Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 41(5): 746-749, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33054457

RESUMEN

Our study aims to present the preliminary findings of an ongoing prospective cohort study that assesses the trainees' ability to perform foetal biometry during the third trimester of pregnancy. Sixty-three women with third-trimester singleton pregnancies were included. A biometry scan was performed byboth residents and a foetal medicine specialist in the Third department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Attikon University Hospital. For each case, the ultrasonographic measurements of the two operator groups were compared. The mean difference of the resident group compared to the specialist group was: for the biparietal diameter +1.3 mm (CI 95%, range -10.6 to +13,3, ±1.96 SD), for the occipitofrontal diameter -2.6 mm (CI 95%, range -31.5 to +26.2), for the anterior-posterior abdominal diameter -2.6 mm (CI 95%, range -17.9 to +12.8), for the transverse abdominal diameter -0.7 mm (CI 95%, range -17.1 to +15.7) and for the femur length -1.1 mm (CI 95%, range -11.7 to +9.6). We observed that, among all biometric parameters, the most accurate -based on the specialist group were the head circumference measurements. The highest discrepancy was noted for the abdominal assessment. Given that foetal biometry is of utmost importance in obstetrical clinical evaluation and management, a study that highlights the weaknesses of residents in this field could open new horizons in optimising the learning procedure.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? After review of the literature, we found only a few studies on inter- and intra-observer discrepancy in foetal biometry measurements among specialists.What the results of this study add? To our knowledge, our study is the first to evaluate residents' capacity of performing a biometry scan, by comparing their measurements to those of MFM specialists.What the implications are of these findings to clinical practice and/or further research? The need for constant evaluation of residents is indisputable. Our study could help to improve their ultrasound skills by giving emphasis on residents' weaknesses. With further research on this subject, a standard system of evaluation could be formed and determine the duration and type of training required for each resident.


Asunto(s)
Biometría , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Perinatología/educación , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Abdomen/diagnóstico por imagen , Abdomen/embriología , Adulto , Largo Cráneo-Cadera , Femenino , Feto/diagnóstico por imagen , Cabeza/diagnóstico por imagen , Cabeza/embriología , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Obstetricia/educación , Proyectos Piloto , Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 28(4): 470-4, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24803010

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) expression in placentae of women with iron-deficiency anemia and ß-thalassemia trait and to correlate the results with hematological parameters as well as with parameters associated with the outcome of pregnancy. METHODS: About 126 women who delivered in the Larissa University Hospital were divided in three groups: iron-deficiency anemia (n = 39), ß-thalassemia trait carriers (n = 53) and control group (n = 34). HIF-1α expression was assessed with immunochemical assays and statistical analysis was performed with chi-squared test and ANOVA. RESULTS: HIF-1α immunostaining was intense in the two groups of anemia. A statistically significant association was found between HIF-1α immunoreactivity and hematocrit (p < 0.001), hemoglobin (p < 0.001), MCV (p < 0.001), transferrin (p < 0.001) and its receptors (p = 0.040), whereas no significant correlations were observed between HIF-1α, iron serum levels (p = 0.256) and ferritin (p = 0.232). We found no association between HIF-1α and birthweight (p = 0.256), placental weight (p = 0.870) and Apgar score at 1' (p = 0.210) and 5' (p = 0.400). CONCLUSIONS: HIF-1α expression is affected by anemia, although this factor has no important direct effect on the perinatal outcome.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica/metabolismo , Subunidad alfa del Factor 1 Inducible por Hipoxia/metabolismo , Placenta/metabolismo , Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo/metabolismo , Talasemia beta/metabolismo , Adulto , Anemia Ferropénica/complicaciones , Anemia Ferropénica/epidemiología , Anemia Ferropénica/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Placenta/patología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo/patología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Talasemia beta/complicaciones , Talasemia beta/epidemiología , Talasemia beta/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA