PLAstic Surgery Teaching In the Undergraduate Curriculum of Medical Students-United Kingdom (PLASTICS-UK): A UK national collaborative survey of plastic surgery in the undergraduate medical curriculum.

OBJECTIVE: To undertake a United Kingdom national medical student survey investigating undergraduate plastic surgery exposure and specialty perceptions. BACKGROUND: Plastic surgery incorporates all anatomical regions, age groups and tissue types; clinical challenges vary from trauma and burns to congenital defects and cancer and although around 50% of the workload is trauma, it is often misperceived to revolve around cosmetic surgery. METHOD: Following ethical approval, a national survey was conducted across 27 included UK medical schools (31/03/23-07/07/23). Trends were analysed, with comparisons made between surgical and non-surgical aspirants. RESULTS: Data were included from 2513 students; 29.2% had surgical career aspirations. Students perceived plastic surgery as challenging, competitive, and impacting quality of life; however, most had no formal teaching (56.3%); merely 6.2% had clinical exposure and 30.4% had an undergraduate plastic surgery placement available. Breast reconstruction was the most frequently correctly identified surgery (91.8%), with head and neck cancer surgery the least (35.9%). Surgical aspirants were less likely to overestimate private practice (p < 0.001) but demonstrated greater self-confidence in plastic surgery understanding (p < 0.001) and their future ability to make plastic surgery referrals (p < 0.001), being more likely to pursue it (p < 0.001). Surgical aspirants were 17.3% more likely to obtain non-curricular plastic surgery experience (p < 0.001), and 5.6% more self-confident dressing basic wounds (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A greater need for undergraduate plastic surgery teaching was determined. Significant heterogeneity across medical schools was identified. Formation of a national undergraduate plastic surgery curriculum, led by professional bodies, may tackle disparities among medical schools, improve accessibility and facilitate knowledge acquisition.

Shifting the paradigm: ankylosis arthroplasty for the proximal interphalangeal joint with a novel collateral ligament reconstruction.

Silicone arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint ankylosis is rarely performed, partly due to the potential for lateral joint instability. We present our experience performing proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty for joint ankylosis, using a novel reinforcement/reconstruction technique for the proper collateral ligament. Cases were prospectively followed-up (median 13.5 months, range 9-24) and collected data included range of motion, intraoperative collateral ligament status and postoperative clinical joint stability; a seven-item Likert scale (1-5) patient-reported outcomes questionnaire was also completed. Twenty-one ankylosed proximal interphalangeal joints were treated with silicone arthroplasty, and 42 collateral ligament reinforcements undertaken in 12 patients. There was improvement in range of motion from 0° in all joints to a mean of 73° (SD 12.3); lateral joint stability was achieved in 40 out of 42 of collateral ligaments. High median patient satisfaction scores (5/5) suggest that silicone arthroplasty with collateral ligament reinforcement/reconstruction should be considered as a treatment option in selected patients with proximal interphalangeal joint ankylosis.Level of evidence: IV.

The use of platelet-rich products for skin graft donor site healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Split thickness skin grafting is a common reconstructive technique which carries unavoidable donor site morbidity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to present the evidence for the use of platelet rich plasma as an adjunct to donor site wound healing. A comprehensive literature search was performed, according to PRISMA guidelines from inception to August 2020, for studies regarding platelet rich plasma and skin graft donor site healing. Animal studies, case series of less than three cases and studies reporting histological outcomes only were excluded. The literature search identified 114 articles. After applying the exclusion criteria, four randomised control trials and two case-control studies remained, incorporating a total of 218 wounds in 139 patients. Four out of six studies reported total healing times for donor site wounds. Pooled analysis showed a significant reduction in healing time when donor wounds were treated with PRP versus controls [MD 5.95, 95% CI 5.04-6.85, p < 0.001]. Of the five studies which reported pain at dressing change, four showed significantly reduced pain scores for the platelet rich plasma treated wounds versus control. There were no significant complications recorded in the treated wounds. The current evidence basis for platelet rich plasma in donor site healing is limited by heterogeneous methodology and reporting outcomes and low powered studies. Nevertheless, the preponderance of data supports its use for accelerating wound healing and reducing pain at dressing change. These preliminary findings need to be substantiated with higher powered randomised controlled trials with standardised PRP manufacture and reporting structures.

Botulinum Toxin Therapy versus Anterior Belly of Digastric Transfer in the Management of Marginal Mandibular Branch of the Facial Nerve Palsy: A Patient Satisfaction Survey.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin (BT) chemodenervation and anterior belly of digastric muscle (ABD) transfer are both treatment options in the management of an isolated marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve (MMB) palsy. We compare the patient satisfaction following either BT injections or ABD transfer in the management of their isolated MMB palsy. METHODS: Patients in the ABD-arm of the study were identified retrospectively from September 2007 to July 2014. The patients in the BT-arm of the study were identified prospectively from those attending the clinic. Both groups of patients completed a validated patient satisfaction survey. Statistical analysis was performed and a P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Seven patients were in the ABD-arm and 11 patients in the BT-arm of the study. The patient satisfaction in both groups was high with 45% of ABD-arm patients and 40% of BT-arm patients rating their overall outcome as 'better' or 'much better', which was significantly more than the proportion rating their outcome as 'worse' or 'much worse' (P<0.001), although there was a significant trend towards those in the ABD-arm being more likely to be dissatisfied with their outcome (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: BT therapy is a good first-line intervention in the management of isolated MMB palsy. We have, however, shown that the overall satisfaction in both groups is high. Therefore, in patients who would prefer a more permanent solution to manage their facial asymmetry, ABD transfer remains a satisfactory treatment option with a good level of patient satisfaction.