Copper induces the assembly of a multiprotein aggregate implicated in the release of fibroblast growth factor 1 in response to stress.

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 1 is known to be released in response to stress conditions as a component of a multiprotein aggregate containing the p40 extravescicular domain of p65 synaptotagmin (Syt) 1 and S100A13. Since FGF1 is a Cu2+-binding protein and Cu2+ is known to induce its dimerization, we evaluated the capacity of recombinant FGF1, p40 Syt1, and S100A13 to interact in a cell-free system and the role of Cu2+ in this interaction. We report that FGF1, p40 Syt1, and S100A13 are able to bind Cu2+ with similar affinity and to interact in the presence of Cu2+ to form a multiprotein aggregate which is resistant to low concentrations of SDS and sensitive to reducing conditions and ultracentrifugation. The formation of this aggregate in the presence of Cu2+ is dependent on the presence of S100A13 and is mediated by cysteine-independent interactions between S100A13 and either FGF1 or p40 Syt1. Interestingly, S100A13 is also able to interact in the presence of Cu2+ with Cys-free FGF1 and this observation may account for the ability of S100A13 to export Cys-free FGF1 in response to stress. Lastly, tetrathiomolybdate, a Cu2+ chelator, significantly represses in a dose-dependent manner the heat shock-induced release of FGF1 and S100A13. These data suggest that S100A13 may be involved in the assembly of the multiprotein aggregate required for the release of FGF1 and that Cu2+ oxidation may be an essential post-translational intracellular modifier of this process.

S100A13 participates in the release of fibroblast growth factor 1 in response to heat shock in vitro.

S100A13, a member of the S100 gene family of Ca(2+)-binding proteins has been previously characterized as a component of a brain-derived heparin-binding multiprotein aggregate/complex containing fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1). We report that while expression of S100A13 in NIH 3T3 cells results in the constitutive release of S100A13 into the extracellular compartment at 37 degrees C, co-expression of S100A13 with FGF1 represses the constitutive release of S100A13 and enables NIH 3T3 cells to release S100A13 in response to temperature stress. S100A13 release in response to stress occurs with kinetics similar to that observed for the stress-induced release of FGF1, but S100A13 expression is able to reverse the sensitivity of FGF1 release to inhibitors of transcription and translation. The release of FGF1 and S100A13 in response to heat shock results in the solubility of FGF1 at 100% (w/v) ammonium sulfate saturation, and the expression of a S100A13 deletion mutant lacking its novel basic residue-rich domain acts as a dominant negative effector of FGF1 release in vitro. Surprisingly, the expression of S100A13 also results in the stress-induced release of a Cys-free FGF1 mutant, which is normally not released from NIH 3T3 cells in response to heat shock. These data suggest that S100A13 may be a component of the pathway for the release of the signal peptide-less polypeptide, FGF1, and may involve a role for S100A13 in the formation of a noncovalent FGF1 homodimer.

The precursor but not the mature form of IL1alpha blocks the release of FGF1 in response to heat shock.

Interleukin (IL)1alpha mediates proinflammatory events through its extracellular interaction with the IL1 type I receptor. However, IL1alpha does not contain a conventional signal peptide sequence that provides access to the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi apparatus for secretion. Thus, we have studied the release of the precursor (p) and mature (m) forms of IL1alpha from NIH 3T3 cells. We have demonstrated that mIL1alpha but not pIL1alpha was released in response to heat shock with biochemical and pharmacological properties similar to those reported for the stress-mediated release pathway utilized by fibroblast growth factor (FGF)1. However, unlike the FGF1 release pathway, the IL1alpha release pathway appears to function independently of synaptotagmin (Syt)1 because the expression of a dominant-negative form of Syt1, which represses the release of FGF1, did not inhibit the release of mIL1alpha in response to temperature stress. Interestingly, whereas the expression of both mIL1alpha and FGF1 in NIH 3T3 cells did not impair the stress-induced release of either polypeptide, the expression of both pIL1alpha and FGF1 repressed the release of FGF1 in response to temperature stress. These data suggest that the release of mIL1alpha requires proteolytic processing of its precursor form and that mIL1alpha and FGF1 may utilize similar but distinct mechanisms for export.