Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 31(6): 592-7, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20402589

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To better understand the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization or infection in different patient populations, to perform quantitative analysis of MRSA in nasal cultures, and to characterize strains using molecular fingerprinting. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter study. SETTING: Eleven different inpatient and outpatient healthcare facilities. PARTICIPANTS: MRSA-positive inpatients identified in an active surveillance program; inpatients and outpatients receiving hemodialysis; inpatients and outpatients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection; patients requiring cardiac surgery; and elderly patients requiring long-term care. METHODS. Nasal swab samples were obtained from January 23, 2006, through July 27, 2007; MRSA strains were quantified and characterized by molecular fingerprinting. RESULTS: A total of 444 nares swab specimens yielded MRSA (geometric mean quantity, 794 CFU per swab; range, 3-15,000,000 CFU per swab). MRSA prevalence was 20% for elderly residents of long-term care facilities (25 of 125 residents), 16% for HIV-infected outpatients (78 of 494 outpatients), 15% for outpatients receiving hemodialysis (31 of 208 outpatients), 14% for inpatients receiving hemodialysis (86 of 623 inpatients), 3% for HIV-infected inpatients (5 of 161 inpatients), and 3% for inpatients requiring cardiac surgery (6 of 199 inpatients). The highest geometric mean quantity of MRSA was for inpatients requiring cardiac surgery (11,500 CFU per swab). An association was found between HIV infection and colonization with the USA300 or USA500 strain of MRSA (P < or = .001). The Brazilian clone was found for the first time in the United States. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns for 11 isolates were not compatible with known USA types or clones. CONCLUSION: Nasal swab specimens positive for MRSA had a geometric mean quantity of 794 CFU per swab, with great diversity in the quantity of MRSA at this anatomic site. Outpatient populations at high risk for MRSA carriage were elderly residents of long-term care facilities, HIV-infected outpatients, and outpatients receiving hemodialysis.


Asunto(s)
Dermatoglifia del ADN/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Cavidad Nasal/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/crecimiento & desarrollo , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Infection ; 34(6): 339-41, 2006 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17180589

RESUMEN

Infections due to antimicrobial-resistant viridans group streptococci are increasing. The present study was done to determine the frequency of antibiotic resistance among community-acquired viridans group streptococci isolated from blood cultures and to identify the risk factors associated with acquiring antibiotic-resistant viridans group streptococci. Twenty-eight community-acquired viridans group streptococcal isolates were recovered from 27 patients, of which 89%, 86%, 79%, 61%, and 39% were susceptible to ceftriaxone, clindamycin, tetracycline, penicillin, and erythromycin, respectively; 100% were susceptible to levofloxacin and vancomycin. Among the patients with previous antibiotic use, 73% had penicillin non-susceptible viridans group streptococci, compared with 18% who did not receive prior antibiotics (p = 0.006). Patients with and without prior antibiotic use, 27% and 0%, respectively, had ceftriaxone non-susceptible viridans group streptococci isolates, respectively (p = 0.05). Patients with and without prior antibiotic use, 45% and 6%, respectively, had tetracycline non-susceptible viridans group streptococci isolates, respectively (p = 0.02). No other risk factors for isolation of non-susceptible viridans group streptococci were identified.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Estreptococos Viridans/efectos de los fármacos , Estreptococos Viridans/patogenicidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Niño , Preescolar , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rhode Island/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 45(11): 3262-6, 2001 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11600396

RESUMEN

Staphylococcus epidermidis is a major cause of infections associated with indwelling medical devices. Biofilm production is an important virulence attribute in the pathogenesis of device-related infections. Therefore, elimination of these biofilms is an ideal treatment. Salicylate (5 mM) combined with 1 microg of vancomycin per ml inhibited biofilm formation by S. epidermidis (RP62A) by >or=99.9%. When biofilm-coated polystyrene beads were exposed to 5 mM sodium salicylate and 4 microg of vancomycin per ml (one-half the minimum biofilm eradication concentration), there was a >99.9% reduction in viable count.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Biopelículas , Salicilato de Sodio/farmacología , Staphylococcus epidermidis/efectos de los fármacos , Vancomicina/farmacología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Macrólidos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
8.
J Intraven Nurs ; 24(3): 180-205, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11530364

RESUMEN

These guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the American College of Critical Care Medicine (for the Society of Critical Care Medicine), and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America contain recommendations for the management of adults and children with, and diagnosis of infections related to, peripheral and nontunneled central venous catheters (CVCs), pulmonary artery catheters, tunneled central catheters, and implantable devices. The guidelines, written for clinicians, contain IDSA evidence-based recommendations for assessment of the quality and strength of the data. Recommendations are presented according to the type of catheter, the infecting organism, and the associated complications. Intravascular catheter-related infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, aerobic gram-negative bacilli, and Candida albicans most commonly cause catheter-related bloodstream infection. Management of catheter-related infection varies according to the type of catheter involved. After appropriate cultures of blood and catheter samples are done, empirical i.v. antimicrobial therapy should be initiated on the basis of clinical clues, the severity of the patient's acute illness, underlying disease, and the potential pathogen(s) involved. In most cases of nontunneled CVC-related bacteremia and fungemia, the CVC should be removed. For management of bacteremia and fungemia from a tunneled catheter or implantable device, such as a port, the decision to remove the catheter or device should be based on the severity of the patient's illness, documentation that the vascular-access device is infected, assessment of the specific pathogen involved, and presence of complications, such as endocarditis, septic thrombosis, tunnel infection, or metastatic seeding. When a catheter-related infection is documented and a specific pathogen is identified, systemic antimicrobial therapy should be narrowed and consideration given for antibiotic lock therapy, if the CVC or implantable device is not removed. These guidelines address the issues related to the management of catheter-related bacteremia and associated complications. Separate guidelines will address specific issues related to the prevention of catheter-related infections. Performance indicators for the management of catheter-related infection are included at the end of the document. Because the pathogenesis of catheter-related infections is complicated, the virulence of the pathogens is variable, and the host factors have not been well defined, there is a notable absence of compelling clinical data to make firm recommendations for an individual patient. Therefore, the recommendations in these guidelines are intended to support, and not replace, good clinical judgment. Also, a section on selected, unresolved clinical issues that require further study and research has been included. There is an urgent need for large, well-designed clinical studies to delineate management strategies more effectively, which will improve clinical outcomes and save precious health care resources.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Fungemia , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Contaminación de Equipos , Fungemia/diagnóstico , Fungemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Fungemia/etiología , Humanos
10.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 7(2): 197-9, 2001.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11294705

RESUMEN

Most intravascular catheter-related infections are associated with central venous catheters. Technologic advances shown to reduce the risk for these infections include a catheter hub containing an iodinated alcohol solution, short-term chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine- impregnated catheters, minocycline-rifampin-impregnated catheters, and chlorhexidine- impregnated sponge dressings. Nontechnologic strategies for reducing risk include maximal barrier precautions during catheter insertion, specialized nursing teams, continuing quality improvement programs, and tunneling of short-term internal jugular catheters.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Desinfectantes , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Sepsis/prevención & control , Alcoholes , Clorhexidina , Humanos , Yoduros , Minociclina , Rifampin , Sulfadiazina de Plata
13.
Ann Intern Med ; 132(5): 391-402, 2000 Mar 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10691590

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To review the literature on prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE database, conference proceedings, and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles. Primary authors were contacted directly if data were incomplete. STUDY SELECTION: Studies met the following criteria unless otherwise stated: Trials were prospective and randomized; catheters were inserted into new sites, not into old sites over guidewires; catheter cultures were done by using semi-quantitative or quantitative methods; and, for prospective studies, catheter-related bloodstream infection was confirmed by microbial growth from percutaneously drawn blood cultures that matched catheter cultures. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on population, methods, preventive strategy, and outcome (measured as catheter-related bloodstream infections) were gathered. The quality of the data was graded by using preestablished criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: The recommended preventive strategies with the strongest supportive evidence are full barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; subcutaneous tunneling short-term catheters inserted in the internal jugular or femoral veins when catheters are not used for drawing blood; contamination shields for pulmonary artery catheters; povidone-iodine ointment applied to insertion sites of hemodialysis catheters; specialized nursing teams caring for patients with short-term peripheral venous catheters, especially at institutions with a high incidence of catheter-related infection; no routine replacement of central venous catheters; antiseptic chamberfilled hub or hub-protective antiseptic sponge for central venous catheters; and use of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated or minocycline-rifampin-impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies that do not incorporate antimicrobial agents (for example, maximal barrier precautions). CONCLUSIONS: Simple interventions can reduce the risk for serious catheter-related infection. Adequately powered randomized trials are needed.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Contaminación de Equipos , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Piel/microbiología
14.
Neuroradiology ; 41(12): 904-9, 1999 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10639666

RESUMEN

Our purpose was to determine if specific MRI findings in spinal epidural abscess (SEA), at the time of diagnosis, are associated with the clinical outcome. The clinical records and MRI studies of 18 patients with SEA were reviewed and follow-up was obtained from the outpatient medical record, telephone interview, or both. The association between findings on contrast-enhanced MRI and clinical outcome (weakness, neck or back pain, and incomplete functional recovery) was evaluated. With univariate analysis, narrowing of 50% or more of the central spinal canal (P = 0.03), peripheral contrast-enhancement (P = 0.05), and abnormal spinal cord signal intensity (P = 0.05) were associated with weakness at follow-up. Persistent neck or back pain was associated with spinal canal narrowing (P = 0.02), peripheral contrast-enhancement (P = 0.02), and an abscess longer than 3 cm (P = 0.04) on MRI. Incomplete clinical recovery was associated with both abscess length (P = 0.01) and the severity of canal narrowing (P = 0.01). Abscess length, enhancement pattern, and severity of canal narrowing can be incorporated in a grading system that can be used to predict outcome.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Epidural/diagnóstico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Absceso Epidural/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
J Emerg Med ; 16(6): 851-6, 1998.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9848699

RESUMEN

Leptospiosis is a common zoonosis affecting most mammals. Leptospirosis has protean manifestations ranging from a flu-like illness to fulminant hepatic and renal failure culminating in death. Although the diagnosis is often not considered upon presentation, the literature suggests that leptospirosis is a reemerging infectious disease in urban centers throughout the industrialized world. It will be incumbent upon Emergency Physicians to include this spirochetal disease in the differential diagnosis of febrile patients with appropriate risk factors and symptomatology. We present the case of a 36 year-old woman who presented to the Emergency Department with fever and hypotension. We review the literature on leptospirosis with specific focus on risk factors and pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome.


Asunto(s)
Leptospira/aislamiento & purificación , Leptospirosis/diagnóstico , Leptospirosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antimetabolitos/uso terapéutico , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Ribavirina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Población Urbana
17.
J Clin Microbiol ; 35(12): 3163-5, 1997 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9399513

RESUMEN

Laboratory technologists (22%) developed infections with Shigella sonnei. The isolates had the same antibiogram and pulse-field gel electrophoresis pattern as an unknown isolate handled by a laboratory student. Covering faucet handles with paper towels during hand washing in the laboratory was protective. No further cases occurred after the laboratory was cleaned with a phenolic agent and a handle-free faucet was installed.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Disentería Bacilar/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Shigella sonnei , ADN Bacteriano/genética , ADN Bacteriano/aislamiento & purificación , Desinfección , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Disentería Bacilar/microbiología , Disentería Bacilar/prevención & control , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Desinfección de las Manos , Humanos , Laboratorios de Hospital , Ciencia del Laboratorio Clínico/educación , Microbiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Personal de Hospital , Rhode Island/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Ingeniería Sanitaria , Shigella sonnei/efectos de los fármacos , Shigella sonnei/genética , Shigella sonnei/aislamiento & purificación
18.
Ann Intern Med ; 127(4): 257-66, 1997 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9265424

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infection related to short-term use of noncuffed central venous catheters is a common and serious problem. Technologic innovations to reduce the risk for these infections are needed. OBJECTIVE: To determine 1) the efficacy of a novel antiseptic catheter in preventing central venous catheter-related infection, 2) patient tolerance of this catheter, and 3) the sources of bloodstream infection originating from noncuffed, multilumen central venous catheters. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Medical-surgical intensive care unit of a 450-bed university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 158 adults scheduled to receive a central venous catheter; 403 catheters were studied. INTERVENTION: Participants received either a standard triple-lumen polyurethane catheter or a catheter that was indistinguishable from the standard catheter and was impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine. MEASUREMENTS: Catheters were studied for colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection at removal; local and systemic effects of catheters were assessed. The origin of each catheter-associated bloodstream infection was sought by culturing all potential sources (skin, catheter segments, hubs, and infusate) and confirmed by restriction-fragment DNA subtyping. RESULTS: Antiseptic catheters were less likely to be colonized at removal than control catheters (13.5 compared with 24.1 colonized catheters per 100 catheters; relative risk, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.89]; P = 0.005) and were nearly fivefold less likely to produce bloodstream infection (1.0 compared with 4.7 infections per 100 catheters; 1.6 compared with 7.6 infections per 1000 catheter-days; relative risk, 0.21 [CI, 0.03 to 0.95]; P = 0.03). In the control group, 8 catheter-related bloodstream infections were caused by Staphylococcus aureus, gram-negative bacilli, enterococci, or Candida species; no infections with these organisms occurred in the antiseptic catheter group (P = 0.003). No adverse effects from the antiseptic catheter were seen, and none of the 122 isolates obtained from infected catheters in either group showed in vitro resistance to chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine. Cost-benefit analysis indicated that the antiseptic catheter should prove cost-beneficial if an institution's rate of catheter-related bacteremia with noncuffed central venous catheters is at least 3 infections per 1000 catheter-days). CONCLUSIONS: The chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine catheter is well tolerated, reduces the incidence of catheter-related infection, extends the time that noncuffed central venous catheters can be safely left in place for the short term, and should allow cost savings.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Sepsis/prevención & control , Sulfadiazina de Plata/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antiinfecciosos Locales/economía , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economía , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/economía , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Clorhexidina/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , ADN Bacteriano/aislamiento & purificación , ADN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Sepsis/economía , Sepsis/etiología , Sepsis/microbiología , Sulfadiazina de Plata/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
J Clin Microbiol ; 35(7): 1800-4, 1997 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9196197

RESUMEN

An outbreak of community-acquired Legionnaires' disease (LD) occurred in Providence, R.I., in fall 1993. To find the outbreak source, exposures of 17 case patients were compared to those of 33 matched controls. Case patients were more likely than controls to have visited a section of downtown (area A) during the 2 weeks before illness (11 [65%] versus 9 [27%]; matched odds ratio, 6.5; P = 0.01). Water samples were cultured from 27 aerosol-producing devices within area A. Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates underwent monoclonal antibody (MAb) subtyping and arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR). All four L. pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates available from case patients who visited area A had identical MAb and AP-PCR patterns. Among 14 environmental isolates, 5 had MAb patterns that matched the case patient isolates, but only 1 had a matching AP-PCR pattern. This investigation implicates a cooling tower in area A as the outbreak source and illustrates the usefulness of AP-PCR for identifying sources of LD outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Legionella pneumophila/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/diagnóstico , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Brotes de Enfermedades , Humanos , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/epidemiología , Estados Unidos
20.
Nutrition ; 13(4 Suppl): 2S-4S, 1997 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9178302

RESUMEN

This article defines the complex interaction between catheterized patients and invading microbial pathogens. Catheter colonization reflects significant growth of a microbe on a catheter component. Localized intravascular catheter-related infection denotes infection at the exit site, tunnel tract, or pocket, in the absence of bloodstream infection. Systemic intravascular catheter-related infection is a complication of colonization or localized infection, usually documented by invasion of the bloodstream. Catheter sepsis is a systemic infection that is difficult to define because symptoms associated with bloodstream infection caused by the most common pathogens to infect catheterized patients, coagulase-negative staphylococci, may not meet the previously published criteria of sepsis. It is hoped that the information contained here will lead to greater uniformity in the definitions used by the many investigators in this fascinating field.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Sepsis/etiología , Bacteriemia , Fungemia , Humanos , Terminología como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA