ratio 0.18 [95% CI 0.03-1.21] and 0.60 [95% CI 0.16-2.28], respectively). CONCLUSION: Exposure to TNFi does not appear to influence the occurrence of ischemic stroke in the medium term in patients with RA. The impact on mortality after ischemic stroke remains inconclusive.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Isquemia Encefálica/inducido químicamente , Accidente Cerebrovascular/inducido químicamente , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Isquemia Encefálica/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of certain solid cancers, in particular lung cancer, compared to the general population. Treatment with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (TNFi) may further enhance this risk. OBJECTIVES: To compare the risk of solid cancer in patients with RA treated with TNFi to that in patients treated with non-biologic (synthetic) disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs). METHODS: Patients with a physician diagnosis of RA enrolled in the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register, a national prospective cohort study established in 2001 to monitor the long-term safety of TNFi, were followed via record linkage with the national cancer registries until first solid cancer, death, for 5â years, or until 2011. Rates of solid cancers in 11â 767 patients without prior cancer who received TNFi were compared to those in 3249 patients without prior cancer treated with sDMARDs. RESULTS: 427 solid cancers were reported in 52â 549 patient-years follow-up for the TNFi group (81 (95% CI 74 to 89) per 10â 000 patient-years) and 136 cancers were reported in 11â 672 patient-years in the sDMARD cohort (117 (95% CI 98 to 138) per 10â 000 patient-years). After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics there was no difference in risk of solid cancer for TNFi compared to sDMARD treated patients: HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.07). There was no difference in the relative risk of cancer for any of the individual TNFi drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of TNFi to sDMARD does not alter the risk of cancer in RA patients selected for TNFi in the UK.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunoglobulina G/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Receptores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Adalimumab , Adulto , Anciano , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Etanercept , Femenino , Humanos , Infliximab , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/epidemiología , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy compared with non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs). METHODS: Using data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register, we compared the incidence of GIPs between 11 881 anti-TNF-treated and 3393 nbDMARD-treated RA patients using Cox regression modelling. Hazard ratios (HRs) with confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Adjustment was made for potential confounders including current steroid use. The study covered the time period between 2001 and 2011. RESULTS: There were 42 (upper 20, lower 22) GI perforations: five in the nbDMARD cohort and 37 in the anti-TNF cohort. After adjustment, treatment with TNF antagonists was associated with an HR of 1.6 (95% CI 0.4 to 6.0) for all GIPs, 2.7 (95% CI 0.4 to 18.1) for lower GIPs and 0.9 (95% CI 0.1 to 5.8) for upper GIPs. Current use of steroids was the single most important predictor of GI perforation with an adjusted HR of 2.9 (95% CI 1.5 to 5.4), but this risk was confined to lower GIPs (HR 8.0, 95% CI 2.6 to 24.1). CONCLUSIONS: We have not found a statistically significant association between anti-TNF treatment and the risk of GIP.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Perforación Intestinal/epidemiología , Gastropatías/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the risk of cancer and compare it with that for the general population in a modern cohort of UK patients with RA and to identify risk factors for cancer among this cohort. METHODS: The study population comprised biologic-naïve RA subjects receiving non-biologic disease-modifying therapy recruited to the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register from 2002 to 2009. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for cancers were calculated using age- and gender-specific cancer rates in the English population. Poisson regression models adjusted for age and gender using England general population data were used to determine the association of other predictors with incident malignancy. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 3771 individuals with RA contributing 13 315 person-years of follow-up. One hundred and eighty-two cancers were reported: 156 solid and 26 myelo- or lymphoproliferative cancers. The overall SIR was 1.28 (95% CI 1.10, 1.48). Risks of lung cancer (SIR 2.39, 95% CI 1.75, 3.19), Hodgkin lymphoma (SIR 12.82, 95% CI 4.16, 29.92) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (SIR 3.12, 95% CI 1.79, 5.07) were higher compared with the general population and risks of prostate cancer (SIR 0.35, 95% CI 0.11, 0.82) and cancers of the female genital organs (SIR 0.35, 95% CI 0.10, 0.90) were reduced. Within the cohort, cancer risk was more than 2-fold higher in current or ex-smokers than in non-smokers. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of cancer was increased in this national cohort of subjects with RA. The association of RA with certain cancers needs to be considered when studying the effects of biologic therapy, such as anti-TNF, on cancer risk.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/etiología , Sistema de Registros , Riesgo , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy is a mainstay of treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In 2001, BSRBR was established to evaluate the safety of these agents. This paper addresses the safety of anti-TNF therapy in RA with specific reference to serious skin and soft tissue infections (SSSI) and shingles. METHODS: A cohort of anti-TNF-treated patients was recruited alongside a comparator group with active RA treated with non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (nbDMARD). 11 881 anti-TNF and 3673 nbDMARD patients were analysed. Follow-up was by 6-monthly questionnaires to patients and clinicians. Analyses considered SSSI and shingles separately. Incidence rates (IR) were calculated and then compared using survival analyses. RESULTS: The crude IR for SSSI were: anti-TNF 1.6/100 patient-years (95% CI 1.4 to 1.8); nbDMARD 0.7/100 patient-years (95% CI 0.5 to 1.0) and shingles: anti-TNF 1.6/100 patient-years (95% CI 1.3 to 2.0); nbDMARD 0.8/100 patient-years (95% CI 0.6 to 1.1). Adjusted HR were SSSI 1.4 (95% CI 0.9 to 2.4), shingles 1.8 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.8). For SSSI, no significant differences were seen between anti-TNF agents. For shingles, the lowest risk was observed for adalimumab (adjusted HR vs nbDMARD) 1.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.0) and highest for infliximab (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.4 to 3.4)). CONCLUSION: A significantly increased risk of shingles was observed in the anti-TNF-treated cohort. The risk of SSSI tended towards being greater with anti-TNF treatment but was not statistically significant. As with any observational dataset cause and effect cannot be established with certainty as residual confounding may remain. This finding would support the evaluation of zoster vaccination in this population.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cutáneas Infecciosas/epidemiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Adalimumab , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Etanercept , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Infliximab , Persona de Mediana Edad , Receptores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Factores de Riesgo , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare the risk of keratinoctye skin cancer (basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)) in patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with the general population, and to determine whether anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy exacerbates this risk. METHODS: Patients with RA enrolled in the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register, a prospective national cohort established in 2001 to monitor the safety of anti-TNF, were followed until 2008. 11 881 patients treated with anti-TNF were compared with 3629 patients receiving non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (nbDMARD). Standardised incidence ratios (SIR) were calculated for each cohort and rates between cohorts were compared using Cox proportional HR, adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: SIR for skin cancer was increased in both cohorts compared with the English population: SIR 1.72 (95% CI 1.43 to 2.04) anti-TNF; 1.83 (95% CI 1.30 to 2.50) nbDMARD only. In patients without previous skin cancer, BCC incidence per 100 000 patient-years was 342 (95% CI 290 to 402) after anti-TNF and 407 (95% CI 288 to 558) after nbDMARD. HR after anti-TNF adjusted for treatment weighting was 0.95 (95% CI 0.53 to 1.71). SCC incidence per 100 000 patient-years: anti-TNF 53 (95% CI 33 to 79); nbDMARD 43 (95% CI 12 to 110); adjusted HR 1.16 (95% CI 0.35 to 3.84). CONCLUSIONS: Skin cancers were increased among treated patients with RA. No evidence was found that anti-TNF therapy exacerbates the risk of BCC or SCC but this cannot be excluded. Patients with RA should use sun protection and be monitored for skin cancer.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , Carcinoma Basocelular/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/inmunología , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Queratinocitos/inmunología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inmunología , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidoresAsunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Proteína Antagonista del Receptor de Interleucina 1/efectos adversos , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/fisiopatología , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Proteína Antagonista del Receptor de Interleucina 1/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Distribución por Sexo , Sociedades Médicas , Tasa de Supervivencia , Reino UnidoAsunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/terapia , Neoplasias/etiología , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of serious infections (SIs) in patients with RA treated with anti-TNF therapy with emphasis on the risk across different ages. METHODS: Using data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register, a prospective observational study, we compared the risk of SI between 11 798 anti-TNF-treated patients and 3598 non-biologic DMARD (nbDMARD)-treated patients. RESULTS: A total of 1808 patients had at least one SI (anti-TNF: 1512; nbDMARD: 296). Incidence rates were: anti-TNF 42/1000 patient-years of follow-up (95% CI 40, 44) and nbDMARD 32/1000 patient-years of follow-up (95% CI 28, 36). The adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) for SI in the anti-TNF cohort was 1.2 (95% CI 1.1, 1.5). The risk did not differ significantly between the three agents adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab. The risk was highest during the first 6 months of therapy [adjHR 1.8 (95% CI 1.3, 2.6)]. Although increasing age was an independent risk factor for SI in both cohorts, there was no difference in relative risk of infection in patients on anti-TNF therapy in the older population. There was no difference in hospital stay for SI between cohorts. Mortality within 30 days of SI was 50% lower in the anti-TNF cohort [odds ratio 0.5 (95% CI 0.3, 0.8)]. CONCLUSIONS: These data add to currently available evidence suggesting that anti-TNF therapy is associated with a small but significant overall risk of SI. This must be balanced against the risks associated with poor disease control or alternative treatments.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones/etiología , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Necrosis Tumoral/efectos adversos , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To quantify nailfold capillary density and dimensions in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) and compare them with those in healthy controls; to look for associations with microvascular disease in IIM; and to determine whether nailfold capillary density and dimensions change over time. METHODS: Nailfold video microscopy (x300 magnification) was performed on 24 patients with IIM and 35 healthy controls. Capillary density and dimensions (total width and apical width) were quantified. Patients were clinically assessed and disease activity recorded using the Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool. Disease severity and physical function were assessed using the myositis damage index and Stanford HAQ, respectively. Findings were analysed using linear and logistic regression, adjusted for age and sex. In a subgroup of 16 patients with IIM and 27 controls, the process was repeated 6-12 months later and the results were analysed using Student's t-test. RESULTS: Capillary density was lower and dimensions were higher in patients with IIM compared with healthy controls (P < 0.001 for all). Anti-Jo-1 antibody was associated with reduced capillary density. In the longitudinal cohort, the mean change in capillary density was -1.4 in patients vs -0.4 in controls (P = 0.07). Mean change in capillary dimensions did not differ between patients and controls, but some patients demonstrated pronounced changes in capillary morphology over time. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced capillary density and increased dimensions in patients with IIM can be quantified using nailfold capillaroscopy, suggesting that nailfold capillaroscopy may be useful as an outcome measure of microvascular disease in studies of IIM.