RESUMEN
Importance: The indications, safety, and efficacy of chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (cVTE) in pediatric trauma patients remain unclear. A set of high-risk criteria to guide cVTE use was recently recommended; however, these criteria have not been evaluated prospectively. Objective: To examine high-risk criteria and cVTE use in a prospective multi-institutional study of pediatric trauma patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was completed between October 2019 and October 2022 in 8 free-standing pediatric hospitals designated as American College of Surgeons level I pediatric trauma centers. Participants were pediatric trauma patients younger than 18 years who met defined high-risk criteria on admission. It was hypothesized that cVTE would be safe and reduce the incidence of VTE. Exposures: Receipt and timing of chemical VTE prophylaxis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall VTE rate stratified by receipt and timing of cVTE. The secondary outcome was safety of cVTE as measured by bleeding or other complications from anticoagulation. Results: Among 460 high-risk pediatric trauma patients, the median (IQR) age was 14.5 years (10.4-16.2 years); 313 patients (68%) were male and 147 female (32%). The median (IQR) Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 23 (16-30), and median (IQR) number of high-risk factors was 3 (2-4). A total of 251 (54.5%) patients received cVTE; 62 (13.5%) received cVTE within 24 hours of admission. Patients who received cVTE after 24 hours had more high-risk factors and higher ISS. The most common reason for delayed cVTE was central nervous system bleed (120 patients; 30.2%). There were 28 VTE events among 25 patients (5.4%). VTE occurred in 1 of 62 patients (1.6%) receiving cVTE within 24 hours, 13 of 189 patients (6.9%) receiving cVTE after 24 hours, and 11 of 209 (5.3%) who had no cVTE (P = .31). Increasing time between admission and cVTE initiation was significantly associated with VTE (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; P = .01). No bleeding complications were observed while patients received cVTE. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective study, use of cVTE based on a set of high-risk criteria was safe and did not lead to bleeding complications. Delay to initiation of cVTE was significantly associated with development of VTE. Quality improvement in pediatric VTE prevention may center on timing of prophylaxis and barriers to implementation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Children with colorectal diseases such as anorectal malformations (ARM), Hirschsprung disease (HD), and functional constipation (FC) undergo bowel management programs (BMPs) to achieve cleanliness. While patient outcomes, such as cleanliness and quality of life, are well understood, patient experience, such as relationships, ability to participate in sports, and independence and self-confidence is less well understood. We aimed to assess the relationship between BMP and patient experience. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to 295 patients ≥3 years old with ARM, HD, and FC completing BMP. The survey contains 22 questions regarding patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and 11 regarding patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs). Each was graded on a Likert scale, with higher scores meaning better experience. Scores were compared by demographics and clinical characteristics and logistic regression was performed controlling for clinically significant variables. A p-value of ≤0.05 was significant. RESULTS: There were 205 eligible respondents (69.5%) with a median age of 8.9 years [IQR: 6.1-12.4]. ARM was most common (51.2%) and most achieved cleanliness on BMP (69.3%). There were no differences in experience scores by age, diagnosis, or bowel regimen. Patients that were clean had significantly higher PREM scores (67.7 [IQR: 64.0-83.0] vs. 64.8 [IQR: 55.0-70.1], p = 0.0002) and PROM scores (36.8 [IQR: 33.0-41.0] vs. 34.0 [31.0-38.5], p = 0.005). On regression analysis, cleanliness remained a strongly significant predictor of positive experience scores (ß 7.37, SE 1.86, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Achieving cleanliness was associated with positive patient experience of bowel management programs. This finding suggests that achieving cleanliness, regardless of regimen, may allow patients the best functional and experiential outcomes.
RESUMEN
This Viewpoint discusses the pros and cons of performing interval appendectomy in patients who have recovered from successful antibiotic treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apendicitis/tratamiento farmacológicoAsunto(s)
Sinusitis , Humanos , Sinusitis/diagnóstico , Niño , Sistemas de Información en Salud/normas , Estados Unidos , Preescolar , Adolescente , Femenino , MasculinoRESUMEN
Importance: Recurrence continues to be a significant challenge in the treatment and management of pilonidal disease. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of laser epilation (LE) as an adjunct to standard care vs standard care alone in preventing recurrence of pilonidal disease in adolescents and young adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a single-institution, randomized clinical trial with 1-year follow-up conducted from September 2017 to September 2022. Patients aged 11 to 21 years with pilonidal disease were recruited from a single tertiary children's hospital. Intervention: LE and standard care (improved hygiene and mechanical or chemical depilation) or standard care alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the rate of recurrence of pilonidal disease at 1 year. Secondary outcomes assessed during the 1-year follow-up included disability days, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), health care satisfaction, disease-related attitudes and perceived stigma, and rates of procedures, surgical excisions, and postoperative complications. Results: A total of 302 participants (median [IQR] age, 17 [15-18] years; 157 male [56.1%]) with pilonidal disease were enrolled; 151 participants were randomly assigned to each intervention group. One-year follow-up was available for 96 patients (63.6%) in the LE group and 134 (88.7%) in the standard care group. The proportion of patients who experienced a recurrence within 1 year was significantly lower in the LE treatment arm than in the standard care arm (-23.2%; 95% CI, -33.2 to -13.1; P < .001). Over 1 year, there were no differences between groups in either patient or caregiver disability days, or patient- or caregiver-reported HRQOL, health care satisfaction, or perceived stigma at any time point. The LE group had significantly higher Child Attitude Toward Illness Scores (CATIS) at 6 months (median [IQR], 3.8 [3.4-4.2] vs 3.6 [3.2-4.1]; P = .01). There were no differences between groups in disease-related health care utilization, disease-related procedures, or postoperative complications. Conclusions and Relevance: LE as an adjunct to standard care significantly reduced 1-year recurrence rates of pilonidal disease compared with standard care alone. These results provide further evidence that LE is safe and well tolerated in patients with pilonidal disease. LE should be considered a standard treatment modality for patients with pilonidal disease and should be available as an initial treatment option or adjunct treatment modality for all eligible patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03276065.
Asunto(s)
Remoción del Cabello , Seno Pilonidal , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Remoción del Cabello/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Seno Pilonidal/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Rayos Láser , Recurrencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Surveillance following sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) resection varies. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing SCT resection and examine current institutional practices to detect recurrence. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of children who underwent resection of an SCT from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2020 was performed. Data were summarized and surveillance strategies compared between histopathologic subtypes using nonparametric methods. RESULTS: Thirty six patients (75.0% female) underwent SCT removal at a median age of 8 d. Histopathology revealed 27 mature teratomas (75.0%), eight immature teratomas (22.2%), and one malignant germ cell tumor (2.8%). Median postoperative follow-up was 3.17 y (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.31-4.38 y). Patients had a median of 2.32 clinic visits per year (IQR: 2.00-2.70), alpha-fetoprotein levels were obtained at a median of 2.01 times per year (IQR: 0-1.66), and surveillance imaging was performed at a median of 2.31 times per year (IQR: 0-2.84). Patients with immature teratomas had alpha-fetoprotein laboratories obtained more frequently than patients with mature teratomas (3.10 times/year versus 0.93 times/year, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the number of imaging studies obtained between groups. Two patients (5.6%) developed recurrence, which were identified on magnetic resonance imaging at 191 and 104 d postresection, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative surveillance practices varied widely. Recurrence was noted in a single malignant case in the first year following resection. Multi-institutional studies are needed to determine the optimal surveillance strategy to detect recurrence of SCT.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias , Neoplasias Pélvicas , Teratoma , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , alfa-Fetoproteínas , Región Sacrococcígea/patología , Región Sacrococcígea/cirugía , Teratoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Teratoma/cirugía , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/patología , Neoplasias Pélvicas/patologíaRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of MRI to predict ovarian malignancy alone and compared with other diagnostic studies. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients aged 2-21 years who underwent ovarian mass resection between 2009 and 2021 at 11 pediatric hospitals. Sociodemographic information, clinical and imaging findings, tumor markers, and operative and pathology details were collected. Diagnostic performance for detecting malignancy was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for MRI with other diagnostic modalities. RESULTS: One thousand and fifty-three patients, with a median age of 14.6 years, underwent resection of an ovarian mass; 10% (110/1053) had malignant disease on pathology, and 13% (136/1053) underwent preoperative MRI. MRI sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 60%, 94%, 60%, and 94%. Ultrasound sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 31%, 99%, 73%, and 95%. Tumor marker sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 90%, 46%, 22%, and 96%. MRI and ultrasound concordance was 88%, with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 33%, 99%, 75%, and 94%. MRI sensitivity in ultrasound-discordant cases was 100%. MRI and tumor marker concordance was 88% with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 100%, 86%, 64%, and 100%. MRI specificity in tumor marker-discordant cases was 100%. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic modalities used to assess ovarian neoplasms in pediatric patients typically agree. In cases of disagreement, MRI is more sensitive for malignancy than ultrasound and more specific than tumor markers. Selective use of MRI with preoperative ultrasound and tumor markers may be beneficial when the risk of malignancy is uncertain. CONCISE ABSTRACT: This retrospective review of 1053 patients aged 2-21 years who underwent ovarian mass resection between 2009 and 2021 at 11 pediatric hospitals found that ultrasound, tumor markers, and MRI tend to agree on benign vs malignant, but in cases of disagreement, MRI is more sensitive for malignancy than ultrasound.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Niño , Femenino , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to perform a feasibility study using real-world data from a learning health system (LHS) to describe current practice patterns of wound closure and explore differences in outcomes associated with the use of tissue adhesives and other methods of wound closure in the pediatric surgical population to inform a potentially large study. METHODS: A multi-institutional cross-sectional study was performed of a random sample of patients <18 y-old who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, umbilical hernia repair, or repair of traumatic laceration from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. Sociodemographic and operative characteristics were obtained from 6 PEDSnet (a national pediatric LHS) children's hospitals and OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium (a PCORnet collaboration across 14 academic health systems). Additional clinical data elements were collected via chart review. RESULTS: Of the 692 patients included, 182 (26.3%) had appendectomies, 155 (22.4%) inguinal hernia repairs, 163 (23.6%) umbilical hernia repairs, and 192 (27.8%) traumatic lacerations. Of the 500 surgical incisions, sutures with tissue adhesives were the most frequently used (n = 211, 42.2%), followed by sutures with adhesive strips (n = 176, 35.2%), and sutures only (n = 72, 14.4%). Most traumatic lacerations were repaired with sutures only (n = 127, 64.5%). The overall wound-related complication rate was 3.0% and resumption of normal activities was recommended at a median of 14 d (interquartile ranges 14-14). CONCLUSIONS: The LHS represents an efficient tool to identify cohorts of pediatric surgical patients to perform comparative effectiveness research using real-world data to support medical and surgical products/devices in children.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Inguinal , Hernia Umbilical , Laceraciones , Laparoscopía , Aprendizaje del Sistema de Salud , Adhesivos Tisulares , Humanos , Niño , Adhesivos Tisulares/uso terapéutico , Laceraciones/epidemiología , Laceraciones/cirugía , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Hernia Umbilical/cirugía , Suturas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted social, political, and economic life across the world, shining a light on the vulnerability of many communities. The objective of this study was to assess injury patterns before and after implementation of stay-at-home orders (SHOs) between White children and children of color and across varying levels of vulnerability based upon children's home residence. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted evaluating patients < 18 years with traumatic injuries. A "Control" cohort from an averaged March-September 2016-2019 time period was compared to patients injured after SHO initiation-September 2020 ("COVID" cohort). Interactions between race/ethnicity or social vulnerability index (SVI), a marker of neighborhood vulnerability and socioeconomic status, and the COVID-19 timeframe with regard to the outcomes of interest were assessed using likelihood ratio Chi-square tests. Differences in injury intent, type, and mechanism were then stratified and explored by race/ethnicity and SVI separately. RESULTS: A total of 47,385 patients met study inclusion. Significant interactions existed between race/ethnicity and the COVID-19 SHO period for intent (p < 0.001) and mechanism of injury (p < 0.001). There was also significant interaction between SVI and the COVID-19 SHO period for mechanism of injury (p = 0.01). Children of color experienced a significant increase in intentional (COVID 16.4% vs. Control 13.7%, p = 0.03) and firearm (COVID 9.0% vs. Control 5.2%, p < 0.001) injuries, but no change was seen among White children. Children from the most vulnerable neighborhoods suffered an increase in firearm injuries (COVID 11.1% vs. Control 6.1%, p = 0.001) with children from the least vulnerable neighborhoods having no change. All-terrain vehicle (ATV) and bicycle crashes increased for children of color (COVID 2.0% vs. Control 1.1%, p = 0.04 for ATV; COVID 6.7% vs. Control 4.8%, p = 0.02 for bicycle) and White children (COVID 9.6% vs. Control 6.2%, p < 0.001 for ATV; COVID 8.8% vs. Control 5.8%, p < 0.001 for bicycle). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to White children and children from neighborhoods of lower vulnerability, children of color and children living in higher vulnerability neighborhoods experienced an increase in intentional and firearm-related injuries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding inequities in trauma burden during times of stress is critical to directing resources and targeting intervention strategies.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we explored which postoperative opioid prescribing practices were associated with persistent opioid use among adolescents and young adults. BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of adolescents and young adults develop postoperative new persistent opioid use. The impact of physician prescribing practices on persistent use among young patients is unknown. METHODS: We identified opioid-naïve patients aged 13 to 21 who underwent 1 of 13 procedures (2008-2016) and filled a perioperative opioid prescription using commercial insurance claims (Optum Deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database). Persistent use was defined as ≥ 1 opioid prescription fill 91 to 180 days after surgery. High-risk opioid prescribing included overlapping opioid prescriptions, co-prescribed benzodiazepines, high daily prescribed dosage, long-acting formulations, and multiple prescribers. Logistic regression modeled persistent use as a function of exposure to high-risk prescribing, adjusted for patient demographics, procedure, and comorbidities. RESULTS: High-risk opioid prescribing practices increased from 34.9% to 43.5% over the study period; the largest increase was in co-prescribed benzodiazepines (24.1%-33.4%). High-risk opioid prescribing was associated with persistent use (aOR 1.235 [1.12,1.36]). Receipt of prescriptions from multiple opioid prescribers was individually associated with persistent use (aOR 1.288 [1.16,1.44]). The majority of opioid prescriptions to patients with persistent use beyond the postoperative period were from nonsurgical prescribers (79.6%). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk opioid prescribing practices, particularly receiving prescriptions from multiple prescribers across specialties, were associated with a significant increase in adolescent and young adult patients' risk of persistent opioid use. Prescription drug monitoring programs may help identify young patients at risk of persistent opioid use.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Periodo Posoperatorio , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Importance: Although most ovarian masses in children and adolescents are benign, many are managed with oophorectomy, which may be unnecessary and can have lifelong negative effects on health. Objective: To evaluate the ability of a consensus-based preoperative risk stratification algorithm to discriminate between benign and malignant ovarian pathology and decrease unnecessary oophorectomies. Design, Setting, and Participants: Pre/post interventional study of a risk stratification algorithm in patients aged 6 to 21 years undergoing surgery for an ovarian mass in an inpatient setting in 11 children's hospitals in the United States between August 2018 and January 2021, with 1-year follow-up. Intervention: Implementation of a consensus-based, preoperative risk stratification algorithm with 6 months of preintervention assessment, 6 months of intervention adoption, and 18 months of intervention. The intervention adoption cohort was excluded from statistical comparisons. Main Outcomes and Measures: Unnecessary oophorectomies, defined as oophorectomy for a benign ovarian neoplasm based on final pathology or mass resolution. Results: A total of 519 patients with a median age of 15.1 (IQR, 13.0-16.8) years were included in 3 phases: 96 in the preintervention phase (median age, 15.4 [IQR, 13.4-17.2] years; 11.5% non-Hispanic Black; 68.8% non-Hispanic White); 105 in the adoption phase; and 318 in the intervention phase (median age, 15.0 [IQR, 12.9-16.6)] years; 13.8% non-Hispanic Black; 53.5% non-Hispanic White). Benign disease was present in 93 (96.9%) in the preintervention cohort and 298 (93.7%) in the intervention cohort. The percentage of unnecessary oophorectomies decreased from 16.1% (15/93) preintervention to 8.4% (25/298) during the intervention (absolute reduction, 7.7% [95% CI, 0.4%-15.9%]; P = .03). Algorithm test performance for identifying benign lesions in the intervention cohort resulted in a sensitivity of 91.6% (95% CI, 88.5%-94.8%), a specificity of 90.0% (95% CI, 76.9%-100%), a positive predictive value of 99.3% (95% CI, 98.3%-100%), and a negative predictive value of 41.9% (95% CI, 27.1%-56.6%). The proportion of misclassification in the intervention phase (malignant disease treated with ovary-sparing surgery) was 0.7%. Algorithm adherence during the intervention phase was 95.0%, with fidelity of 81.8%. Conclusions and Relevance: Unnecessary oophorectomies decreased with use of a preoperative risk stratification algorithm to identify lesions with a high likelihood of benign pathology that are appropriate for ovary-sparing surgery. Adoption of this algorithm might prevent unnecessary oophorectomy during adolescence and its lifelong consequences. Further studies are needed to determine barriers to algorithm adherence.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Ovariectomía , Procedimientos Innecesarios , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Algoritmos , Adulto Joven , Hospitalización , Negro o Afroamericano , Blanco , Cuidados PreoperatoriosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Missed diagnosis (MD) of acute appendicitis is associated with increased risk of appendiceal perforation. This study aimed to investigate whether racial/ethnic disparities exist in the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis by comparing rates of MD versus single-encounter diagnosis (SED) between racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: Patients 0-18 y-old admitted for acute appendicitis from February 2017 to December 2021 were identified in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS). International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for Emergency Department visits within 7 d prior to diagnosis were evaluated to determine whether the encounter represented MD. Generalized mixed models were used to assess the association between MD and patient characteristics. A similar model assessed independent predictors of perforation. RESULTS: 51,164 patients admitted for acute appendicitis were included; 50,239 (98.2%) had SED and 925 (1.8%) had MD. Compared to non-Hispanic White patients, patients of non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 2.0-3.1), Hispanic (2.1, 1.8-2.5), and other race/ethnicity (1.6, 1.2-2.1) had higher odds of MD. There was a significant interaction between race/ethnicity and imaging (P < 0.0001). Among patients with imaging, race/ethnicity was not significantly associated with MD. Among patients without imaging, there was an increase in strength of association between race/ethnicity and MD (non-Hispanic Black 3.6, 2.7-4.9; Hispanic 3.3, 2.6-4.1; other 2.0, 1.4-2.8). MD was associated with increased risk of perforation (2.5, 2.2-2.8). CONCLUSIONS: Minority children were more likely to have MD. Future efforts should aim to mitigate the risk of MD, including implementation of algorithms to standardize the workup of abdominal pain to reduce potential consequences of implicit bias.
Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Diagnóstico Tardío , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Niño , Humanos , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Diagnóstico Tardío/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Adolescente , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Disparities in pediatric health outcomes are widespread. It is unclear whether rurality negatively impacts outcomes of infants with surgical congenital diseases. This study compared outcomes of rural versus urban infants requiring complex surgical care at children's hospitals in the United States. METHODS: Rural and urban infants (aged <1 year) receiving surgical care at children's hospitals from 2016 to 2019 for esophageal atresia, gastroschisis, Hirschsprung's disease, anorectal malformation, and congenital diaphragmatic hernia were compared over a 1-year postoperative period using the Pediatric Health Information System. Generalized linear mixed effects models compared outcomes of rural and urban infants. RESULTS: Among 5732 infants, 20.2% lived in rural areas. Rural infants were more frequently white, lived farther from the hospital, and lived in areas with lower median household income compared with urban infants (all P < .001). Rural infants with anorectal malformation and gastroschisis had lower adjusted hospital days over 1 year; rural infants with esophageal atresia had higher adjusted odds of 30-day hospital readmission. Adjusted mortality, hospital days, and readmissions were otherwise similar between the 2 groups. Outcomes remained similar when comparing urban infants to rural infant subgroups with the longest hospital travel distance (≥60 miles) and lowest median household income (<$35 000). CONCLUSIONS: Despite longer travel distances and lower financial resources, rural infants with congenital anomalies have similar postoperative outcomes to urban infants when treated at children's hospitals. Future work is needed to examine outcomes for infants treated outside children's hospitals and to determine whether efforts are necessary to increase access to children's hospitals.
Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Anorrectales , Atresia Esofágica , Gastrosquisis , Humanos , Niño , Lactante , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Rural , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , HospitalesRESUMEN
The management of pediatric appendicitis continues to advance with the development of evidence-based treatment algorithms and a recent shift toward patient-centered treatment approaches. Further research should focus on development of standardized institution-specific diagnostic algorithms to minimize rates of missed diagnosis and appendiceal perforation and refinement of evidence-based clinical treatment pathways that reduce complication rates and minimize health care resource utilization.
Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Humanos , Niño , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Apendicitis/cirugía , Apendicectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , AlgoritmosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: It has been reported that pediatric patients experienced a delay in treatment for acute appendicitis during the pandemic, resulting in increased rates of complicated appendicitis. We investigated the association of the COVID-19 pandemic and the incidence and severity of acute appendicitis among pediatric Medicaid patients using a population-based approach. METHODS: The claims database of Partners For Kids, a pediatric Medicaid accountable care organization (ACO) in Ohio, was queried for cases of acute appendicitis from April to August 2017-2020. The monthly rate of acute appendicitis/100,000 covered lives was calculated each year and compared over time. Rates of complicated appendicitis were also compared. Diagnosis code validation for classification as complicated or uncomplicated appendicitis was performed for patients treated at our hospital. RESULTS: During the study period, 465 unique cases of acute appendicitis were identified. Forty percent (186/465) were coded as complicated. No significant difference in the incidence of acute appendicitis cases was observed across the 4 y, either in an overall comparison or in pairwise comparisons (P > 0.15 for all). The proportion of acute appendicitis cases that were coded as complicated did vary significantly over the 4-year study period (P = 0.005); this was due to this proportion being significantly higher in 2018 than in either 2019 (P = 0.005 versus 2018) or 2020 (P = 0.03 versus 2018). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with reduced access to treatment for acute appendicitis among patients in a pediatric Medicaid ACO. This suggests that an ACO may promote continued healthcare access for their covered population during an unexpected crisis.
Asunto(s)
Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención , Apendicitis , COVID-19 , Niño , Humanos , Enfermedad Aguda , Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Apendicitis/cirugía , COVID-19/epidemiología , Ohio/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In pediatric and neonatal populations, the carotid artery is commonly cannulated for venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The decision to ligate (carotid artery ligation [CAL]) versus reconstruct (carotid artery reconstruction [CAR]) the artery at decannulation remains controversial as long-term neurologic outcomes remain unknown. The objective of this study was to summarize current literature on clinical outcomes following CAL and CAR after Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO). METHODS: PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched using keywords from January 1950 to October 2020. Studies examining clinical outcomes following CAL and CAR for VA-ECMO in patients <18 y of age were included. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case series, case-control studies, and case reports were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were performed independently by two reviewers. Assessment of risk of bias was performed. RESULTS: Eighty studies were included and classified into four categories: noncomparative clinical outcomes after CAL (n = 23, 28.8%), noncomparative clinical outcomes after CAR (n = 12, 15.0%), comparative clinical outcomes after CAL and/or CAR (n = 28, 35.0%), and case reports of clinical outcomes after CAL and/or CAR (n = 17, 21.3%). Follow-up ranged from 0 to 11 y. CAR patency rates ranged from 44 to 100%. There was no substantial evidence supporting an association between CAL versus CAR and short-term neurologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Studies evaluating outcomes after CAL versus CAR for VA-ECMO are heterogeneous with limited generalizability. Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term consequences of CAL versus CAR, especially as the first survivors of pediatric/neonatal ECMO approach an age of increased risk of carotid stenosis and stroke.