Progressive motor impairment from "critical" demyelinating lesions of the cervicomedullary junction.

BACKGROUND: Progressive motor impairment anatomically associated with a "critical" lesion has been described in primary demyelinating disease. Most "critical" lesions occur within the spinal cord. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and radiological features of "critical" lesions of the cervicomedullary junction (CMJ). METHODS: Observational study on people presenting with a CMJ lesion associated with primary demyelinating disease-related progressive motor impairment. Clinical data were extracted by chart review. Brain and spinal cord magnetic resonance images were reviewed to characterize the CMJ lesion and determine additional demyelination burden. RESULTS: Forty-one people were included: 29 (71%) had progression from onset and 12 (29%) had a relapse onset (secondary progressive) course. Most had progressive hemiparesis (21 (51%)) or progressive quadriparesis (15 (37%)) with a median Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 5.5 (2.0-8.5) at last follow-up. No "critical" CMJ lesion enhanced; most were bilateral (25 (61%)). Brain magnetic resonance images were otherwise normal in 16 (39%) or with a restricted demyelination burden in 15 (37%). Cervical and thoracic cord MRIs were without additional lesions in 25 (61%) and 22/37 (59%), respectively. CONCLUSION: CMJ "critical" lesions can correlate with progressive motor impairment even with few or no additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions. Lesion location is an important determinant of progressive motor impairment in demyelinating disease.

Frequency of New or Enlarging Lesions on MRI Outside of Clinical Attacks in Patients With MOG-Antibody-Associated Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of new or enlarging T2-hyperintense or enhancing lesions outside of clinical attacks in myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein-antibody-associated-disease (MOGAD) versus multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4 antibody-positive-neuromyelitis-optica-spectrum-disorder (AQP4+NMOSD). DESIGN/METHODS: We retrospectively included Mayo Clinic MOGAD patients with: 1) MOG-IgG positivity by live-cell-based-assay; 2) Fulfilling proposed MOGAD diagnostic criteria; 3) Baseline and follow-up paired MRIs without interval attacks. A neurologist and neuroradiologist reviewed MRIs (T2-FLAIR brain, T2 spine, and T1-post-gadolinium brain and spine) to identify new or enlarging lesions. A MOGAD subset was then compared to MS and AQP4+NMOSD patients, based on broadly similar inter-scan intervals. RESULTS: We included 105 MOGAD patients (median age, 31 years[range, 2-80]; 60% female) with 373 paired MRIs. In total, 10/105 (9.5%) patients and 13/373 (3%) scans had one or more new T2-lesions (brain, 12/213[6%]; spine, 1/160[0.6%]) and 8/367 (2%) had enhancing lesions. New brain lesions were less in MOGAD (1/25[4%]) than MS (14/26[54%], p<0.0001) but did not differ from AQP4+NMOSD (1/13[8%], p=1.0) in subgroup analysis. New spinal lesions were rare across groups (0-4%). CONCLUSIONS: New or enlarging MRI lesions rarely develop outside of clinical attacks in MOGAD differing from MS. Surveillance MRIs in MOGAD have limited utility with implications for clinical practice and trial design.