Novel sample double dilution calibration method for determination of lithium in biological samples using automatic flow system with in-syringe reaction.

A novel sample double dilution calibration method (SDDCM) and an automatic flow system with in-syringe reaction and spectrophotometric detection were developed for determining lithium in biological samples. The method is based on the reaction of lithium with Thorin in an alkaline medium and the signal was measured at 480 nm. The reaction was performed simultaneously for both standards and samples in three syringes of the automatic flow system. The method was validated and successfully applied to the determination of lithium in synthetic and pharmaceutical samples, with results consistent with the ICP OES method. The novel calibration method, developed for the determination of lithium in biological samples, uses a sample with two dilution degrees. Using the method, the concentration of the analyte is determined by relating the signal for a less diluted sample to the calibration plot for a more diluted sample and vice versa. The implementation of the calibration method was facilitated by preparing solutions directly in the flow system. The use of two sample dilutions makes it possible to determine the analyte in the sample without preliminary preparation. Moreover, obtaining two results based on signals for a sample diluted to different degrees allows them to be verified for accuracy. The proposed approach was successfully verified by the determination of lithium in certified reference materials of blood serum and urine. Using the developed method lithium was determined within the concentration range of 0.06-1.5 mg L-1, with precision (CV, %) less than 6.7, and accuracy (RE, %) better than 6.9. The detection limit was 0.03 mg L-1.

Novel Integrated Flow-Based Steam Distillation and Titration System for Determination of Volatile Acidity in Wines.

Novel integrated flow-based steam distillation and titration system with spectrophotometric detection was developed for determination of volatile acidity in wines. Using the system, the distillation procedure was carried out in an automatic manner, starting with introducing into a heated steam distillation module a sample and subjecting it to steam distillation. Under selected conditions, all the analyte was transferred to the distillate; therefore, the system did not require calibration. The collected distillate and titrant were introduced into the next monosegments in varying proportions, in accordance with the developed titration procedure, and directed to the detection system to record the titration curve. The titration was stopped after reaching the end point of titration. Procedures for distillation and titration were developed and verified separately by distillation of acetic acid, acetic acid in the presence of tartaric acid as well as acetic acid, tartaric acid, and titratable acidity, with precision (relative standard deviation) and accuracy (relative error) for both procedures lower than 6.9 and 5.6%, respectively. The developed steam distillation and titration systems were used to determine volatile acidity in samples of white and rosé wines separately and as the integrated steam distillation and titration system, both with precision lower than 9.4% and accuracy better than 6.7%.

A Perspective of the Comprehensive and Objective Assessment of Analytical Methods Including the Greenness and Functionality Criteria: Application to the Determination of Zinc in Aqueous Samples.

The recently proposed concept of White Analytical Chemistry (WAC), referring to the Red-Green-Blue color model, combines ecological aspects (green) with functionality (red and blue criteria), presenting the complete method as "white". However, it is not easy to carry out an overall quantitative evaluation of the analytical method in line with the WAC idea in an objective manner. This paper outlines the perspective of the future development of such a possibility by attempting to answer selected questions about the evaluation process. Based on the study consisting in the evaluation of selected model methods by a group of 12 independent analysts, it was shown how well individual criteria are assessed, whether the variability of assessments by different people is comparable for each criterion, how large it is, and whether averaging the scores from different researchers can help to choose the best method more objectively.